Paper ID #30698Faculty Perceptions of Industry Sponsorships in Capstone Design CoursesDr. Jen Symons, University of Portland Jen Symons is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering in the Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland. She is most passionate about teaching biomechanics and statistics for engineers. Her research focuses on understanding the causes of musculoskeletal injury and developing noninvasive mechanisms that prevent injuries and/or enhance performance in equine athletes.Ms. Kate Rohl, University of Portland c American Society for Engineering
, once it is widely disseminated, to generate awide range of reviews, including positive and negative comments. That input, drawing onthe ASCE experience, could be the basis for an improved second edition.Definition of Entry into Professional PracticeAs explained early in this paper, the EBOK is defined as the depth and breadth ofknowledge, skills, and attitudes appropriate to enter practice as a professional engineer,that is, licensed and in responsible charge of engineering activities that potentially impactpublic health, safety, and welfare.Responsible charge means activities such as carrying out assignments, making projectplans, directing engineering designs, writing specifications, preparing engineeringreports, or deciding methods of
AC 2008-154: THE ACADEMIC VALUE OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION: ALITERATURE REVIEWTylisha Baber, Michigan State University At the time this paper was written, Dr. Tylisha Baber was serving as a National Academies Christine Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow. She earned a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Michigan State University. Tylisha’s dissertation focused on the design and implementation of a biomass conversion process for improving the fuel properties of biodiesel. She is currently an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering at North Carolina A&T
student populations under consideration. Despite this, the PMP represents anoutlet for abundant future research related to best practices in supporting underrepresentedengineering students. The program’s structure allows for a snapshot of student engagementduring their first-year as a program participant, while also providing an opportunity forlongitudinal analysis as students progress through their academic careers. There are likewiseabundant opportunities to explore outcomes associated with being a peer mentor. To pursuequalitative analyses, we would like to conduct focus groups with members of the 2022-23mentee cohort to better understand how the program impacted their first year on campus.Eventually, we would also like to utilize quantitative
the lens of Golde and Walker’s(2006) Stewardship framework. Although service and outreach are not tenets of the three arms ofStewardship as proposed originally by Golde and Walker, we find that they are integral parts ofall three tenets of Stewardship. As part of a larger NSF-funded study on the preparation ofengineering doctoral students, interview data from 40 Ph.D.-holding engineers in a variety ofcareers indicate that practicing engineers identify strong linkages between their engineeringexpertise and outreach, service, and the broader impacts of their work. This research will help toprepare new engineering faculty for the expectations of service based on the paths of priorgenerations of engineers and engineering educators.Background and
Paper ID #16350Privatization of Public Education: Lessons from New Orleans for Engineer-ing Education in K-12 and BeyondDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Mrs. Janice L. Hall, Virginia Tech I am a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. I have B.S. and M.S. degrees in biolog- ical and bio-medical engineering respectively. It was through my participation in extracurricular activities and my experience as a graduate teaching assistant I found my passion for engineering education. My research interests include broadening participation and
].For the first time the academic credits are the unit of measurement of academic work to expressall the activities that are part of the curriculum that must be met by students. An academic creditis defined as a 48-hour academic work that includes the hours with direct accompaniment of theprofessor and the hours of independent work that the student must dedicate to the realization ofstudy activities, practices or other tasks that are necessary to achieve the learning goals.Although this law was designed for facilitating the national and international mobility of studentsand graduates, and curricular flexibility, among other aspects, also the academic activitiesassociated with research training that may be developed in contents or options of
counseling concerningpreparing for and applying to graduate programs.Faculty-Directed Individual and Group Undergraduate Student Research Projects: The goal of this program is to provide students with "hands on" opportunities to serve asapprentice researchers to a faculty member's research project which genuinely prepares them forfurther research at the graduate level. These projects have academic expectations for theparticipating underrepresented minority students above and beyond the ordinary expectations oftheir course work.LEVEL 2 (NON-INTENSIVE) ACTIVITIESSkill Building Workshops: Workshops are designed to increase student performance on the graduate record examination.These workshops sessions are a one-day experience providing guidance and
AC 2011-750: ”IT’S GONNA BE A LONG TRIP.”- A STUDENT’S EXPE-RIENCE WITH ENGINEERING ABROAD.Tiago R Forin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tiago Forin is currently a third year student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his Bachelors degree in Civil Engineering from Florida State University in ’06 and his Masters degree in Environmental Engineering from Purdue University in ’08. While in the School of Engineering Education, he works as a Graduate Research Assistant in the X-Roads Research Group and has an interest in cross-disciplinary practice and engineering identity development
engineering work, he is also a published freelance photographer who has works with local and international NGOs. Dr. Striebig was the founding editor of the Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Development and an assistant editor for the Journal of Green Building. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Annual Conference Building Life Cycle Assessment skills with GREET and SimaPro to engage students in analyzing the sustainability of biofuel alternativesSustainability is important in manufacturing, construction, planning and design. The concepts ofsustainability have been pigeon-holed into graduate
