Collection

2015 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Jessica L. Isaacs; Anthony Bellezza; Vicki Brown

score out of 80 pointswas determined for each team. 5: Excellent, 4: Above average, 3: Average, 2: Below average, 1: Poor Pitch Video/Q&A Content1. Product/concept was clearly conveyed2. Idea(s) were realistic/feasible3. Motivation/need for product was clearly addressed4. Market clearly identified5. Addressed all necessary components in detail6. Well organized with clear introduction of topic/idea, leading up to conflict and resolution with summary of key points/highlights7. Explains what their product/idea does and how it adds value8. Described why their product/idea is unique and different (and/or better)1. Knew material/answers to questions2. Spoke at

Collection

2015 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Kathryn Schulte Grahame; Diane Schilder; Christos Zahopoulos

of Engineering’ E ’s female ennrollment of 25%). Moreeover,the majorrity of the peersisting stud dents remainned minorityy as shown inn Figure 1. Figure 1. Race/Ethn nicity of Perrsisting Stud dents Hispaniic African n American Asian Mixed 9% % 4% 22

Collection

2015 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Ronald Gonzales; Alan Watkins; Chris Simpson

analysis of asecond packet capture (pcap) file. The pcap files are used from a previous and publicly availableNetwork Forensics contest [5]. Utilizing a pcap file, the students learn to extract a transmitted fileand locate information in a TCP connection stream. Next, students replay a TCP file from an oldhoneynet scan of the monthly contest and learn how to review and analyze alerts in Snorby andsquil [6]. Once students are familiar with these tools, they are given another task named “AnnSkips Bail” [7]. The purpose of this lab is to find some specific data in the pcap files. Onechallenge to using publicly available contests, is the easy availability of answers; especially forolder contests. In addition to answering the specific question(s

Collection

2015 ASEE Zone 3 Conference

Authors

Heath Schluterman; Candace Rainwater; Leslie Massey

topics such as fundamentals where some studentshad been exposed to the concepts in high school as well as in the chemistry and physics coursesthey were taking alongside the Introduction to Engineering class. Similarly, when it came tolearning to use Microsoft Excel, some student s were experts while others had never seen itbefore. Lecturing on how to use excel had the additional problem of one student halting theentire class of fifty since we were teaching sequential steps. In our flipped classroom model, thedevised process for each assignment was students watch video lectures, complete an electronic“Concept Quiz”, complete the necessary calculations or questions on a provided worksheet, andfinally complete the assignment by submitting the

Collection

2015 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu; Rajan Chandra

their peers and they are graded by their peers and the instructor(s).At the end of the academic year, we expect to finish the following additional supplemental items: a. A customized website that provides introduction to any topics in the C++ environment with many examples to support the chosen topic. b. An online tool that will allow students to debug, run, and study the behavior of their codes. This tool will accomplish the goal by accessing a C++ compiler on a remote server or Chromebook. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Design in the First Year: Challenges and Successes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines; M Brunhart-Lupo, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

longterm benefits of the design solution to the client and end users. These descriptions, justificationsand evidence are gained through thinking, in a reflective manner, about the ramifications of whatthe students are designing to solve the problem(s) presented by the project client.Research MethodologyA weekly reflective journal assignment was given to approximately 50 students during each ofour fall and spring semesters, using a template containing sixteen rows and three columns. Eachrow corresponded to a specific week in the semester. The columns contained responses to thesequestions: What did you learn? Why is it important? Where else could you use it? During eachweek, students identified a specific skill, concept or insight that they learned

Collection

2015 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Christine Cassel, National Quality Forum

Computer Science and integrative Joe McCannon, ConsultantBiology, University of Texas at Austin William B. Rouse, Director of the Center for Complex SystemsJames P. Bagian, Director, Center for Healthcare Engineering and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technologyand Patient Safety Elizabeth Teisberg, Professor of Family and communityMelinda Buntin, Chair of the Department of Health Policy, Medicine, Dartmouth CollegeVanderbilt University School of Medicine Deryk Van Brunt, President and Chairman, HealthyMolly Joel Coye, Chief Innovation Officer, UCLA Health System Communities InstituteGary S. Kaplan, Chairman and CEO, Virginia Mason Health

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 16: That Important Decision - Which Engineering Major?

