learning experiences. She has authored numerous engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre- College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating discussions in science and engineering.Jamie Mikeska © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Simulated Engineering Teaching Experiences
Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Adding a “Design Thread” to Electrical and Computer Engineering Degree Programs: Motivation, Implementation, and EvaluationAbstractThis article details the multi-year process of adding a “design thread” to a four year,undergraduate electrical and computer engineering curricula. We use the conception of a“thread” to mean a sequence of courses that extend unbroken across each year of theundergraduate curriculum. The design thread includes a project-based introduction to thediscipline course in the
strengths might be a viable option to foster an increase instudent engineering identity.AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by the National Science Foundation Award # 1744006. The authors aregrateful to the help provided by the following research students at Angelo State University: JesseLee, Maria Ochoa, Austin Poole, Nicholas Manrique and Timmons (TJ) Spies.References[1] M. Cooley (1989). "Human-centered Systems." Designing Human-centred Technology, 133–143. Springer.[2] M. Garbuio, & M. Dressel (2019). 6 Building Blocks of Successful Innovation: HowEntrepreneurial Leaders Design Innovative Futures. Routledge.[3] P. Polak (2008). Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional Methods Fail. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.[4] B. Amadei (2014
complex engineering design projects. Her scholarship is grounded in notions of learning as a social process, influenced by complexity theories, sociocultural theories, sociolinguistics, and the learning sciences.Ms. Kate FisherProf. Zachary Holman, Arizona State UniversityMathew D. Evans, Arizona State University Mathew D Evans is currently a doctoral candidate at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Fostering Belonging through an Undergraduate Summer Internship: A Community of Practice model for engineering research educationIn the 21st century, it is not sufficient for engineering students to acquire good
-2019/#GC3 (accessed Jan. 25, 2024).[7] H. J. Passow and C. H. Passow. “What competencies should undergraduate engineeringprograms emphasize? A systematic review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 3,pp. 475-526, July 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20171.[8] C. E. Baukal, C. Stokeld, and L. A. Thurman. “What Employers Look for in NewEngineering Graduates," 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN,USA, June 26-29, 2022, Paper 36984.[9] E. Khoo, K. Zegwaard, and A. Adam, “Employer and academic staff perceptions of scienceand engineering graduate competencies,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol.25, no. 1, pp. 103-118, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1801238.[10] M. Cooper and E. D. Cardenas-Vasquez
postsecondary design courses starting in 2015. The findings highlightedthe limitations of postsecondary course content due to time constraints, prompting a focus ondeveloping a yearlong college preparatory secondary HE education program for fourth-yearstudents. Implementing this, observational data and feedback were collected from three cohortsof fourth-year secondary students before and after graduation. This data collection spanned afour-year period between 2019 and 2023 [17]. The aim was to discern which knowledgecomponents and learning practices of their yearlong secondary HE program significantlycontributed to their success at the postsecondary level. The findings revealed that students whoreceive comprehensive instruction and practice across a
% 97.6% 94.4% 80.3% David 9-12 75% 46% 78.4% 77.1% Karen 6-8 32.1% 7.9% 48.2% 28.8% Note. Pct. = Percentage of total. Eco Dis.= Economically Disadvantaged. Source: All data is reported by schools to government based on the 2015-2016 school year, and accessed through U.S. News & World Report, 2019. Culturally Responsive Teaching Outcome Expectations (CRTOE). The CROTEsurvey is designed to provide insight on the set of beliefs that teachers hold about the positiveoutcomes associated with culturally responsive teaching practices. The survey is a self-reportedmeasure whereupon teachers rate the
’ engagement with co-curricular and extracurricular activities [41]. • Examining how instructional innovations or educational interventions could enhance student engagement. This research area involves intervention studies that include student engagement as an outcome. It constituted the largest research area within the ASEE conference papers that included “student engagement” in their titles, as revealed in our literature search on the PEER repository in January 2024. As an example, one study reported the contribution of a hands-on design experience to first-year engineering students’ increased engagement with engineering studies [2]. This research area can overlap with the second one that examines the
: Accelerating female talent in science, engineering, and Technology. Center for Talent Innovation, 2014. [Online]. http://www.talentinnovation.org/publication.cfm?publication=1420 [3] J. Williams, S. Li, R. Rincon, and P. Finn, “Climate Control: Gender and Racial Bias in Engineering?,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4014946. [4] R. Yonemura and D. Wilson, “Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and Otherwise Chilly Conditions,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26843. [5] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships
