Undergraduate Research Assistantships (URAs) for the womenhonors students.Introduction - RISER program interventions for improving early retentionRetention of freshmen female engineering students associated with any of the honors programs,or taking the honors version of EF, was a concern at the time the proposal was submitted. In2010 this group was low in total number but the percentage of these women leaving engineeringduring their freshmen year was high. The PI’s believed that one reason for this was that most ofthese young women were concerned about their career path having a clear connection to beingbeneficial to society. The RISER URA program was initiated for these students to buildmentoring relationships with faculty members, senior researchers
providing scholarships to communitycollege transfer students; providing support services including peer tutors, conferences, lectures,presentations, and career planning workshops; and increasing student engagement in college- anduniversity-wide activities that contribute to persistence.This paper details the process of development and implementation of a systems approach toevaluation, where the assumption is that our program is itself lodged in a larger system withvarious stakeholder interests and desired outcomes. The assessment plan was created by usinglogic and pathway models that relate activities in the ASPIRE Program to short term, mediumterm, and long term outcomes. The assessment plan further identifies how activities supportoutcomes and
specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and accessibility.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology
undergraduate engineering, learning analytics approaches to improve educational practices and policies, interdisciplinary teaching and learn- ing, organizational change in colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education.Dr. Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin Maura Borrego is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Curriculum & Instruction at the University of Texas at Austin. She previously served as a Program Director at the National Science Foun- dation and an associate dean and director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award
evaluating teamwork models, statewide pre-college math initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM programs.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc Rebecca Brent is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm located in
students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29196earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity,which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering stu-dents
earlierdecision. He stated that I always knew I wanted to get a graduate degree… I knew I was going to get a graduate degree eventually… I knew I wanted to continue education. If anything it probably hastened my decision to realize I didn’t want a career in the Army.In contrast, Maryanne felt that her work as a civilian Navy employee did have an impact on herdecision to go to graduate school. As she described it, Through my work, it’s one of those things where the more you learn the more you realize you don’t know anything. The more I learned at work I was like, “I need to learn more, because I don’t know a lot of this stuff.” I considered going back to grad school for a few years… I think as those years
made thediscussion sections the locus of change. The presiding faculty members could teach theirlectures as they normally would. The changes to the pedagogy were driven instead by the TAswho were in charge of the two experimental intrinsic motivation discussion sections. These TAschanged their teaching activities and grading activities to focus on supporting students’autonomy rather than any one particular learning outcome. Since these TAs also want to becomefaculty, this increased responsibility for the TAs created a secondary benefit of training theseTAs to become agents of change in their future careers. The remaining six discussion sectionswere led by other TAs who used interactive engagement (IE) pedagogies. We considered thesesections to
terms of emotional, psychologicaland social well-being. Semi-annual application of the instrument will allow comparison of stu-dents’ mental health of the various cohorts over time. (6) Mindset: Dweck established the importance of mindset on a variety of learning, pro-fessional, and personal outcomes 24. We include several questions within the survey instrument toevaluate whether student participants have a fixed- or growth-oriented mindset. (7) Work and life: We adapted questions from a recent national survey by The WorkFoundation to probe student participants’ attitudes toward career, employers, personal life, andwork-life balance25. (8) Engineer identity: Through the annual interview process we assess students
. Our experiences indicate that early face-to-faceinteractions are essential to user satisfaction and patience with technological glitches, tocommunity building, and ultimately in establishing strong mentoring relationships. All of thesehave the potential to lead to a productive discussion-based seminar and to the long-term successof collaborative student project teams, although challenges need to be addressed as they arise.IntroductionFacilitating professional development and mentoring for STEM students can be a challenge forprograms but is important for students’ ultimate success and satisfaction with their careers. Inconjunction with a National Science Foundation-sponsored scholarship program, we havedeveloped an interdisciplinary peer
