Paper ID #39106How Do Engineering Attitudes of Learners Who Are Displaced Change afterExposure to a Relevant and Localized Engineering Curriculum?Maham A Godil, Purdue University West Lafayette Maham Godil is an undergraduate researcher at DeBoer Lab at Purdue University. She is a junior majoring in Computer Engineering. She is interested in Data Analytics.Prof. Jennifer Deboer, Campbell University Jennifer DeBoer is currently Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses on international education systems, individual and social development, technology use and STEM learning, and
Education – ICEE 2007.[2] Jaime Núñez S, Sheila Lascano F, Iván E. Esparragoza, A project-based learning approachfor a first-year engineering course, 11th Latin American and Caribbean Conference forEngineering and Technology, Cancun, Mexico August 14-16, 2013.[3] Carol Hulls, “et al”, The Use of an Open-Ended Project to Improve the Student Experience inFirst Year Programming,[4] Michael McGuire, Kin Fun Li, and Fayez Gebali, Teaching Design to First-Year EngineeringStudents, 2015 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA15) Conf.[5] Eric Constans, Dr. Jennifer Kadlowec, Ac 2011-511: Using A Project-Based LearningApproach to Teach Mechanical Design to First-Year Engineering Students, American Society forEngineering Education, 2011.[6] David
.1-4 Proposed changes include discussion ofnew technology such as computer science or green chemistry or soft skills like professionalismwhich were not part of the curriculum 20 years ago. However, the same level of action is notseen in the articles regarding the graduate curriculum. There are limited papers on the integrationof new ideas into the graduate curriculum, and only one paper describing the course curriculumacross the US.1, 5-7 The study by David Kauffman attempts to capture the number of schools inthe US which require/suggest the core chemical engineering classes at the graduate level in2002.7 In the nearly 20 years since this paper was published, the research on graduate studiescurriculum in engineering has been lacking. This
Paper ID #36769Facilitating Engineering Faculty Mentorship with a Focus on theEntrepreneurial MindsetDr. Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University Lindy Hamilton Mayled is the Director of Instructional Effectiveness for the Fulton Schools of Engineer- ing at Arizona State University. She has a PhD in Psychology of Learning, Education, and Technology from Grand Canyon University. Her research and areas of interest are in improving educational outcomes for STEM students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. Prior to her role and Director of Instructional Effectiveness, she
University. His areas of interest are control systems and signal processing. He holds a BS, an MS, and PhD (ABD) all in electrical engineering. Additionally, he is a registered professional engineer in WV since 2001, and is an active member of IEEE.Dr. Vamsi Borra, Youngstown State University Before moving to YSU, Dr. Borra worked as an assistant professor and program coordinator (Computer Engineering Technology) in the Department of Computer Science, Information Systems, and Engineering Technology at California University of Pennsylvania (CALU). Also, prior to CALU, Vamsi was a visiting assistant professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) department at the Univer- sity of Toledo. He also worked
complete the same General Education sequence.The articulation of engineering with the liberal arts was considered from two perspectives. Thefirst is the obvious benefit of a liberal arts education to the engineering student [15]. Whileadvances in knowledge and technology are creating excitement in science and engineeringeducation, tomorrow’s engineer must also be able to write and communicate well; considerethics and social responsibilities; understand business; and live and work in teams as a globalcitizen. They must be able to think critically and problem-solve. The faculty of RMC pridesitself on producing graduates with all of these so-called “soft skills” as well as the breadth ofknowledge obtained by completing a large General Education
development efforts, and served in several administrative roles. She has been recognized for her teaching, advising, service, and research and as an Exemplary Faculty Member for Excellence in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Ms. Susie Huggins, West Virginia University Susie Huggins currently works for the Fundamentals of Engineering program at West Virginia University. She is pursuing her PhD in Education, a lifelong dream. Huggins is an advocate of STEM learning in the K-12 arena as well as a proponent of after school programing to help build the workforce of the Technological Revolution. 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville
Paper ID #36450Illuminating the APIDA Experience in Engineering Education: A ScopingReviewMs. Michelle Choi Ausman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Michelle Choi Ausman is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received a BS in Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, and an MS in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Her research focuses on exploring relation- ships between Asian American identity, multiracial identity, and belonging in engineering. Her research interests include engineering identity
Paper ID #38588Board 240: Computational Thinking in the Formation of Engineers: Year 3Dr. Noemi V Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University Dr. Mendoza is a faculty member of Technology Management in the College of Education-Engineering at Texas A&M University. She has worked as electrical engineering professor in Mexico. She recently obtained funds from NSF to investigate enculturation to engineering and computational thinking in engi- neering students. She is the co-advisor of the Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers and advisor of Latinos in Engineering and Science at TAMU and is interested in computing
. 4, pp. 613–629, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0487-0.[34] M. D. Bramhall, L. Gray, C. Corker, K. Garnett, and R. Hill, “Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills in an International, Cross-Institutional Group of Engineering Master’s Students,” Ind. High. Educ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 323–327, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.5367/ihe.2012.0109.[35] P. A. Facione, C. A. Gittens, and N. C. Facione, “Cultivating A Critical Thinking Mindset,” Acad. Edu Wkly. Dig., vol. 28, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.measuredreasons.com/[36] J. Kirti, “Academic Writing: A Torture Worth Enduring?,” in JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH, K. Matwick and Y.-C. Hsieh, Eds., Language and Communication Centre, Nanyang Technological University
