.4085[2] S. Tecpan, and C. Hernández, “Assessment of physics teachers towards Interactive Lecture Demonstrations,” (in Spanish), Revista de Enseñanza de la Física, vol. 31, no. Extra, pp. 689-696, 2019. [Online]. Available: www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/26641[3] L. Gang, and F. Ning, “Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 1(A), pp. 19–29, 2016.[4] M. Ramírez Díaz, and E. Chávez Lima, “Similarities between 3MAT systems and interactive lecture demonstrations in the teaching physics,” (in Spanish), Revista Estilos de Aprendizaje, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 141-155
. Christopher, ‘Self-Study as a Method for Engaging STEM Faculty in Transformative Change to Improve Teaching’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 195–213, 2019.[2] E. Elliott, R. Reason, C. Coffman, E. Gangloff, J. Raker, J. Powell-Coffman, and C. Ogilvie, “Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered,” CBE Life Sci Edu., vol. 15, pp. 1-14, March 2016.[3] S. Pulford, N. Ruzycki, C. Finelli, L. Hahn, and D. Thorsen, “Making value for faculty: Learning communities in engineering faculty development,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conf. &
Programs, 2022 – 2023," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/. [Accessed 1 January 2023].[5] M. K. Swenty and B. J. Swenty, "Is Engineering Education the Weak Link in Licensure's Three-legged Stool?," in ASEE Conference and Exposition, Virtual Conference, 2021.[6] ASCE, "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/epdf/10.1061/9780784415221. [Accessed 31 January 2023].[7] Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114, 122, 1889.[8] P. M. Spinden, "The Enigma of Engineering's Industrial Exemption to Licensure: The Exception that Swallowed a Profession," 2015. [Online]. Available: https
Paper ID #39219Chaturved Janaki ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Building communities of technical STEM faculty for long-term engagement in educational researchIn this paper, we report on the impacts of the ProQual Institute—a $1M award via the NSF ECR-EHR Core Research program in 2019—as it nears the end of its funding period. The ProQualInstitute’s goal is to build national capacity for STEM education research by engaging technicalSTEM from across the U.S. in cohorts that participate in an 8-week course on qualitative andmixed methods educational research techniques, followed by engagement in severalcommunities of practice to continue supporting participant research
experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 978–1003, 2010, doi: 10.1002/tea.20363.[19] M. Taheri et al., “Exploring Computing Identity and Persistence Across Multiple Groups Using Structural Equation Modeling,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32803. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32803
enrollment of historically excluded students in engineeringschools between private (not-for-profit) and public institutions? 3. How does the proportion ofhistorically excluded engineering students change over time in states that enacted bans? 4. Doaffirmative action bans impact the enrollment of underrepresented women of color inengineering in unique ways in states with bans?Our study utilized annual survey data on enrollment (by gender and racial categories) from theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and information about public/private statusfrom the National Center for Education Statistics. We examined six states with currentaffirmative action bans for which there was sufficient enrollment data both before and after theban (2005
, demonstrating the com-plete picture of developing algorithms first on simulators and then deploying them to the physicalrobots. Another direction is to extend to robotic manipulators.References [1] M. Galli, R. Barber, S. Garrido, and L. Moreno, “Path planning using MATLAB-ROS inte- gration applied to mobile robots,” in IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, 2017, pp. 98–103. [2] W.-J. Tang and Z.-T. Liu, “A convenient method for tracking color-based object in liv- ing video based on ros and MATLAB/Simulink,” in International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics, 2017, pp. 724–727. [3] R. L. Avanzato, “Development of a MATLAB/ROS interface to a low-cost robot arm,” in ASEE Anuual
Paper ID #36630An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Work in a MechanicalEngineering ProgramMs. Elizabeth Whitehurst, Mississippi State University Elizabeth Whitehurst graduated from Mississippi State University in 2019 with a bachelor’s degree in me- chanical engineering. She now works as a mechanical design engineer in the defense industry, supporting efforts to help protect and propel the capabilities of the warfighter.Nathaniel Hyams, Clemson University Graduated from Mississippi State University and the Bagley College of Engineering in 2021 with a Bach- elors in Biological Engineering. Currently a graduate
science is changing water scienceand engineering," Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 145, no. 8, 2019, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001578.[5] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Skills for theDigital Transition: Assessing Recent Trends Using Big Data, Paris, France: OECD Publishing,2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/38c36777-en.[6] K. Gibert, J. S. Horsburgh, I. N. Athanasiadis, and G. Holmes, "Environmental datascience," Environmental Modelling and Software, Article vol. 106, pp. 4-12, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.04.005.[7] B. S. Gottfried, “Teaching computer programming effectively using active learning,”presented at the ASEE Annual Conference
Education, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[4] R. S. Harichandran, D. J. Adams, M. A. Collura, N. O. Erdil, W. D. Harding, J. Nocito-Gobel and A. Thompson, "An integrated approach to developing technical communication skills in engineering students," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[5] R. Gregory and S. Green, "A collaborative assessment tool for technical writing and communication," in 2019 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, Raleigh, NC, 2019.[6] L. Wahlin, "Chapter 2: Understanding your audience," in Fundamentals of Engineering Technical Communication: A Resource & Writing Guide for the Fundamentals of Engineering Program, The Ohio State University, pp. 15-25
