Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #11826 as program and planning committees’ member and reviewer and chairman of several ones. He was co- chair of the conference EDUCON 2010 (Engineering Education Conference), TAEE 2010 (Tecnolog´ıas Aplicadas a la Ense˜nanza de la Electr´onica) and ICECE 2005 (International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education). Is co-chair of the conference FIE 2014 (Frontiers in Education Conference) to be organized in Madrid, Spain, by the IEEE and the ASEE. He is co-editor of IEEE-RITA (Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnolog´ıas del Aprendizaje) and of the Electronic Journal of
, mostly oriented to bridge, earthquake, and wind engineering. In the General Engineering De- partment at UPRM, Portela serves as President of the Planning and Development Committee and member of the Engineering Mechanics Committee.Mr. Emmanuel Francisco Oquendo, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez CampusMr. David Candelario SuarezMr. Christian Gabriel Hernandez-Negron, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Christian G. Hernandez Negron is an undergraduate student in the Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM). He is pursuing a dual degree of Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Civil Engineering and Surveying Topography from the UPRM, expecting to graduate in
regard to the value ascribed to graduate student professional development, support for preparation for diverse career pathways, and the availability of, and support during, teaching opportunities • Structural dimension: The size and composition of programs that prepare students for academic careers, including, but not limited to measures of diversity of students enrolled, diversity of post-graduation plans, and frequency and duration of teaching experiences • Perceptual dimension: A doctoral student’s perception of peer, faculty, departmental, and institutional support for his/her career preparation and professional development • Behavioral dimension: Interactions among graduate students, program
Architecture and the Center for Spatial Analysis at OU. His main interest is in understanding how social factors shape architectural design in order to provide a balanced environment between occupants and construction. He is also interested in climate responsive building design and the consciousness of using an effective design method for the reduction of the environmental impact.Dr. Somik Ghosh, University of Oklahoma Dr. Ghosh is an Assistant Professor in the Construction Science Division at the University of Oklahoma. Ghosh received his PhD in Environmental Design and Planning from Virginia Tech after completing his MS in Construction Management from Michigan State University, and Bachelor of Architecture from Jadavpur
outside the classroom setting in which facultymembers are confronted with freedom of speech issues. For instance, a student asks a professorin class about his opinion of the dean’s plan to reorganize the college or department and the impactthis might have on the student’s career or graduation plans. Or perhaps, a professor serves on auniversity budget committee. Can this professor publish articles and engage in public debate usingthe information gained through his involvement as a member of the committee?The federal courts are currently split over the application of the First Amendment to speech byprofessors employed at public universities. In 2006 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Garcetti v.Ceballos1 that government employees may be disciplined
typical semester 30 courses are offered by the construction management program. It isone of seven programs within a department devoted exclusively to technology. It offers aBachelor of Science degree and an undergraduate certificate. The department resides within anurban, nonresidential campus with a student enrollment population of 30,690 for the fall of 2014.(Indiana University, 2014) Currently the program’s enrollment consists of 135 students.The program is accredited by ABET. It does not utilize proprietary assessment software nor isthere dedicated assessment staff. The program’s accreditation plan was developed exclusivelyby its full time faculty with copious support by experienced faculty residing within thedepartment and by the dean’s
project and list them withinthe report section they planned to implement the literature. The efficacy of this pedagogicalchange to contextualize examples followed by immediate application was assessed by measuringthe frequency and type of citations used by all 3 sections of the class. Citation analysis found astatistically insignificant 7% increase in total number of citations used by the test sectionstudents. Although the utilization of engineering standards did not increase, the use of greyliterature in the test section increase 83% compared with the two control sections taught by thesame engineering faculty. Furthermore the test section decreased their use of multimediainformation. Two subsequent sections of the course taught by other
