engineering programs have been required to document assessment ofoutcome items a-k as defined by ABET.1 Some of these outcome items can be classified as‘hard’ skills, such as (c) [an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability]. The evaluation and assessment of‘hard’ skills is generally considered to be significantly easier than that of ‘soft’ skills andabilities, such as (h) [The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context]. Without good assessmentmethods, determining if improvements have
problems g. an ability to communicate effectively h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementThese are the well known “a through k” criteria for engineering technology programs.EAC of ABET documentation 3 delineates a very similar set of criteria for engineeringprograms. The general criteria apply to all ET programs at both associate andbaccalaureate degree levels. For programs in specific disciplines, different
areas: • Engineering Design16,17,18,19 • Professional Communications • Professional Tools • Engineering Ethics20Engineering Design Plan integrates design-and-build experiences with a structuredapproach to problem solving across all four years of the curriculum, culminating in a yearlong senior project. Professional Communications and Tools are concurrently introducedin the design courses throughout the four-year sequence to support the execution ofdesign projects. The Engineering Ethics component provides students with a frameworkfor understanding and accommodating professional expectations.The interdisciplinary greenhouse heating project with the WKU Agriculture Departmentprovided an excellent vehicle for this integration and
AC 2007-1960: THE USE OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT EVIDENCE TO ASSESSUNIVERSITY, PROGRAM, AND COURSE LEVEL OBJECTIVES AND STUDENTCOMPETENCIES IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGRonald Terry, Brigham Young University Ron Terry is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University and an Associate in BYU's Office of Planning and Assessment. His scholarship is centered on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education. He is one of BYU's co-investigators for the NSF funded National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.W. Vincent Wilding, Brigham Young University Vincent Wilding is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at
engineering, (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (g) an ability to communicate effectively, (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context, (i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, lifelong learning, (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues; (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
class under the guise of Advanced Technology. He consults on the side for the UPC wind development group.Ronald Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University and an Associate in BYU’s Office of Planning and Assessment. His scholarship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education. He is one of BYU’s co-investigators for the NSF funded NCETE.Thomas Erekson, Western Illinois University Dr. Erekson serves as the Dean for the College of Business and Technology at Western Illinois
Biomaterials, Microfabrication, Micro Systems Technology,Failure Analysis, Material Characterization and Corrosion. The capstone course, entitled“Corporate Culture,” gives students an overview of how to practice engineering in the corporateworld and covers topics such as organizational structures, product development processes,corporate business models, intellectual property, ethics and the practice of life-long learning.Moreover, each student must complete a Senior Design Project and present their findings at theannual Materials Engineering Technology Conference. Page 12.367.10Assessing Our ProgressOne of the continuing challenges of any pedagogy is
Concepts relating technological advancement/hindrance with ethical and environmental issuesResults and Discussion Page 11.229.8 Using both quantitative and qualitative analysis of the engineering content as defined inEEF, we found that region-wide there is a discrepancy in the incidence of engineering conceptsthat were present in the various state science frameworks. This analysis was conducted for 49state’s science frameworks in the United States including the District of Columbia and the ITEAstandards [4]. As mentioned earlier, the State of Iowa was not included in this analysis, as theirstate science
needs, 4.1 Apply Quality tools to the profession. 4.2 Apply Quality tools to the profession.5. Safety: • apply general safety precautions and demonstrate knowledge of safety and workplace hazards, 5.1 Demonstrate knowledge of safety and workplace hazards.6. Lifelong Learning and Professionalism: • recognize the need to continuously pursue learning opportunities in order to remain technically competent, • understand professional and ethical responsibilities as defined by applicable professional organizations. 6.1 Understand professional and ethical responsibilities.7. Application and Design: • apply an understanding of the design of systems, components and processes applicable to program objectives, 7.1 Apply
and interpret data. C. An ability to design a system, components, or process to meet desired needs. D. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. E. An ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. F. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. G. An ability to communicate effectively. H. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. I. Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. J. Knowledge of contemporary issues. K. An ability to use
