-basedcourse where students worked in interdisciplinary teams on FEW related research projects. TheNRT Seminar consisted of training sessions related to team collaboration, career pathways, cam-pus resources, professional development, science communication, and exposure to FEW researchinitiatives.This paper details the graduate-level NRT activities with focus on educational activities includ-ing activities description, summative evaluation, and insights gained from four NRT student co-horts. Evaluation findings show the NRT is an inclusive, supportive, applied curriculum that ena-bled 40 graduate students to train as interdisciplinary researchers. This paper provides insights tocurrent and future NRT programs, as well as other new interdisciplinary
integral component of the first-year engineering course, with participation inthese sessions contributing to the students' final course grades.Expanding the Peer Mentoring Program to include transfer students necessitates greaterflexibility compared to students following the traditional FEP curriculum. Given that the transferclass operates as an asynchronous remote course, adjustments were made to the Transfer PeerMentoring Program to accommodate both remote and in-person meetings. Existing mentorsvolunteered to also serve the transfer student population and were matched with mentees basedon declared major and meeting preference (i.e., in-person vs. virtual). Instead of providingpredetermined topics, mentors adopted a more personalized approach
Education 2of engineering courses in our curriculum. These visits are planned by individual course instructorsfor the students in their specific class. This approach allows the instructor to tailor the content andobjectives of each visit so that it is most relevant to the course instructional material. To date, ourdepartment has integrated industry visits for all academic years except the junior level classes,although this is an important academic level to include, since students are subject to at least sixdiscipline-specific courses at this level. An industry site visit for a freshman level course serves tofamiliarize the students with the industries and processes where chemical engineers are
and virtual international project experiences.” Jour. of Int. Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 1, article 5, 2021.[6] Reddy, E. A., Kleine, M. S., Parsons, M., Nieusma, D. (2023, June) Sociotechnical Integration: What is it? Why do we need it? How do we do it? In 2023 ASEE Conference & Exposition.[7] M. D. Patton, "Beyond WI: Building an Integrated Communication Curriculum in One Department of Civil Engineering," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 313-327, 2008[8] J. L. Craig, N. Lerner, and M. Poe, "Innovation Across the Curriculum: Three Case Studies in Teaching Science and Engineering Communication," Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
how to integrate and teach engineering in their classrooms. Weconjecture that this is due to engineering being viewed as more difficult to comprehend andintegrate than translanguaging practices.Preliminary ResultsThus far one of the teacher participants, Emma (a pseudonym), has taught two engineeringchallenges in her classroom. As she had an additional number of Spanish speaking students joinher class, she created a group with all the Spanish speaking students to work together andappointed the bilingual student as a leader and facilitator of the group. Emma designed a Spanishlanguage version of the English language brainstorming sheet used by the rest of the class(Figure 1). During testing, Emma also asked the students questions in Spanish
used the research to refine the instrument in its 2nd and 3rd editions. They reduced the number of the basic scales from its original 14 to 10, eliminating overlapping categories. They also limited the number of questions to an efficient 60 items [10].II. Methodology: Implementation of LASSI in the department A. The decision: The Assessment Committee in the department of mechanical engineering oversees evaluating each ABET student outcome. The committee accomplishes this task by assigning one or more outcomes to its members who in turn devise appropriate evaluation methods, coordinate integration of the methods in the curriculum, analyze the data, and
Paper ID #43121Board 171: The Design of a Course to Train STEM Pre-Service Teachers(Work-in-progress)Dr. Garth V Crosby, Texas A&M University Dr. Garth V. Crosby is an associate professor in the Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution Department at Texas A & M University. He obtained his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Florida International University in Computer Engineering and ElectricalDr. Maram H Alaqra, Sharjah Education Academy Dr. Maram Alaqra has over 17 years’ experience in education, working across higher education and K-12 settings. Dr. Alaqra has taught graduate and undergraduate courses at
