laboratories in their Mechatronic courses.1. IntroductionThe reshoring of manufacturing in the United States requires a retraining of a workforce toutilize advanced manufacturing tools and techniques and automation [1]. Automation requirestraining in mechatronics, which integrates mechanical and electrical systems to developautomated systems that are controlled with programming. Mechatronics is the foundation ofautomated systems and has become not only a need to shorten the current manufacturing skillsgap [2], but also serves as a platform to provide STEM education. Mechatronics is an important area of study for several STEM related fields, butspecifically for the applied ones such as Engineering Technology (ET). ET as a discipline hasexisted
solutions to modern problems.While traditional engineering programs provide students with the technical skills required oftheir profession, students often lack the knowledge and resources on how to incorporate complexenvironmental and social factors into decision-making so that they are prepared to face society’sevolving challenges. As part of a larger initiative to integrate traditional technical skills withenhanced social awareness into the engineering curriculum, a two-part module emphasizing theenvironmental and social design considerations of sustainability was added to an existing moduleseries in a third-year Materials Science course. This paper will describe the design,implementation, and assessment of one part of this module entitled “The
designexperiences of students: a venue within undergraduate engineering education where leadership isoften addressed. The goal of this paper is to make more explicit how leadership works within theArmy and West Point, to give engineering educators additional tools and models that they mayconsider in developing engineering leadership programs and processes within their owninstitution.IntroductionAs the engineering profession continues to emphasize leadership as an integral part ofengineering practice, many engineering leadership programs and courses have developed acrossthe United States and North America more broadly [1]. Because engineering has traditionallynot been considered a leadership profession, engineering leadership has not gained traction as
approaches to discipline-specific curriculum reform to keeppace with the rapidly changing landscape. In 2017, our department launched a new initiative to integrate professional practice intocurriculum in real time. Each year, multigenerational biomedical engineering (BME) teams ofupper level undergraduates, graduate students, postdocs, and faculty interview post graduatestakeholders to identify critical professional and technical skills for recent graduates. Informationfrom these interviews are then used to inform the development of short, 1-credit modules, for earlycareer BME undergraduates. The purpose of this study is to analyze data collected from 63 BMEstakeholder interviews over three years (2017-2019). Specifically, we ask,1. What are
way to facilitate student veterans’ socialintegration and academic success is offering them a chance to link their prior military experienceand experiential knowledge to what they learn in academic courses. However, despite thesignificant number of student veterans on college campuses, very little effort has been made todevelop a specific curriculum or academic course that integrates military veterans’ priorexperiences and knowledge in higher education.The University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNCC) is a large urban public research institutionwith over 29,500 students [1], 7,400 of which are considered non-traditional or adult students.The university has shown a 21.5% growth in military (veteran, active, reserve and familymember
Paper ID #28962Creating a Master ”Entrepreneurial Mindset” Concept MapDr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to
-discipline problem solving skill is particularly difficult to acquire with conventional curriculum structure lacking inter- disciplinary consideration [10]. In such situations, the problems students are trained to solve tend to be confined within the respective discipline. For example, ME students might have difficulty identifying the stress-related issue in an interconnect with an IC chip, even though they have the skill to conduct stress analysis in a composite beam. This course was designed to provide students with unfamiliar cross-disciplinary problems in microelectronics reliability, requiring them to identify prior knowledge within their discipline for technical judgement and analysis.• Interdisciplinary teamwork
three universities. This information may assist Construction Management and Engineering programs that are interested in integrating BIM into an existing curriculum. Key Words: BIM, Engineering, Construction, CurriculumIntroductionBuilding information modeling (BIM) has increased at an exponential rate over the past decadein the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. BIM adoption has steadilyincreased since 2007; according to McGraw-Hill Construction’s Smart Market Report [1], 17%of AEC industry utilized BIM software systems in 2007, 49% in 2009, and 71% in 2012. A morerecent McGraw-Hill Construction survey conducted in 2019 states that mechanical and plumbingsubcontractors are responsible for producing
Education at the School of Education and Human Development at the University of Virginia.Blakeley Calhoun Blakeley Calhoun is the Assistant Director of Undergraduate Success in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science, joining in July 2018. Blakeley has previously worked in Residence Life as an Assistant Community Director at Michigan State where she also completed her Master of Arts in Student Affairs Administration. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Full Paper: First Year Academic Co-Advising Improvement Lisa Lampe
after hiring.Specifically, the skills and competencies supporting the Advanced Manufacturing sector havebeen shown to be in high demand and are the focus of the current project under National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Advanced Technological Education (ATE) grant No.1601487.The goals and objectives of the NSF grant project are listed in Table I. Table I. Goals of the Project GOAL 1 To strengthen an Engineering Technology program serving the southern New Jersey region. Objective 1.1 Highlight technical and non-technical (soft) skills across the curriculum; align with industry needs, including student work-based learning opportunities such as undergraduate
