engagement in introductory stem courses,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, p. 229–261, 2012. [3] T. Tucker, S. Shehab, E. Mercier, and M. Silva, “Board 50: Wip: Evidence-based analysis of the design of collaborative problemsolving engineering tasks,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. [4] T. Nokes-Malach, J. Richey, and S. Gadgil, “When is it better to learn together? insights from research on collaborative learning,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, p. 645–656, 2015. [5] E. Mercier and S. Higgins, “Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 25, p. 13–23, 2013. [6] L. Paquette, N. Bosch, E. Mercier, J. Jung, S
-mentoring/docview/1355441588/se-2.[4] J. McDermott, J. Beagle, “GradTrack Scholars: A comprehensive online mentoring programto build community and prepare the next generation of underrepresented minority graduatestudents (Work in Progress),” ASEE PEER Document Repository, 23-August-2022. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/gradtrack-scholars-a-comprehensive-online-mentoring-program-to-build-community-and-prepare-the-next-generation-of-underrepresented-minority-graduate-students-work-in-progress. [Accessed: 09-Feb-2023].[5] P. Boyle-Single and C. B. Muller., “When Email and Mentoring Unite: The implementationof a nationwide electronic mentoring program,” in Creating mentoring and coaching programs,L. Stromei, Alexandria, VA: American Society
, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.[2] "The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 259-261, 2006.[3] K. D. Beddoes, "Undisciplined Epistemology: Conceptual Heterogeneity in a Field in the Making," in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[4] C. Faber and L. C. Benson, "Engineering Students' Epistemic Cognition in the Context of Problem Solving," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 677-709, 2017.[5] Y. Yang, "Examining Epistemological Views of Engineering among First-Year Engineering," in 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[6] J. Gainsburg, "Engineering Students’ Epistemological Views on Mathematical Methods in
engineering graduate school. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and has been recognized with the PAESMEM award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Designing Professional Development to fit your Audience (Other)AbstractProfessional development for engineering education in the precollege space can vary widely formany reasons. One of the most compelling reasons for differentiation is the learning needs of theaudience. A workshop for teachers who have immediate need for activities to incorporate in theirclassroom looks different from a workshop for counselors who are guiding students throughcareer choices. This paper looks at the design considerations for professional developmentworkshops by using
Design. She is the faculty advisor for ASME student organization, and I am ME! Drexel Women in Mechanical Engineering organization. She is a member of ASEE and ASME.Christine Chesebrough, Drexel UniversityDr. Lutfi Agartan, Drexel UniversityAaron Herbert BernardJen Katz-BuonincontroEvangelia G. Chrysikou, Drexel University Dr. Evangelia G. Chrysikou is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Drexel University, the Director of the Applied Cognitive and Brain Sciences PhD Program (https://drexel.edu/coas/academics/departments-centers/psychology/research/applied-cognitive-and-brain- science/), and the Associate Dean for Research for the College of Arts and Sciences. She is also the
. Hughes, W. J. Schell IV PE, B. P. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.Appendix A. Alternative Project 1 Design ENGR XXXXX – Project 1: The Water Filtration DeviceBackgroundWater is a source of life for everyone! Unfortunately, many populations in our current worlddon’t have easy access to clean drinking water. Currently, about 17% of the world doesn’t haveeasy access to safe drinking water. The problem is serious enough that it was listed as one of the14 great engineering challenges of tomorrow. Your engineering team has been hired to workwith the
inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN).Ms. Jazmin Jurkiewicz, Virginia Tech Jazmin Jurkiewicz (she/they) is a fourth-year PhD candidate in Engineering Education at
, Mechanics and material engineering, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 467–478, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1299/jsmea1993.39.4_467.[2] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineeering Education: The CDIO Approach, 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.[3] Lindsay Ellis, “TK Corporate Ed Boeing Wanted Better Engineers. Higher Education Would Never Be the Same.,” Chron High Educ, vol. 66, no. 7, Oct. 2019.[4] E. F. Crawley, “The CDIO Syllabus A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education,” 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org[5] L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, and J. Fredricks Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of EC2000,” 2006. [Online]. Available: www.abet.orgwww.ed.psu.edu
). Throughout her engineering career, she has tried to integrate global engineering into her work. Most recently, she spent the final year of her PhD at the University of Cape Town, integrating her benchtop cardiovascular research into computational models. In 2018-2019, she spent a year living and working in Tanzania, in East Africa through the Fulbright US Scholar program, teaching and conducting clinical research. Now at UD, her scholarship work includes embedding global engineering opportunities into the engineering curriculum through study abroad programs, new courses, serving as an advisor for UD’s Engineers Without Borders, and hosting global design workshops. ©American Society for Engineering
Competency standard for professional engineers," Engineers Australia, 2019. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/publications/stage-1-competency-standard- professional-engineers[3] R. Lawrence, "The promotion of future opportunities and possibilities for engineering graduates," Australian Council of Engineering Deans, 2020. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aced.edu.au/downloads/Engineering%202035%20report.pdf[4] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, "Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science," in 2011 Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. F1C-1- F1C-5.[5] J. Burdett, "Making groups work: University students
