and why’ behind each activity.Many participants still attend based on parent or school recommendations but generally seemmore invested in the program mission.Program planning begins with securing funding, as OPTIONS relies solely on external fundingto continue operating. The curriculum is adjusted to meet the goals and requirements set by thefunding agency, while remaining true to the program mission of encouraging young women toexplore and pursue engineering and computer science. Curriculum planning coincides withscheduling field trips, mentor visits, and faculty-led workshops. Advertisements generally beginin December and January, and college counselors are finalized in the spring semester.Registration is accepted on a first-come, first
engages students in hands-on projects,enhances their practical and project management skills, and gains valuable experiential learningexperience. It also adapts the Students as Partners (SaP) method to cultivate students' sense ofownership and responsibility in their SIGs. Academic advisors and participating studentscollaborate in various decision-making processes, including planning, funding acquisition,recruitment, training, prototyping and deployment.This practice paper offers an in-depth exploration of the SIG program hosted within the HKUInno Wing, delving into governance aspects such as the management structure, funding model,resource allocation, and development support. It showcases two exemplary SIGs as case studies:one centered on bio
coaching for and by language teachers (e.g., peer coaching, critical friending in educational contexts). Ari has planned and facilitated language and literacy workshops and lectures, as well as curriculum development, in Ghana, Israel, Italy, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Sweden, Thailand, and the USA. As a private person, Ari travels to the Israeli occupied West Bank of the Jordan river where he documents Israeli settlers who engage in violence, agricultural theft, intimidation, and threats. Ari’s videos, notes, and presence support a coalition of non-government organizations working in solidarity with Palestinian communities in the Jordan Valley to prevent the destruction of Palestinian villages and to prevent the
Engineering Division (SWED)Key Words: Software Engineering, Agile Software Development, User documentation, ActiveLearning, Real-world project, Technical Communication.Introduction“Complexity kills,” Microsoft executive Ray Ozzie famously wrote in a 2005 internal memo [1].“It sucks the life out of developers; it makes products difficult to plan, build, and test; it introducessecurity challenges; and it causes user and administrator frustration.” If Ozzie thought things werecomplicated back then, one might wonder what he would make of the complexity softwaredevelopers face today with software users that expect flexibility from software in many the areas offeatures, connectivity options, high performance, multiple platforms, including the Internet
team-based work structures, perfor- mance management, quality management, research methodology, and engineering education.Mr. Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Techno- logical Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Assistant Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons
the idea, not the person (for example, "I don't think that idea will work because…" not "That's stupid"). • No "cross talking" is allowed. This means not interrupting when someone else is talking.The instructors will also provide the scope of the items and talking points for discussion in eachmeeting to the cornerstone and capstone teams.2. Assessment ToolsVarious assessment tools are planned to assess the research questions and to help improve theimplementation of the peer mentorship model for future semesters. Specifically, a pre and post-activity survey was designed, and some of the questions are listed in the Appendix for both thefirst-year design and senior design cohorts. The questions (in Appendix B and C) were designedbased on
which 39.4% were awarded to URMs and 35% to women.Over a six-year period, N.C. A&T has awarded a total of 314 doctoral degrees, including 204doctoral degrees in STEM, 134 to women, and 139 to URMs. Building on past strategicsuccesses, the University’s current strategic plan—A&T Preeminence 2023: Taking theMomentum to 2023—sets several goals relevant to developing competitive graduate studenttraining programs. Of note are Goal 3, “Position the university to be a national, premier research-intensive, doctoral, science and technology-focused learning institution,” and Goal 5, “Foster amore diverse and inclusive campus community by promoting cultural awareness and collegiality,and by cultivating respect for diverse people and cultures.” To
college/unit within UD,allowing us to bring together small groups of chairs for facilitated discussion and the sharing ofexperiences. We also address the role of deans in securing institutional commitment for theproject, as well as initial evaluation results and plans for long-term evaluation. Finally, wehighlight follow-up efforts to develop and disseminate new resources on fostering inclusivedepartment climates, including a written guide that builds off strategies that emerged duringworkshop discussion, encouraging department chairs to learn from the experiences of colleaguesacross the university.I. IntroductionIn recent years, many institutions of higher education have implemented strategies to recruit andretain faculty from underrepresented