protocol following a critical incident approach [31]. Senior faculty included those atthe Professor rank and Associate Professor rank for a minimum of two years. Junior facultyincluded those at the Assistant Professor rank and Associate Professor rank for less than twoyears. Participants were recruited from the top twenty largest US doctoral-granting engineeringschools, as determined by the 2021 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Engineering by the Numbers report [32]. The research team contacted the heads/chairs ofengineering departments within each of these twenty institutions with a request to share a studyinvitation and screening survey link with their engineering faculty. The screening survey wasdesigned to take approximately 10
currently serves as his Department's Head, an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Mentor, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Civil Engineering Division Freshman Director.Camilla M. Saviz (Professor and Chair) Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA where she has happily taught since 1999. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis in the area of hydrodynamic and water quality modeling
teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Kelly Ann Arcieri (Co-op/Internship Advisor) Kelly Arcieri has served as the Co-op/Internship Advisor for the Civil Engineering and Computer Science programs at York College of Pennsylvania since 2017. She teaches a career training class to prepare civil engineering and computer science sophomores for their first co-op or internship. Kelly has helped 167 students to find nearly 200 co-ops or internships. With over 30 years of experience in
-Buonincontro J (2019) STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31: 31-43.3. Aguilera D, Ortiz-Revilla J (2021) STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7): 331.4. Akçalı E, M Buraglia, A Essenfeld, J Williams (2021). Poetry writing in engineering education: Results and insights from an exploratory study, 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, https://peer.asee.org/375855. Akçalı E, J Williams, Burress R, Aguila A, M Buraglia, (2023). In their own words: Student perceptions of technical poetry writing in discipline-specific undergraduate engineering courses: Opportunities and challenges, INFORMS Transactions
engineering program, and over three years at a community college. Dr. O’Riordan-Adjah help develop the college’s strategic plan during his time at one of the community colleges. He is committed to aligning student learning to not only the strategic plan but also the real world, and employer needs. He understands how the college can serve students holistically by focusing on retention and student success initiatives, like improved advising, success coaching, and connections to employers. He is also an advocate of the Building and Construction Trades which provides a great opportunity for hands-on student enthusiasts. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference
Paper ID #40074The Person behind the Mann Report: Charles Riborg Mann as an Influentialbut Elusive Figure in Engineering EducationDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She has served twice as chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is co-director of the Communication Across Divisions initiative. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Person Behind the Mann
threads together descriptions of six different modes of complexity that engineers andbuilders working in predominantly Alaska Native remote communities have described as beingsituationally important for designing and constructing culturally and environmentally relevanthomes. As the engineers, carpenters, builders, drafters, economists, scientists, policymakers, andhomeowners we have spoken to affirm, it is important to unpack the implications that varyingsituational forces have on building processes. In doing so, engineers and builders canintentionally “think locally” and embrace complexity rather than ignore its impact on jointactivities (Escobar 2019). As Annemarie Mol and John Law have argued, the concept of“complexity” can be used to
of ABET, and is currently Secretary/Treasurer of the ABET Foundation Board of Directors. She has also served as a program evaluator for J.D. pro- grams for the ABA, for universities’ regional accreditation for SACSCOC, and for Business Schools for AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Christine A. Stanley, Texas A&M University Christine A. Stanley is professor of higher education, holder of the Ruth Harrington Endowed Chair, and vice president and associate provost for diversity emerita in the College of
engagement and achievement in school,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22.[26] H. De Loof, A. Struyf, J. Boeve-de Pauw, and P. Van Petegem, “Teachers’ Motivating Style and Students’ Motivation and Engagement in STEM: the Relationship Between Three Key Educational Concepts,” Res. Sci. Educ. Australas. Sci. Educ. Res. Assoc., 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9830- 3.[27] G. Crosling, M. Heagney, and L. Thomas, “Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: Improving Teaching and Learning,” Aust. Univ. Rev., Jan. 2009, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.159225407205474.[28] E. A. Skinner and J. R. Pitzer, “Developmental
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
future.Ms. Reya Magan, Duke University Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science student at Duke UniversityDr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American
theory.Student Learning Approach and Course DevelopmentIn the Summer of 2019 the authors participated in their Center for Advancement of Teaching’ssummer course (re)design program to design their Control Systems and Instrumentation course.During this program, the authors worked through the book, Building a Pathway for StudentLearning [13]. Before this program, the authors approached the course design as “how can wepossibly consolidate all these topics to one course?” The course changed the authors’ narrative to“what do our students look like after they have completed our course? What can they do thatthey could not before taking our course?” From this crucial change in perspective, the authorsbegan to work backwards from a final project, build an