Asee peer logo
Displaying results 691 - 720 of 1303 in total
Conference Session
Green Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Radian G. Belu, Drexel University; Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University, Goodwin College of Professional Studies, Engineering Technology Program
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
://www.nrel.gov/learning/,Accessed: 19 January 2009.3. U.S Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,http://energy.senate.gov/news/dem_release.cfm?id=2211794. H. Salehfar, “State of the Art Power Electronics, Electric Drives, and Renewable Energy Systems Laboratories atthe University of North Dakota”, Proceedings, 2005 IEEE PES General Meeting, San Francisco, CA, June 12-16.5. P. Jennings, “New directions in renewable energy education”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, 2009, pp. 435-439.6. J. DeWaters, S. Powers, "Work in progress – energy education and energy literacy: Benefits of rigor andrelevance", Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009. FIE '09. 39th ASEE/IEEE, San Antonio, TX, 2009.7. M. H. Nehrir, “A course on alternative energy wind/PV/fuel
Conference Session
New Research & Trends for Minorities in Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
K.L. Jordan, Michigan Technological University; Susan Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Sheryl A. Sorby, Michigan Technological University; Tammy L Haut Donahue, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
belonging in engineering?To analyze the data scores were computed and the appropriate statistical analysistechniques were applied.Question 1Are there differences in students’ engineering self-efficacy across academic levels?This question asks if there is a difference in the engineering self-efficacy of a sophomoreengineering student as compared to a freshman engineering student, and so forth. Thisquestion seeks to find the result for all students, regardless of ethnicity. Table 3 shows theANOVA table for the subscales contributing to engineering self-efficacy. The resultsshow that there is/are marginally significant difference(s) between means of the fourclasses (Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior) for math outcome expectations (F =14.356, p = 0.0
Collection
2011 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Iem Heng; Farrukh Zia
connection to pin RC2#define LED1 PORTC.RC2// User defined function to convert strings to individual characters// for serial transmission by the USART_Write library function.void COM_Write (char *s){ while (*s) { USART_Write(*s++);}}// main programvoid main (void){ int Adc_Val; char txt[6]; // string length must be 6 as required by WordToStr() Usart_Init (9600); // initialize PIC serial port speed to 9600 baud TRISC.RC2 = 0; // set RC2 as digital output pin LED1 = 0; // initialize LED1 to OFF state for (;;) { Adc_Val = Adc_Read (0); // read ADC channel 0 WordToStr(Adc_Val, txt); // convert ADC value to string COM_Write (txt); // write value string to PC
Conference Session
Engineering Design in Pedagogy
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
students starting andfinishing the sequence of engineering courses at each high school to help the team address thesecond research question: Does student participation in a multi-year sequence of courses focusedon engineering correlate with changes in performance or design knowledge?AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. DRL-0918621. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation. References1. National Center for Technological Literacy. Our Nation's Challenge. 2010 [cited 2010 January 12
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Schneider, Cornell University; Maria Terrell, Cornell University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
concepts represented on the MAI from pre-calculus are average of numbers,average rate of change, fractional change, reasoning from and about graphs/graphical displays,asymptotic behavior, and signed numbers (arithmetic with positive and negative numbers). Themathematical concepts from introductory calculus include the derivative, the definite integral,and the fundamental theorem of calculus. MAI items were categorized into a short taxonomybased on the mathematical content area(s) represented and the cognitive process (knowing,applying, or reasoning) required to solve the item.In addition to analyzing students’ open-ended responses to the MAI test items, researchers alsoconducted in-depth interviews with a sample of fourteen students immediately
Conference Session
They're Not "Soft" Skills!
