typification for first-year engineering students using theStrengthsFinder assessment and provides a positive psychology perspective on the use of thisassessment instrument in the first-year engineering curriculum. The research was focused on aqualitative understanding of the StrengthsFinder signature themes of first-year engineeringstudents, and whether or not this understanding could be used in any practical way.III. DATA COLLECTIONThe logistics of the research project were more challenging than initially expected. Before theonline survey could be conducted, university policy21 necessitated that a research ethics proposalhad to be written and approved. Each of the students had to sign a consent form to release thesurvey results for use in this
found in any engineering program and can be mappeddirectly to courses that are very similar from program to program.4 However, the “soft”outcomes raise some interesting questions. These soft skills as stated in the a-k Student Page 25.1246.2Outcomes include: (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an
understanding of the relationship of electrical science Page 25.1255.4and technology to other disciplines and relevant ethical, social, cultural, historical andpolitical issues; 2) a substantive knowledge of the essential concepts, controversies andareas of exploration of a specialized topic in electrical science and technology; 3) anability to critique scientific and technological arguments and claims in oral and writtenpresentations.” To show how these objectives are fulfilled, the following two paragraphswill provide overall course layout, approach to the topic, activities assigned and methodsof assessment. After that, this section will describe more
engineering itself. The result of this novel approach to integrating softwareengineering concepts into a curriculum is the infusion of new approaches to realizingeducational goals in both software engineering and non-software engineering areas throughoutthe curriculum.State of the fieldThe “across the curriculum” paradigm is well recognized. One of the best-known examples isthat of writing across the curriculum, which has been influential in higher education for anumber of years. A number of efforts have specifically addressed computing curricula. Arnowet al.1 describe teaching distributed computing across the computing curriculum. An NSF-funded effort toward development of teaching social impact and ethics across the computingcurriculum spans a
. Academia must ask questions everywhere,of everyone who has perspective on the institutions into which their students will findjobs. Only then can academia hope to understand what needs to be taught in order toeffect real and substantive change. In this way academic institutions can refrain fromusurping the primary customer’s functional needs.I propose continuation of “the basics” of engineering education. To be an industry leaderin the engineering world requires the fundamental understanding of engineeringprinciples. I do suggest, however, that the remaining coursework be less tailored torandom electives and more towards coursework on leadership, ethics, philosophy,technology forecasting and history of American industry
analysisconsiders changes in the constrains and conditions of the project along with corrective measures Page 3.175.5needed. This analysis along with the safety, ethical, and efficiency considerations contribute tothe teams grade beyond the C level. This is an exercise for the team members’ critical thinkingand problem solving skills.When team members schedule meetings amongst themselves, the time, date and placeinformation on the meetings is provided to the project manager at least two days in advance. Theproject manager could partake in the meetings to provide input and to observe thecommunications taking place amongst the members.If time permits, an oral
, etc.). These carry a lot of weight inpromotion and tenure decisions, further broaden one’s contact network, and are important tomarketability. On the other hand, limit the number since they will often involve travel and a lotof time.24. Pick your battles carefully and don’t make enemies for nothing. They will often come backto haunt you. Don’t be confrontational unless the importance or ethics of the issue demands it.Don’t hold grudges. Be willing to apologize. On the other hand, if the issue does deserve it,stand your ground but as diplomatically as possible. Don’t be gullible or a “pushover” on issuesof real importance.25. Be extremely careful of what you say and, especially, write about anyone, especiallysuperiors’. Try to anticipate how
problem in business development,operational improvement, financial or people development. The key learning outcomes include: 1. Demonstrate the systematic thought processes used in engineering design thinking and assessment of current industry practice. 2. Apply the engineering problem solving approach to practitioner problems. 3. Identify a need and define a problem, its objectives, and constraints from real-world business challenges. 4. Implement key steps in ‘engineering problem solving to evaluate possible solution taking into consideration broad problem constraints including economic, environment, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. 5. Develop a detailed plan for deployment of
additional sources of critical consciousness developmentinto the curriculum, enabling a more comprehensive evaluation of students' change over time.Although Castaneda’s (2019) results were counter-intuitive, it does not negate the fact thatengineers can benefit from the development of critical consciousness. Like Castaneda’s (2019) work Trbušić (2014) proposed that reforming engineeringeducation involves examining and critically questioning engineering curricula and practices. Thegoal of the work was to introduce a critical pedagogical approach to foster conscientizationamong engineers, enhancing their ethical acumen by raising awareness about a wide range ofpressing issues such as sustainability, environmental protection, poverty eradication
within two engineering disciplines, civil andenvironmental engineering, and biological systems engineering, in Spring 2023. Thesedisciplines were strategically chosen based on the principal investigators’ home departments asproposed in the larger study from which this research is a part. 115 students participated in thereflection activities. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and hasreceived approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University. The studyprotocol underwent rigorous review by the IRB to ensure the protection of participants' rights,safety, and confidentiality. Measures were implemented to uphold ethical standards throughoutthe research process, including obtaining informed consent from
