. Six semester hours, representing the sciencecourse and the humanities/social science elective course, may be taken at the cooperatingtechnical and community colleges, for a total of 70 semester hours of such transfer credit (forstudents in this distance learning program only). Even though the program is spaced out over a period of four or more years, it is arelatively intensive commitment for the working adults, many with families, which it serves. Itrequires taking two courses per semester, involving two evenings per week plus study andresearch time. And it is relentless, maintaining this pace for four years. Furthermore, sincethere are no other cohorts planned at this time, any failure or withdrawal from a required courseis
document the steps of disassembly in a disassembly plan (in order to aid in reassemblingthe product) and also develop a bill of materials which lists all of the parts contained within theproduct. An exploded view and subtract-and-operate procedure are required to make the studentsconsider assemblability issues and to truly understand how their product fits together. Actualproduct function is documented and compared to the prediction. A morphological matrix isconstructed using the parts and their corresponding functions, and function sharing throughoutthe device is investigated. Once the students fully understand the physical nature of their productand its functionality, they are asked to develop complete QFD matrices for the product
adapted for manufacturing in Mexico, at a cost that would make a NAFTAtrading bloc more competitive against the Asian manufacturers.The best way for an exchange student to exploit these opportunities is to develop an overallexchange concept and goal - e.g., to gain an understanding of manufacturing engineering in Canadaor Mexico. This could be done through a combination of courses, projects, and industrial contacts.This is better than making the direct equivalency of courses the first priority. The objective should beto transcend the similarities and to learn what is different and distinctive. The next step is to presentexchange a learning project, We train our students to plan and carry out engineering projects, so whynot approach exchange in
from industrial sponsors, some primarily associatedwith the competition, and some specifically with the Rose-Hulman team. A list of industrialsponsors is given at the club web site2.The VehicleAfter several years of refinement, and a few substantial changes in the competition rules, the1998 vehicle consists of a large model helicopter with on-board computer and sensors, and aground station for image processing and path planning. Because of planned changes in thecompetition mission for 2000, the club is also adding a ground robot to the system, although thispart is not expected to be operational at the 1999 event.The main vehicle is based on a Bergen Industrial Twin model helicopter with a two-cylindergasoline engine and a five-foot diameter
Technology programs. He is also member of AIChE and ASEE. Currently, he serves as director for ASEE’s Engineering Technology Council (ETC).Dr. Lisa Deane Morano, University of Houston Lisa Morano is a Professor of Biology and Microbiology at the University of Houston-Downtown (UHD). She is also the Director of the Center for Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (CUAS) at UHD. Her research has focused on the bacteria found inside plan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024A Student Experiential Learning Program – An Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainability Vassilios Tzouanas1 and Lisa Morano2 1
accessible as aprimary focus to engineering students with tight degree plan requirements within their majors.The proposed specialization is an important long-term programmatic creation effort to advancesustainability education within engineering. The department chair has supported a multi-yeareffort to support and create student-centric community-engaged learning opportunities. Thisdepartment driven (top-down) effort is also supported at college level by the Associate Dean andDirector for Academic Programs in the College of Food, Agricultural and EnvironmentalSciences.The Engineering for One Planet Mini-Grant resources were to develop General Education courseofferings within the Sustainability theme as well as technical electives that promote
kind of major-related transferable skills did you learn during the independent study/undergraduate research? Please list them below: Q.11. Please explain how independent study/undergraduate research experience influences your academic and career plans. Also, you can make suggestions that could improve participant experience in the future course offerings. Figure 1: Survey questionnaire for the studyThe data collected through the surveys were analyzed to understand the students’ perceptionsand attitudes about the independent study. The Qualtrics survey was sent to about 22 studentswho took the independent study with the authors in the last few years, only 12 that is 55%responded. The