to the bottom of the page,changes the number to show “All,” and clicks the Update button. Once he can see all of theinstruments in ASSESS related to Professional Skills, the evaluator sorts the results by reliabilityby clicking on the Reliability column heading. The evaluator can now see six instruments thathave more reliability information than the other 25. Four of the six instruments also have morevalidity information. Since the evaluator is interested in finding an instrument with soundpsychometric properties, he decides to first read through the summary descriptions of the fourinstruments that have more information for both reliability and validity (the Career Decision-Making System-Revised, Level 1; the CATME; the Creative Engineering
Mid-Career Advancement (MCA) award. She is passionate about Engineering Education and experienced in developing inverted classroom lectures and facilitating students’ learning through authentic engineering problems. She was the Co-PI for the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments grant awarded to the Mechanical Engineering department at Seattle University to study how the department culture changes can foster students’ engineering identity with the long-term goal of increasing the representation of women and minorities in the field of engineering.Dr. Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University Kathleen Cook, Ph.D. is a Professor in the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook
research activities outside the classroom, such as participatingin summer research internships, fellowships, programs, and guided research projects.Undergraduate research experience serves as a valuable platform for fostering students' interestin research, attracting more individuals to pursue advanced degrees in Science, Technology,Engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-related fields, and cultivating a well-trained and diverseworkforce in STEM careers. The impacts and benefits of the REU program have been confirmedby several large-scale surveys [1-6].Recognizing the importance of involving undergraduate students in meaningful research andscholarly activity alongside faculty members [6], numerous REU sites have garnered supportfrom various agencies
pursuing environmental justice for these communities is urgent. Many URMfaculty engage in CER and work to help their communities, and these faculty are seen as trustedallies to enhance the adoption of EnvE technology [24],[25],[26]. CER requires intrinsicallymore holistic approaches that challenge the typical engineering culture that views itself as expert,technophilic, depoliticized, and disengaged from public welfare [27],[28],[29]. Evidencesuggests that URMWF who utilize CER methods often have the rigor of their scholarly activitiesquestioned or discounted as service [30], which can have deleterious consequences for early andmid-career faculty. Thus, it is of concern that research methodology and focus choices might addto other biased practices
Societyof Manufacturing Engineers; The Mechanics of Carbon Nanotubes by ASME; Engineering TinyNano World by Allegro Productions; Nanoparticles and Mega-fears: Debating the Risks ofNanotechnology by La Compagnie des Taxi-brousse; Nanotechnology by DiscoveryCommunication; and Upgrade Me, and From Micro to Nano by Films Media Group.Guest Lectures will be organized, bringing experts in the field into the course modules. Guestspeakers may include project investigators, senior personnel, NAC members, and invited guests.A major observation by Hispanic leaders on how Hispanics will succeed in STEM careers is thatthey need more Hispanic role models in the STEM fields52. Many people related to the projectrepresent minority groups, such as Dr. Fazarro
Engineering from the University of Illinois, and a Doctorate from the University of Texas at Austin. After receiving her PhD, she spent two years as a post-doctoral researcher at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Her academic career began in 1994 when she became an Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In 1999, she accepted a position in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Virginia Tech where she was promoted to Professor in 2003 and was recognized as the William S. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering in 2005. In 2006, she was appointed and continues to hold the position of Head of the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #7735Water and Wastewater Technician EducationMs. Jana Fattic, Western Kentucky University Jana Fattic is the interim director of the Center for Water Resource Studies at Western Kentucky Uni- versity. Jana has served in various management capacities throughout her career, spanning the private, regulatory and academic sectors. Jana has experience in drinking water and waste water treatment, storm water and watershed management, public health and safety, and solid waste management. She holds a master of science degree in Geoscience from Western Kentucky University, and conducted research for her master’s thesis
-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female fac- ulty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee.Prof. Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is a professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Sci- ence at Duke University
built environment andmotivate them to consider engineering careers in the construction industry. Examples include theASCEville [7], developed by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). The secondgroup of computer tools aims to simulate construction activities and processes for constructionengineering students, thereby helping them to develop a better and more realistic comprehensionof construction projects. Examples include Sawhney et al. [8]. The third group of computer tools,including the one developed by Ayer et al. [9], uses 360-degree immersive digital environmentsto interact in a virtual-reality construction site. Still, these efforts neither offer a systematicapproach to educating students about engineering core concepts nor do