has been teaching. Her re- search domain is Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Planning using Remote Sensing, GIS, Modeling, and Observation techniquesDr. Laura E Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University Dr. Laura Sullivan-Green is a Professor and Department Chair in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at San Jos´e State University. She obtained her BS from the University of Dayton (Dayton, OH) in 2002 and her MS (2005) and PhD (2008) from Northwestern University (Evanston, IL). She teaches in the areas of Geotechnical Engineering, Engineering Mechanics, and Forensic Engineering. Her research interests include forensic engineering education, STEM education pedagogy, and incorporating general
used in different fields. Hence, without proper documentationand management of such projects, achieving overall objectives can be underpinned.To aid the successful management of complex or multi-departmental projects in fields outsidethe university, various social management frameworks and program management tools havebeen developed, employed, and reported. Aside from promoting teamwork andcommunication, smoothing decision-making and problem-solving, and enabling transparencyand accountability, PM management processes and tools are strongly related to projectsuccess [2],[3]. These tools are designed to support the successful execution of projects byproviding a range of features and functionalities that help plan, organize, and control
strategies for instructional teams. This paper will present a developing conceptualframework that guides these activities, describe each component, present preliminary findings,and discuss potential next steps.Literature ReviewFactors that influence academic successIndividual learning consists of cognitive, metacognitive, and affective components [1] and is asocially-embedded process [2]. Cognitive learning refers to acquiring knowledge at increasinglevels of complexity, as in Bloom’s Taxonomy [3], and is measured through course assessments(e.g., exams). Metacognition refers to awareness and self-assessment of one’s own thinking andabilities [3], and regulation refers to the ability to plan and adjust behaviors accordingly based onthat knowledge [4
covered by the team project or by individual assignments.Common themes emerged, and are summarized in Table 1. Since these topics are mostfrequently covered, capstone instructors must generally feel that they are important. The topicsthemselves are not TCs, but they are a promising set of topics within which to look for TCs.Communication, elements of design process (planning/scheduling, concept generation, anddecision making), and teamwork emerged as common themes. Communication is a topic thatmany students struggle with, and good communication enables success in nearly all other aspectsof capstone design. It was identified by Capstone-to-Work researchers ([5], [6]) as a topic thatstudents struggle with at work and one where they rely on their
what has been done by librarians in the past, so that college anduniversity libraries across the country are better able to plan, implement, and assess potentialoutreach and assistive programs for veterans on their campuses, both residential and virtual.INTRODUCTIONSince World War II, there have been several “G.I. Bills” passed by Congress to provide benefitsfor veterans of America’s wars. The first, officially known as the Servicemen’s ReadjustmentAct of 1944, included low-cost mortgages and loans, a year of unemployment compensation, and(most importantly) dedicated tuition and living expenses for veterans attending college. By 1956,when the act expired, over 2.2 million veterans had successfully used the G.I. Bill to attend thecollege of
purposes, the program has defined four competencies that providegreater specificity to Outcome #6. Competency 1 calls for students to be able to “Develop anexperimental plan to answer a specific question or test a hypothesis.” Competency 2 requiresstudents to have the ability to “Collect data appropriate to the experiment or test.” Competency 3requires students to be able to “Analyze data collected using appropriate methods.” And finally,Competency 4 requires students to “Draw appropriate inferences from analysis results toimprove processes.”To improve student achievement of these competencies, lessons in Statistical Process Controls(SPC) and Design of Experiments (DOE) were designed and added to the ETME 415 – Designfor Manufacturing and Tooling
was that after participants engagedwith facilitators at the workshop, they were provided with one year of coaching by a faculty peermentor. This was an opportunity for participants to test ideas from the workshops with a supportsystem in place and guidance as needed, all in a safe way. Coaching cut across disciplines inengineering and course levels and was successful in helping many faculty implement workshopideas [2].In 2020 nine in-person workshops were planned. The plans shifted swiftly to a remote formatdue to COVID-19 and raised several research questions aligned with this transition: 1. Does the COVID shift create long-term benefits for faculty development structures? 2. Did EM assist the faculty facilitators with the COVID
