prevents a lengthy divergence into these the arena of arts based researchand design thinking, we briefly define them next. Class assignments were developed within adesign thinking framework of human-centered design developed by the global design firmIDEO (Ideo, 2015). We developed assignments--Projects and Provocations (more on thoselater) keeping in mind IDEO’s Mindset elements of Empathy, Iteration, Creative Confidence,Making, Embracing Ambiguity, and Learning from Failure. Course activities also incorporateddesign thinking concepts of Ideation and Implementation methods to evaluate research, defineproblems, establish audience/s, and develop solutions. In addition to design thinking methods,we were inspired by the methods of the emerging field
international policies on entrepreneurship and engineering education.References 1. Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., and Elber, S. (2008) Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re- Organization of Engineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (4) 433-447.2. Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P.T., & Volkein, J. F. (2006) Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000. ABET: Baltimore3. ABET (n/d). Criteria from Accrediting Engineering Programs-Proposed Changes. Retrieved from: http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Proposed-Revisions-to-EAC-Criteria-3-and-5.pdf4. ABET. 2016-2017 Rationale for Revising Criteria 3 and 5. Retrieved from: http
CPS grant1329742.References[1] R. Lynn, “Enhancing Awareness of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturability with Voxel-Based Simlations,” Georgia Institute of Technology, 2017.[2] R. H. Todd, W. E. Red, S. P. Magleby, and S. Coe, “Manufacturing: a strategic opportunity for engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. July, pp. 397–405, 2001.[3] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2014.[4] Min Jou, “Development of an e-learning system for teaching machining technology,” in Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Active Media Technology, 2005. (AMT 2005)., pp. 347–352.[5] J.-D. Kim and M.-H. Kim, “A study on the
interdisciplinarySTEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEMEducation, 1(6), 1–7.Berland, L. K. (2013). "Designing for STEM Integration." Journal of Pre-College EngineeringEducation 3(1): 22-31.Birgili, B. (2015). "Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based LearningEnvironments." Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 2(2): 71-80.Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomyof educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook I: Cognitive domain.New York.Blumenfeld, P. C., E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial and A. Palincsar (1991)."MOTIVATING PROJECT-BASED LEARNING - SUSTAINING THE DOING,SUPPORTING THE
, ismore advantageous than traditional lecturing in improving student performance across the STEMfields and across all class sizes. This aligns well with the need in the engineering mechanicsclasses to engage student in qualitative judgement activities for active learning.Several studies have been conducted on demonstrations for engineering courses. Vander Schaafand Klosky [12], Welch and Klosky [13] presented demonstrations for solid mechanics to linktheory to the students’ natural knowledge and excite interest in the course. Paul. S. Steif andAnna Dollár [14, 15, 16] developed demonstrations on statics along with concept questions thatinvolved students applying forces with their hands or body to make force and moment conceptsmore perceivable in
, TechnologyEngineering and Math Education (C-STEM). One of the authors began teaching an “Introductionto 3D Printing & Design” class in the summer of 2016, and the C-STEM purchased threeFusion3 F-400S’s, an FDM machine, specifically for the class (see Figure 11). The C-STEM hasallowed the Library to keep one of the machines on loan. The F400-S was chosen because itallows the use of a wide range of printing materials such as PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG,Polycarbonate, PC-ABS, Flexible, Polyesters, Acrylic, Soluble, and more.43 Its build volume of14.0 in x 14.0 in x 12.60 in (355 x 355 x 320 mm) is also more than two times larger than theLulzbot TAZ 5 and five times larger than the FlashForge. Between the three printers, the 3DPrint Studio can print almost any model
laboratory environments.Acknowledgement This research is funded by the National Science Foundation NSF NRI #1527148. Anyopinions, findings, or conclusions found in this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.References1. National Robotics Initiative 2.0: Ubiquitous Collaborative Robots (NRI-2.0) (nsf17518) | NSF - National Science Foundation.2. Tucker C, Kumara S. An Automated Object-Task Mining Model for Providing Students with Real Time Performance Feedback. In: ; 2015:26.178.1-26.178.13.3. Hu Q, Bezawada S, Gray A, Tucker C, Brick T. Exploring the Link Between Task Complexity and Students’ Affective States During Engineering Laboratory Activities. In: ASME 2016
to solar panel. future paper.Accomplishments included fabrication of a solar-powered DAQ system, submission of a writtenproposal for an intended application of their sensor(s), and an oral presentation to the class of theproject results. Students voluntarily completed an end-of-semester survey on their achievementof the intended goals. Forty-seven students completed the course (eight were not declaredchemical engineers or freshmen); an additional five dropped the course within the first fewweeks of class. Thirty working solar-panel boxes were completed for twenty-three individual orteam projects (all students completed initial machine shop training), and thirty-seven surveyswere completed (79% response rate). One professor lectured
-informed treatment of flow coefficient and/or friction. 45 Muzzle Sensor 40 Backstop Isothermal 35 Adiabatic Compressible Flow Model, Cv=1.25 30 Exit Velocity (m/s) 25 20 15 10 5 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Paper ID #19149Capstone - Rules of EngagementDr. Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Filippas received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Patras, Greece. After earn- ing her M. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Texas at Austin, she completed post-doctoral research with the Institute of Accelerating Systems and Applications in Athens, Greece. Post-academically, she worked for Ansoft Corporation as a research scientist spearheading the development of the next genera- tion code for Ansoft DesignerTM. Dr. Filippas joined Virginia Commonwealth University as an Assistant