, reflections were ignored as asource of information.Events were first categorized based on how convenient they were for the students to attend(Table 2). For instance, an event that did not require advanced planning on the part of thestudent and could be completed at any time (i.e. – reading and reviewing a technical paper) wascoded as “highly convenient” while a career fair that has a set date but drop-in hours was codedas “medium convenience”. Table 2 shows the number of reported events that fell into eachcategory. The vast majority of events in both years were low convenience events, indicating thatthe event took place on a set time and date. Table 2: Coded Convenience Level of Events Reported by Sample GroupCode Level Description
Paper ID #13627Improving Healthcare by Teaming Industrial Engineers with CliniciansDr. James Benneyan, Northeastern University Dr. James Benneyan is former senior systems engineer at Harvard Community Health Plan and founding director of the Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute at Northeastern University, including three NSF and CMS funded centers and five undergraduate through post-doctoral degree, internship, and fellow- ship programs. Jim is faculty and senior fellow at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, holds joint appointments in Northeastern’s engineering and health sciences colleges, and past is
you hear and understand yourself well? Do you find anything about the way you presented distracting? List one, or two, items that you felt you did well during the presentation? What is one improvement that you plan to make for the next presentation?Following the second presentation, group members are asked to individually watch the video oftheir group’s performance and provide comments pertaining to how effectively they thought theother individuals in their group communicated. They are asked to not focus on themselves so thatemphasis is placed on other group members. The Google Forms survey for intra-group critiquesrequests group number along with critique questions to reduce organizational time required
- Page 26.938.2dimension in nature, and are ineffective in many situations. In recent years, many attempts havebeen made whereby the conventional methods are challenged. Programs such as NSF's Engage3and pedagogies such as classroom flipping4 are being demonstrated across many institutions.However, these strategies may present an adoption-rate challenge among instructors, particularlyseasoned professors and lecturers who may have already developed structured lesson plans thatare resistant to modifications. Other alternatives such as immersive visualization technology areoften costly and require specialized laboratory and wearable equipment, creating a disconnectbetween lecture and spatial learning.The positive impact of active learning, spatial
, Multidisciplinary Engineering Laboratory. • American Society of Mechanical Engineers • American Society of Engineering EducationProf. Jeffrey A. Holley P.E., Colorado School of Mines Jeffrey Holley, PE received a BS in Engineering from Colorado School of Mines in 1988, a MBA from the University of Colorado in 1993, and a MS in Environmental Science and Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines in 2011. As a practicing civil engineer registered in 14 western states his specialties include planning and construction document preparation for grading, drainage, infrastructure utility, and storm water quality enhancement design. As an instructor at CSM he has had the opportunity to teach Water and Wastewater Treatment, Fluid
college/university and high school level students. Page 26.23.3Literature Review The MSLQ is more narrowly focused and oriented similarly; it encompasses students’motivation and their learning strategies, thereby providing different information. It is based onimportant theoretical insights into the nature of learning and the determinants of academicperformance7 which have been used by several studies. Self-regulated learning is an integratedlearning process, which consists of behavior growth that affects students’ learning. Moreover,the learning process is planned and adjusted according to the student’s objective, so that changeswill
changes to theway the students form project teams and assessment of individual performances within groupscan enhance student experience and engagement in the group project. For instance, the author letstudents choose teams, which could have led to some skewness in the teams. While some groupscomprised students that were already highly engaged in class, other groups had students thatwere not as interested. Forming more well-rounded groups with a range of students in eachwould promote positive interdependence, collaborative skills and peer-to-peer mentoring asshown by studies of Felder et al.11 For future offerings of this course with the group-projectcomponent, the author plans on letting students fill brief survey based on which students would
committee then wanted to know what the students thought. The committee designeda detailed survey for engineering students who had already taken the introductory coursesequence to better understand what they actually learned and how useful they felt it was as theyprogressed through their respective programs (year 2 through 4 students). Along with the general survey the committee wanted to talk to students directly, and partof the plan was to conduct a focus group of selected upper class students in each department tosurvey their feelings about potential program redesigns based on their experiences with theoriginal program. After analyzing the results of the focus group, the survey, and the analysis of otherprograms, the next step in
