, I’m mechanical engineering” to “we’reengineering.”Primarily, two parallel case studies are presented for comparison: 1 – Hyperboreans; Amultidisciplinary team which has an accepted entry into the Hyperloop Challenge, and consists ofstudents from civil (1), computer (1), electrical (2), and mechanical (3) engineering. The majorityof the students are participating because they are passionate about the project and only expectacademic compensation in the form of additional credits that show up as invaluable experience ona transcript and resume, but do not count directly toward a degree. 2 – University of Hawai‘iDrone Technology (UHDT); A VIP project involving 23 students: computer (3), electrical (6),mechanical (11), and pre-engineering (3
causes that continue to fuel racial inequality: 1. Poor educational outcomes 2. High disease burden 3. Divided communities 4. Public service performance is uneven 5. Spatial patterns marginalize the poor 6. Too few South Africans are employed 7. Corruption 8. Resource intensive economy 9. Crumbling infrastructureThe continuing struggle to provide the tools necessary for black South Africans to succeed inSTEM fields seems to be rooted in the lack of will and government initiative7. The NationalDevelopment Plan 2030 is another report generated by the South African National PlanningCommission, whereby 119 actions are identified in order to overcome persistent
important as instructors try to design and understand strategies for creating inclusivelearning environments.Fostering an inclusive learning environment is a goal of engineering educators, especially at thefirst-year level. First, research has shown that feeling a sense of belonging is an essentialcomponent to retention. According to a recent White House report, students leaving science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) cite an uninviting atmosphere along with lackof topic relevance as top reasons for leaving the field.1 This may be addressed by acknowledgingthis deterrent and putting forth intentional efforts to create a culturally-relevant and inclusiveclimate for all students.Second, as students enter university, they bring with
engineer.” They also felt thatempathetic and caring faculty were helpful in motivating students to learn, and felt that empathyand care were already included in engineering coursework.Research QuestionsThe goal of this study was to better characterize faculty who are engaged in LTS. The specificresearch questions being explored were: 1. How has the number and type of engineering faculty who are active in LTS changed over time? a. It is hypothesized that given changes in generational values, younger engineering faculty are more likely to embrace LTS. However, the typical model at research- intensive universities places more value on research as compared to teaching and service, which
engineering students who have made it beyond traditional exit points inengineering, and into upper division courses. This understanding will be developed throughaddressing the following research questions (RQ):RQ 1) What experiences, affective domain traits, and social capital resources explainengineering students’ development of engineering role identity and feelings of belongingness?RQ 2) In what ways are these experiences unique for first generation engineering students whencompared to continuing generation peers?This increased understanding will be further utilized by the research team in subsequentqualitative phases of the research project by exploring grounds for causation and thedevelopmental role of any significant factors play in development
contemporary engineer – one who isnot only technically excellent but also innovative and aware of the inescapable humanisticaspects of working in complex socio-technical systems [1-4]. This vision of the “UGA engineer”has informed the curricula development for the College’s eight undergraduate programs. In theMechanical Engineering program, this vision led to the implementation of a design sequence thatincludes a compulsory, 3 credit hour, sophomore class that focuses on engineering and society(Engineered Systems in Society: MCHE 2990). In this paper, we describe the development of aset of four empathy modules that we have created as a core and integrated element of this courseand preliminary observations from their implementation in fall 2015. We
(Glowacki-dudka & Brown, 2007; Hubball &Albon, 2007). In order to understand the design, participation, and outcomes of new faculty learningcommunities, we asked the following overarching research questions to guide our investigation: RQ-1: How do faculty describe their participation (or lack of participation) in NFLC? RQ-2: What roles do faculty report that the NFLC play in new faculty development?Organizational Socialization Organizational socialization is the ongoing behavioral and cognitive processes in whichan individual becomes part of the organization's pattern of activities (Anderson, Riddle, &Martin 1999; Jablin & Krone, 1987). The socialization processes involve both parties. On onehand