, clean water, homeland security, manufacturing, globalwarming, population growth and its implications, nanotechnology, space exploration, andmedical implants, as well as engineering ethics. Students have regular homework assignmentsand select a topic of interest to them on which to do a term report. These oral reports have beenvery successful in allowing fascinating looks at many additional topics. In addition to societalchallenges, the course also offers the opportunity to examine pioneers in electronics, fromBenjamin Franklin to Robert Noyce, to obtain insight into the origins of innovation and thechallenges faced in the past. Figure 8 and caption provide a glimpse of the course integration ofsocietal challenges. The designated textbook is
,professional and ethical responsibility, teamwork, leadership, lifelong learning, andattitudes) in which there may be both a cognitive and affective level of achievement. Asubcommittee has been formed and has the following charge: 1. Review and study research on the affective domain of Bloom’s taxonomy. This should also include the current use of the affective domain in developing college- level educational objectives. 2. Provide a short white paper to the BOK2 Committee documenting the issues related to the affective domain and alternative courses of action for their inclusion in the BOK second edition. 3. Complete the preceding in three months.Pre-licensure Experience to Fulfill the CE BOK:A new committee, focused
12.1281.18Appendix 3Program Outcome #1 : "An ability to apply knowledge of math, science, and engineering"Program Outcome #2 : "An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data"Program Outcome #3 : "An ability to design a system, component or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”Program Outcome #4 : "An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams"Program Outcome #5 : "An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems"Program Outcome #6 : "An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility"Program Outcome #7 : "An ability to communicate effectively"Program
learning outcomes, globalization,advancements in information technologies, and intense competition among numerousproviders of education1–3. Universities are asked to produce graduates who are skilled inhigher-order cognition, such as critical thinking and complex problem solving; behave ina principled ethical fashion; can accept and work harmoniously and productively withpeople unlike themselves; have the ability to adapt to diverse and changing situations;and take responsibility for their work4,5.Modern educational organizations are no longer viewed as formal, rational andhierarchically closed systems with hierarchical control patterns. A way to address oldorganizational structures is to build learning organizations. For Senge a
constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, regulatory, manufacturability, and sustainability; d. an ability to function on and assume leadership roles in diverse, multi-disciplinary teams; e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve bioengineering problems; f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; g. an ability to communicate effectively, especially in an interdisciplinary environment; h. the broad education, including service learning and entrepreneurship, necessary to understand the impact of bioengineering solutions in a rapidly changing global, economic, environmental, and societal context; i. a recognition of the
, being a role model forthe student by demonstrating personal and professional ethics, and being accessible and non-judgmental. For faculty mentors, it is important to be in a capacity to help build the mentee’sprofessional network.5,6 For underrepresented minority students, having a mentor that is willingto understand factors that may be attributed to societal mores, associated with the student’sculture and/or gender, that could influence the mentee’s academic success is important.12However, a good mentor-mentee relationship tends be reciprocal and consists of mutual respect, Page 23.562.2shared values, and good communication. There tends to
Materials 6 66 47 97 A8. Numerical Methods 3 44 13 56 E. Management and Professional Tools E1. Design Office Organization/Management/Office Ethics 0 19 34 94 E2. Business Development and Practices 0 10 22 81 E3. Design/Build & Other Project Methods 0 13 23 87 E4. Leadership Skills/Adaptation to Changes 0 32 25 91 E5. Working with Architects, Contractors, etc. 0 27
future and educating engineers to meetthe needs of the new era Engineer of 202022. The report on “The Engineer of 2020: Vision ofEngineering in the New Century” completed in 2004, and “Educating the Engineer of 2020:Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century” completed in 2005 discusses variousfuture scenarios based on scientific and technological trends for United States to maintain itseconomic competitiveness and improve the quality of life for people around the world. It alsoidentifies ideal attributes of the engineer of 2020, and recommends ways to improve training toprepare engineers for addressing the complex technical, social, and ethical questions raised byemerging technologies.22,23 Many engineering institutions in the US are
and interpret data Exemplary Total (c) design a system, component, or process to meet desired a goals 18% 57% 25% 100% 90% (d) an ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team b 0% 0% 0% 0% (e) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems c 2% 74% 24% 100% 80% (f) understand professional and ethical responsibility d 0% 0% 0
-class discussionsabout ethical, practical, and social aspects of the Challenge. We emphasize that the manner inwhich this overview is presented can differ across institutions and courses, and based on thespecific instructor’s goals. In all cases, however, the broad, cross-disciplinary nature of thetheme and its societal context should be emphasized.Stage 2: Definition/Problem RestatementFollowing the introduction of the theme, students reflect on what they have learned and thendefine the Challenge in their own words. This process engages the students as participants in theproblem-solving process; they must progress from the relatively passive experience of Stage 1 toan active consideration of the Challenge (i.e., what makes it a difficult
