, practices,facility characteristics, inspections, and engineering controls [3,4]. For example, national studiesin 2002 and 2022 found that only 81% and 83% of educators respectively had the appropriateeye protection for all students engaged in science and engineering activities in their courses [4].Furthermore, a national study published in 2022 by the International Technology andEngineering Educators Association (ITEEA) in collaboration with the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association(NSELA), discovered a number of alarming safety deficiencies among P-12 programs andeducators providing engineering instruction in the United States (U.S.) [3]. Further analysesfound that teachers who
traditional LIWC analysis with the standard dictionarygives a psychologically verified and impartial look at the language, while with the customdictionary it gives a measure of the known signposts for a topic. The MEM analysis gives theemergent themes within the topic. When these two a priori and in vivo thematic computationalmethods arrive at similar landmarks, researchers can be confident that although this took lesstime, the adventure has not only been worth the computations, but it has also arrived in thecorrect place.6 References[1] ASEE, “Engineering by the Numbers, 2010,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2011.[2] ASEE, “Engineering &
was a recipient of the Ap- prentice Faculty Grant from the Educational Research Methods ASEE Division in 2009. She also has been an Electrical Engineering Professor for two Mexican universities. Dr. Mendoza is interested in sTEm education, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, Latino studies in engineering and computer aided/instructional technology in sTEm.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a Professor of Computer Science and Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of Oklahoma. Her research foci are diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education and introductory software engineering education. She has a particular interest in how organizational
, Director of Centre for En- gineering Education ResearchDr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is a 150th Anniversary Professor, the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and
role of empathy in various domains, including engineering ethics, design, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue Uni- versity’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the 2021 division chair-elect for the ASEE Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering and Society division and is the Editorial Board Chair for the Online Ethics Center.Mr. Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez, Purdue University at West Lafayette Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. He previously worked as an export business development manager at a Spanish radio
a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA).Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is faculty in Engineering Education and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the University
articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 118 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,000 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Use of a Design Canvas in a Robotics Workshop and Analysis of its Efficacy (Fundamental)1. IntroductionAdvances in science and technology are shaping every aspect of
about smartness, diversity and inclusion, and engineering culture. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Studying Smartness in Engineering Culture: An Interdisciplinary DialogueAbstractThis theory paper contributes to the study of smartness in engineering culture from differentdisciplinary perspectives. We are interested in the construct of smartness, which is a powerful,yet implicit, driver of students’ experience in engineering education. Smartness in engineeringculture can be linked to both the broad narratives and norms that overarch engineering at asocietal level (e.g., engineers are smart) as well as the more specific, individual beliefs thatindividual
and in experiential learning for undergraduates in science and engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Specifications Grading in an Upper-Level BME Elective CourseRecent trends in BME education emphasize aspects of the engineering profession such as designprocess, entrepreneurial mindset, and active problem-solving. However, the grading strategy inmost traditional BME courses revolves around assigning points to student work based onapparent quality or degree of completion. Awarding “partial credit” is time-consuming and oftenis not closely mapped to learning objectives [1]. As a result, students often focus on how manypoints they earned relative to their perceived level of effort
. During these two growing seasons of 2016and 2017, tomatoes have performed substantially better than previous seasons and 2019 growingseason, with minimal root damage.H. Pedagogical Aspects and Some Suggestions for Student Design Project Advisors [4, 21]Pedagogy refers to the “interactions between teachers, students, and the learning environmentand the learning tasks.”This broad term includes how teachers and students relate together aswell as the instructional approaches implemented in the classroom. Some of the pedagogicalapproaches that may be used are:(a). The “Teacher-Centered Pedagogy” positions the teacher at the centre of the learningprocess and typically relies on methods such as whole-class lecture, note memorization, andchorus answers