spaces where communities can optimize their search for information andexpect fair treatment from automated systems.IntroductionRecent discourse in information ethics has raised questions about bias in search algorithms andmachine learning. Algorithms are sets of instructions within computer programs that direct howthese programs read, collect, process, and analyze data. Algorithms have become part of thearchitecture of much of the internet and are also the basis of artificial intelligence (AI). We usethe term algorithm bias to refer to computer systems that “systematically and unfairlydiscriminate against certain individuals or groups of individuals in favor of others.”1 Severalarticles and books, such as Safiya Noble’s Algorithms of
majors. In the capstone course,students are presented with overviews of each of the sponsoring organizations along with thebasic scope of each organization’s challenge. Students rank projects based on interest and thenare placed into teams taking into consideration student rankings, distribution of majors, and anyspecial circumstances for the project. For both courses, students remain in these teams for theentirety of the course. The original structure of the QUEST program consisted of a one-cohort model in whichone cohort of students was admitted each year. In 1992, 30 first-year undergraduate studentswere admitted as Cohort 1. As the program gained popularity and more qualified studentsapplied, more students were admitted and cohort
. Page 26.1773.2INTRODUCTIONThroughout history there have been many attempts to provide an incentive to graduate fromcollege as fast as possible in order to optimize the different resources available to students.1 Whencompared, some of these incentives have been more effective than others.2 Undergraduate studentstake longer than expected to graduate with a 4-year undergraduate degree.Specifically at The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) students take longer than the nationalaverage3 to graduate4. Some of the factors for this delay are: social setting (commuter campus),low-income student population, cohort is not as homogeneously defined as in a residential campus,and the lack of available data to the operator or the agents. In some cases the
the greatest challenges facing society today require technical solutions that can only becreated through collaboration within interdisciplinary teams.1 For these collaborations toeffectively harness the capabilities of groups that may not normally work together, effectivetechnical leadership must be deployed. Thus, the need for engineering leadership (EL).As evident by the development and growth of the Engineering Leadership Development Division(LEAD) within the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), recognition of the needto develop engineers with greater leadership skills is gaining momentum. However, observationsduring LEAD’s sessions at ASEE’s 2015 Annual Conference & Exposition seemed to indicatethat faculty engaged in
ignite their curiosity as theyinvestigate the Grand Challenges proposed by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE).Students from various majors work together in teams using their creativity to design a solutionthat solves the stakeholders’ needs. Students are motivated to produce a high quality design notonly through the intrinsic motivation of meeting stakeholders’ needs, but also by the requirementof holding a press-conference with local media, who will need to be convinced of both the needfor and the value of the students’ design.Background: About our ProgramThe program investigates the Grand Challenges proposed by the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE)1 in a multidisciplinary course providing credit in Communication, Physics,and
gender mix of students in traditional courses for the ElectricalEngineering program in our college versus the gender mix and race of students choosing othermayors such as humanities, business or arts programs [1]. In particular, four cohorts of the seniordesign classes were used to perform the investigation, with about a total of 120 studentsparticipating. The student population was as follows: Women (of any race) comprised about9.3% of the total class population for these senior design course offerings, while male African-American comprised 23%, and Hispanic students comprised 5.3%. On the other hand, inhumanities, business and arts programs, women comprised over 50.2%, African- American 27%,and Hispanic 2.61% of the student population. We also
showed a decline in the number of undergraduate studentsmoving on to graduate school after graduation 1. A report by the Council of Graduate Schools2suggest that in order for the United States to maintain its leadership role in global innovation anddiscovery, our country must continue to develop highly skilled human talent through graduateschool. Studies suggest that suggest that undergraduate research may hold some of the answersto increasing student learning, retention, graduation rates and entrance into graduate programs 3-9.Federal agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense, andNational Institute of Standards and Technology offer programs to provide research experiencesfor undergraduate students10-11. NSF’s