andunstructured learning.Setting and MethodsThis paper presents four case studies of academic maker spaces. Three of the fourinstitutions are public, while one is private. The spaces have been open from three to fiveyears, and three are directly supported by or housed in the school of engineering, whilethe other one by the school’s IT department. All four makerspaces were previously opento users from across the entire university.In 2018, a community of practice was established between the case study locations and 6-8 other regional makerspaces, with members regularly meeting to share ideas andinitiatives [7]. This community continued to develop over 2019 with a yearly day-longmeeting and intermittent emails. In 2020, during the early days of the pandemic
engineers’ perceptions of communication training and their recommendation for curricular change: Results of a national survey. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39, 38 – 42.4. Engineering Accreditation Commission (2019). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD; ABET “an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in broadly-defined technical and non-technical environments...5. Male, S.A. (2013). An Australian Study of the Importance of Communication for Engineers. In Brandt, C. & Prescott, D. (Eds.), Agendas for 21st Century Engineers (pp. 64–84). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.6. Darling, A. L., & Dannels, D. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk
discrimination in Chile remain evident, aswitnessed by international organizations' different world rankings and studies. According toeconomic theory, the current engineering focus continues to be project assessment, often withoutconsidering any social and environmental impact.According to [3], the social crisis in Chile in October 2019 demanded equality and finishedabuses, an apposition of a hierarchical society in which a group has greater power or status. Thisdemand is directly related to the social sustainability indicated by the SDGs. Given this context,there is already an approach to equality for students who participated in this study.METHODOLOGYThis research work evaluates the impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on sustainabilitycriteria for
. References[1] N. S. F. . "NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program | NSF - National Science Foundation." (accessed January 3, 2021.[2] E. Dell and Y. Verhoeven, "Using Self Determination Theory to Develop Strategies for the Retention of Women in Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs," presented at the American Society for Engineering Educators (ASEE) Zone 2 Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, March 2, 2017, 2017.[3] E. M. Dell, Y. Verhoeven, J. W. Christman, and R. D. Garrick, "Using Self-Determination Theory to build communities of support to aid in the retention of women in engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 344-359
desde la perspectiva del estudiante. (Assessment of online courses from a student's perspective)," Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23-38, Jan. 2016. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412016000100002[2] S. Sundararajan and T. Heindel and B. Ganapathysubramanian and S. Subramaniam, “Women in Mechanical Engineering: A Departmental Effort to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Engagement of Women Students,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22240, 2012, pp. 25.1483.1 - 25.1483.15. https://www.jee.org/22240[3] E. P. Deess and K. Joshi and V. Briller and R. Calluori, Predicting Engineering
was offered for the first time in the Fall 2020 semester. In academicyear 2019 -2020 the course went through the full administrative approval processes, beingstrongly supported by the department, college, and university curricula committees, as well as bythe industrial advisory board. The renewable energy course is intended to provide a graduate-level understanding of the renewable energy conversion principles, concepts, technologies,resource assessment, analysis, control, operation and protection of renewable energy conversionsystems. It also examines the issues involved in grid integration, economics, environmentalimpacts and applications [12-16]. Based on the technical and sustainability challenges, futureoutlooks for each of the sources
experiences and the detail processes so thatother institutions in our ASEE community may use as a reference if they choose to host mathcompetitions for their local schools.Introduction to MATHCOUNTSMATHCOUNTS is an annual national math competition program aimed at enhancing problemsolving skills for middle school students through a series of math competitions at the local, state,and national levels. Currently in its 38th year [1], MATHCOUNTS is one of the largest and mostsuccessful education partnerships involving volunteers, educators, industry sponsors, parents,and students in this country. Local professional engineers volunteered their time to organize thecompetitions as MATHCOUNTS Coordinators. As an extracurricular activity, MATHCOUNTSrecognizes
Experience, Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition,” 2019.[8] S. Luryi et al., “Entrepreneurship in engineering education,” in 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, 2007, pp. T2E-10.[9] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, p. 425, 2012.[10] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial career choice and characteristics of engineering and business students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[11] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E
. Stice, A. Rugarcia, "The Future of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods that Work," Chem. Engr. Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 26-39, 2000.[6] ABET. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3. [Accessed 21 January 2020].[7] "Engineering Unleashed," [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset- matters.aspx.[8] E. L Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum Press, 1985.[9] M. Cavanagh, "Students’ Experiences of Active Engagement through Cooperative Learning Activities in Lectures," Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23