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eckehard Doerry, Northern Arizona University; James Dean Palmer, Northern Arizona University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
number of team members. Thus, each member of a three-personteam would have 300 points to distribute across the three teammates, representing contributionsby each teammate to the team deliverable(s); in a well-balanced team, each team member wouldsimply receive 100 points. To guard against vindictive or wildly unfair ratings, detailedcommentaries justifying each rating in terms of tasks assigned and completed was required aswell, and students were informed that they might be contacted by the instructor for clarificationin extreme cases. Team members emailed their ratings to the instructor, who averaged theratings received for each team member (including the self-rating) to arrive at an overall peerrating; this rating was then counted towards the
Conference Session
Best Zone Paper Competition
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College
Tagged Topics
Council of Sections
Education Leadership and Policy.2. National Science Foundation (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2007, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.3. National Science Foundation (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2004, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6
Conference Session
Robot Mania!
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeffrey H. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology, CEISMC
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
Robotics course instructor available to answer her questions and provide tips andresources, she became more confident in her role over the course of the semester and alsorealized that she is not “in this all alone.” The key point that the teacher reported in coming tothe ePDN Robotic course was that she felt the need to be educated to integrate Robotics into theschool curriculum and to develop technological fluency. She also reported that she first neededto experience Robotics design experience herself and to engage in a learning by designexperience through a professional development course in order to teach robotics courseseffectively in her school. The LEGO Robotics ePDN courses met these needs. She concludedthe interview by stating ”It s like a
Conference Session
Design Communications & Cognition II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Caleb DeValve, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
. Page 22.904.12References[1] Malik Q, Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Buch N, Shanblatt M, Pierce SJ, 2010. Understanding student attitudes in a freshman design sequence. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1179-1191[2] Farrell S, Hesketh RP, Newell JA, Slater CS, 2001. Introducing freshmen to reverse engineering and design through investigation of the brewing process. International Journal of Engineering Education; 17(6): 588-592[3] Al-Rizzo H, Mohan S, Reed M, Kinley D, Hemphill Z, Finley C, Pope A, Osborn D, Crolley W, 2010. Directional-based cellular e-commerce: undergraduate systems engineering capstone design project. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1285-1304.[4] Hines PD
Conference Session
Ethical Perspectives on the Grand Challenges of Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
upon work supportedby the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1033111.References1. Berra, Y. (2002) When You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It!: Inspiration and Wisdom from One of Baseball's Greatest Heroes, Hyperion: 1592. National Academy of Engineering (2008) Grand Challenges for Engineering, http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/Object.File/Master/11/574/Grand Challenges final book.pdf3. Marx, L. (1987) Does improved technology mean progress? Technology Review (January): 33-41; 714. Gray, E. (1988) The World That Moses Built, PBS, The American Experience5. Dolnick, S. (2010) On Bronx Stoops, a Highway’s Traffic Entertains, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/02/nyregion/02bottleneck.html
Conference Session
Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
traversing of an engineerthrough the world in this context can help define engineering.      Bibliography 1. Dall’Alba, G., J. Sandberg. (2006). Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models. Review of Educational Research. 76(3). 383-412. 2. Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning Professional Ways of Being: Ambiguities of Becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 41(1): 34-45. 3. Florman, S.(1976). The Existential Pleasures of Engineering. St. Martin’s Griffin. New York City. 4. Bonasso, S. G. (2001). Engineering, Leadership, and Integral Philosophy. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 127(1), 17. 5
Conference Session
Incorporating Innovative Technologies into the Curriculum
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael J. Kozak, University of Dayton
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
quiz administered after activity four were inconsistent and itis difficult to generalize beyond what has already been discussed.ConclusionsThe assessment instrument was found to be very poor at discriminating between the relativemerits of the different activities. The author strongly feels that there was significant growth ofthe students’ R&R knowledge and capabilities from activity to activity, but it is not apparentfrom the assessment tools that were used. Further development and refinement of the author’simplemented assessment tools are required.Bibliography1. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, January 5, 2011.2. Bloom, Benjamin S., Engelhart, Max D., Furst, Edward J., Hill