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University; James Warnock, Mississippi State University; Amy Barton, Mississippi State University; Rani Warsi Sullivan, Mississippi State University; Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University; Jane Nicholson Moorhead, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

in multiple categories, following recommendations by Reid and his coauthors,we identified the top one or two content classifications for each course based on the percentageof subtopics covered in the course and the percentage of course time dedicated to each topic. Table 1. Summary Of Eight Department Introduction to Engineering Courses Typical Primary Credit Contact Department FYE Course(s) Course Content Hours Hours

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum Design and Evaluation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cory J. Prust, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Richard W. Kelnhofer, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Joerg Mossbrucker, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Kerry R Widder, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Hue V. Tran P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Stephen M. Williams P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

engineering curriculum is not new. Many engineeringprograms meet EAC of ABET General Criterion 5 requirements through the use of project-basedsenior design course(s). Project-based design courses have been shown to have positive impacton professional skills post-graduation3. However, such courses occur at the end of thecurriculum and the ability to study the impact on the curriculum as a whole is not possible.Oregon State University demonstrated the use and benefits of a robotics project-based courseearly in an electrical engineering curriculum4,5 with the TekBot platform. Since that time otherengineering programs have implemented and studied the impact of project-based roboticscourses early in the curriculum. As an example, the United States Naval

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University; Meisha Nicole Berg, Iowa State University; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Wesley Teerlink, Penn State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

solutions can vary drasticallybased on the perceived size of the solution space of the problem as a whole.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation, Research in EngineeringEducation (REE) Grants #1264715, #1265018, and #1264551.References1. Silk EM, Daly SR, Jablokow KW, Yilmaz S, Rosenberg M. (2014). The design problem framework: Using adaption-innovation theory to construct design problem statements. Annual Conference of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), June 16-18, Indianapolis, IN2. Brophy DR (2001) Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creat Res J 13:439–4553. Liu Y-C, Chakrabarti A, Bligh T (2003) Towards an

Conference Session

Faculty Development I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jim L Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: What Effective Teachers Think. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington) June, 2006.2. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J. & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.3. Clark, C. M. (1995). Thoughtful Teaching. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.4. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1979). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 6. (pp. 157-185). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publisher.5. Carberry, A. R. (2014). Investigating the role teacher and student engineering epistemological beliefs plan in engineering education. In J. Heywood & A. Cheville (Eds

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gustavo Lopez, Universidad de Costa Rica; Francisco Cocozza, CITIC; Alexandra Martinez, Universidad de Costa Rica; Marcelo Jenkins, University of Costa Rica

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

of the Fifth International Conference on Quality Software, pages 313–316, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.2. T. Y. Chen and P.-L. Poon. Experience with teaching black-box testing in a computer science/software engineering curriculum. IEEE Trans. on Educ., 47(1):42–50, Feb. 2004.3. Z. Chen, J. Zhang, and B. Luo. Teaching software testing methods based on diversity principles. In Proceedings of the 2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pages 391–395, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society.4. S. H. Edwards. Improving student performance by evaluating how well students test their own programs. J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 3(3), Sept. 2003.5. S. Elbaum, S

Conference Session

Data Analysis and Assessment

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David B. Knight, Virginia Tech, Department of Engineering Education; Cory Brozina, Virginia Tech; Eric M. Stauffer, Virginia Tech; Chris Frisina, Virginia Tech; Troy D. Abel, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 9–17). ACM. doi:10.1145/2090116.20901185 Few, S. (2006). Information dashboard design: the effective visual communication of data (1st ed.). Beijing ; Cambride [MA]: O’Reilly.6 Malik, S. (2005). Enterprise dashboards: design and best practices for IT. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley.7 Siemens, G. (2014). Supporting and promoting learning analytics research. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(1), 3– 5.8 Siemens, G. (2012). Learning analytics: envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ACM: 4