approaches for data-guided decision-making in theirexisting business operations; a recent survey indicates that the majority (~85%) of large businessesare in the midst of AI implementation plans [20].Given the greater focus on AI to support decision making, there is a need for industrial engineeringstudents to be prepared to understand and use AI tools in a business context. Yet, at this stage,there is a dearth of educational resources on AI or related technologies that are tailored for thisstudent population [21]. Emerging programs to integrate AI education into industrial engineeringcurriculum include the development of Industry 4.0 themed labs, both physical [22, 23] and virtual[24]. To date, these efforts tend to be technology-focused with an
course would only be sustained if we couldsuccessfully recruit new faculty for the course, who may or may not be interested. Broad-scaleresearch on faculty incorporation of diversity-oriented activities into the curriculum has foundthat even when faculty believe that diversity in a classroom leads to better learning outcomes,belief doesn’t necessarily translate into teaching practices that include diversity-orientedmaterials [4]. However, departmental support is important in integrating diversity into thecurriculum, as faculty who believed their departments emphasized the importance of diversity intheir field and supported the integration of diversity-related content into their courses were morelikely to do so [4], and were more likely to be
Fosmire [2] have made the argument that informationliteracy can be integrated into a number of student outcomes. However, the engineeringtechnology (ETAC) student outcomes changed around 2011 by explicitly mentioninginformation skills, extending the old 3.g, “ability to communicate effectively,” [3] to 3.g, “anability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non-technicalenvironments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature.” [4]With this change to the student outcomes in engineering technology, there is the potential fornew opportunities for collaboration between librarians and those programs. While the work oflibrarians in EAC programs has been well documented, for example, at every
; connected communities, and securing cyber-physical systems [4,5], we are not aware that currently exist an educational model that integrates cyber security as partof STEM curriculum. The program’s goal is to broaden knowledge of our STEM graduates to beaware of cyber issues as engineers. The curriculum is shown in Figure 1, where 4 tracks areavailable for the student’s interest and major of study. The courses within each track are existingcourses with security content added to them. Figure 1: Cyber-informed engineering curriculum for STEM majors. Each track gives the students an opportunity to earn a security certificate as part of their undergraduate degree. The color of boxes has no special meaning.The introductory
tostrengthen it and to include industry. The process of “critical doing” actively involved facultyand students in the design of the new curriculum. Details on the process of developing our newcurriculum can be found in Ref. [2].The University approved the changes for implementation in Fall 2019. Additions to thecurriculum included the vertically integrated design course, data acquisition courses, and thesenior design course sequence.1. Vertically integrated design project courses (VIDP). Historically, the program has a strongsenior design course sequence where seniors work in teams on real projects sponsored andmentored by industry for an entire academic year. Senior design provides valuable experiencedoing hands-on engineering with practicing
. She has expertise in integer, fixed, and floating-point hardware system design, signal processing, controls, and atmospheric radiative transfer modelling.Dr. Jack Bringardner, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing
aligned curriculum from teachengineering.org as well as other curriculum providers.Ms. Dua Chaker, University of Colorado Boulder ”Dua Chaker is the Project Engineer for the TeachEngineering Digital Library in the Integrated Teach- ing and Learning Program, College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Born and raised in Boulder, CO she received her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering with a Structural emphasis from the University of Colorado Boulder summa cum laude in 2013. She has been working for the TeachEngineering digital library for the past 7 years supporting K-12 Engineering curriculum development and dissemination.”Ms. Andrea Marks, Oregon State University Andrea
consistentlyshow that students are very concerned about cheating. So as a consequence of our Program’sadoption, assessment, and evaluation of performance-indicator SO-4.a, (i) academic honesty isnow a topic in the required curriculum, and (ii) a regular assessment of student attitudesconcerning academic misconduct is carried out every year.The fourth observation is that sole function of a given performance indicator is to facilitatestudent attainment in its SO. Programs evolve, and so does a SO committee’s view for how bestto integrate the SO within the curriculum. For both reasons, a SO committee may wish to modifya performance indicator and this is a good thing, because it means the committee appreciates thatperformance indicators are utilitarian
students to practice creativity and receive feedback.The first suggestion is motivated by a common practice in the education of artists – writers,musicians, actors, and visual artists, all of whom study past works in depth. The second and thirdsuggestions are supported by research. For example, to counter the observed trend that theperception of the value of creativity in engineering, Zappe and Tise described that “opportunitiesfor students to engage in the creative process need to be more fully integrated within theengineering curriculum.”13 Regarding feedback, Hennessey and Amabile state that “positiveaffect leads to higher levels of creativity”15 and clear, specific feedback plays an important rolein developing self-efficacy.In the
, to do good for humankind” [5]. Much of the curriculum is hands-on and projectbased; many of the courses are co-taught by interdisciplinary teams and much of the content isintegrated across disciplines. Olin also emphasizes teamwork, design, and student autonomy,positioning students as co-creators of their own educational experiences. In addition, all studentscomplete an Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences concentration alongside their engineering major,and essential outcomes of a liberal education, per the Association of American Colleges andUniversities, are integrated throughout the curriculum [6], [7].Olin President Richard K. Miller brought this philosophy to GCSP as one of the three foundersof the nationwide program. Olin was one of the