developing countries. He also writes and does research in the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education.Edmond John Dougherty, Villanova University Edmond John Dougherty is a graduate of Villanova and Drexel universities. He is the Director of the Engineering Entrepreneurship program at Villanova University. He is also President of Ablaze Develop- ment Corp and a Founder of Wavecam Media. Ablaze provides electronic and software product design services. Wavecam designs, produces, and operates a number of aerial remote camera systems for sports and entertainment. He specializes in product design, engineering project management, artificial intelli- gence, and creativity. He was a key part of a team that won an
Office of Future Engineers, and a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University in the College of Engineering; his ”Pracademic” background combines rigorous research with practical experiences. Wilson started, sold, and consulted Fortune companies in the University-Industry entrepreneurial space for over twenty successful years. He earned a Bachelors of Science from the University of Massachusetts and a Masters from the University of Chicago; his broad research interests include Engineering Education, Network Science, and Modeling Human Sociometrics. Professor Wilson may be reached at wilsonmd@purdue.eduDr. Stephen R Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette Stephen R. Hoffmann is the Assistant Head of the School of Engineering
AC 2011-8: MENTORING WITH INDEX CARDS: AN EARLY INTRO-DUCTION TO FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR NEW FACULTYJohn K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is a Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern Univer- sity. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, first-year engineering instruction, and the pedagog- ical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon.Nathaniel Bird, Ohio Northern University Nathaniel Bird is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Computer
research experienceThe impact of undergraduate research, including summer research experiences, has beenresearched extensively and the findings indicate a beneficial effect on intellectual, professionaland personal growth for students and increased job satisfaction and professional outcomes forfaculty1, 2. Students from under-represented groups in particular are thought to benefit from anundergraduate research experience, since they often experience less access to the informalmentoring and networking opportunities and the quality high school education that traditionalstudents enjoy. Participation in undergraduate research has proven to be an effective strategy toremedy such gaps in access for under-represented groups. A study on the impact
students who have been in the program for at least one year (i.e. sophomores, juniors, seniors, and transfer students who have been in residence at least one year). We would like to have an even distribution of students among our four academic programs: Computer Science, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Civil and Environmental Engineering. We realize that each of these groups will still include a variety of intersecting identities, and in some cases some aspects of a student’s identity may not be emphasized in the conversations that ensue. Due to practical limitations on the number of students expected to be available for focus groups, these six groups were chosen as the best option to capture the population
which support practices best support students in STEM majors totransfer to colleges and universities and how students’ creativity and propensity for innovationaffects such transfer persistence.[Portions of this paper in the review of the literature and research design have been reprintedfrom the 2015, 2016 and 2017 ASEE Poster Session Papers which provide preliminary materialfor the reader.]1,2Motivation and overviewThere is a critical need for more students with engineering and science majors to enter into,persist, and graduate from postsecondary institutions. Increasing the diversity in engineering andscience is also a profound identified need.3 According to national statistics, the largest groups ofunderrepresented minority students in
Paper ID #18253Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineer-ing CurriculumDr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Dr. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes. Her research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materials in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she is the senior director of the Civil Engineering
positions including the chairman of the Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Dean of Graduate College and Vice Provost for Graduate Academic Affairs and most recently for Faculty Affairs. He received his graduate degrees (MS and PhD) from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in civil engineering with a specialty in structural engineering. Among his many publications include a book on systems engineering (ISBN: 978-1-60427-055-6, J. Ross Publishing, 2012). Over several decades, he has been heavily involved in education of engineering students in such areas as system reliability, bridge management, systems engineering and structural design. A licensed structural engineer and
to seek employment and be employed inthe nuclear industry, labs, or research facilities after graduation for a period of time determinedby the length of time they received the NRC scholarships. This commitment was typically sixmonths of employment for every partial or full year of scholarship received.The second part involved the enhancement program. This part included student support activitiesto ensure continued student interest in the STEM fields and nuclear programs, talentdevelopment through STEM course support, such as tutoring, undergraduate researchopportunities, field trips that included visits to the collaborating institution and career fairs, andworking lunch meetings where the scholarship recipients came together. The
studies we have continued to improvelearning effectiveness through changes in the computer agent design27. Important innovationsinclude offering students control over the timing of feedback16, using social strategies motivatedby the field of collaborative group work1, 10, and developing agents that demonstrate alignmentwith student goals17.The underlying thesis of this research is that offering a dynamic self-paced learning environmentfor student use outside of the lecture room is the best practical means for integratingsophisticated design and analysis experiences into undergraduate engineering curricula.Furthermore, the machine-monitored internet chat-based tutorial environment we use to achievethis goal offers an excellent opportunity for