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Christopher Martinez, University of New Haven; Mark J Graham Ph.D., Yale University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Engineering Education, 2015 Development and Implementation of a Pathway Assessment Model for the ASPIRE ProgramAbstractThe University of New Haven received S-STEM funding for A Scholarship Program to IncreaseRetention in Engineering (ASPIRE): Improving Work-Study-Life Balance. The goal of the 5 yearprogram is to improve retention, particularly in the sophomore and junior years, for engineeringstudents who show academic potential but are at risk of not completing their studies due tofinancial concerns and/or life-work-study balance issues. The ASPIRE program aims toaccomplish this by: providing scholarships for sophomore and junior level matriculated studentsbased on both financial need and merit; recruiting and

Conference Session

Two-year College Division: Authors Address Transfer Matters-Part I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University; Anita Grierson, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

, and multivariable control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited presentations - 13 plenary - at international and national forums, conferences and corporations. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research academic success and professional development (ASAP) program that has served over 500 students. These efforts have been supported by NSF STEP, S-STEM, and CSEM grants as well as industry. Dr. Rodriguez’ research inter- ests include: control of nonlinear distributed parameter, and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment (FAME); design and control of micro-air vehicles

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenahvive K. Morgan, Rowan University; Mario J. Leone, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

://www.ifmachines.com/, accessed March 2015.3. Adafruit (2015) “About Us,” http://www.adafruit.com/about, accessed March 2015.4. Adafruit (2015) “Wearable Electronics,” http://www.adafruit.com/beckystern, accessed March 2015.5. Goulev, P., Stead, L., Mamdani, E. and Evans, C. (2004). “Computer aided emotional fashion.” Computers & Graphics. 28(5), 657–66.6. Catrysse, M., Puers, R., Hertleer, C.,Van Langenhove, L., Van Egmond, H., Matthys, D. (2004). “Towards the integration of textile sensors in a wireless monitoring suit.” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 114(2-3), 302– 311.7. Dunne, L.E., Brady, S., Smyth, B., Diamond, D. (2005). “Initial development and testing of a novel foam-based pressure sensor for wearable

Conference Session

Curriculum and New Course Development in ET

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Huiru Shih P.E., Jackson State University; Pao-Chiang Yuan; Richterica Tukiya Ford; Thomasina Jenkins

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Homeland Page 26.668.3Security S & T professionals, Mississippi Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting, and ATMAEAnnual Conference. The students had the opportunities to present research papers, participate inworkshops and social events, as well as to interact with the representatives from federal, state,and local governments, hospitals, charity organizations, and private sector.During the past several years, the EMT program has placed students into internship positions atthe National Transportation Security Center of Excellence at Tougaloo College, NationalWeather Service (Jackson, Mississippi), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tobias Rossmann, Lafayette College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

of the historical case studiespresented in class as well as to apply the risk assessment tools developed during the seminar.Final papers were judged using the same rubric as the initial writing assignment. On averagestudents’ understanding of ethical concepts more than doubled to 4.3 out of 5 as did their abilityto apply risk assessment tools to ethical problems (4.1 out of 5).AcknowledgmentsThe development of this seminar was partially supported by the John J. and Dorothy Byrne FirstYear Seminar Program Endowment at Rutgers University.References1 Haws, D.R. (2001). Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis. ASEE Journal ofEngineering Education, 90:2, 223-229.2 Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kumar Yelamarthi, Central Michigan University; Eron E. Drake, Central Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

identify the applicationsof digital circuits, perform simulations, and conduct experiments firsthand. As a result, they havea better grasp of the subject, and have a better understanding and significance of digital circuits.The proposed format became very attractive to students as they were able to see the benefits intheir learning during a short span of time, and were better prepared for future courses inengineering disciplines.Bibliography1. A. Ganago, H. Liao, “Student learning in a required Electrical Engineering (EE) course for non-EE majors: Perception of values for future work in multidisciplinary teams,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2013.2. D. G. Rosa-Pohl, S. A