storming, norming,and performing, directly correlating with the research questions of the study. This process, fromopen coding to thematic structuring, allowed for an in-depth exploration of team dynamicswithin the REU program.3.4 Ethical and Trustworthiness ConsiderationsTo ensure the ethical integrity of the study, informed consent was obtained from all participants.The data was anonymized to protect the identity of the participants and stored securely on Box.To enhance the trustworthiness of the findings, an additional coder was enlisted to conductinitial coding and analysis and participate in peer debriefing and inter-rater reliability (IRR)analysis. The IRR analysis measured the degree of agreement among the coders in applying thecodes and
chemical processes. Laboratory experiments in green chemistry and Practice field trips to waste management facilities will be used to demonstrate eco-friendly processes. Discipline “3P” components (Policy – Pedagogy – Practice) Policy Data privacy, cybersecurity, AI regulations. Covering cybersecurity, data protection Computer Science and Pedagogy regulations, and AI ethics. Engineering Conducting coding workshops
-structuredness. The integration of ethics is also an ill-structured aspect of the problem, especiallysince meeting the 20% weight reduction is a stretch goal, which the instructor is aware of but thestudents are not. In resolving ill-structured aspects present and emergent in the problem, studentsnecessarily participate in actions that constitute problem framing.Like the previous problem, resolving complexity is reflected in actions of decomposing the pedal-crank system into individual components that can be analyzed as part of the redesign process.Eventually, complexity is further resolved in synthesizing changes to individual components tounderstand the impact at the system level. Procedural and structural knowledge are necessarilydeveloped and
Isn’t Always Believing: Gender, Academic STEM, and Women Scientists’ Perceptions of Career Opportunities," Gender & Society, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 422-448, 2021, doi: 10.1177/08912432211008814.[34] I. Villanueva Alarcón and E. Moore, "Diversity, Context, and Complexity in Regenerative Medicine," Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-3, 2023.[35] R. J. Burke, "Work Stress and Women's Health: Occupational Status Effects," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 91-102, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074735, 2024/03/13/.[36] W. Shaw, S. Labott-Smith, M. M. Burg, C. Hostinar, N. Alen, M. A. L. van Tilburg, G. G. Berntson, S. M. Tovian, and M. Spirito
and II, Poster Discussion/Poster Preparation, andApplying Ethical Research. The overarching objective of these research activities was threefold:1) to cultivate an understanding of how scientists and engineers conduct their research, 2) to exposeparticipants to engineering research, and 3) to generate heightened interest in STEM fields.Engineering Scholars successfully achieved these research goals through collaborative efforts withresearch faculty mentors from both FCC and CSU-F.Notably, workshops on remote sensing prompted students to contemplate local communities andthe environment, preparing them to create posters on natural disasters. These posters wereshowcased at the 63rd Annual Geomatics Engineering Conference (Jan 24 - 25, 2024) at
Validation framework a good fit for the results to the social reality under social reality under investigation (and other similar social investigation? realities?) Ethical Validation Is the study conducted Do the findings do justice to the social reflexively, responsibly, and in reality under investigation, and the best interests of the social positively impact the people that reality under investigation? comprise it (and other similar social realities?) Process How can random influences on
technical knowledge as well as account for the social and contextual factors thatboth shape and are shaped by engineering processes and solutions. There are numerous calls(e.g., [1] - [5]) for engineering education to help students develop what we refer to as sociallyengaged engineering skills - which relate to conducting engineering work from a holistic andinclusive perspective by gathering, utilizing, and equitably applying rich and diverse contextualinformation about stakeholders, communities, ethics, the environment, and economic factors.Engineering training, long rooted in technocentric views about the nature of work in the field,has typically stressed the development of technical competencies while underemphasizingsocially engaged aspects of
Finance ZJU 1 Intelligent Public Administration ZJU 1 AI Ethics USTC, ZJU 1 Computational Healthcare ZJU 1 AI + Art Design ZJU 1 AI is an interdisciplinary field, and in terms of curriculum design, we mainly focus on AI knowledge. At the same time, we will use a certain application scenario from other disciplines as teaching assistance to help students better understand the application of AI and promote interdisciplinary research. In addition, this
-world problem-solving, students, professionals, and all who are engaged must understandthe context of the problem. Contextual understanding is rooted within disciplines of the socialsciences such as history, geography, civics, and more. Dually important is how the engagedproblem-solvers relate to the context as a sense of place or their relation to community. Theneeds of our communities guide real-world problem-solving. The increasingly urgentenvironmental, ethical, and social justice exigencies require a critical rethinking of education,particularly STEM education. This opens educational opportunities for situating learners incritical, agentive roles and supporting their tackling of challenges and controversies usingreal-world tools in
and Perceptions of Computing Predicts Students’ Sense of Belonging in Computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, pages 11–19, Toronto ON Canada, July 2019. ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-6185-9. doi: 10.1145/3291279.3339426. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3291279.3339426.[16] E. Soep, C. Lee, S. Wart, and T. Parikh. Code for what. In Popular Culture and the Civic Imagination: Case Studies of Creative Social Change, pages (pp. 89–99), 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479891252-008.[17] S. Vakil. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. In Harvard Educational Review, pages 26–52