(RCBC), much attention isgiven to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education requirements around bothinstitutional and educational assessment. Guidance is given by Middle States through Standard 7(Institutional Assessment) and Standard 14 (Assessment of Student Learning) in the obsolete„Characteristics of Excellence‟, now being phased out as transition to a new set of standardsoccurs. The new standards contain a strong focus on assessment as well through Standard V(Educational Effectiveness Assessment), a condensed summary of which is presented in Table I1.Table I. Middle States New Standard V. Educational Effectiveness AssessmentNew Standard V. Condensed SummaryEducationalEffectivenessAssessment 1
, Engineering, Engineering TechnologyIntroductionDuring the 2014-2015 academic year, the SPIRIT (Scholarship Initiative via Recruitment,Innovation, and Transformation) Scholars program at Western Carolina University (WCU)provided 27 undergraduate students in engineering and engineering technology an opportunity toparticipate in a new approach to the recruitment, retention, education, and placement ofacademically talented and financially needy students. The SPIRIT program worked to establish atransformative learning environment through vertically and horizontally integratedinterdisciplinary project-based learning (PBL), undergraduate research, peer-to-peer mentorship,and focused institutional support services.1-8 WCU is classified as a regional
Challenges identified by theNational Academy of Engineers (NAE). The authors’ ultimate vision is that nanotechnologyeducation will become integrated into throughout engineering curricula by including relevantexamples in courses on traditional engineering subjects. This work is motivated by theimportance of creating a well-trained, diverse pool of professional engineers who will contributeto societal advancement. Altruism has been shown to have a significant influence on the careermotivations for Millennial and GenZ students.1‐4 The NAE Engineering Grand Challenges highlight the significant positive impact engineers canhave on solving global problems. Many of these solutions will involve nanotechnology. In factthere are striking similarities
, innovation suffers and emergingengineering students are left with a skill gap which employers are limited by their resources tofill4, 7-8. Therefore, in order to fill gap and create the next generation of innovative engineering,universities must adjust current engineering curriculum and find a balance between engineeringdisciplines and practical experience. Over the past decade many universities have adjusting curriculums to develop studentsinto T- Shape professionals, professionals who are highly trained in a single discipline, but havethe capability of communicating, understanding, and working with people from a variety of otherareas3-4, 9. Figure 1 represents a diagram that clearly defines the qualities of a T-shaped
the E-book and use the calculatorand interest tables to help themselves. This app has been developed for both Apple iOS andGoogle Android platforms, and they have been released in the Google Play and Apple App Store.The cross-platform app development allows easy deployment to multiple mobile platforms. Thisapp is intended to give students more opportunity to learn and practice concepts of EngineeringEconomics whenever and where they want using their mobile devices.* Acknowledgment: This project is partially supported by a grant from the National ScienceFoundation DUE-1140457 to Lamar University. Page 26.541.2 1. Introduction Engineering
Lesson 1 (Day 1 & 2) Lesson 2 (Day 3-5) Lesson 3 (Day 6 & 7) Introduction: Biotechnology: Surface Area: Engineering & Cells DNA Extractions Data Analysis & Measurement - Introduction to the - Learn how to extract DNA - Use physical and graphical models to design challenge from cells explain the relationship of exterior and STEM Integration Activities - Review cell
Paper ID #13075Engineering Graphics Concepts: A Delphi StudyDr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Learning in the Purdue College of Technology where she provided leadership for strategic initiatives in undergraduate education. As a professor of Computer Graphics, her research interests include enhancing visualization skills, cre- ative thinking, and learning styles. She is currently funded to begin gathering data to create a concept inventory for engineering graphics. As
on the experiences of African-Americans onmultiracial teams and this study aims to fill that gap.This qualitative study employs a phenomenological approach, using a three-interview sequencewith eight African-American male engineering students across academic levels (average age =19) as they worked on team projects at a large research-intensive, predominantly whiteinstitution (PWI). The project durations ranged from two weeks to two full semesters. The semi-structured interviews 1) gathered background information about participants, 2) exploredparticipant descriptions of the team functionality during the project, and 3) asked participants toreflect on the experience in the context of their engineering education and identities. Followingthe