with Project WET at the University of Arizona Maricopa County Cooperative Extension as a curriculum developer and professional development faciltator.Prof. Clark Miller, Arizona State University Clark A. Miller is Professor and Director of the Center for Energy & Society at Arizona State University. He holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University.Carlo Altamirano-Allende c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Building Youth’s Socio-Technical Engineering Knowledge through Engagement in a Community Solar Energy ProjectThe 21st century has seen increased public and research attention to engineering as a socio-technical field, requiring knowledge not only
identity.Robert Renaud PhD, University of Manitoba Dr. Robert Renaud is cross-appointed as an Associate Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education, and is the Head of the Department of Educational Administration, Foundations, and Psychology at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. He teaches assess- ment, program evaluation, and research methods. His main areas of research interest include program evaluation, student assessment, teaching effectiveness, and quantitative methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Determining the Dependencies of Engineering Competencies for Engineering Practice: An Exploratory
determine if the current ABET CivilEngineering Program Criteria (CEPC) should be changed to reflect one or more of the 24 outcomesof the second edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge published in 2008. After twoyears of work, a proposed CEPC has been approved by the relevant ASCE committees andforwarded to ABET for approval and incorporation into accreditation criteria. A paper chroniclingthe committee’s efforts through a review of the literature, the committee’s methodology andprocess, and the key issues that emerged was presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference inIndianapolis. This paper updates that effort by presenting the resulting proposed criteria, thechanges generated by constituency feedback, progress on the Commentary, the
Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feminis- tengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She has received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She was co-PI of Purdue’s ADVANCE pro- gram from 2008-2014, focusing on the underrepresentation of women in STEM faculty positions. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research
. W. Chesterton, Boston Scientific, and Procter & Gamble. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring the Unique Skills and Challenges Veterans with Disabilities Bring to College: A Qualitative Study in EngineeringAbstractMilitary careers and student life have stark differences. No matter each veteran’s militaryexperiences, the transition from military to college may be fraught with unexpected challenges.Student veterans with disabilities may face additional challenges that uniquely differentiate themfrom other students. This exploratory research study aims to develop a deeper understanding ofthe experiences of engineering student veterans with service-connected
Paper ID #27578A Mixed Methods Analysis of Motivation Factors in Senior Capstone DesignCoursesElisabeth Kames, Florida Institute of Technology Elisabeth Kames is a graduate student working on her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Florida Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on the impact of motivation on performance and persistence in mechanical engineering design courses under the guidance of Dr. Beshoy Morkos. She also serves as a graduate student advisor to senior design teams within the mechanical engineering department. Elisabeth is a member of ASME, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society and Pi Tau
at the 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.777.1-26.777.13. Accessed: Dec. 27, 2023. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/first-year-engineering-courses-effect-on-retention-and-workplace-performance[11] J. Gess‐Newsome, “A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK:Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit,” Re-Examining Pedagog. Content Knowl. Sci.Educ., pp. 28–42, Jan. 2015.[12] S. Magnusson, J. Krajcik, and H. Borko, “Nature, Sources, and Development ofPedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching,” Sci. Technol. Educ. Libr., pp. 95–132,doi: 10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4.[13] K. Mcglynn and J. Kelly, “Creating a self-sufficient classroom,” 2024.[14] Z. Daouk, R. Bahous, and N. N. Bacha
–26, 2015.[15] Kim, Daniel, Introduction to Systems Thinking. Pegasus Communications, Inc., 1999.[16] C. L. Dym and D. C. Brown, Engineering Design: Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2012.[17] E. P. Byrne, “Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: A Review of International Progress,” Jan. 2003, Accessed: May 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/22975797/Engineering_Education_for_Sustainable_Developme nt_A_Review_of_International_Progress[18] de Weck, Olivier, Roos, Daniel, and Magee, Christopher, Engineering Systems. MIT Press, 2011.[19] A. Johnson, D. Papi-Thornton, and J. Stauch, “Student Guide to Mapping a System,” Jan. 2019, Accessed: Nov. 01, 2023