, andreduced performance and the extent of litigation in the construction industry illustrates the levelof distrust. At the same time, market forces are demanding significant performanceimprovements. Collaborative project delivery systems now account for more than 50 percent ofall construction projects as compared to 10-15 percent twenty years ago.19 However, thesecollaborative project delivery systems alone do not ensure long term, sustainable collaboration.Increasingly, the amount of litigation in the area of Design-Build signals an underlying difficultyin establishing true collaborations within the context of contractually organized and controlleddelivery methods. Despite the integration of more collaborative contracts into IPD projects,successful
-division courses.Labs covered with the Pocketbeagle include digital and analog I/O operations, PWM and UARTinterface lab projects, all using Python programming. Several of these labs will be discussed in thispaper, along with schematics, configurations, and results as well as an assessment of how well thestudents were able to achieve the course goals.IntroductionIn a General or Mechanical Engineering degree, there are many classes that incorporatemicroprocessors / microcontrollers as part of their curriculum. The format for each of theseclasses are similar (in curriculum) in that their end goal is to teach Python programming, as wellas embedded hardware and applications.While educational philosophy and pedagogy will vary from one instructor to
A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education
manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage[7] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.[8] P. R. Carlile, “Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries,” Organization Science, Vol. 15, pp. 555–568. Oct. 2004.[9] A. Cooper, and S. Shewchuk, “Knowledge brokers in education: How intermediary organizations are bridging the gap between research, policy and practice internationally,” Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 23, Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2355[10] S. Secules, S., J. J. Bale, N. W. Sochacka, and J
applied research in partnership.Rebecca D Levison, University of Portland Rebecca Levison is a graduate research fellow working on her doctorate in education at the University of Portland. As a research fellow, Rebecca works on a KEEN assessment project and partnership between the School of Education and the School of Engineering to improve engineering education. When not working on the KEEN project, she works full time for Portland Public Schools as an ESL Teacher on Special Assignment. In that role, Rebecca writes science curriculum accessible to language learners that aligns with the Next Generation Science Standards and trains teachers how to implement new strategies for all learners
audiences, anABET learning outcome criterion. This collaboration was very valuable in bridging the gap in theengineering curriculums between the United States and Austria. IntroductionThe purpose of this pilot project was to increase undergraduate and graduate students’ interest atWest Texas A&M University (WTAMU) in research on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in areasof agricultural and surveying applications. This project provided the students with the opportunityto learn how to manage an international project and to work on a global team by collaborating withinternational students from another foreign institution. This pilot project was the start of Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE
each lesson. The curriculum team was able touse this as formative feedback when creating remaining lessons as well as improving on thelessons that had already been evaluated by the teachers.When discussing a marketing strategy for other high school administrators, BPSTIL’s Principaland Counselor were especially helpful. Adding an entire new course in a high school’s currentcurriculum and funding plan would be a challenge, but we learned that Louisiana high schoolsdesire “points” toward their annual grading calculation. One thing that will earn points forschools is offering a course within a “Jump Start” pathway, which is an initiative by theLouisiana Department of Education to better prepare high school students for local high-need,high-wage
exist that will be further refinedwhat works and what does not in both internal and external collaborations.Experimental Centric Based Engineering Curriculum for HBCUsIn Fall 2013, Howard University, in collaboration with the 12 HBCUs listed above, receivedfunding for the NSF ECP project. The project had the significant outcome to create an “HBCUEngineering Network” that is focused on the development, implementation, and expansion of anExperimental Centric-based instructional Pedagogy in engineering curricula used in theseHBCUs.The project started during the 2013-2014 academic year by implementing a hands-on approachthat introduced concepts related to circuit analysis and experiment design to selected ECE. Bythe end of 2016 over 100 curriculum
(ANSAC) and Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC),respectively. These programs follow an “Introduce, Reinforce, Master” curriculum map as partof the assessment plan where each student learning outcome (SLO) is assessed in at least threecourses of different levels, so that each SLO is assessed at each of the three levels (introduced,reinforced, and mastered). We seek to effectively assess, at the introductory level, the proposedANSAC SLO (5) and the new EAC SLO (4) with a series of case studies and a rubric in ourintroductory physics course. There are two primary difference between the SLOs from the twocommissions. Firstly, the EAC requires that the students recognize while the ANSAC requiresthat the students understand ethical and
OptimizationFig. 1 Core curriculum of undergraduate students in mechanical engineering and the process of a projectIt is worth mentioning that the procedures of disassembly and assembly of an existingmachinery should be added at the very beginning to help students get started quickly and lookfor design ideas. According to current syllabus of mechanical engineering at Beihanguniversity, the core curricula related to “handwriting robot” project include Introduction toMechanical Engineering, Mechanical Drawing, C Programming Language, Mechatronics,etc. Also, some basic curricula, such as Engineering Mathematics, Material Mechanics,Circuits can be integrated into “handwriting robot” project. Considering a