2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Teaching Students Essential Survival Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Critical Thinking, Digital Literacy, and Cybersecurity AwarenessTeresa Piliouras, Steffi Crasto, Chinmay Dharap, and Navarun Gupta Pui Lam Yu Department of Electrical EngineeringCenter for Advanced Research on Emerging Technologies University of Bridgeport TCR, Inc. Bridgeport, CT, United States Weston
applied infrequently in the reflections compared to the otherlevels. This work serves as a basis for understanding how students reflect on complex topics, suchas hydrostatics. In future work, this method will be applied to all six quizzes in the course.References[1] J. J. A. Selter, "Infusing Professional Skills Development into Co-op Student," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.777. 1-25.777. 3.[2] L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, J. F. Volkwein, and G. D. Peterson, "The changing face of engineering education," BRIDGE-WASHINGTON-NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING-, vol. 36, no. 2, p. 5, 2006. 14[3] S
. Affiliations include Fellow of ASME, member of ASEE, AIAA, the Penn State Alumni Association, Centre County Chapter Board of Directors, President’s Club, Nittany Lion Club. He has been honored with a LMC Leadership Award, GE Phillippe Award, PSEAS Outstanding service award, Jaycee International Senatorship, and an ESM Centennial Fellowship.Dr. John Jongho Park, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Park is an assistant research professor in the Engineering Leadership Program at Penn State Uni- versity. There is four interrelated areas of inquiry characterize Dr. Park’s scholarship: psychological attributes, professional identity development, group processes, and leadership development. Particularly, he examines
years. Awards: Alan is the recipient of the Hope of America award (1987), and the Eagle Scout award (1993). Personal: Alan lives in the Salt Lake Valley, is married, and has six children.Dr. Nick Safai, Salt Lake Community College Dr. Nick M. Safai is an ASEE Fellow. He has been an ASEE officer and member for the past 30 years. He has been the six-time elected as the Program Chair of the ASEE International Division for approximately the past 15 years. Three times as the Program Chair for the Graduate Studies Division of ASEE. Nick has had a major role in development and expansion of the ID division. Under his term as the International Division Program Chair the international division expanded, broadened in topics
Region College Educator Award for Excellence in Teaching by the American Chemical Society. He has presented at the Southeastern Arizona Teachers Academy, the ASTA Annual Conference, NSTA, ACS, and the Biennial Conference on Chemical Education (BCCE). He is a member of ASEE, ASTA, NSTA, AAPT, ACS, and 2YC3. He is the current membership secretary of ASTA, a position which he has held since 2010. He has been a volunteer with the Boy Scouts of America for the past 25 years and was a recipient of the Silver Beaver Award. For the past 12 years, he has served as Dean of Instruction, while continuing to teach Organic Chemistry.Dr. Clark Vangilder, Central Arizona College c American Society for
interview questions but also look at intersectionalityand combine the qualitative analysis with the findings of our ongoing quantitative studies.MethodsThe qualitative pilot study was designed to contribute to overarching project goals, by providingstudent voices and discovering the reasons behind disparities in representation. We piloted aninterview protocol with undergraduate students for qualitative data collection and analysis tocomplement the ongoing quantitative study. This paper/poster focuses on the portion of thequalitative analysis that answers the research questions in Section Introduction and Motivation.The interview protocol was IRB-approved in all participating institutions (IRB protocol numbers:1354049, 2019 SP 59-R, and 201331
Paper ID #27175Stuck on the Verge or Perpetually Reinventing? What Papers from the 2018Annual Conference Tell Us about Change and Continuity in Liberal Educa-tion for EngineersDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders. c American Society for
a Graduate Assistant for the UBelong Collaborative.Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh Anne-Ketura Elie earned a BS degree in 2019 in psychology from the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. She is currently a graduate student researcher at the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her research interests are the factors that foster sense of belonging in academic settings, more specifi- cally teacher-student relationship factors that promote student’s sense of belonging and adaptive meaning making. Ms. Elie is also a member of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She is an Assistant ProfesShea E. LapeAlison Casson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Open-ended Modeling Problems and Engineering IdentityAbstractEngineering identity is an integral determinant of academic success in engineering school, as itallows students to have an understanding of themselves in relation to what they study. Studies inengineering and other STEM disciplines have shown a positive correlation between identity andretention. Previous
Paper ID #17689Ethics and ArtifactsDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology, where she has taught for nearly four decades. She has been a member of ASEE for 32 years and is active in the Engineering Ethics Division, as past chair, and the Engineering Technology Division, as communi- cations editor the the Journal of Engineering Technology. She is an ASEE fellow (2008), winner of the James McGraw Award (2010), winner of the Berger Award (2013), and serves as the communications editor of the Journal of