of 17 do not see the need for or want to use the tools. Given that the tools have been widely available for about a year before the survey, the level of support is quite high.Question 8 - To what extent do faculty consider ChatGPT (or other chatbots) in other courses? ● A majority of students are in courses that use and/or require AI use. ● A majority of students are in courses that discourage the use of AI. ● There is a lack of instruction in ethical usage.Question 9 - Feel free to share some comments on why or why not you want to use ChatGPT (orother chatbots) in the future. ● Students question the value to support learning and feel it may reduce their learning. ● The responses that focus on AI reducing the rigor of
-year students in the Summer 2023 offering ofENSC 406 - Engineering Law and Ethics at SFU, which is one of the few mandatory fourth-yearcourses all students must complete as part of their degree requirements. Although the timing of thecourse offering was a pragmatic reason for starting with these students, they were also our desiredstarting point given their time and experience in an engineering program.The survey was formulated to ask questions that did not focus on program-specific issues such asduration of study, academic expectations, and course difficulty. The survey, comprising a total of 41close- and open-ended questions, covered a range topics inspired by current literature, such as identity[8] - [10] (e.g., “In what ways does your
://tennesseelookout.com/2022/02/21/suicides-at-vanderbilt-highlight-demand-for- mental-health-services/[10] B. L. Benderly, “Explosions in the Lab,” Slate, May 22, 2009. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://slate.com/technology/2009/05/what-makes-so-academic- laboratories-such-dangerous-places-to-work.html[11] A. Cohen and Y. Baruch, “Abuse and Exploitation of Doctoral Students: A Conceptual Model for Traversing a Long and Winding Road to Academia,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 505–522, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04905-1.[12] P. Hutchinson, “Health insurance is a make-or-break cost for LSU graduate assistants,” Louisiana Illuminator. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https
Ethics and Systems, 39(1), 21- 35.[6] Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International journal of management reviews, 12(4), 384-412.[7] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). Fastest growing occupations. Occupational Outlook Handbook. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/fastest-growing.htm[8] Subagja, I. K. (2020). Effect of motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance through working discipline at PT. Bamboo Tirta Engineering. International Journal of Business and Social Science Research, 1(1), 28-35.[9] San Santoso, D., & Kulathunga, H. E. R. (2016). Examining happiness: Towards better understanding of performance improvement. Procedia Engineering, 164, 354-361.[10] Chew, Y. T. E., Atay, E., &
education 6. active learning retention 7. software engineering education diversity 8. engineering design e-‐learning 9. engineering software engineering 10. diversity software engineering education 11. design engineering design 12. women in engineering pedagogy 13. collaboration gender 14. teamwork computer science 15. ethics tablet
AC 2011-452: RIGOROUS EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGI-NEERING:Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Barry is an assistant professor and course director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engi- neering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He predominately teaches in the area of engineer- ing mechanics. His current areas of research include professional ethics, economic factors influencing engineering education, identity development, and non-verbal communication. Dr. Barry is a licensed professional engineer with multiple years of consulting experience.Kathryn Purchase, United States Military Academy Major Kathryn Purchase is currently an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical
AC 2011-2761: RE-ENGINEERING THE CAPSTONE: MELDING AN IN-DUSTRY ORIENTED FRAMEWORK AND THE BOK2John V Tocco, Lawrence Technological UniversityDonald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Donald Carpenter is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and the Director of Assessment at Lawrence Technological University. Prior to being Director of Assessment, Dr. Carpenter was the Founding Director for the Center of Teaching & Learning at Lawrence Tech where he was responsible for conducting faculty development programs. In addition, Dr. Carpenter actively conducts educational and pedagogical research on teamwork, leadership, and ethical development and is Kern Fellow for En- trepreneurial Education
Page 22.1546.4attitudes among their employees.Among the Criterion 3 Program Outcomes, there are six that relate directly to leadership. Theseare: d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning j) a knowledge of contemporary issuesIndustry needs to articulate the specific competencies it wants in its leaders. Those competenciesneed to be communicated to academic leaders. Just as important
can attendfour lab divisions in a day. Corporate representative also participate in the lectures and workshops that are part of theEPICS course. Topics cover design, project management, communication, ethics, customerrelations and community involvement. Finally, corporate partners also provide financial assistance for the materials needed forthe designs. EPICS does not charge the not-for-profits for their products and corporate funding Page 22.1285.7allows this tradition to continue and add needed value to the community.Corporate PerspectivesFour of the corporate advisors, each spending weekly time with the Purdue students as
generally implemented with students working on team or class wide projects. Thesecourses, especially engineering capstone design courses, are used by universities to satisfy ABETcriteria [1]. All but one of the ABET outcomes can be satisfied with design courses, including: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data 3. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. 4. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 5. An