. Experiments should show some current engineeringequipment and some should be of a nature to not need any technical equipment.One of the better experiments in the course is that of dropping rocks off a suspension foot bridgeand comparing the distance found by timing the drop compared to a measured distance. They areonly given the definitions of velocity and acceleration for analytical tools to work from. Thisencourages thinking and hopefully moves them away from formula dependency. The best part ofthis experiment is to ask them to design an experiment to prove their reasons for the error thatthey are often quick to give in the original experiment. This starts them on the path of some reallearning.Another good experiment is that of having students
. Page 11.207.14However, the real measure must take into consideration the start point of the participantsbefore ETW as shown in Figure 11. Upon comparison of the long-term results for each groupof participants, the delta between before and after for each category has been relativelyconsistent since the workshop started in 1999.The obvious result is that the exposure of ExCEEd participants to demonstrations ofexcellent teaching using physical models and practicing the use of physical models anddemonstrations by participants under the watchful gaze of a mentor is key. Some of thespecific comments by recent ExCEEd Teaching Workshop Graduates are: • Toys help me (the instructor) to see the concepts more clearly • I need one for every lesson
Paper ID #28522Comparing Effectiveness of Peer Mentoring for Direct Admit andCollege-Ready FreshmenDr. Teresa J. Cutright, The University of Akron Dr. Cutright is a Professor of Civil Engineering at The University of Akron. She has a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering with emphasis on environmental remediation techniques with over 20 years of experience conducting site assessments, soil characterizations and treatability studies for a variety of environmental contaminants. In addition she also conducts education research via an EPA education grant and a NSF Scholarships for STEM education. Most recently she
teaching and learning modules of engineering mechanics. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 2011;19(3):421-32.14. Collis B, Wende van der M. Models of technology and change in higher education: An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education. 2002.15. Collins A, Halverson R. The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2010;26(1):18-27.16. Klein JD. Trends in performance improvement: Expanding the reach of instructional design and technology. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook 2010;35(1):135-45.17. Evans R. E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Teachers College
curriculum in the context ofengineering problem solving.The first major change involves the development of a module-based freshman course inengineering. In this course, students take a common module focused on engineering problemsolving and computing for seven weeks. The general module is taught in the context of datamanagement/analysis using different software packages. Based on these skills, discipline-specific modules were created for each engineering major offered at the Vanderbilt School ofEngineering (VUSE). The general module is followed by two self-selected four-week, discipline-specific modules that focused on a current event or area of research. Each discipline-specificmodule was designed in the context of problem based learning with a
isneeded.The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) report [10] emphasizes that using a piecemealapproach to data science curriculum development may result in content coverage but also ‘lackeducational and cross discipline cohesion’. While programs need to address data science skills,they should also prepare students for the actual ‘data challenges they will face in their careers’[10]. The NAS report also calls out the need to include high impact educational practices such asfirst year seminars, undergraduate research, common intellectual experiences (common andintegrative core knowledge), writing intensive courses, collaborative projects and assignments,and capstone courses. Important findings to note within the NAS report [10] include enhancingthe
Paper ID #242182018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Understanding How Engineering Identity and Belongingness Predict Grit forFirst-Generation College StudentsDina Verd´ın, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education and M.S. student in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship. Her
appropriateinfrastructure in place, and ensuring that faculty receive formal training in distance educationmethods and technology 20.Considerable research has focused on assessing distance education practices, and a number ofpublications have examined this topic in terms of what faculty can do to improve the educationalexperience for students: “What determines the success of distance teaching is the extent to whichthe institution and the individual instructor are able to provide the appropriate opportunity for,and quality of, dialogue between teacher and learner, as well as appropriately structured learningmaterials” 15, p. 6. However, tension can also exist between faculty and instructional designpersonnel. Whereas the ideal relationship would be one of
. 4. Silverstein, David L., Vigeant, Margot, Visco, Donald, Woods, Donald, “How We Teach: Freshman Introduction to Chemical Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. 5. Silverstein, David L., Vigeant, Margot, “How We Teach: Kinetics and Reactor Design”, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. Page 25.703.13Appendix A. Print version of online survey. Page 25.703.14UK College of Engineering Surveys - AIChE Best Practices in Teaching 2011 http
conclusions [12]. While natural processes act without political/social intent, people practice science within a social context that is immersed in cultures infused with political and social power differentials. The questions asked, priorities assigned, interpretation of data, and presentation of results are all deeply subjective. Conversely, SE respects and values varied ways of knowing and, therefore, the sharing of power over what and how engineers should research, design, and implement. ● Meritocratic: Meritocracy is the false assumption that the system as it currently exists is fair and just. The meritocratic narrative purports that equal reward is always provided by the system for equal effort within it and that the