interview. In the course of theinterviews, participants were asked to rate their risk tolerance and their interest in pursuing a startupon ten-point scale. The interviews were assessed (see Coding Book, Appendix A) through recordingof categorical and numerical responses for: • Immigration generation • Parents’ education • Employment during college 4 • Switch of major • Risk tolerance • Startup interestand through thematic content analysis [14] for: • Family influence on major • Career plans • Career certainty • Reasons for pursuing or not pursuing a startupThe students in the entrepreneurially oriented engineering major and the students in the
of skills and knowledge and end with documenting and presenting their work.The project engineering design stages include literature review, problem formulation andanalysis, project planning, creating design alternatives, evaluating and selecting the best designalternative.During each of the project engineering stages, challenges are compared and analyzed. Project-related challenges were ranked the highest for all comparisons performed. The study also showedthat two out of the five student outcomes were harder to achieve and faced higher challenges.When comparing how each of the course evaluation methods helped to reduce the identifiedchallenges towards each student outcome, it was found that the project-related assignmentscontributed the
assessed thedifferences in student perceptions towards pursuing an engineering degree by grade level, race,and gender post taking part in a week-long residential academy. Results show that majority ofthe participants’ interests and knowledge of engineering increased because of taking part in theweek-long academies. More boys (84.3%) planned to take more math and science courses inhigh school than girls (60%) post completing the academies. Also, highlighted in the findingswere the representations of groups who are traditionally under-represented in the fields ofengineering. The academy tailored for girls were very successful in recruiting African Americanstudents. Overall, the week-long academies and instructors on the university campus
sup- ply chain management, data analytics, logistics, production planning, lean manufacturing systems, and the intersection between operations management and information and technology. More specifically, his research seeks to innovate and improve operational performance using data analytics and IoT technology at manufacturing and supply chain levels. He is also particularly interested in supply chain resiliency, co- ordination issues, and real-time analytics-based decision making. Prior to his academic career, Dr. Diaz worked for seven years as a process engineer and management consultant in the international consulting arena. American c Society for
conducted this program fully virtualwith all participants working remotely. Students were matched with faculty based on their primaryfields of interest, had to work a minimum of 20hrs per week, and were actively involved in theirhost lab routines [3]. We organized a series of workshops on research methods, scientific writing,and career planning discussed in detail in subsequent sections. The program ended with a virtualconference which gave all students the opportunity to present their work and to participate in aresearch presentation contest. We had a total of 21 participants working in 10 different labs. Theprogram was designed to address fundamental gaps in the engineering undergraduate curriculum:project-oriented coding experience, scientific
,engineering has been considered a key player to plan, design, implement, and develop solutionsto address humanitarian challenges [38]. For instance, the role of engineering and technology hasthe clear role of providing resources and conditions, such as water [39]–[41] and energy [42],[43]. In the infrastructure and management domain, engineering also plays a role in creatingsolutions that address the development of livelihood conditions [44], [45], logistics [46], [47],and communication [48]–[50]. These challenges are examples of opportunities whereengineering and technology play essential roles in translating ideas into an immediate solution inthe humanitarian context.Methodology We conducted a qualitative case study [51] to explore the LED
women are under-represented.INTRODUCTIONExtension Services for Undergraduate Programs (ES-UP) at the National Center for Women &Information Technology (NCWIT) employs a multi-pronged, systemic approach to increasing theenrollment and retention of women in undergraduate computing departments. ES-UP advocatesimproving the environment for all students using research-based strategies that correspond to thesix components of the NCWIT ES-UP Systemic Change Model. The components include creatinga Recruiting Strategic Plan; retaining students with Inclusive Pedagogy, Curriculum, and StudentSupport; securing appropriate Institutional Policies and Support; and finally, implementing acomprehensive Evaluation and Tracking System (See Figure 1.)Figure 1