Conference Session
Design Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lynne A. Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; J.Kevin Taylor, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
ddesigned for UPF. The R Rockn’ Bowleer allows a person with partial p quadrriplegia to boowl. This devvice is a “high-end”attachmeent for the Un niversal Playy Frame, giv ving the userr a great deall of control oover the spinn andplacemen nt of the balll. Perhaps th he most uniqu ue feature off the Rock nn’ Bowler is the powereddspinning rail system that can be used u to add spin s to the b all. As the bball rolls dow wn the ramp,, itcomes inn contact with h two rails spinning
Conference Session
Teaching Mechanics
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ing-Chang Jong, University of Arkansas; William T. Springer, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
2009. His research interests are in mechanics and engineering education.William T. Springer, University of Arkansas William T. Springer is 21st Century Chair in Mechanical Engineering and Associate Professor at the University of Arkansas. He received his BSME in 1974 from the University of Texas at Arlington, his MSME in 1979 from the University of Texas at Arlington, and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 1982 from the University of Texas at Arlington. Dr. Springer is active in ASME where he received the Dedicated Service Award in 2006, was elected to Fellow Grade in 2008, and was awarded the S. Y. Zamrik Pressure Vessels and Piping Medal in 2011
Conference Session
Special Session Celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the MATE International ROV Competition
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University; Valorie Troesch, Michigan Technological University; Jean Kampe, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Ocean and Marine
observations, like those of the zebra mussels described above, have ledto many questions which the team is interested in exploring. For example, students haveobserved plant material scattered, sometimes densely, about the underside of the ice roof. Theyhave questions such as; what species of plant(s) are represented, how the material migrates to theice roof, and what happens to it over the winter and into spring?More information about this team’s work is presented on the HSE website:http://www.enterprise.mtu.edu/highschool/currentteams/traverse-city-central/index.html. Theteam also posts many videos on its own Vimeo pages: http://vimeo.com/user1446488/videosSummary and ConclusionsThis paper has focused on one HSE team using ROVs to excite and motivate
Conference Session
A Systems-Thinking Approach to Solving Problems
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic State University; Scott C. Banks, Georgia Tech Research Institute
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
major incidents,tracking assets and resources is hindered by a lack of interoperability between theagencies2. Interoperability3,4,5 encompasses the radio communications between theagencies as well as the coordination of responses and creating a command and controlorganization. Agencies each use their own particular set of communications equipment, Local S Responders Communications P T O A L N Resource I State D
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christopher W. Swan, Tufts University; John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Kurt Paterson, Michigan Technological University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
, gender, institution as obtained through surveys and virtual and real communities) • Number and type of student engaged in LTS • LTS career impacts to faculty • Learning outcomes for students from participation in LTS activities • Institutions with LTS (program models, number of faculty and students involved, disciplines) • Communities benefited by LTS (locations, number of projects created, project types, number of people affected)5.0 AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1022927, 1022883, 1022738, 1023022, and 1022831. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do
Conference Session
WIED Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassandra Groen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
mentoring is becoming more widely known throughout business and academic fields,women still feel at a disadvantage in terms of finding a mentor or a group of mentors to assistthem during their careers. Because STEM fields, such as engineering, are traditionally maledominated fields, women may find it difficult to find a proper mentor(s) to suit their needs. Fewwomen occupy high organizational ranks, which in turn may create difficulty when femaleprotégés are trying to initiate a mentoring relationship with potential female mentors20. Studies have also shown that the gender of the mentor and protégé may affect the overallmentoring experience20,21. Mentoring relationships that contain participants with the same genderare often more successful and
Conference Session
State of Manufacturing Engineering Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karen Wosczyna-Birch, CT College of Technology and the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing; Wesley Francillon; Robert W. Simoneau, Keene State College