administration of the pre/post surveys and Dr. DavidDelaine for his insight on intervention design.ReferencesR.D. Austin, G.P. Pisano, “Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage: Why you should embrace it in your workforce,” Harvard Business Review. May-June issue, 2017.A. Bolhari & S. Tillema. 2022. Enhancing Engineering Students’ Innovation Self-Efficacy through Design of K-12 STEM Projects Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/40763J. Buckley, A. Trauth, S.B. Grajeda, and D. Roberts, “Gender and racial disparities in students’ self-confidence on team-based engineering design projects,” presented ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.S. Y., Chyung, A
, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michi- gan. She is Fellow of both the ASEE and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), associate editor for the European Journal of Engineering Education, and member of the Governing Board of the Research in Engineering Education Network. She was previously chair of EECHA, chair of the ERM Division of ASEE, co-chair of the ASEE Committee on Scholarly Publications, deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education, and associate editor for IEEE Transactions on Education. Dr
Engineering Education: Practice and Policy. University of Dublin: IEEE Press, 2016.[2] T. Gorichanaz, “‘It made me feel like it was okay to be wrong’: Student experiences with ungrading,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. I-13, May 2022. [Online]. Available: Sage Journals, https://journals.sagepub.com. [Accessed Feb 23, 2023][3] A. R. Carberry, S. A. Atwood, M.T. Siniawski, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “A comparison and classification of grading approaches used in engineering education,” in Varietas Delectat... Complexity is the New Normality: Proceeding of the 47th SEFI Annual Conference, SEFI 2019, Budapest, Hungary, September 16- 19, 2019, Balazs Vince Nagy, Mike Murphy, Hannu-Matti Jarvinen, Aniko
Software Engineering with iTrust: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” 2018 ACM/IEEE 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training.[13] Harding, Trevor, Carpenter, Donald, Montgomery, Susan, and Steneck, Nicholas, “The Current State of Research on Academic Dishonesty Among Engineering Students,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2001.[14] R. Graham and T. Porterfield, “Preparing Today’s Engineering Graduate: An Empirical Study of Professional Skills Required by Employers”, in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , June 2018.[15] N. D. Fila and J. L. Hess, “What do students learn about innovation?”, in 2019 ASEE Annual
. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J. Coleman, “Hands-on summer camp to attract K–12 students to engineering fields,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144–151, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TE.2009.2026366.[9] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), Diversity and STEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023. Special Report NSF 23-315. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd[10] A. Clark and R. Kajfez, “Engineering identity in pre-college students: A literature review,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32727. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32727.[11] J. DeWaters
post-pandemic are overwhelmingly desirous of in-class instruction with no videos. Wefind that our graduate students co-enrolled in senior design electives have been less affected bythe pandemic in terms of acceptance of the flipped format. This gives hope that the effects of thepandemic on the student experience with flipped classrooms will be temporary. However, it is areminder that student acceptance of pedagogical tools does vary in time, and that instructorsshould be nimble in being able to respond to the needs of an individual cohort.References[1] Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1200).[2] Bishop, J., & Verleger, M
. H. Tan, and R. S. Rajab, "Haptic- based virtual reality system to enhance actual aerospace composite panel drilling training," in Structural Health Monitoring of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites: Elsevier, 2019, pp. 113-128.[17] A. Stratos, R. Loukas, M. Dimitris, G. Konstantinos, M. Dimitris, and C. George, "A virtual reality application to attract young talents to manufacturing," Procedia CIRP, vol. 57, pp. 134- 139, 2016.[18] P. Wang, P. Wu, J. Wang, H.-L. Chi, and X. Wang, "A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training," International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 15, no. 6, p
tools. These results also suggest that instructionfocused on helping students to isolate bodies in more realistic or hands-on environments maybe warranted for all students of mechanics. Future work investigating what enables students todraw FBDs in less abstract contexts is also worthwhile, as it may lead to teaching tools that helpstudents draw FBDs in more realistic scenarios.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the Kern Family Foundation. Their Rising Star Award given toBucknell University supported this work.References[1] P. Cornwell, P. and A. Danesh-Yazdi, “Good strategies to avoid bad FBDs,” in Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 16-19, 2019.[2] P. S. Steif and A. Dollar, “Reinventing
is structured such that the whole class meets once a month, with the remainder of the time spent in the ARG research teams in weekly meetings for research and reporting. 4. Four graduate students provide research support for the teams. Course completers, who are undergraduate students, will be hired to serve as mentors for the following year. This near-peer relationship fosters continuity and community integration into the ARG team and the discipline. 5. Each ARG research team will work towards a deliverable of a research poster they will present at an annual conference such as the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). In addition, some students may lead authorship for a student
. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[3] C. T. Amelink and E. G. Creamer, “Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01044.x.[4] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 4. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 293–301, 2004. doi: 10.1002/j.2168