semester), we are now expanding this into a 4-credit SocialWorld course at UMass Amherst. Section 2 of this paper describes the first offering of the course duringSpring 2016; section 3 describes the second offering during Fall 2016, where changes were made in theschedule based on student feedback and instructor experience. Section 4 describes the logic and plan toimplement this course as a 4 credit course in the future. Section 5 offers conclusions, and references are givenin section 6. The appendices to this paper reproduce verbatim comments that students have provided abouttheir experiences in this course.2. First Course Offering: One Credit Seminar, Spring 2016 Queer Lights was initially developed in
/she fell below the required GPA. At the recommendation of an NSFProgram Officer, the 2010 proposal (and the subsequent proposals submitted by ECU) included arecovery semester that enabled a funded student to retain his/her funding as long as his/her GPAwas only below 3.0 for one semester. While it is the case that some students have had to leavetheir S-STEM program at ECU due to a low GPA, it is also true that three engineering studentsand two biology students have been able to recover after one semester below 3.0 and remain intheir respective S-STEM program.Since there are occasions when students must leave an S-STEM program, it is important for aproposal to include a “substitution plan”. This is a plan for finding a student to become a
and learn about current research.ImplementationThe program focuses on teachers and students at both the middle and high school level. It startswith the training of teachers through a 5-week intensive research experience in which teacherscomplete the design challenge while simultaneously developing lesson plans they will use toteach the material in their classrooms. Teachers implement the program in their schools and havestudents complete the challenge. Finalist teams from each school present their design at anannual competition. Throughout the process, representatives from the Center make classroomvisits or host tours in order to support the teachers’ implementation. To date over 50 teachershave completed the summer training. Over 400
University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work in Progress: Self-Guided Professional Development as an Enabler for Multidisciplinary ProgramsAbstractThe capstone design program at Colorado School of Mines serves three departments and fourdegree programs, each having their own demands, distinctive industry-specific languages, anddepartmental expectations. Each discipline is looking to the capstone design program to provideABET required capstone projects and assessment, professional practice training, and instructionin multiple discipline specific design tools and techniques to their students. This paper describesthe use of student-specific professional development plans, in
College • Collaborative Projects (2007-2013) – Orange, Lake, Sumter, Seminole and Osceola County Public Schools, Lockheed Martin, Electronic Arts, Girl Scouts, Junior Achievement, Prism, Orlando Science Center, University of Central Florida, Valencia, Seminole and Lake Sumter Colleges • Coordinator of Industry Expert Review Committee: 2008 Math Sunshine State Standards • Member of the Strategic Planning Committee (2011-2012) - Florida Center for Research in Math and Science Education • Medical Scholars Program (2014-present) – Florida A&M University, MCAT prep curriculum developer c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
their context, by adapting strategies we have employed.At this stage, formalizing our engineering project curriculum as authentic experiential learningrepresents a work in progress involving a pilot group of five engineering students who mustsatisfy the new ELI requirements by spring 2017 to graduate on schedule. Results of this pilotgroup help test our plan, providing feedback to inform us what adjustments we may need tomake, as we ramp up to the “full-on” implementation of 50+ students per year over the next twoyears. As available, this paper presents details of the ongoing pilot group results.Having introduced the case for experiential learning with its move from popularity towardmaturity in engineering education, and having described the
Professor of Civil Engineering and Director of Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes: transporta- tion infrastructure planning and design, infrastructure resilience, traffic operations, highway safety, and geographic information systems. His research interests include: constructing spatial databases for bet- ter management of transportation infrastructure, improving transportation design, operation, safety and construction, understanding long-term effects of urban development patterns, and advancing active living within the built environment for improved public health. He teaches courses in interchange design, trans- portation engineering, highway design. engineering
compile the list, one researcher read all of theportfolio narratives, noting which activities or experiences each student described and totalingthe number of times each activity was mentioned.FindingsOur review of the portfolio narratives revealed 27 different activities or experiences described bystudents as being among the most meaningful parts of the program. Some were entire retreats,while others were brief, organic experiences that we did not even plan. Of the 27 total activitiesor experiences, only five were described by four or more students as being among the mostmeaningful for him/her. Figure 1 (below) lists the most prevalent activities or experiences andthe number of students who mentioned them. Figure 1: Most