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
support education institutions that embrace manufacturing as anecessary and critical career pathway and in the process create the workforce necessary for theeconomic growth and stability of the United States.Bibliography1 National Science Foundation, Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf07315.pdf2 Georges, Annie.“Keeping What We’ve Got: The Impact of Financial Aid on MinorityRetention in Engineering” NACME Research Letter Volume 9, No 2. NACME, New York, NY1995.3 Sullivan, J., Davis, S., deGrazia, J., and Carolson, D., “Beyond the Pipeline: Building a K-12 EngineeringOutreach Program”, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 11b5-21-26, San Juan,Puerto Rico, Nov. 1999.4 Poole, S., deGrazia, J
Conference Session
FPD I: Attacking the Problems of Retention in the First Year
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yvette Pearson Weatherton, University of Texas, Arlington; Andrew P. Kruzic, University of Texas, Arlington; Beth R. Isbell, University of Texas at Arlington; Lynn L. Peterson, University of Texas, Arlington; Carter Tiernan, University of Texas, Arlington; Vu V. Pham, University of Texas at Arlington
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
one of the FIGs, called FORCES (FocusOn Retention in Cohorts of Engineering Students), compared to students in the other three FIGsand the College of Engineering as a whole. FORCES is funded by NSF’s S-STEM (Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) program and targets students inunderrepresented groups for recruitment with the broad goals of removing financial barriers andimproving student retention.Recognizing that success in mathematics is critical to engineering student success, key FORCESprogram elements were designed with a focus on calculus. FORCES scholars were required todemonstrate first fall semester calculus readiness by either earning an acceptable score on theuniversity’s Math Aptitude Test (MAT) or by
Conference Session
Laboratories and Projects in BME
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yakov Cherner, ATEL, LLC; Sonia Sparks Wallman; Margaret Bryans, Montgomery County Community College; Marina Taranova, Southern Federal University, Russia
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
Liquid Chromatography Laboratory (HLCL) which is designed to facilitate ablended learning mode. Page 22.1662.6 Figure 5: Actual LP Biologic Chromatography SystemLearning cyclesThe proposed blended learning cycle recommends a five-step approach to student learning: 1. use simulations and online materials to learn the theory and basic principles underlying protein purification; 2. use simulations to become familiar with a liquid column chromatography system, its components and their function; 3. perform virtual experiment(s); 4. evaluate knowledge and virtual skills, using a built-in assessment tool, before granting access
Conference Session
Use of Technology in Civil Engineering Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Harry Cooke, Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA, 2001.2. Wankat, P. C. and Oreovicz, F. S., Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1993.3. Lowman, J., Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, 2nd Edition, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1995.4. Klosky, J. L. and VanderSchaaf, R., “Hands-on-Demonstrations in Introductory Mechanics”, Proceedings of 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 9 pp., June, 2002.5. Lesko, J., Duke, J., Holzer, S., and Auchey, F., “Hands-on-Statics Integration into an Engineering Mechanics- Statics Course: Development and Scaling”, Proceedings of 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, 7 pp., June, 1999.6. Graves, E., “Demonstrations that Work in the
Conference Session
Computers in Education Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chi N. Thai, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
controllers. 2. The Premium kit uses the CM-510 controller with additional capabilities beyond the CM- 5’s as it can also interface with user-created sensors using memory-mapped I/O ports. It also has similar RS-232 and ZigBee communications capabilities. 3. The CM-700 became available in mid 2010 as a bare-bone controller having all the capabilities of the CM-5 and CM-510, and also RS-485 interfaces to the more advanced servo motors from Robotis series RX and EX. The CM-700 is not yet used in our robotics course. Figure 1. Current Bioloid controllers CM-5, CM-510 and CM-700.For communications between a PC and the various CM-5/510/700 controllers, there are a varietyof options (see Fig. 2): 1. Plain RS-232 9
Conference Session
Computers in Education Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Riddell, Baker College, Flint; Anca L. Sala, Baker College; Tom Spendlove, Baker College, Flint
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
. Thurston, S. Hundley, “Enhancing Student Classroom Engagement through SocialNetworking Technology”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.3. L. Frehill, A. Lain, C. Didion, “Destination Unknown: Gender Differences in Attrition from Graduate Study inEngineering”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.4. J.K. Estell, “Connecting with Alumni: An Experiment In Social Networking Using Facebook Groups”, 2009ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.5. ABET, “2010-2011 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf Page 22.1707.6