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

and team activities that directly contributed to theachievement of learning outcomes. The effectiveness of peer evaluation will also be assessed inthe future.References Page 26.1074.101. ABET, Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2010, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” ABETInc, Baltimore, MD.2. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., Ross, G., 1976, “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving,” Journal of Psychology andPsychiatry, 17, pp. 89-100.3. Bender, W. N., 2012, “Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21 st Century,” Corwin Press.4. Boss, S., Krauss, J., 2007, “Reinventing Project-Based Learning,” International

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric A Holt, University of Nebraska ; Scott Kelting, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

course increased my knowledge of the subject. 208 103 13 3 0 4.55 5. The examples and activities helped me understand 157 113 47 8 0 4.24 the information. 6. I could follow along with the instructor(s) in the 241 74 10 0 0 4.65 student guide. 7. I was encouraged to ask questions and participate 219 84 23 1 0 4.57 throughout class. Page 26.1088.6 8. The course prepared me for the test. 205 87 24 2 0 4.40 9. I would recommend this course to others. 208 85 25 7 0 4.47 10. Overall, the course met my

Conference Session

Make It!

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, organization is key for this experience! 3. For each dye: • Wet the fabrics thoroughly with warm water • Dip the fabrics in the dye for about five minutes • Remove the fabrics from the dye, squeeze out until damp, and arrange to dry • As you arrange them to dry, keep track of mordant/dye combination!Assignment: Due 3/5/14Arrange your dry fabric swatches in a pattern so you can draw conclusions about theeffect of mordant and fabric type. You may cut the fabric if you wish. Hand in thearrangement(s) along with the worksheet (below).Name: ___________________________________Dyeing Conclusions (available on Moodle)Effect of:Fabric Type

Conference Session

General Technical Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Geoffrey Brown, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

.  Prosser.  Engineering  students'  conceptions  of  and  approaches  to  learning  through  discussions  in  face-­‐to-­‐face  and  online  contexts.  Learning  and   63   19.9%  Instruction,  18(3),  267-­‐282.  2008.    R.A.  Ellis,  P.,  Goodyear,  M.  Prosser,  A.  &  O'Hara.  How  and  what  university  students  learn  through  online  and  face-­‐to-­‐face  discussion:  Conceptions,  intentions  and  approaches.  Journal   51   16.1%  of  Computer  Assisted  Learning,  22(4),  244-­‐256.  2006.    S.  Ozkan  &  R.  Koseler.  Multi-­‐dimensional  students’  evaluation  of  e-­‐learning  systems  in  the  higher  education  context:  An  empirical

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 16: That Important Decision - Which Engineering Major?

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry L. Meyers, Youngstown State University; Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Kathleen A Harper, The Ohio State University; Victoria E Goodrich, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

taught a variety of classes ranging introductory programming and first-year engineering design courses to introductory and advanced courses in electronic circuits. He is a member of ASEE, IEEE, and ACM.Dr. Kathleen A Harper, The Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and college of

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Curricular and Program Innovations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rolfe Josef Sassenfeld, New Mexico State University; John Ross Tapia, New Mexico State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

profession. 4. Develop flow diagram construction and structured programming skills in MATLAB. 5. Learn the use of engineering tools (spreadsheets, drawing software, math, economics, etc.) 6. Become knowledgeable of dimensions (length, time, mass, force, temperature, electric current, energy and power) and related engineering parameters. Page 26.1461.4Instructional approaches, the flipped classroomA key aspect with respect to ENGR100’s instructional approach was the decision to implementthe flipped classroom, often referred to as “Learn before Lecture”. The professors were asked toimplement this strategy in each of their