: www.annualreviews.org[3] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance,” J Vocat Behav, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, Aug. 1994, doi: 10.1006/JVBE.1994.1027.[4] C. Carrico, H. Matusovich, and M. C. Paretti, “A Qualitative Analysis of Career Choice Pathways of College-Oriented Rural Central Appalachian High School Students:,” J Career Dev, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 94–111, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0894845317725603.[5] H. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students’ motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289–303
) in 2021. Two of her students in Biology Education have been the recipients of the Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching (PAEMST), which is the highest honors bestowed by the United States government specifically for STEM teachers. One of her students was awarded the Maryland Teacher of the Year award in 2019. Her research interests and expertise include micro and macroalgal ecology; seaweeds in human health and nutrition; biomonitoring and biosorption potential of seaweeds and seagrasses; bioenergy from algae; water quality; and sustainable robotic farming with applications of seaweeds as biostimulants. She is the recipient of various research and teaching awards, and has published
, Technical University of Cluj – Napoca, RomaniaDr. Stephen Hill, Mercer University Stephen Hill earned his BS in General Sciences from Morehouse College and his BSME, MSME, and Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He is currently an associate dean and associate professor in the School of Engineering at Mercer University. He worked for the oilfield services giant Schlumberger for 14 years before. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Assessing Correlation between Erosion, Wear and Hardness Behavior for Polymers, Metals and Ceramic Coated Metallic Surfaces Dr. Dorina Mihut 1, 2, Dr. Stephen
are in mathematical modeling research on cancer treatments, water treatments, and cosmetic science. Her research has consisted of hyperther- mia treatments, fluid mechanics understanding, and now chemotherapy in cancer tumor treatment: an Interplay of Scales, Transport, and Kinetics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Chemotherapy in Cancer Tumor Treatment: An Interplay of Scales, Transport, and Kinetics via the Renaissance Foundry Model Pedro E. Arce and Sahera Abumarian Department of Chemical Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN-USA
, partnerships only work ifthere is sufficient trust, which comes from knowledge of and engagement with one another.IntroductionThe Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC) is a collaboration of 21 Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) programs from Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) and similar programsfrom several Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs), along with several industrial partners.Established in 2019, IEC aims to improve the diversity and preparedness of Electrical andComputer Engineers by fostering collaboration among its member institutions. The IEC wasborn from a successful NSF-funded project that aimed to implement Experiment CentricPedagogy (ECP) in 13 HBCU ECE programs [1]. The participants in this project realized
National Institute of Engineering Ethics, and past-division chair for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division.Dr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Nicholas D. Fila is a research assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His research interests include empathy, innovation, design thinking, course design, and engineering ethics.Dr. Corey T. Schimpf, University of Buffalo, SUNY Corey Schimpf is an Assistant
Statics Textbook," in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020: IEEE, pp. 1-4.[3] D. H. Jonassen and W. Hung, "All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning," Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, vol. 1741, 2015.[4] S. Condoor, S. Jayaram, and J. Kianfar, "Work in Progress-Strategies for Stimulating Engineering Relevance in Statics Education," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[5] S. Wodin-Schwartz, C. A. Keller, and K. LeChasseur, "WIP: Hands-on Wednesday (HOW)- An Introduction to Statics Experience," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[6
Economy, 17th Edition, Pearson Higher Education, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2019.[11] J. A. White, K. S. Grasman, K. E. Case, K. L. Neeedy, and D. B. Pratt, Fundamentals of Engineering Economic Analysis, 2nd Edition, J. Wiley, NY, 2020.[12] G. M. Nicholls, N. A. Lewis, and T. Eschenbach, “Teaching Time Value of Money: A Few Winning Strategies from the Front Lines,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN, June 15, 2014. Paper ID #8658, Accessed on 2/5/2023 at https://peer.asee.org/23105.[13] P. M. Boerger, “Moving Beyond Time Value of Money: The Application of Macroeconomic Theory to Capital Investment Decision-Making,” 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC, June 1996
alleviates faculty time constraints.References[1] “Cards | Engineering Unleashed.” https://engineeringunleashed.com/card (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[2] “The Framework | Engineering Unleashed.” https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework (accessed Feb. 26, 2023).[3] A. M. Kim, C. J. Speed, and J. O. Macaulay, “Barriers and strategies: Implementing active learning in biomedical science lectures,” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2019, doi: 10.1002/bmb.21190.[4] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, “Being Intentional About Incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into Engineering Curriculum,” in Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers, L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Eds. Cham: Springer
developed to date, classroom implementation plans,assessment strategy, a preliminary analysis of student learning gains and which will be furtheranalyzed by the time of the ASEE Work-In-Progress presentation, and future directions for con-tinuous improvement.Fluidized Bed LCDLMDesign, Development and Testing of the Fluidized Bed LCDLMThe FB DLM is designed to help student conceptual learning as well as promote active learningof packed bed and fluidized bed theory in a normal classroom. This new module has been con-structed from mostly off-the-shelf hardware. Construction of the FB DLM requires minimum ad-ditional modifications to the purchased hardware such as drilling holes in the PVC piping, cut-ting and inserting a mesh, filling the column with