.[8] S. A. Atwood, M. T. Siniawski, and A. R. Carberry, “Using standards-based grading to effectively assess project-based design courses,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[9] T. Guskey, “Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s ‘Learning for Mastery,’” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 8–31, 2007.[10] A. R. Carberry, M. Siniawski, S. A. Atwood, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Best practices for using standards-based grading in engineering courses,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[11] D. Lewis, “Student anxiety in standards-based grading in mathematics courses,” Inno. High. Educ., 2019.[12] B. S. Bloom, “Time and learning,” Am. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 9, pp
Mechanical Engineering at Florida Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on the impact of motivation on performance and persistence in mechanical engineering design courses under the guidance of Dr. Beshoy Morkos. She also serves as a graduate student advisor to senior design teams within the mechanical engineering department. Elisabeth is a member of ASME, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society and Pi Tau Sigma International Mechanical Engineering Honor Society.Miss McKenzie Carol Clark, Florida Institute of TechnologyDr. Beshoy Morkos, Florida Institute of Technology Beshoy Morkos is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology where he
. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 To Be or Not to Be: A Dialogic Discussion of Two Researchers’ Hidden and Transitioning Identities Introduction Simplicities are enormously complex. Consider the sentence “I am”. With this opening adapted from a poem by Richard O. Moore (2010), we emphasize howsome of the simplest aspects of the human experience contain vast complexity: identity;belonging; education; justice. The CoNECD community focuses on these aspects and centers thescholarship and practice of equity and
research at the Curricular Analytics Lab focuses on using machine learning and data analysis to enhance educational outcomes. Key contributions include developing a cohort-tracking analytics platform that assists in improving graduation rates by addressing curricular barriers. Melika has co-authored papers presented at conferences such as the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, exploring the intersection of curriculum complexity and student performance. Her technical proficiency spans multiple programming languages and cloud computing, furthering her research into innovative educational technologies.Kristina A Manasil, The University of Arizona Kristi Manasil is a first-year PhD student in the School of
. Kajfez and L. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[4] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, “Development of professional identity through socialization in graduate school,” J Stud Aff Res Pract, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 69–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1515/JSARP-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.[5] T. Luft and R. Roughly, “Engaging the Reflexive Self: The Role of Reflective Practice for Supporting Professional Identity Development in Graduate Students,” Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students Proven Practices in Higher Education, pp. 53–62, 2016.[6] H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, M. A
2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Grad- uate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple iden- tities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the
Learning TrajectoriesDr. Cindy Rottmann, Prof. Doug Reeve, Dr. Serhiy Kovalchuk, Mike Klassen, Milan Majkovic, Prof. Emily MooreTroost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead)Paper accepted to the 126th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition—Tampa, Florida, June 16-19, 2019. To be published in the ASEE conference proceedings on June 16th, 2019.Abstract:In the early 1950s, many science and technology focused organizations in the United States andCanada began to formalize a technical career track to accommodate the professional aspirationsof engineers reluctant to abandon technical work for management [1-7]. While the resulting dualcareer track model
recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 62 journal articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 118 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,000 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
pathways to equity. The program culminates with an optional online competition with studentsubmissions judged by industry professionals. This program has been ongoing since the 2019-2020 school year, and program evaluation efforts have been undertaken since the program’sinception. Participatory evaluation framework principles were followed, including a process toobtain input from program leaders and staff to create program goals and a logic model that mapsout the program’s activities and how these link to the goals. The evaluation includes thecollection of data from all program participants (i.e., teachers, students, and judges) via onlinesurveys conducted immediately after the conclusion of the online competition. In these onlinesurveys
to develop, implement, and refine an out-of-school elementary engineering program.An overarching goal in this effort is to uncover what roles and methods parents, mentors,parents, and other community members might play in developing student awareness, interest,and preparation for engineering careers. Families were recruited for participation throughinformational fliers, social media posts, and partnerships with local community organizations(e.g., Boys & Girls Clubs, local schools, public libraries). Programs occurred between Januaryand June of each year (2019-2022). While aspects of the program evolved to meet the specificneeds and circumstances of participating families, the general program, materials, and projectformats remained