entrepreneurial mindset as required student attributes for graduation. Oncerequired as learning outcomes, faculty would benefit from training on teaching these professionalskills and assessment methodology for professional skills development.The site has already added acquiring an entrepreneurial as a student learning outcome andteaches entrepreneurial mindset in stand-alone courses. Still, recent research suggests it shouldbe integrated into technical content. It seems dangerous to off-load these important professionalskills to be only taught outside of the engineering curriculum in either humanities or other stand-alone courses. A more integrated approach is needed. Engineering programs can consider addingentrepreneurial mindset to the engineering
ConvivenciaSocial.Program Models for International ExperiencesStudy abroad courses that are faculty led and short term are seen as one of the major vehicles forstudents to integrate an international experience in their curriculum. The opposite is true for theGlobalCUNY model, which consists of eight weeks or more of a research experience modeledafter the traditional REU programs. In earlier work, several essential operational elements wereidentified in the programming [43]. In the Colombia based programming, a site coordinator whoserves as a liaison to the host site’s international office is key. This role is sometimes filled by agraduate student who may also be conducting research with a host faculty. The internationaloffice is also crucial in securing housing
audiences. University engineeringprograms can fill this gap to promote their educational programs to youths in their regions. Theycan begin to integrate skill development with their outreach sessions to promote desiredengineering skills, or habits of mind, such as problem solving, collaboration, creativity,communication, ethical considerations, innovative thinking, etc. [3]. Recognizing the importanceof this preparation, the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno coordinatedsummer camp programming for middle and high school students to introduce them toengineering disciplines and get them excited about pursuing an education in this field. TheCollege of Engineering summer camp program primarily focused on exposing students
for educators [7]-[10]. Concurrently, academicinstitutions are grappling with ethical implications, such as the lack of equitable access to AI, andacademic integrity issues, such as tensions around cheating, that GAI technologies might bring[11]-[13].This work-in-progress paper provides an initial exploration of engineering faculty perspectiveson students' use of AI assistance in homework completion. The research draws upon role identitytheory [14], [15] and activity theory [16] as guiding frameworks. By doing so, the full researchwill uncover the multi-dimensional views of faculty regarding student use of AI, investigatingthe similarities or differences across engineering disciplines and between proponents andopponents of AI assistance in
engineering school has recently launched an AI4All initiative, which hopes to equip every engineering student with an ML skillset. Introducing ML curriculum within ENES100, a required three-credit first-year engineering course, is crucial for AI4All as it introduces essential concepts at an early stage. ENES100 consists of a semester-long collaborative project where groups of eight students construct a small Arduino-powered robot (OTV) from scratch capable of autonomous navigation and mission-specific sensing and actuation, described in Table 1 below. The integration of ML within ENES100 involves a 2-hour lesson delivered by an instructor during which they learn and receive tools to use
throughout theentirety of the graduate student experience. Based on the assessment outcomes, the model is revised.Thus, the innovation lies in integrating the components into a department-wide model that (1) mutuallysupports an individualized, student-centered educational strategy and (2) deploys rigorous assessment toquantify the impact of our approach on students and faculty. We are undertaking a sweeping overhaul ofSTEM graduate education while documenting the process and outcomes, establishing the potential foradoption across our school and nationwide.The model is derived from the five principles of personalized learning by Watson and Watson[14] andcomprises the following key components: (1) establishing Instructional Goals for each student
Paper ID #40892Investigating Performance in First-Year Engineering Programs as aPredictor of Future Academic SuccessAlexa C. Andershock, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Lexy Andershock is an undergraduate student studying Computer Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Her research interests include the influence of first-year engineering programs on engineering students, especially relating to major choice and future academic performance.Baker A. Martin, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Baker Martin is a Lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, where he
Experiments and Blended Learning in Engineering Education: A Framework for AssessmentAbstractThis paper presents a comprehensive framework for refining desk-scale experiments andimplementing an impactful blended learning curriculum within the realm of chemical engineeringeducation. The primary focus is on evaluating the influence of these enhancements on studentlearning outcomes and the overall success of educational transformation initiatives. The studyaddresses two central research questions. The first question centers on improving the studentunderstanding of topics related to graphical flow characterization by using a desk-scaleexperimental module. We consider critical factors such as ease of installation, safe to operate, andability to