learning experiences. She has authored numerous engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre- College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating discussions in science and engineering.Jamie Mikeska © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Simulated Engineering Teaching Experiences
Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Adding a “Design Thread” to Electrical and Computer Engineering Degree Programs: Motivation, Implementation, and EvaluationAbstractThis article details the multi-year process of adding a “design thread” to a four year,undergraduate electrical and computer engineering curricula. We use the conception of a“thread” to mean a sequence of courses that extend unbroken across each year of theundergraduate curriculum. The design thread includes a project-based introduction to thediscipline course in the
strengths might be a viable option to foster an increase instudent engineering identity.AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by the National Science Foundation Award # 1744006. The authors aregrateful to the help provided by the following research students at Angelo State University: JesseLee, Maria Ochoa, Austin Poole, Nicholas Manrique and Timmons (TJ) Spies.References[1] M. Cooley (1989). "Human-centered Systems." Designing Human-centred Technology, 133–143. Springer.[2] M. Garbuio, & M. Dressel (2019). 6 Building Blocks of Successful Innovation: HowEntrepreneurial Leaders Design Innovative Futures. Routledge.[3] P. Polak (2008). Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional Methods Fail. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.[4] B. Amadei (2014
complex engineering design projects. Her scholarship is grounded in notions of learning as a social process, influenced by complexity theories, sociocultural theories, sociolinguistics, and the learning sciences.Ms. Kate FisherProf. Zachary Holman, Arizona State UniversityMathew D. Evans, Arizona State University Mathew D Evans is currently a doctoral candidate at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Fostering Belonging through an Undergraduate Summer Internship: A Community of Practice model for engineering research educationIn the 21st century, it is not sufficient for engineering students to acquire good
-2019/#GC3 (accessed Jan. 25, 2024).[7] H. J. Passow and C. H. Passow. “What competencies should undergraduate engineeringprograms emphasize? A systematic review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 3,pp. 475-526, July 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20171.[8] C. E. Baukal, C. Stokeld, and L. A. Thurman. “What Employers Look for in NewEngineering Graduates," 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN,USA, June 26-29, 2022, Paper 36984.[9] E. Khoo, K. Zegwaard, and A. Adam, “Employer and academic staff perceptions of scienceand engineering graduate competencies,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol.25, no. 1, pp. 103-118, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1801238.[10] M. Cooper and E. D. Cardenas-Vasquez
postsecondary design courses starting in 2015. The findings highlightedthe limitations of postsecondary course content due to time constraints, prompting a focus ondeveloping a yearlong college preparatory secondary HE education program for fourth-yearstudents. Implementing this, observational data and feedback were collected from three cohortsof fourth-year secondary students before and after graduation. This data collection spanned afour-year period between 2019 and 2023 [17]. The aim was to discern which knowledgecomponents and learning practices of their yearlong secondary HE program significantlycontributed to their success at the postsecondary level. The findings revealed that students whoreceive comprehensive instruction and practice across a
% 97.6% 94.4% 80.3% David 9-12 75% 46% 78.4% 77.1% Karen 6-8 32.1% 7.9% 48.2% 28.8% Note. Pct. = Percentage of total. Eco Dis.= Economically Disadvantaged. Source: All data is reported by schools to government based on the 2015-2016 school year, and accessed through U.S. News & World Report, 2019. Culturally Responsive Teaching Outcome Expectations (CRTOE). The CROTEsurvey is designed to provide insight on the set of beliefs that teachers hold about the positiveoutcomes associated with culturally responsive teaching practices. The survey is a self-reportedmeasure whereupon teachers rate the
’ engagement with co-curricular and extracurricular activities [41]. • Examining how instructional innovations or educational interventions could enhance student engagement. This research area involves intervention studies that include student engagement as an outcome. It constituted the largest research area within the ASEE conference papers that included “student engagement” in their titles, as revealed in our literature search on the PEER repository in January 2024. As an example, one study reported the contribution of a hands-on design experience to first-year engineering students’ increased engagement with engineering studies [2]. This research area can overlap with the second one that examines the