, no. 5, pp. 2-3, 1998.[7] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. Mcglamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–174, 2010.[8] R. F. Korte, “How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 285–306, 2009.[9] A. Buch, “Engineering by other means: transformations in engineering work practices,” Engineering Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–92, Mar. 2016.[10] Lutz, B. D. (2017). Into the Workplace: Exploring the Learning Experiences of Recent
/tech/evidence-based- practices/finalreport.pdf.[3] Graham, R., (2018), “The global state of the art in engineering education,” New Engineering Education Transportation (NEET) Report, MIT, School of Engineering.[4] Gannon, K., (2019) “Teaching Online Will Make You a Better Teacher in Any Setting,” Retrieved on January 13th, 2020 from Chronicle of Higher Education, https://www.chronicle.com/article/Teaching-Online-Will-Make-You/247031/.[5] Livingston, J., Summers, S., and Szabo, J., (2019) Incorporating Universal Design for Learning Principles in Online and Hybrid Technical Communication Courses, Journal of Online Engineering Education, (10) 2.[6] Kinney, L., & Liu, M., & Thornton, M. A. (2012), Faculty
critical Rarely is publicly Occasionally is publicly Often is publicly critical of the project or the critical of the project or critical of the project or of the project or the work of others. Always the work of others. the work of other work of other members has a positive attitude Often has a positive members of the group. of the group. Often has a about the task(s). attitude about the Usually has a positive negative attitude about task(s). attitude about the the task(s
cannot properly apply concepts to newsituations. Conscious efforts to link class content to previous classes in the curriculum as well asfuture electives and careers are included to promote awareness of life-long learning. Themethods described are specific to a course in the Design of Steel Structures, but the basicconcepts could be applicable to any design course.References:1) Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C. and Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.2) Felder, R. M. and Brent, R. (2016) Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. Jossey- Bass, A Wiley Brand.3) Krathwohl, D.R. (2002) A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy
that the flexibility indeveloping video content is a good opportunity to fix the content and seeks to continue addingnew content or make changes to reflect accumulated experience and student feedback.The course under considerationThe Electrical Circuits is an undergraduate level course at Missouri S&T intended for non-EEstudents. The content primarily includes AC circuit steady-state analysis covering single andpoly-phase circuits with emphasis on applications like transformers, induction machines andfrequency response. DC circuit analysis is used as a special case to introduce the basiccomponents and basic analysis techniques. Primarily, students from Mechanical Engineering,Civil Engineering and Engineering Management departments take
, “Report to the President, Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Washington, D. C., 2012.[3] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 312–340, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20118.[4] National Research Council, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press, 2013.[5] S. Brophy, S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers, “Advancing engineering education in P- 12 classrooms,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 369–387, 2008, doi
. Effective for Reviews during the 2020-2021 Accreditation CycleIncorporates all changes approved by the ABET Board of Delegates Engineering AreaDelegation as of November 2, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E001-20-21-EAC-Criteria-Mark-Up-11-24-19-Updated.pdfAssociation of American Colleges & Universities. (2009). Member Survey Findings. Retrievedfrom https://www.aacu.org/about/membership/surveytalkingpoints.https://www.aacu.org/leap/hipsAidoo, J., & Sipes, S. M., & Hanson, J. H., & Lovell, M. D. (2013, June), Capstone DesignAlumni Survey Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta,Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19283Brouwer, R., & Sykes, A., & VanderLeest, S. H
-centered design charrettes for K-12 outreach,” interactions, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 74–77, 2018.[5] E. Rose, A. Davidson, E. Agapie, and K. Sobel, “Designing our future students: Introducing User Experience to teens through a UCD charette,” in Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, 2016, pp. 1–6.[6] A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman, and S. I. Safferman, “Understanding K–12 engineering outreach programs,” Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2004.[7] G. S. Jakubowski, “Is there a role for ASEE in K-12 education?,” ASEE Prism, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 41, 2002.[8] B. Moskal and C. Skokan, “Supporting the k-12 classroom through
.” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 12, no. 2. September, pp. 1-11, 2016.[3] J.T. Stanley and H.J. Lewandowski. “Recommendation for the use of notebooks in upper-division physics lab courses.” American Journal of Physics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 2018.[4] K Maton. “Legitimation Code Theory: Building knowledge about knowledge-building,” in Knowledge-building: Educational studies in legitimation theory, K. Maton, S. Hood, and S. Shay, Eds. New York: Routledge, 2016.[5] B. Bernstein. Class, codes and control: Volume 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge, 1971.[6] K. Maton. “Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building.” Linguistics and Education
model variance.Table 2: Results of the 2-Way ANOVAAnalysis of Variance Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value ID 6 0.12534 0.020890 3.68 0.010 CON 4 0.05776 0.014440 2.54 0.066Model Summary S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.0753658 57.32% 39.54% 9.24%Post-hoc analysis using a Tukey test was performed to determine which variables in the datawere likely contributing to differences in means as indicated by ANOVA. Means that do notshare a letter are statistically different, with a 95% confidence interval. Table 3. Tukey test to