. The self-assessment form can be found in Appendix A. In general, very few students are aware of ABETor of its student outcomes [11]. By having the students participate in the self-assessment processand reflect on their experiences, each student is able to identify outcomes which have not beenachieved and develop a plan to achieve all ABET outcomes prior to graduation. This proactiveself-assessment prompts students to identify weak points in their education and has the potentialto shape better student outcomes, filling all the ABET student outcomes and preparing studentsto be well-rounded engineers.[12]. The two senior semesters of IBL allow the students to directtheir learning and create their own learning experiences to address these
Systemic Change inEngineering Education” [10]. A planned NAE Engineering of 2050 Report describes thedirection, the referenced ASEE Mindset Report sets the path, and The Blueprint for ChangeAward develops an actionable plan to get engineering where it needs to be.The author also had opportunity to spend time with invited researcher Dr. Amy Salazar,Associate Vice Provost of Student Success at Sam Houston State University (SHSU), in multiplevenues over several days in 2023 and 2024. Dr. Salazar conducted an in-depth study on LearningLoss influences on SHSU students, faculty and staff [3]. In addition to identifying overallimpacts to her institution – such as declining performance indicators like recruitment, retentionand persistence; loss of revenue
Network Analysis (ENA)One possible strategy for analyzing the connections between these frame elements is ENA, amethod that uses coded data to find temporal connections between ideas within an individual orcommunity. Each of these codes are represented as a node in the network, and edges betweennodes represent the strength of an individual or community’s connection between those twocodes. For example, epistemic network analysis has been used to investigate how engineeringidentity emerges as students participate in a medical device company simulation [12], howstudents develop an epistemic frame when completing an urban planning simulation [13], andhow engineering values and epistemology emerge as students participate in a four-weekengineering
director, or they may have been the product of such a program. In neither case,however, is it possible for new directors to understand and learn every aspect of planning andstrategy. Even if the previous director desires to impart all that they know, it is possible that thereis knowledge or meta-knowledge that they, themselves, are unaware they possess.Another challenge is the lack of widespread understanding of the state of the art in diversity,equity, inclusion, and belonging from a practitioner standpoint. The community exists in a stateof functional dichotomy between those designated as researchers and practitioners. In addition,there are many members of the academic community who are not aware of either the currentstate of practice OR
, and Canvasas the Learning Management System (LMS). Additionally, E. Session 3: Final Preparations and Strategyparticipants learn how to interact with their IoT devices,including initial setup, connectivity, and basic programming. The final session before the marathon event allows teamsThis session ensures teams are equipped with the necessary to refine their strategies and address any remaining technicaltools and understanding for effective collaboration and project or conceptual challenges. Participants review their progress,management. Figure 3 finalize their project plans, and ensure all components are fully
with the rubric encouraged educators to internalize itsconcepts, making inclusivity a central consideration in their pedagogical planning and execution.In addition, the rubric was adaptively used in action research projects, underscoring its versatilityand applicability across various educational initiatives. Although it was not initially specified asa requirement for these projects, educators intuitively incorporated the rubric into their researchmethodologies. This spontaneous adoption highlights the rubric’s utility in structuring inquiriesinto inclusive practices, enabling educators to conduct meaningful investigations that contributeto the broader discourse on equity in STEM education.Through both its immediate application during the
connections.• Boeing is working with several airports, airlines and other partners in developing tools such as SARA (Speed & Route Advisor) for “tailored arrivals”.• SARA delivered traffic within 30 seconds of planned time on 80% approaches at Schiphol airport in Holland compared to within two minutes on a baseline of 67%.• At San Francisco Airport, more than 1700 complete and partial tailored arrivals were completed between December 2007 and June 2009 using the B777 and B747 aircraft. The tailored arrivals saved an average of 950kg of fuel and ~ $950 per approach. Complete tailored arrivals saved approximately 40% of the fuel used in arrivals. For one year period, four participating airlines saved more than 524,000 kg of fuel and
results-driven outcomes. Thephilosophy of this approach focuses on three components: 1) a clear set of desired results byidentifying goals for students, identifying the specific information students will understand andwhat students would be able to do as a result of the learning activity; 2) identification ofassessment evidence, allowing teachers to develop performance tasks to evaluate student results;and, 3) creating a learning plan that includes activities for students, enabling them to achieve thedesired results.This approach allows us to address the lessons learned in Year 1, because the approach will workregardless of the framework standard or grade level. This approach also allows teachers to use