exponential functions such as e2x correctly. Most students or in some cases the entireclass did not completely answer the thermodynamics questions correctly. For example none ofstudents completely answered the following question correctly. For a single component fluid (e.g.,water) in the two-phase saturation region, which of the following properties defines the state (areindependent pair of properties)? Circle all correct pair of properties: a) P and v, b) P and s, c) P and T,d) v and x, e) T and x, f) u and v.Most students could not correctly simplify the following general rate equations as applied to acontrol volumes with single inlet and outlet under specified conditions. dmcv dt m m i
constructs, we would not necessarily expect that these two facultygroups share similar pedagogical approaches.Our data also reveal a correlation between ILS alignment score and pedagogical choices, with ahigher A-R or S-G misalignment corresponding to a more lecture-centric teaching approach.Faculty with higher mismatch on the S-I and V-V dimensions tended to use more of the research-based pedagogies including active and collaborative learning.Are ILS results a proxy for expertise in this case?In reflecting on these results, one cannot help but wonder why the ILS misalignment betweenfaculty and students is so dramatic across several ILS dimensions—more dramatic than has beenpreviously reported[31]. This observation is intriguing, and acknowledging
, electro-mechanical technology, passive technology, information technology and advanced materialtechnology. This categorization is based on the types of actuating technologies used in responsive 4Fig.1: Sensing, actuating and control technologies used in responsive facade systems 5facade systems. Also, a system with integrated technology is proposed by integrating passive andactive systems, which utilizes the advantages of both systems.Mechanical Technology and Responsive FacadesThe previously discussed factors triggered the need for transition from traditional static facades toautomated facades. The common architectural slogan in the 1960’s was “make a
literature review and what 3 Support table & Map for topic must it contain? Support & Map Topic Devel. & Readings. Fine tune literature map, What possible research structure(s) & ethical issues 4 identify research discipline or genre should be consider for your thesis topic? Ethics Philosophy & K & R Ch. 1 & 7, Bring journal article How do research philosophy, scientific theory & 5 with methodology you might use methodology impact research outcome? Methodologies
; Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’ s Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 7, 368–381. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08Forbes-Lorman, R. M., Harris, M. A., Chang, W. S., Dent, E. W., Nordheim, E. V., & Franzen, M. A. (2016). Physical models have gender-specific effects on student understanding of protein structure-function relationships. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 1– 10. http://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20956Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of
research, 24(3), 366-385.3. Branford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National Academies Press, Washington.4. Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.5. Butler, D. L. & Winne, P. H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.6. Yorke, M (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and thenhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501.7. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A
used to rank eachcandidate in which a low GPA would not automatically disqualify an applicant as long as therewere other positive aspects within the application. Positive aspects included: extracurricularactivities that demonstrate ability to work on a team, personal statement demonstrates a passionfor a particular area of research that matches the planned REU projects, no prior researchexperience, home institution lacks research opportunities, high GPA in particular course(s),and/or exceptional recommendation letter(s). At least six quality applicants from the target poolwere selected. The remaining four slots would go to the highest ranked applicant in either targetor non-target pool.The only factor that could automatically disqualify an
purposes.32Additionally, engineering habits of mind may involve skills such as spatial thinking orsystems thinking that are geared at manipulation of geometrical designs20 but in this article,we are rather interested in the essence of S&E thinking so we may be able to promote it atearly grades in K-12.3. Relevant literatureConfidence in our understanding of how the mind works has been hindered by the fact that itinvolves a delicate, inaccessible, and complicated organ, the brain. Yet, technology hasrecently broken some of the barriers to understanding its functions. Neuroscientists useimaging techniques to understand brain mechanisms that take part in receiving, storing,retrieving, and processing information. Cognitive psychologists use
instructor: I mean I loved the teacher that we had. He was an awesome teacher. He would engage with us on a personal level. I mean, not extremely personal, but more of— he would break into the world that we know. Um, so that we could translate the material that he was teaching us into understandable experience[s], like our phones, or the computers that we have or laptops. Just, or just even everyday examples. . . Just—examples like that would help me, um, cope with like, with the things that I actually didn’t know, and was trying to learn from him.David felt warmth toward the instructor, and he described how this instructor taught in a waythat made the course topics easy to understand, and relatable to the
Paper ID #20240Enculturation of Diverse Students to the Engineering Practices through First-Year Engineering ExperiencesDr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, taught at Northwestern for Fall 1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engineering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods
Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education,” Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 40, No. 5, Sep/Oct 1999, pp. 518-529.[3] Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21), Learning for the 21st Century: A Report and MILE Guide for 21 st Century Skills, Washington, DC: P21, 2003. Web: http://www.p21.org/our- work/resources.[4] Deci, E. L., and Flaste, R, Why we do what we do: the dynamics of personal autonomy, New York: Putnam’s Sons, 1995.[5] Pink, D., Drive: the Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, New York, NY: The Penguin Group, 2009.[6] Hirsch, L., Gibbons, S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., and Bloom, J., “High school students' attitudes to and knowledge about engineering
discussed in this paper: 2. Demonstrate creativity, in the context of engineering problem-solving. 6. Function effectively on multidisciplinary teams. 10. Speak effectively. 11. Incorporate knowledge of contemporary issues into the solution of engineering problems.Recognizing that the Department’s mission statement includes educating and inspiring, the civilengineering faculty have sought to develop their program appropriately along a set of commonlyaccepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy. These widely known taxonomiesare based on the seminar work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom.The committee established a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning
analyze teaching in traditional versus innovativeclassrooms. Proc 2nd Joint EMBS-BMES ConfHerreid C, Schiller NA. 2013. Case studies and the flipped classroom. J College Sci Teaching42:62-66Roehl A, Reddy S, Linga S, Gayla J. 2013. The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engagemillennial students through active learning strategies. J Family Consumer Sci 105:44-49Roselli RJ, Brophy SP. 2003. Redesigning a biomechanics course using challenge-basedinstruction. Eng Med Biol IEEE 22:66-70. DOI 10.1109/MEMB.2003.1237504Schwartz DL, Bransford JD. 1998. A time for telling. Cogn Instruct 16:475-522Silverthorn DU. 2006. Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. Adv Physiol Educ30:135-140. DOI 10.1152/advan.00087.2006Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted
mirrors was calculated to ensure that none of the mirrors detachwhenever the disc is rotated at a high speed. The centrifugal force was calculated in thefollowing process.The angular to linear velocity formula is ω 𝑣E 𝑣E = 𝑟×𝜔, (9a)wherevt = Linear velocity in m/s rr = Radius in meterω = Angular velocity in rad/s.The revolution per minute (RPM) to Equation (9a) is𝑣E = 𝑟×𝑅𝑃𝑀× *K (9b) Figure 10: Linear Velocity LM
and the outcomes of suchopportunities help prepare the future professionals of the construction industry.References1 Wandahl, S. & Ussing, L. F. (2016). Facilitating Industrial Placement in the Construction Engineering Curriculum.Construction Research Congress.2 Weber, S.L. (1998). Field Internships for Construction Studies: A Survey. ASC Proceedings of the 34th AnnualConference Central Connecticut State University- New Britain, Connecticut, April 15 - 18, 1998.3 Chapin, T., Roudenbush, W., & Krone, S. (2003). Cooperative education in the Associated Schools ofConstruction. Journal of Construction Education, 56-68.4 Rondinelli, D.F., Allen, S. Y. and Hauck, A. J. (2000). Impact of Structured Internship Programs on StudentPerformance in
devices, an optional 4-day course on engineering of musicalinstruments, and an opportunity for students to get together and speak about their experiencesthrough guided storytelling. We will report on the results of these programs at a later date.BibliographyASEE (2014). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering,Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles.Alon, S. (2005). Model mis-specification in assessing the impact of financial aid on academicoutcomes. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 109–125.Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in collegegraduation rates by institutional
where the student explains how s/he solved the problem. To answer thissection, we ask the students to imagine that they are trying to explain what they did to their boss,what the problem was, and how it was solved. Students should assume that their boss knowsabout computer hardware and the current subject. Thus, they should use the correct language andthe right terminology. Some labs ask the students to write a procedure to solve the problem theysolved, assuming that the procedure would become part of the company’s documentation andtraining for other technicians. Some labs require collecting data from the conducted experiment.Students most format the data in tables and charts and present an analysis explaining themeaning of the data. This
used words werelearning, biology, and hands-on. Fortunately, the cultural climate of an institution changes asstudents graduate and new students arrive. Word of mouth spreads quickly and students havecome to understand that, despite the extra work required, they can expect a positive learningexperience in our studio classroom. What was new has become the norm as students engage withbiology in a more meaningful and thorough way.AAAS. (2011). Vision and Change: A Call to Action AAAS, Washington, DC.Allen, D., and Tanner, K. (2009). Transformations: Approaches to College Science Teaching.WH Freeman and Company: New York, NY.Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making ThinkingVisible.Cortright, R.N., Collins
Academy of Engineering, (2016) Grand Challenges for Engineering: Imperatives,Prospects, and Priorities. Washington: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23440.[2] Dodds, R. and Venables, R. (2005) Engineering for Sustainable Development: GuidingPrinciples, The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, U.K.[3] Department of Energy, (2005) Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030-Overview, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.[4] Bessant, S., Bailey, P., Robinson,Z., Tomkinson, C.B., Tomkinson, R., Ormerod, R.M., andBoast R. (2013) Problem-Based Learning: A Case Study of Sustainability Education, The HigherEducation Academy, U.K.[5] Allenby, ,B.R., Allen, D.T., and Davidson, C.I. (2007) Teaching Sustainable