andacademic development workshops into the curriculum of an introductory engineering class. Inaddition, this paper discusses the importance of a peer-to-peer mentorship program, specificallyfocusing on utilizing the course teaching assistants (TAs) as role models and mentors. Thestudents’ demographic data, the development workshop topics and content, and the impact andoverall effectiveness of the interventions implemented in this study are discussed. The researchproject explores the implications of future iterations that integrate the lessons learned from thisanalysis and propose the next steps to ensure a replicable positive impact on the students.MethodologyOverview of Introductory Engineering CourseAt the University of Texas at El Paso, first year
offer an interaction aspect yet shows effectivenessin visualizing complex fluid power systems. In their later work on fluid power education, Azzamet al. [8] focused on integrating VR into the laboratory work of engineering technology courses toteach students about hydraulic gripper components and assembly in a construction environment. Figure 3. The hydraulic grippers in the developed VR construction-like user interface [8]Furthermore, students shall develop solid foundations in electronics, instrumentation, dataacquisition, and programming of pneumatic and hydraulic systems, as they constitute value-addedskills for fluid power professionals [3]. Nevertheless, previous fluid power laboratory practiceswere insufficient in tackling the
Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 12 References1. Knight, Daniel W., Lawrence E. Carlson, and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan. "Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education. 2007.2. Olds, Barbara M., and Ronald L. Miller. "The effect of a first‐year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study." Journal of Engineering Education 93, no. 1 (2004): 23-35.3. Fuentes, Arturo A., Horacio Vasquez, and Robert A
content was covered in isolation from the engineeringprojects with one week of equitable and inclusive STEM environment content followed by aweek of technical experiences with the project-based engineering curriculum. In each subsequentyear, the leadership team adjusted the content planning to better reflect the need for equity workto be embedded in STEM pedagogy, and not as something separate. The most consistentcomponent of the CISTEME365 professional development model was the Action Research forEquity Project (AREP). Participants designed, implemented, and then presented their findingsfrom an action research project where they investigated the impact of implementing one or moretargeted equity and inclusion strategies in their STEM Clubs or
Microcontroller Curricula Developments and Assessments.” In Proceedings of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 24 - 27.12. Morgan J., and J. Porter. 2015. “Modular Integrated Stackable Layer (MISL): An Academic– Public Sector Partnership for Rapid Prototyping and Development” In Proceedings of 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, June 14-17.13. Barrett, S., C. Hager, M. Yurkoski, R. Lewis, M. Jespersen, and Z. Ruble. 2008. Undergraduate Engineers For Curriculum and Laboratory Equipment Development: A Freescale S12 Microcontroller Laboratory Trainer. In Proceedings of 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 22-25.Biographical
habits and pleasures of good scholarship. Thecommon read used in the FYS class is Atomic Habits by James Clear. Working with a familiarfaculty member and one of the same student mentors from Engineering Ahead, the first semesterstudents explore the expectations of personal integrity, level of effort, and civility on a universitycampus. In addition to providing academic support for their entry level mathematics and sciencecourses, an additional curriculum component of FYS is career exploration. Throughout thecourse, students refine their resume and communication skills and take part in the largeruniversity career fair. Further, this course provides several opportunities for students to visit localindustries and extend collaborations with alumni
investigate strategies for integrating AI intocivil engineering education. While this integration could be done using new elective courses onAI and civil engineering (see [11]), we were interested in relevant topics that could incorporatedinto existing coursework. Our assumption is that the technical details of using AI would becovered in other courses (e.g., data science). Here, we were interested in demonstratingapplications, providing opportunities to interact with and use AI efficiently, and providing clarityaround the ethical issues of AI.AI in the curriculum: Infrastructure monitoringAs civil infrastructure systems age there is an increasing need for methods and tools that allowowners to efficiently monitor and maintain these systems over time