Conference Session
Design Communications & Cognition I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tiffany Tseng, Stanford University; Maria Yang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Daniel Frey for consenting to use his course as acontext for this study and also thank the students for their participation. The work described inthis paper was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award 0830134. Theopinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Page 22.1501.15References1. Hsi, S., Linn, M., and Bell, J. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.2. Sorby, S. (2009). Educational
Conference Session
Sustainability and Humanitarian Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Khanjan Mehta, Penn State University; Duarte B. Morais, North Carolina State University; Yu Zhao, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
experience with the team project. If you speak about thecontents of the focus group outside the group it is expected that you will not tell others whatindividual participants said. Please let us know what you think. 1. To start off this conversation, I’d like to know more about you: a. Please state your name, major(s), and minor(s) b. Please take a minute to explain the MTR project in your own words. c. List three things you learned (specifically) while working on this project. 2. In what way has participation in the MTR project shaped your global awareness and understanding (of other people and cultures). Please give an example. 3. You may consider yourself a
Conference Session
ELD Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James A. Van Fleet, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
, evidence and narrative. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.3. Foenix-Riou, B. (2006). When search engines play at maps: Visualization technologies. Online, 30(2), 29-32.4. Marcinko, R., & Arnold, S. (2009). Grokker mystery : Beyond search. Retrieved 2/18/2011, 2011, from http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/08/22/grokker-mystery/5. IBM Research, & IBM Cognos Software Group. (2010). Many eyes. Retrieved 2/22/2011, 2011, from http://www-958.ibm.com/software/data/cognos/manyeyes/6. Simboli, B. D. (2008). Web of science's "citation mapping" tool. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, (54), 5-5. http://www.istl.org/08-summer/electronic-1.html7. Luther, J., Kelly, M., & Beagle, D. (2005). Visualize this. Library Journal
Conference Session
Issues Affecting Engineering Program Development
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brian L. Houston, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
educational system. Why cannot a system develop wherefaculty with research aspirations are balanced by those who have passion for teaching, withouttrying to get “a little bit of everything” from each person? In this way both sets of individualshave the ability to expand there potential to greater heights within their own area of passion.In fact the power structure of most of academia is held by those who have doctorates, and believethat this is the single criteria for exclusion. This is in part due to the diversity of criteria acrossthe various technical and non-technical fields. It also has roots in the executive directives of the1960’s to develop a research powerhouse within the United States to compete with cold war
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica R. McCormick, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Beverly Radloff, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Nancy Lamm, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
they are not in a traditional engineering program nor in the EDDP.Appendix A contains a comprehensive listing of the month and year each survey participantgraduated and Appendix B shows the distribution of responses by engineering discipline.Research QuestionsResearch questions were developed to gather a large amount of data that can be evaluated toanswer the research problems. The questions were compiled using an if/then system in thesurvey tool. The employment questions (3-10) were given based upon the previous question’sresponse. Each participant was asked questions 10-14. The questions are: 1. Month and year of graduation 2. Major(s) 3. When did you receive your first job offer (related to your major)? Month and year 4. Did
Conference Session
Innovations in Computing Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aidsa I. Santiago-Román, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Cesar A Aceros; Brandeis H Marshall, Purdue University; Eric T. Matson, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
problemsolving task, we explored how technology and engineering students approach solvingcomputational problems. This study is guided under the premise that people’s ways ofexperiencing phenomena result from the unique interaction of their understanding of thephenomena and the situation in which they must apply that understanding 6 . Our ultimate goal isthat by identifying, comparing, and contrasting students’ understandings and strategies toapproach problems, more effective instructional approaches will be identified.Theoretical FrameworksProblem-based learning and Computational thinking theoretical frameworks are merged in thedesign and analysis of this study. Problem-Based learning is a student-centered instructionalstrategy to guide the learner(s