all students to learn. These are: 1) Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) 2) Developing and using models 3) Planning and carrying out investigations 4) Analyzing and interpreting data 5) Using mathematics and computational thinking 6) Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) 7) Engaging in argument from evidence 8) Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating informationIII. Implementation and ResultsThe TAR-STEM curriculum has been offered as a track along with the regular Bangor HighSchool program since September of 2012. In each year of the program, all incoming students arenotified of the TAR-STEM program and connected with the school
microcontroller. The students incorporated the previouswind tunnel calibration data into their embedded software to provide a complete solution with asimple serial data output interface.A Pitot-static probe was chosen as the first project due to its simplicity of design and previoussuccessful experience with students designing similar probes. The inherent nonlinearity of thepressure sensor output voltage with respect to the air speed provides an opportunity for studentsto apply theory and achieve very good results.4 The nonlinear nature of the probe also lends itselfwell to the use of an embedded lookup table to simplify its use.Managing a multi-year project involves a little forward-thinking and resource planning. Thestudents are given the requirement
, students discuss the lessons learned andpropose recommendations for system improvements in a debriefing session. The improvedscenarios indicate the status of on time delivery, reduced variation and operational expenses,lower inventory levels, improved product quality, and increased productivity, revenue, andavailable capacity [12]. Page 26.149.6The designed network in this game considers a low-volume high-mix product supply chain andincludes four different customers, six suppliers and a manufacturing facility, which in turnincludes production planning and accounting departments, warehouse and factory area. Thecustomers, manufacturing company and
with the FDM parts was related to the sparse fill used to save weight. Thestudents planned (but had not indicated on the drawings) to drill and tap into the sides of theenclosures for mounting purposes. The sparse lattice fill within the hollow walls however wasnot strong enough to hold threads and the screws pulled out almost immediately. As a quickremedy, the students drilled out the failed holes and plugged them with polycaprolactone (PCL).Commercially sold as Shapelock or Instamorph [6,7], PCL is a plastic that is moldable attemperatures as low as 140 F, but hardens to a nylon like consistency when cooled. Whileheated, the PCL was pressed such that it infiltrated the voids in the lattice structure and bondedto the existing plastic when it
data (MSDS) sheets, and proper handling, storage, and disposal of chemicals. Become familiar with basic principles of emergency vents.Safety is stressed throughout the course and university on-line modules from the university wideEnvironmental Health and Safety (EHS) are required before students enter the laboratory. Sevenmodules are required: Laboratory Standard Training, Chemical Spill Cleanup, Compressed GasCylinders, Toxicology, Building Emergency Action Plan (BEAP), and Hazard Communicationfor Laboratory Personnel. Emergency vents for pressure relief are covered in detail in a lectureintroducing the “layers or protection” model of plant safety. Students are given examples ofaccidents and proper design of control systems
. Garzolini, Boise State University Judith (Jude) Garzolini is the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant Project Manager for the Idaho STEP grant at Boise State University. She is responsible for managing the $1 Million grant to plan and implement activities focused on increasing the throughput of graduates in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. During her over 23-year career in industry she worked for Hewlett-Packard Company where she contributed as both an R&D project manager and program manager in the disk drive and printing supplies businesses. Jude received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Wayne State University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of California, Davis. She was
foster the ability to weigh the complex issues surroundingvarious energy generation sources and the capability to develop strategies for reduced energyconsumption. In recognition of this prominence, the United States Department of Energy (DOE)has advocated for promotion of energy literacy through energy education in strategic plans, otherdocuments, and various events4,5,6. The DOE has devoted significant efforts to the developmentof a guide for general energy literacy principles to serve as the basis for educational efforts7. Energy literacy has been measured by testing broad energy knowledge through tests andquestionnaires. Such efforts have shown generally low levels of energy literacy both in children8,9,10,11 and