EML in structural analysis course. The students wereassigned a project competition to design a prototype balsa wood bridge truss for ODOT. Basedon students’ feedback and observation of the instructor, the project competition based on theframework discussed herein can expose students to EML effectively and improve theirperformance.AcknowledgementsThe author acknowledges the financial support of 2018-19 KEEN Cross Network Grant at OhioNorthern University. The input from Dr. Heath LeBlanc is greatly appreciated.References[1] Svihla, V. and Reeve, R., 2016. “Facilitating Problem Framing in Project-Based Learning.”Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2).[2] Mikesell, D. R., and Yoder, J-D. S., 2011. Teaching dynamics with a
business processes necessaryto nurture new technology from concept to commercialization.Concluding remarksThe pitch presentation as a communication technique is an effective tool in the arsenal ofentrepreneurial thinking. Considerable work, preparation and motivation are required to deliveran effective and persuasive presentation of this kind. At Stevens we have developed a companioncourse to the senior design sequence that involves a required participation in a pitch competition,involving prizes of considerable monetary value that are externally endowed in perpetuity. Wehave found that the format of our pitch presentation is well-structured, with both internal andexternal validation. The engineering teams select their best pitcher(s) to represent
trips. If networkintrusion attacks succeed to compromise IoV systems, intruders will control the autonomous vehiclescommunicating with the infrastructure, and this may lead to serious fatal consequences. Therefore,using an IDS to protect the IoV system is very crucial. In this project, students will use traditional IDSto protect the IoV system.REFERENCES[1] Cisco, "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017–2022 White Paper," 2019.[2] IBM, "The demand for cybersecurity professionals is outstripping the supply of skilled workers," 2019.[3] T. Omar, S. Venkatesan and A. Amamra, "Development of Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Program: A Literature Survey," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt
DescriptionWe designed the VR simulation to mirror the physical simulation of the four-member teamproduction process. The VR simulation was built in the Unity game engine in the 2018 Long TermSupport release. The simulation worked both with the HTC Vive VR headset and the Oculus RiftS headset, the two most popular virtual reality platforms. For this section, we use "user" to referto a student or a participant using the VR simulation. The simulation was designed for thesimultaneous participation of four users, although two to three users would be able to participatewith some adaptation. Each user wore either an HTC Vive headset or an Oculus Rift S headset.The headsets could be mixed. Through the headset, each user was presented with a shared
students need and create a learning environment that is both academically rigorousand culturally balanced. Concrete examples showed how STEM faculty have used results oftheir student surveys and other practices to adapt their course(s) to be more culturally responsive,helping students feel welcome, respectful of each other's culture and backgrounds, engaged withSTEM, and prepared for the cultures they may encounter as they transition to the workforce.Thirty-eight post webinar survey responses (a 40% response rate) indicated that the webinarexceeded expectations (47.37%) or mostly met expectations (47.37%). Survey respondentsindicated that their confidence level to introduce culturally responsive instruction into theirclassroom/ institutions
because all the free response (long answer)questions received input from most of the students. Students provided constructive feedbackwhich faculty have found to be very useful in modifying the course content for future offerings.Table 2 gives a complete list of the categorical questions along with the response means. Over90% of the questions had a response average of 4 or more and nearly 75% of the questions had aresponse average over 4.5 or higher. Three questions received 5’s from all 11 students: • How studying this subject area helps people address real world issues; • How doing hands-on classroom activities helped learning; and • How the Design Charrette helped learning.Table 1 Springer 1 Course Student Assessment of
traditionallyconsidered more transitive in nature, such as nursing students. Performing this activity withnursing students could help to bolster our findings as we would expect to see a higher proportionof nursing students use transitive action-statements.References[1] E. A. Cech, "The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices," in Engineering Education for Social Justice, J. Lucena Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 67-84.[2] E. A. Cech, "Culture of disengagement in engineering education?," Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, 2014.[3] G. S. Aikenhead and O. J. Jegede, "Cross‐cultural science education: A
for working in the construction industry.6 Theresults showed that a one-time teamwork training intervention did not impact student’s attitudesand behaviors about teamwork. However, instead of using a snapshot, one-time, method,another study added the element of time by reviewing team performances to accomplish asemester long project. The study consisted of 53, four to five-person student teams. The studyindicated that proper management of relationships and task conflicts had a positive effect onteam cohesion and that team cohesion had a positive relationship to team performance, thereby, apositive relationship existed between proper conflict management and team performance.30Therefore, in contrast to Carter et al.’s approach to employing a
increase the replicability,reliability, and generalizability of the study. This approach will further validate the findings bydelving deeper into students’ perceptions and help understand students’ perspective on grades.REFERENCES[1] S Hurtado, K Eagan, T Figueroa, B Hughes. Reversing Underrepresentation: The Impact ofUndergraduate Research Programs on Enrollment in STEM Graduate Programs. Los Angeles:Higher Education Research Institute, 2014.[2] Russell SH, Hancock MP, McCullough J. The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate researchexperiences. Science. 2007;316(5824):548–549.[3] Gregerman, S. (1999) Improving the Academic Success of Diverse Students ThroughUndergraduate Research." Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterlv, 20. 5459.[4] Petrella