literature on quality in engineering education, accreditationis the predominant theme [4]–[8]. Engineering has been a pioneer in a discipline-specificaccreditation process, which serves as a model for other professional disciplines [6].The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) implemented in 1997 anew set of accreditation standards (Engineering Criteria 2000, EC2000), after which alearning outcomes assessment protocol became central for quality assurance models inundergraduate engineering programs [9] [10] [11]. Different international accreditationagencies for engineering programs have since agreed to define comparable learning outcomesthat shape the current quality standards in the discipline [12][13]. The latter has impacted
rShiny works and how they can use it to engage with the data set. Basedupon this, we conclude that the communicative and technological skills required in the internshipaligned with our micro-credential goals.CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONSThis program is in its infancy: we’ve only just now begun the second cohort, and the pandemicgreatly impacted our ability to secure students. Nonetheless, we think reporting out on thisproject is worthwhile for a number of reasons. First, data science is an increasingly importantpart of STEM education, but its locale within academic programs is inconsistent and notnecessarily within engineering programs’ footprints. We hope this program offers a blueprint forhow interdisciplinary and engineering programs might
titles of the degrees that they offer, which may have led to some of the differences thatwere found on the websites. Among ABET EAC accredited non-specialty programs, degreenames included general engineering, interdisciplinary engineering, multidisciplinary engineering,and engineering.Table 1. Examples of ABET EAC Accredited Program Name Changes [19]Institution Older Name Newer NameGrand Valley State University Engineering BS 1988-1989 Interdisciplinary Engineering 2011- Engineering BSE 1989 - 2011 presentMontana Technological Engineering Science BS 1981-1999 General Engineering BS 1999- University
stations would be a good investment based on the rate of consumption andreserves of natural gas [35]. As another example, Corum and Garofalo [34] focused on usingmathematical modeling to support middle school students’ understanding of engineeringtechnology applications. The engineering technologies included speakers, motors, andgenerators. Corum and Garofalo [34] designed the engineering task using the model-elicitingactivity framework [34], which is a pedagogical approach for teaching mathematics-basedconcepts that requires one to represent real-world situations mathematically. The engineering-based mathematics task allowed the students to draw on their knowledge of pre-algebra, algebra,and magnetism to develop a multivariable mathematical model
curriculum through project- based learning,” in 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, pp. F3F–F3F, Nov 2002. 2. Han, S., Capraro, R., and Capraro, M. M., “How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (stem) Project-Based Learning (pbl) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: the Impact of Student Factors on Achievement”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1089–1113, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0. 3. Stein, K., & Riermann, G. (2022, August), A Low-Cost, Portable, Smartphone Schlieren Imaging System Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/40807 4. Lemke, N., &
Paper ID #39470Board 266: Engaging Transfer Students in a College of EngineeringDr. Christy Wheeler West, University of South Alabama Christy Wheeler West is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering at the University of South Alabama, where she also serves as Director of the Office of Undergrad- uate Research. She holds a Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. from the University of Alabama.Dr. Eric Steward P.E., University of South Alabama Associate Professor in the Civil, Coastal, & Environmental Engineering Department at the University of South AlabamaDr
find that students are engaged, especiallywomen and students from historically marginalized communities, increase their knowledge andconfidence in the subject matter, and find the module valuable to gain much-needed (field)experience. More recently, we find that the game-based learning intervention seems resilient and,in fact, a solid solution to the disturbances caused by the pandemic, with many studentsproviding positive remarks about being able to experience hands-on learning, which is key toquality engineering education and difficult to achieve through online education. Opportunitiesfor improvement exist regarding access to technology, as well as the instructional design. Whilewe demonstrate the scalability of this approach across multiple
AssistantMr. Assad Iqbal, Arizona State University Assad Iqbal is a Postdoctoral Research Scholar at Arizona State University working on the National Sci- ence Foundation-funded research project i.e., Engineering For Us All (e4usa). Assad Iqbal is an informa- tion system engineer with a Ph.D. in Engineering Education and around 14 years of teaching experience in undergraduate engineering and technology education. His research interest is to explore ways to promote self-directed, self-regulated life-long learning among the undergraduate engineering student population. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Quantitative Analysis of Self-Regulation in Undergraduate Engineering and
analyt- ics, creativity and innovation, and emerging technologies. He is actively pursuing the development of educational techniques and methods in construction. He has developed construction-based simulation applications and strives to bring aspects of project management into simulation applications.Dr. Raheleh Miralami, Mississippi State UniversityDr. George D. Ford, Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi Stateˆa C™s Building Construction Science (BCS) program. Dr. Ford has 15 years of industrial experience including corporate work, and 16 years of teaching experience at the post-secondary level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
State University, San Luis Obispo. He is also a licensed California Structural Engineer with extensive industry experience. Current research and engineering interest are in sustainable knowledge transfer to developing nations; concentrated solar power for urban areas; masonry design, technology, and sustainability; and active learning for higher education. His is actively involved with The Masonry Society, Research in Sustainable Grout for Masonry, Elected Official for Local Community Governance, and Teaching Full Time.Dr. Peter Laursen, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Peter Laursen, P.E., is an Associate Professor of Architectural Engineering at the California Polytech- nic State