in decision-making representation in decision- decision-making making Shared Funding • Undercompensating the • Provide fair & equitable • Set up a sustainable funding community partners funding to community for system for the future • No plan for long-term duration of project • Community can generate operations & • Funding is centered around value after the project has maintenance
engineering set-up and anybusiness model that is to appropriately capture and nurture the essence of engineering firms mustof a necessity be able to position innovation properly as a value proposition that is central andconnected to all activities of such firms.The Business Model Canvas is a model building tool that has had wide use since it wasconceived in planning for the future of an enterprise. It is used principally to identify the valueinherent in a business activity and how such value will be packaged and offered to the targetmarket. However, just like any other business concept, the Business Model Canvas has itsdrawbacks and researchers are quick to point to what it cannot do more than what it can do. TheBusiness Model Canvas proposed by
students are encouraged to consider these specific course learning outcomes:1. Apply a formal engineering design process to solve an open-ended, externally supplied engineering design problem.2. Work effectively on an engineering team.3. Formally define an engineering problem and generate an engineering specification document.4. Apply creative techniques to generate conceptual design solutions.5. Apply structured decision schemes to select appropriate engineering concepts in a team environment.6. Evaluate potential design solutions through the use of engineering and physical science analysis techniques and tools.7. Construct and test prototype designs.8. Develop and implement a design verification plan and report.9. Communicate and
collaborations. To help meet these goals, Harvard and USP participants were fullyintegrated in the classroom, on field visits, in hotels, and throughout their social interactions.Participants were encouraged to experience the culture of the destination cities during the freetime and organized group outings. Additionally, students were given information about potentialfunding opportunities for international internships and were encouraged to talk with facultymembers about their academic and career goals.Course planning and pre-departure preparationsIn order to plan an effective course that encompassed these comprehensive goals, a long-termcollaborative effort by a dedicated team of faculty and staff members from the three sponsoringinstitutions was
Page 22.7.2the US workforce in general. Within the DoD, jobs associated with capability planning andrequirements definition, as well as much of the studies and analysis efforts that support pre-acquisition decision making, are typically not counted as part of the acquisition workforce, butthey often require individuals with STEM proficiencies. Within the STEM career fields, theDoD has singled out Systems Engineering (SE) as a critical need in order to improve the abilityto conceive , develop, sustain, modify and eventually retire its’ warfighting systems. Thosepersonnel identified as occupying critical positions (typically those in the acquisition workforce)receive training and certification on SE through a series of Defense Acquisition
specific focus on theterms A(amplitude) and (angular velocity). There were four primary goals for this project: (1)to open lines of communication between the University Saint Thomas and local PK-12 teachers,(2) to aid in the teaching of trigonometry lessons through the use of hands-on activities created tosatisfy MN Academic Standard #9.2.1., (3) to incorporate engineering content into math lessons,and (4) to hone students’ visual-to-mathematic conversion skills, which has been recognized asan increasingly important skill1 for students to possess. This paper discusses the collaborationprocess and presents a lesson plan that can be replicated by other schools.IntroductionThe engineering department at the University of Saint Thomas was approached by
the identified areas. Thesurvey instrument is unique in that it presents students with a realistic global engineeringscenario, and then prompts them to pick the specific abilities and qualities they think would bemost essential for completing the described assignment. The list of 15 attributes presented torespondents is focused on the professional and global dimensions of engineering practice, and isbased on relevant attributes from Purdue University’s Engineer of 2020 initiative. In addition topresenting aggregate results from the survey, we use demographic data to discuss somesimilarities and differences across different sub-populations. We conclude with a discussion ofongoing and future work, including similar surveys planned for faculty
was charged with the development and implementation of a strategic plan for Texas A&M in South America. While at the Office for Latin America Programs, Maria was also responsible for the opening of the Soltis Center in Costa Rica. Maria speaks three languages fluently (Spanish, Portuguese and English). Maria completed her undergraduate studies at Lynn University in Florida, where she graduated with honors in Business Administration in 2002. She was part of the tennis team and was the team captain for two years, including the year the team was NCAA National Champion in 2001. She is a December 2003 graduate of the MS-Marketing program at Texas A&M University. And in the Fall of 2009, Maria started the PhD