Information Security Program and affiliated with The Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security (CERIAS) at Purdue University. He has a B.S. in Computer Science from Chaminade University of Honolulu. His research areas include global policy, ethics, information security and assurance, technology adoption, biometrics, education, pharmaceutical supply chain, and energy. Page 23.205.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Approaches to Integrating Public Policy into Engineering EducationAbstractPolicy education has been deemed an important
SDASME-1,2,&3) algebra, a knowledge of chemistry and calculus-based physics (with depth in physics), and an ability to apply their knowledge of advanced math (through multivariate calculus and differential equations), science, and engineering.2-2. (ABET-i) OU ME graduates will demonstrate a recognition of the need for, and an SA A D SD ability to engage in life-long learning3-1. (ABET-g) OU ME graduates will demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively SA A D SD4-1. (ABET-f) OU ME graduates will demonstrate an understanding of professional and SA A D SD ethical responsibility4-2. (ABET-h) OU ME
Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scien-tists and Engineers. The survey included 1,440 respondents selected randomly from ninety-ninedepartments of chemistry, civil engineering, microbiology, and sociology in major research uni-versities in the U.S. Students were asked to report their level of agreement with 5 questions. Theresults of the survey suggested that there was room for improvement in doctoral programs, bothacademically and socially. Page 25.599.4In a similar vein as the main objective of this paper Crede and Borrego5 argued that If the U.S.was to remain a globally recognized source of technological and scientific
. These four were that (1) collaborationsshould not be stressful, (2) the time requirements should be reasonably low, (3) all thecollaborators should have clear roles in the project, and (4) all the collaborators should live up totheir commitments. In order to achieve these ideal collaborations, seven factors were identifiedas being most important, namely: (1) compatible interests/passions; (2) shared goals; (3)complimentary skills; (4) compatible personalities; (5) compatible work ethic; (6) a sharedunderstanding of rigor; and (7) a desire to learn from each other (see Figure 3). Common to theseseven factors was the notion of sharing and compatibility. Factors most important for a
19 Defining engineering 11 Space in curriculum 10 Work ethic/ability of students 9 Budget issues 9 Lack of effective/proven curriculum 9Figure 2: Greatest Challenges to K-12 Engineering EducationThe third research question posed to participants asked, “If you could participate in a meeting withSTEM educators from various countries, what would you define as the most important topics todiscuss?” Figure 3 shows the most frequently mentioned issues. For this question
; Transportation; Tropical Medicine; Water Resources2 Acoustics; Anthropology; Biophysics; Clinical Neurology; Ecology; Engineering, Aerospace; Genetics & Heredity; Hematology; History Of Social Sciences; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology; Industrial Relations & Labor; Infectious Diseases; Linguistics; Materials Science, Ceramics; Medical Ethics; Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering; Nanoscience & Nanotechnology; Nutrition & Dietetics; Physics, Applied; Physics, Multidisciplinary; Public Administration; Social Issues; Virology; Women's Studies3 Allergy; Astronomy & Astrophysics; Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
, including nonlinear structural analysis, computational mechanics, and biomechanics. He is also active in engineering education and engineering ethics, particularly in the subjects of mechanics education and appropriate technology. At UPRM Papadopoulos serves as the coordinator of the Engineering Mechanics Committee in the Depart- ment of General Engineering. He also co-coordinates the Social, Ethical, and Global Issues (SEGI) in Engineering Program and Forums on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technology.Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Romn, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Aidsa I. Santiago-Romn is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Science and Materi- als and the Director of the Strategic Engineering
N MeanApply knowledge of mathematics, 0 0 2 35 9 46 4.15science, and engineeringDesign and conduct experiments, as 0 2 4 30 10 46 4.04well as to analyze and interpret dataDesign a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, 0 0 2 25 19 46 4.37environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainabilityFunction on multidisciplinary team(s) 1 1 6 26 12 46
the make up of students who select to enroll in pre-collegeengineering classes. To deny (or even delay) access to suit research faces serious ethical barriers,since it denies students and parents their preferences, and could impose serious damage to theirscholastic progress and even later academic and workplace opportunities. In a somewhat similarmanner, teachers opt to participate in or avoid engineering instruction and manipulating thisselection for research purposes faces serious professional and ethic issues. With limited ability inpublic schools to assign teachers to their classes, there is a need to document inherent differencesthat may exist among teachers and to interpret the impact of training and teaching experiences
. This paper attempts to review the literature onthe subject of inclusivity with respect to these issues, within the context of first year post- Page 15.362.2secondary education, to create a practical framework that unites the different approaches into anup-to-date resource that is relevant for engineering.The Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineering 1 has a collection of over 50abstracts that address teaching to diversity in engineering. Minority retention rates in post-secondary education, for instance, is a topic that also falls in this category. The 2008 annualreport by the National Action Council for Minorities in