teaching the Design of Experiments courseunderscores its effectiveness in preparing students to meet the evolving demands of the workforceand contribute meaningfully to the field of engineering. Moving forward, continued refinementand integration of such innovative teaching methodologies will be essential in ensuring thecontinued success and relevance of engineering education in addressing global challenges anddriving innovation.The MEEN 404 Paradigm stands as an example of excellence in engineering education, promotingstudent-led projects, project-based learning, and the development of a profound understanding ofengineering principles. By encouraging students to take control of their projects, fostering areflective mindset, and endorsing a
commitment to their decisions. Finally, 5 out of 6 studentsdisplayed leadership skills by motivating one another and negotiating solutions.ConclusionThe pilot study presented in this research underscores the potential of game-based learning,specifically using Lego sets, in enhancing the educational experience of construction engineeringstudents. By integrating Lego into the curriculum, this study moved beyond traditional learningmethodologies to provide an environment where students could actively engage in thedevelopment of crucial skills in construction field such as communication, leadership, problem-solving, and decision-making. The findings from this study contribute valuable insights into thefield of engineering education, particularly by
networking event hosted at Elevate Rapid City on September 15th, 2022.The mission of Elevate Rapid City is to promote economic development for Rapid City and theBlack Hills region. The mixer created an opportunity to inform stakeholders what the A+Eprogram has accomplished, solicit input on programmatic elements going forward and to discusspotential collaborative opportunities. The mixer was also a celebration and a chance for interestedparties to network in Elevate’s new facility. The keynote speaker of the evening was artist andProfessor Quintin Owens, a well-known local artist and academic (Black Hills State University)who integrates Computer Aided Design, Clay 3D printing, and art in his courses. Owens’ keynote,titled Science + Art + Technology
Paper ID #43392Board 425: Work in Progress: Initiating a Research Experience for TeachersCentered on ManufacturingProf. Marian Kennedy, Clemson University Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to engineering education with a focus on developing early career researchers and faculty.Dr. Kristin Kelly Frady, Clemson University Kristin Frady is an Assistant Professor and Founding Program Director of the Human Capital Education
Paper ID #44710The Impacts of Reflective Writing on Peer Evaluations in EngineeringDesign CoursesMr. Adam Weaver, Baylor University Mr. Adam Weaver joined the Baylor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering with over 15 years of experience in industry and government service. He served in the Active Duty Air Force as an engineer for over eight years, specializing in test and evaluation of avionics, guidance/navigation, and space systems. After his time in the military, he worked as a Propulsion Test and Integration Engineer with Space Exploration Technologies as well as multiple positions with L3Harris
moreemphasis on ABET skills 2-7. One way to for instructors to better understand how to incorporateABET skills 2-7 in the classroom is by increasing the level of collaboration between academiaand industry to incorporate the changing needs of engineering industry into curriculum [12].Curriculum should be regularly reviewed to ensure it is meeting ABET standards across multiplecourses which will enable students an opportunity to practice and refine their skills over time.From the data, it is clear that instructors need to provide students with opportunities to improveon skills that go beyond basic problem-solving. Not only is student development necessary,reflecting on how to integrate more of the ABET outcomes across the curriculum helps to fulfilthe
2 School of Computing, University of GeorgiaAbstractProject-Based Learning (PBL) is a pedagogical method that combines theory and practice byinvolving students in real-world challenges. Continuous feedback is crucial in PBL, guidingstudents to improve their methods and foster progressive thinking. However, PBL faceschallenges in widespread adoption due to the time and expertise needed for effective feedback,especially with increasing student numbers. This paper presents a novel approach usingGenerative AI, specifically an enhanced ChatGPT, to provide effective PBL feedback. For anundergraduate Web Technology course, we integrated three methods: 1) fine-tuning ChatGPTwith feedback from various sources; 2) using additional course-specific
ManufacturingEngineering Technology Program," Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 7.824.1-9, 2002.[4] D. Crevier, "Educational Experiments in Machine Vision," IEEE Transactions onEducation, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 90-92, 1996.[5] G. Morison, M. D. Jenkins, T. Buggy and P. Barrie, "An Implementation FocusedApproach to Teaching Image Processing and Machine Vision - From Theory to Beagleboard,"Proceedings of the 6th European Embedded Design and Research, pp. 274-277, 2014.[6] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen and L. Vanasupa, "Integrating Project-based Learningthroughout the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no.3, pp. 15-27, 2007.[7] C. Jiang, Y. Wan, Y. Zhu