during the summer. In this paper, two GEPexperiences are presented: one in Scandinavia and one in Egypt-Jordan. The authors agree withMintz et al.2 who noted that participatory and active learning experiences were the mostsignificant learning experiences in a study to educate engineers in addressing global societalproblems. In fact, participatory and active learning experiences have been emphasized in theGEP since its inception.3.1 The Scandinavian ExperienceBefore the first GEP to Scandinavia, pre-planning trips were undertaken to make appropriatecontacts with Copenhagen University and Danish Institute for Study Abroad (DIS) and to lay thegroundwork for delivery of the course and cultural experience. Issues of safety were paramountand access to
programs, with the capability for adaptation by other fields of study.The authors also presented a conceptual model for integrating and synthesizing the industrialengineering curriculum. We began by identifying the core knowledge areas of IE and theexpected life-long engineering proficiencies. We then developed a plan that builds on andcontinually reinforces these areas throughout the curriculum in support of our first objective ofintegration. Following this we detailed a plan for combining the technical skills with life-longengineering proficiencies, in support of our second objective of synthesis. Finally, we discussedcurricular implications of the changing role of science and technology in society. Pedagogicalissues related to each of
in the era of manufacturing, have a focus on thedesign and fabrication of “products” rather than the design and creation of service systems.While curricula such as engineering management and industrial engineering provide somesupport to service systems engineering, their legacies are tied to the manufacturing sector, and asa result, they are not optimized to support the service sector. With this in mind, a Delphi Studywas performed to identify the features, characteristics, and topics relevant to a service systemsengineering curriculum. This paper describes the planning, conduct, and results of the servicesystems engineering Delphi Study and how this information is being used to establish a newdegree program.IntroductionThe modern-day
for that and tohave a plan for dealing with it. Thinking about it ahead of time, free from the stress and emotionof a change in progress, will lessen the blow and make the change easier to handle. Likewise, itis folly to spend years waiting for a negative to change if it is never going to happen.Learning and Development “The term development implies a positive step forward towards the future, with better personal well-being and professional growth as the outcomes. Career development no longer implies onwards and upwards for the broad mass of people, and perhaps it never did. Career development is coming to mean developing the workplace in a way which is personally satisfying. Development can occur when people
material. An infrastructure of learningmodules complements the general analysis thread in engineering education while imposingcontrolled exposure to CAE software. Learning modules expose students to state-of-the-art CAEtools without requiring a specialized CAE course. Encouraging the development of CAE skills,the project aims to facilitate and enhance undergraduate scholarship such as capstone seniordesign projects. This paper discusses the project strategies, concerns, plans for assessment, andsome formative assessment results. The project reveals a practical means for faculty to begindeveloping and implementing active learning techniques.IntroductionThe Mercer University School of Engineering (MUSE) strives to prepare graduates to serve
engineering remains a problem.In this paper, we describe development of a seminar course to address other ABETCriterion 3 outcomes in the freshman year, particularly global and societal context (h),contemporary issues (j), and lifelong learning (i). Objectives-based course design wasused to develop activities directed toward these outcomes. Assessments of both the pilotand the full program involving all USC engineering freshmen are presented.Improvements made and future plans will also be discussed.IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) EC 2000 Criterion 3mandates 11 program outcomes common to all engineering degree programs seekingaccreditation to ensure that engineering graduates have the nontechnical skills
students time to plan their answers, and therewas no defined element of presentation of their final solutions.In the mid 1990s there was a concerted movement in education to research, identify, andincorporate effective methods of authentic assessment. This effort was supported and funded bythe US Department of Education (Kerka, 1995). The results were as expected: Authenticassessment methods that incorporate a wide variety of techniques designed to correspond asclosely as possible to 'real world' student experiences are most effective and representative(Custer 1994; Rudner and Boston 1994). Further research has shown that projects and workbased on authentic assessment have longer-lasting influences on students’ confidence andmarketability