Conference Session

Latest Trends and Implementations in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Esther Rodriguez-Silva Ph.D.; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

manufacturing or other related fields withincolleges of Engineering in a reasonably representative manner.Popescu (2012) outlines the following five attributes for engineering students to be successful ina global environment: a) ability to appreciate other cultures; b) ability to work in diverse teamenvironments; c) ability to communicate in cross culture environments; d) experience orexposure to engineering in a global context; and e) ability to deal with ethical issues emanatingfrom cultural and national differences. Specking et al. (2013) performed a comparative study oftwo universities (University of Arkansas, a public university, and Stevens Institute ofTechnology, a private university) to investigate as to what factor(s) is (are) keeping

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University; Frazier Benya, National Academy of Engineering; Karin Ellison, Arizona State University; Rachelle D. Hollander, National Academy of Engineering; Kelly Laas, Center for the Study of Ethics, Illinois Institute of Technology; Simil L Raghavan, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

-EB main activities in the first year of the project have been recruiting members andreviewing current site materials. The LES-EB reviewed a number of existing OEC casematerials; key measures concerning content—including the content “area(s)” portrayed in eachcase and whether the case raised “ethics and society” (macroethical) issues—reinforced the needto develop additional materials. Regarding content areas, the review showed that the existingcollection only has substantial sets of resources for “genetics and genomics” and “biomedicalsciences.” Only these fields had more than 15 resources when reviewers assigned cases tosubfields within the life and environmental sciences using a modified version of the taxonomy oflife science graduate

Conference Session

Aerospace Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hüseyin Sarper, Old Dominion University; Linda Vahala, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

and ejection delay (3). The rocket was observed to be still climbing briefly before beginning its descend, but after the ejection charge. It is reasonable to assume that the remaining time (1.23 seconds) was due to that brief observation. There were 19 other team launches using A8-3 engine. Not all results were as close as the ones reported from this student team report.AVION FLIGHT 25 :Rocket: Avion Engine: B6-4 The model weight: 28.46 g (heavier than most due to optionalspray paint used). Total weight including engine (Wo) = 46.75 grams ,propellant weight (Wp) =6.24 grams Impulse (I) = 5.00 N-s , Thrust Duration (Δt) = 0.8 sec. 1. Average Weight to Burnout (Wb) a. b. Converted to Pounds: 2. Thrust

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University; Thomas L. Merrill, Rowan University; Mary Staehle, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

://www.bls.gov/ May 8, 2011. 3 Farrell, S. J. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, R. Polikar, M. Staehle, J. Vernengo 4 Dean J, Schechter AN. “Sickle-cell anemia: molecular and cellular bases of therapeutic approaches,” New England Journal of Medicine. 1978;299:752-63. 5 Horne M. “Sickle cell anemia as a rheological disease.” The American Journal of Medicine. 1981;70:288-98. 6 Merrill E. “Rheology of Blood,” Physiol Rev. 1969;49:863-88. 7 Purdy, C., J. Vernengo and S. Farrell, “Teaching Fundamental Concepts of Rheology within the Context of Sickle Cell Anemia”, Chemical Engineering Education, 48(3), 2014. 8 Lysaght, M.J. Boggs, D.R. and Taimisto, M.H., “Membranes in Artificial Organs,” in Synthetic Membranes, M.B. Chenoweth, ed., Hardwood Academic Publishers, Chur

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: It's All About Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Gerold Willing, University of Louisville; Thomas D. Rockaway, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

their degree program. The UTAs will be trackedthrough their curriculum to determine if this has an impact in their advanced courses and theirfuture career paths. It is anticipated that the deeper understanding of the materials gained bybeing a UTA will entice them to take more rigorous courses as they matriculate. It is possiblethat the teaching experience may influence them to pursue an academic career at either theprimary, secondary or collegiate levels.4. AcknowledgementsPartnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science (PRIMES),National Science Foundation Project NSF-08569, $1,997,451, June 1, 2011 – May 31, 2016.Bibliography1. Otero, V., Pollock, S. & Finkelstein, N. A physics department’s role in