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] L. Singleton, "Tactile Trigonometry: Improving Student Success with 3D-Printed Manipulatives," MathAMATYC Educator, vol. 9, no. 3, Summer 2018.[8] M. K. Watson, S. T. Ghanat, T. A. Wood, W. J. Davis and K. C. Bower, "A Systematic Review of Models for Calculus Course Innovations," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] R. B. Kozma and J. Russel, "Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 949-968, 1997.[10] K. L. Daniel, C. J. Bucklin, E. A. Leone and J. Idema, "Towards a Definition of Representational
project manager, team name, and a logo. The course isassigned an instructor although students are advised by all department faculty on differentaspects of the project. There are also industry advisor(s) and/or a project sponsor. Students oftenfind their projects and industry advisors while they are completing the co-op experience.Sometimes engineers within the community volunteer their time as advisors and bring their ownprojects. Other typical projects involve design of a new campus building or development of anempty property lot within the city. Similar to what is done at other institutions, students interactwith local engineers, stakeholders, and city officials during their projects [13, 16]. Each teamworks on a unique project.The course has
seekassistance to increase their teaching skills. For various reasons (research, too many classes, highservice load, etc.), there is a large population of teachers between the groups described abovewho could use help increasing their teaching and communication skills as shown in the middlelevels of the teaching skills hierarchy in Figure 1. This population of teachers may not attendMTEI programming, but will frequently respond well to information tied to their specificcourse(s) that is timely and time efficient to implement. Reaching all faculty, including in thislast group, has guided the design and implementation of the mid-semester course feedbackprogram.MTEI is supported and mentored by very successful alumni and we value the insights andexternal
supporting this project. We would also like to thank Mr. Brian Naberezny and hisstudents for the assistance in filming the “using an automatic level” video and for narrating insome videos.References[1] L. Freina and M. Ott, “A Literature Review on Immersive Virtual Reality in Education: State Of The Art and Perspectives,” eLearn. Soft. Educ., vol. 1, no. 133, pp. 10-1007, 2015.[2] W. Li, A. Y. C. Nee, S. K. Ong, “A state-of-the-art review of augmented reality in engineering analysis and simulation,” Multimodal Techn. Interact., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17, 2017.[3] P. Wang, et al., "A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training," Int. J. Environ. Res. Pu., vol. 15
instructor-centric teaching performances.The remainder of this subsection is organized paragraph-wise according to the context ofteaching methods. Each paragraph contains a synthesis of studies concerning one context-area:out-of-class activities, in-class activities, projects/labs, or lectures.Three of the four studies focus on out-of-class methods [5], [10], [11], while two concernin-class methods [12], [8] ([8] applies both in- and out-of-class). [5] and [9] both study the effectof online homework on student learning. [9]’s WeBWorK framework is a simple, open-sourceonline homework platform which translates typical circuits problems into a digital context,randomizing values in problems to prevent cheating. The authors conclude that WeBWorK “is
leadership skills. An important finding of this study was theeffect self-selection into co-curriculars like undergraduate research can have on studies usingself-report measures of student outcomes as a comparison tool. The study found that studentswho engaged in undergraduate research tended to report higher skills, but when accounting forboth curricular and classroom experiences, few differences were seen between students who didor did not participate. This and similar work have contributed to knowledge about “what types”of engagement in co-curricular experiences are most significant for engineering students. UntilFisher et al.’s recent work, however, a thorough review of the potential relationships betweenspecific co-curricular opportunities and
-surveys. TABLE II T O WHOM DO STUDENTS TURN FOR HELP WHILE STUDYING ? A S REPORTED BY STUDENTS BEFORE AND AFTER THEIR INTERNSHIPS . Resource Number (percent) of students report- Number (percent) of students report- ing typically consulting this resource ing typically consulting this resource (pre-survey) (post-survey) The class discussion board 47 (78%) 47 (78%) Your friends 49 (82%) 52 (87%) The instructor, TAs, and/or tutors 47 (78
(Seppet al. 2015; Kim, Campbell, et al., 2019) due in part to the efforts of the Consortium to PromoteReflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, see www.cpree.uw.edu). In the context ofreflecting on experiences broadly, reflection has been defined as “an intentional and dialecticalthinking process where an individual revisits features of an experience with which he/she isaware and uses one or more lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that can guidefuture action (and thus future experience)” (Turns et al. 2014). This definition is consistent withour conception of skills and habits needed by reflective engineers, though we think it importantto emphasize extending the temporal view to include not only the past, but also the
, and Kyle Weingartner.References [1] The 2015 Gordon Research Conference on Visualization in Science and Education. https://www.grc.org/ visualization-in-science-and-education-conference/2015/. Accessed: 2019-10-16. [2] J. Barnes and P. Hut. A hierarchical O(n log n) force-calculation algorithm. Nature, 324(6096):446, 1986. [3] M. Bastian, S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2009. [4] F. Beck, M. Burch, S. Diehl, and D. Weiskopf. A taxonomy and survey of dynamic graph visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 36(1):133–159, 2017. [5] J. Berry. Improving discrete mathematics and algorithms