funding agencies. He is a member of the editorial board for a number of professional journals as well as an Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Online Engineering. Dr. Azad is active with remote laboratory field and is the President of the Global Online Laboratory Consortium (GOLC) as well as the Vice-President of the International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE). Dr. Azad is also active with few other professional organizations like- IEEE, IET, ASEE, ISA, and CLAWAR Association and served as Chair and Co-Chairs of numerous conferences and workshops. He was a program evaluator for the ABET and is active in evaluating research and development projects for various national and international funding
Smith, JA Orozco, JG Corso, CR Sanchez, JK Freise, H Ringler, I Cortes, “Engaging Freshman in Team Based Engineering Projects,” Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--2128814. J Walther, SE Miller, NW Sochacka, “A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being,” Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123-148, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.2015915. AMA Journal of Ethics, January 2020 on “Culture, Context, and Epidemic Containment” https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/cases. Accessed February 202016. National Institute of Health Annual Review of Ethics (Case Studies) https://oir.nih.gov/sourcebook/ethical
Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using Ideation, Disruption and Aha (IDA) Pedagogy in Introduction to Flight Sidaard Gunasekaran1 University of Dayton Abstract A fundamental essence of Aerospace Engineering is creativity. However, most aerospacecourses offered in academia does not teach creativity which as history suggests, is integral totechnological breakthrough. At the University of Dayton, the Ideation, Disruption and Aha (IDA)pedagogy developed by the Institute of Applied Creativity and Transformation (IACT) wassuccessfully implemented in the sophomore level Introduction to Flight
received all of his degrees from Purdue University, including his PhD in Engineering Education, Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. Justin is the Program Chair-Elect of the American Society for Engineering Education’s Liberal Education/Engineering & Soci- ety Division and the vice chair of the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committee on Sustainability subcommittee on Formal Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 What Do Students Learn About Innovation?IntroductionInnovation is a complex construct. It spans a variety of processes and tasks [1,2], project andproduct outcomes [3,4], personal
Introduction to Engineering, Introduction to Materials and Manufacturing, and Structural and Chemical Characterization of Materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ Perceptions of Team SupportsAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we report on a variety of interventions we provide in anattempt to support first-year student teams in a project-based learning course. At the end of thesemester, we surveyed students to ask their perception of the usefulness of each of theintervention strategies. While a majority of students rated each of the strategies as useful, the twostrategies rated highest were peer mentoring and progress meetings with the
, special education and engineering education.Ms. Yuxin Xu, University of Washington Yuxin (Ziva) Xu is a second-year undergraduate student at University of Washington, Seattle. Her research areas of interest include reflection in engineering education, equity in engineering, and human-computer interaction. Address: 746 1035 NE Campus Pkwy, Seattle, WA 98105 Phone: 206-209-6202 Email: yxxuziva@uw.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ engagements with reflection: Insights from undergraduatesIntroductionIn this research paper, we situate our work in an understanding of reflection as a form of thinkingthat involves stepping out, thinking about, and connecting forward [1
Technology Education in a So- cietal and Student Oriented Context, www.cetuss.se) and the IEEE Education Society Nordic Chapter. He as a reviewer for a number of major journals and conferences, including the Computer Science Education Journal (Taylor and Francis), the ACM SIGCSE and ITiCSE and Koli Calling International Computer Science Education conferences.Dr. Niall Seery, Athlone Institute of Technology Dr. Niall Seery is also the Director of the Technology Education Research Group (TERG) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Theorising the Role of Engineering Education for Society: Technological Activity in Context?AbstractThis paper establishes a
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Introducing EngOTG: A Framework for an Audio Study Material App for Engineering StudentsABSTRACTAuditory learning tools, such as recorded study materials, are very commonly used in manydisciplines and have proven to be effective for second-language learners, learning-disabledstudents, and struggling readers. However, such tools have been seldom used in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, mostly because of the technicalnature of the subjects. The objective of this study is to investigate the features of audio studymaterials that could improve student learning and
on which to draw to help mentor the engineering leaders of the future. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Making Connections Across a Four-Year Project-Based Curriculum: ePortfolios as a Space for Reflection and Integrative LearningAbstractThe systematic use of reflection and integrative learning across experiences in thecurriculum and co-curriculum has often been neglected in engineering education,yet these processes are essential for deep and transferable learning. This paperreports on the use of ePortfolios to provide a mechanism for reflection andintegrative learning in a four-year, project-based curriculum. Student use ofePortfolios was introduced in the