Design Graduate Program Track at Portland State University. Her primary focus is on teaching. Prior to joining the ECE department at Portland State University, she was at Intel Corporation for 21 years in Hillsboro, Oregon, where she was a senior staff engineer, involved in key product development and in- dustry adoption of technologies, standards, specifications and methodologies. She was the chairperson of cross-functional Joint Engineering Teams at Intel and industry consortium JEDEC DDR2 Memory Power Thermal Task Group, addressing system level memory power, thermal, and performance challenges. She has extensive experience in platform design, power management architecture and led the development of Intel’s
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Sense of belonging of Chilean engineering students: a gender perspective approachAbstractStudents' affective characteristics, such as motivation, attitudes, self-efficacy, expectations,and sense of belonging, are relevant topics for higher education research. Much researchindicates that having a sense of belonging in academic, social, and community settings arecritical to students' development, engagement, and persistence. Prior research on women'sparticipation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) careersdiscusses the need to improve their sense of belonging as a socio-cognitive variable related tothe gender imbalance in participation in STEM
intuition in judicial decision-making.” Hous. L. Rev., vol. 42, p. 1381, 2005.[6] E. Miskioğlu, C. Aaron, C. S. Bolton, K. M. Martin, M. Roth, S. Kavale, and A. R. Carberry, “Situating intuition in engineering practice,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112 ED-2, 2023.[7] E. Salas, M. A. Rosen, and D. Diaz-Granados, “Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations,” Journal of Management, vol. 36 ED-4, pp. 941–973, 2010.[8] S. E. Dreyfus, “The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 24 ED-3, pp. 177–181, 2004.[9] S. E. Dreyfus and H. L. Dreyfus, “A five-stage model of the
, and otherCOVID impacts have stabilized.As shown in the student comments, spreading the project out over time will address studentconcerns over it being too compressed. Changes to the design challenge may be made in order tokeep the project fresh for each group of incoming students.References[1] E. J. Theobald, M. J. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe et al.,"Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduatescience, technology, engineering, and math," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476-6483, 2020.[2] H. Li, A. Öchsner, and W. Hall, “Application of experiential learning to improve studentengagement and experience in a mechanical
Teaching Professor in the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engi- neering at Syracuse University, where she has taught Chemical Engineering core courses since 2011. She holds a BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (now the Missouri University of Science & Technology) and PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she also was a postdoctoral fellow in Engineering Education & Outreach. She has previously taught at Madison College. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Trends in US Chemical Engineering Teaching-Track FacultyMost chemical engineering departments in the United States have at least one faculty who isnot on
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings 1 Redesign of Purdue Construction Engineering and Management 2 (CEM) Capstone Course 3 Brandon Fulk Kyubyung Kang* Purdue University Purdue University fulk@purdue.edu kyukang@purdue.edu 4 5 INTRODUCTION 6 7 In large part, the evaluation of construction engineering education has gone untouched 8 since its inception post-WWII (Abudayyeh et al., 2000). More specifically, the curriculum 9 and overall content for the construction engineering education within the Purdue10 Construction Engineering and Management
. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? Science Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305[9] Geisinger, B. N., & Raman, D. R. (2013). Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 914– 925. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/607/[10] Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2012). Connecting to the Professor: Impact of the Student–Faculty Relationship in a Highly Challenging Course. College Teaching, 60(2), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.627576[11] Hong, B. S.S., & Peter, J.S. (2010). A Retrospective Study of the Impact Faculty Dispositions Have on
diverse expertise in tutoring, teaching, coaching, and design. Through designing numerous innovative programs and initiatives, Mari has helped countless students achieve academic success. Her commitment to lifelong learning is evident in her ongo- ing pursuit of new technologies, teaching methods, and learning trends. Mari’s collaborative approach and leadership skills have earned her the respect and admiration of her colleagues and students alike. Mari earned an M.F.A. in Graphic Design and Visual Experience from Savannah College of Art and Design after completing two B.F.A. degrees, one in Graphic Design and one in Fashion Design, from Virginia Commonwealth University School of the Arts in Qatar. With her unwavering
Paper ID #36949A New Paradigm for Learning the Fundamentals of Materials Science &EngineeringDr. William D. Callister Jr., University of Utah William D. Callister, Jr. has been authoring introductory materials science and engineering textbooks for over forty years. His B.S. degree was in ceramic engineering from the University of Utah. He received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Academic ap- pointments have been at The Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology (now Montana Tech- nological University) (Metallurgy and Mineral Processing), Brigham Young
Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices. 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4. 9. Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305 10. Vea, T. (2020b). The learning of emotion in/as sociocultural practice: The case of animal rights activism. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 311-346. 11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. Sage: London. 12. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 17, 273-85