. Page 26.1275.2Introduction and Literature ReviewPast research shows the need for an educational shift in the general engineering curricula from apurely technical focus to one that will add entrepreneurial skills to complement theirundergraduate engineering major.1 Angela Shartrand, et al.2, in “Technology Entrepreneurshipprograms in U.S. Engineering Schools: An Analysis of programs at the undergraduate level”examined programs and courses offered at 340 ASEE member schools in the U.S. Theirresearch showed that “entrepreneurship education is available in at least half of the engineeringprogrammed examined and has been integrated within the engineering program in approximately25% of these programs”2. We asked ourselves the question “do engineer
materials and teaching methods.1 While thesematerials and methods are evidence-based and shown to positively affect student learningand educational outcomes, they have been slow to be adopted or disseminated.In an effort to improve curriculum sharing, there is currently a two-part study underway forthe development and dissemination of a web based repository containing curriculummaterials and best practices. These two efforts are in place to understand, facilitate, andencourage sharing of materials and best practices between educators. The first is thedevelopment and refinement of the web-based repository for curriculum materials; thesecond is a study on the curricular decision-making processes of transportation engineeringeducators.The overarching
the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing Page 26.1390.1 comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ABET and of the AIChE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Spatial Visualization Skills Intervention for First Year Engineering Students: Everyone’s a Winner!IntroductionThe connection between spatial visualization skills and performance in engineering courseworkis becoming more evident 1-3
engineering is an up-to-date issue and is a topic of internationaldiscussions. US, European and Asian researches suggested many innovative ideas that allowfor better international engineering interaction and students’ readiness for the open world [1],[3], [6], [8], [9]. For example corporate education presented by Herman Schneider more thana hundred years ago was successfully implemented as the option for students to gain secondlanguage proficiency and international job experience [3]. Page 26.425.2 Leading Russian universities also take part in the global integration process. Thenumber of international students is increasing from year to year
scientific and engineering principles with the new tools of technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Enabling Machine Design Innovation among Freshman Mechanical Engineering Students Anurag Purwar Research Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Director, Computer-Aided Design and Innovation Lab Stony Brook University (SUNY), New York, USA anurag.purwar@stonybrook.edu1 IntroductionThis paper presents 1) creation and teaching of a newly developed Freshman Design Innovation(FDI) class for Mechanical Engineering students at Stony Brook University (SBU), and 2) Mo-tionGen, a
study their preferences and therefore acquire knowledge to build age appropriate userinterfaces to control the Online Laboratory in order to make these more attractive andtherefore improve the learning experiences.Together with national and international partners we are carrying out a project that placesstudents of technical secondary schools in Austria in the role of remote laboratory developersunder the supervision and tutoring of the project staff. Students are actively involved in thescientific process and actively participate in the acquisition of knowledge.The project pursues three main objectives: 1. Studies on age-appropriate requirements for the use of Online Laboratories at secondary schools. 2. Peer feedback to improve the
/engineering technology course that was designed to support student retention. Anew course could not simply be added to the existing curriculum of the university’s engineeringand engineering technology degrees, however, as state law capped the hours required for anundergraduate degree. Instead, the researchers customized an introduction to the universityfreshman seminar course for engineering and engineering technology majors. This course designadapted elements from successful first-year introductory classes in Engineering and EngineeringTechnology at other universities. Besides fostering a learning community between Engineeringand Engineering Technology students, the objectives of the new course include: (1) introductionof design and problem solving
along theway. We believe that this intentional emphasis on connections between disciplines develops theinterdisciplinary skills and perspectives which are important for graduation, and it lays thegroundwork for interdisciplinary thinking in the workplace.1. Interdisciplinary Learning in Undergraduate EducationUndergraduate degree programs consist of courses for a major and general education courses.Each degree program has learning outcomes mapped to the outcomes of its courses. Ideally,students establish synergistic connections among the different courses in the curriculum.However, abundant evidence suggests that transfer of skills between courses is relatively rare.1-3Students often do not make connections between general education courses and