detailed the team’s work. Completion of the prototype was alsorequired which covered the building, testing, and evaluation of the prototype. Additionally, eachstudent was required to maintain an engineering logbook of the efforts on the project, keepingtrack of the time spent, the tasks being worked on, etc. The project required planning, proposalpresentation, scheduling, engineering, implementation, and written and oral presentations ofproject results.The assessment of the course was twofold: 1) learning of a design process and 2) developing aprototype by utilizing concepts and technical skills learned from courses throughout themechatronics curriculum. Based on the course objective, the following items were used to assessstudents’ learning
itselfbased on student feedback.Bibliography1. Badri, M.A., Mortagy, A., Davis, D., and Davis, D. “Effective Planning of R&D stages: A Simulation Approach,” International Journal of Project Management, 15:6, Dec. 1997, pp. 351-358.2. Thomke, S.H., “Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products,” Management Science, 44:6, Jun. 1998, pp. 743-762.3. Drezner, J., and Huang, M., On Prototyping: Lessons from RAND Research, RAND Corp., 2009, downloaded March 29, 2013, Web, http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP267.html.4. Yang, M., and Epstein, D., “A Study of Prototypes Design Activity and Design Outcome,” Design Studies, 26:6, pp. 649-669, 2005.5. Houde, S.,and Hill, C., “What Do Prototypes Prototype?”, in
learningobjectives and outcomes. Felder et al.10 note that Level 3 evaluations are difficult to answer andtherefore require the previous two levels to fully understand the implications of the intervention.Therefore, this project seeks to include assessments that address all three levels related to theoutcomes of the VAPR (Table 2). The primary forms of data used to evaluate VAPR include therecorded videos of the classroom, faculty interviews at the end of the academic years, studentfocus groups of each recorded classroom, student evaluations, and end of year grades. Page 26.597.6Table 2. Evaluation Plan: Project outcomes, related theoretical frameworks, and
Paper ID #11243Engineering Economics as a Benchmark Course in the Context of a Sustain-able Continuous Improvement ProcessDr. Zia A. Yamayee, University of Portland Dr. Yamayee’s current professional interests include outcomes assessment in engineering education; de- sign in engineering education; engineering design methodologies; and application of design methods to electric power distribution, transmission, and generation. Dr. Yamayee’s work to date has included projects in power system planning, maintenance scheduling, hydro-thermal simulations, unit commit- ment, operational and financial impacts of integrating new
development engineering and manufacturing content expert. He develops and teaches all related engineering courses. His responsibility as a director of Center on Access Technology Innovation Laboratory include the plan- ning, implementation and dissemination of research projects that are related to the need of accessibility. He received his BS from RIT and his MS from Lehigh University. His last assignment with IBM was an Advanced Process Control project manager. He managed team members in delivering the next generation Advanced Process Control solution which replaced the legacy APC system in the 300 mm semiconductor fabricator. Behm has fifteen patents and has presented over 30 scientific and technical papers at various
learning objectives of the module are to i) explain the generalproperties of magnetic materials and magnetic nanoparticles, ii) describe the application ofinduction heating to hyperthermic cancer therapy, iii) describe the mechanisms of heating singleand multiple domain magnetic materials, iv) to quantify the effect of applied current, suspensionviscosity, and nanoparticle concentration on the SLP and explain the phenomenon within thecontext of induction heating of single-domain magnetic nanoparticles.4. EVALUATION PLAN Summative and formative project evaluation will be carried out according to therecommended practices of the National Science Foundation 36. The following instruments willbe used as a formative assessment of whether the project
orderto enhance the understanding of the bio-nano interfaces [8, 9]. Such interdisciplinary educationallows us to begin to predict the biological response to nanomaterials in order to more rationallydevelop materials such as diagnostic, therapeutic, imaging, and theranostic agents and implantmaterials [10]. Under the funding support from National Science Foundation-NanotechnologyUndergraduate Education (NUE) in Engineering we have developed a plan to enhanceundergraduate student learning in bioengineering and provide students with researchexperiences, introducing them to the area of bio-nano devices and systems. Our plan integratesnanoscale technologies with biological systems in the development of new materials, biomimeticnanostructures, tools
enforcingstandards, and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance. Employers mustcomply with all applicable OSHA standards. Employers must also comply with the General DutyClause of the OSH Act, which requires employers to keep their workplace free of seriousrecognized hazards7. The OSH Act covers most private sector employers and workers in all 50states, the District of Columbia, and the other United States (U.S.) jurisdictions either directlythrough federal OSHA or through an OSHA-approved State Plan. State Plans are OSHA-approved job safety and health programs operated by individual states instead of federal OSHA.The OSH Act encourages states to develop and operate their own job safety and health programsand precludes state enforcement of