research careers in bioinformatics and at providing authenticresearch experiences that led to publications or presentations”. Although the evaluation of theprogram was mostly positive, there were some key areas for improvement identified.Specifically, the main area for improvement was related to the pre-training activities primarilycentered around building the proper technical coding skills. The IRES students stated that theywould like to have additional experience with coding, exercises tailored to their specific projects,and perhaps more time to learn some of the background of their projects.Efforts to Improve Student PreparednessIn the lead-up to the first year of this IRES program, the PI created a custom course in DataCamp(https
implemented new lessons. The teachers participated in 2 regional teacher conferences, 8 winners at competitions including at state-level, and 2 NSF-ECC grantee conferences. One teacher was appointed as key trainer and technical supervisor for manufacturing section at the new Career and Technical Education center in Bryan, Texas. ▪ Industry supports: Gene Haas Foundation provided funding for additional teachers; AutoDesk provides professional training and complimentary software to participating schools. Unist donated equipment to selected schools. ▪ Nine educational /technical articles were presented /published from this RET program.III.3. Issues and recommendationsIn addition to program interruption by the
department at Seattle University to study how the department culture changes can foster students’ engineering identity with the long-term goal of increasing the representation of women and minority in the field of engineering.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co
, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023,” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, Special Report NSF 23-315, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.[3] J. C. Weidman and L. DeAngelo, Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career: Theory, Research and Application. 2020. Accessed: Sep. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8[4] A. Holbrook, K. Shaw, J. Scevak, S. Bourke, R. Cantwell, and J. Budd, “PhD Candidate Expectations: Exploring Mismatch with Experience,” IJDS, vol. 9, pp. 329–346, 2014, doi: 10.28945/2078.[5] N. Bouhrira and J. M. Cruz, “System Factors Affecting Underrepresented Minorities in Doctoral Programs in Engineering: A Literature Review
worse for low-income and URM students [6].• In cohort 3, the annual survey showed potential issues in academic integrations and self- regulation. Academic integration is a measure of the students’ perceptions of their academic experiences with faculty, counselors, and administrators, as well as perceptions about their career preparation at their institutions. Self-regulation is the awareness, knowledge, and control of cognition. It includes the students’ ability to control their effort and attention in the face of distraction and uninteresting tasks [5] which also may reflect the potential lack of motivation seen in the pandemic generation [6].• Academic performance goals as measured by GPA were met with recent cohort
University. She is as an astrophysicist focusing on what we can learn about galaxy evolution from the gas and star formation properties of galaxies. She is also working to improve STEM education with a focus on the education and retention of a diverse group of students in the STEM disciplines. She has developed and implemented education programs that span K-20, researched improvements to STEM classroom education, and is working to develop a career-ready quantum workforce. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Post-COVID Professional Development and Community Building for a Pedagogical Change ProjectProject BackgroundThis project, funded through the Institutional
backbone of the current curricular programs including a math-intensivesummer bridge experience (Engineering Ahead), a first semester First-Year Seminar, and asecond semester STEM-Persistence Seminar. In addition, co-curricular activities of the LIONSTEM program focus on professional communication skills, financial literacy, career readiness,undergraduate research, and community engagement. Although our primary outcome measure ofthe program is retention in baccalaureate Engineering majors (and other STEM majors), alongthe way we seek to take a holistic approach to analyzing STEM-persistence as a byproduct ofone’s development of their STEM-identity. This paper presents data collected about roleidentities from the first cohort of LION STEM Scholars
Education Organization and Leadership from the University of Illinois. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Early Research Scholars ProgramBackgroundResearch experiences for undergraduates has shown to increase retention in scientific fields [1],and the NSF Summer REU program provides great support for such experiences. Most REUs aredesigned for advanced students with strong foundations in Computer Science. The EarlyResearch Scholars Program (ERSP) was designed to provide a structured research experience forstudents early in their CS career (pre-data structures when they apply). The goal is to increaseretention of women and under-represented
Education and Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clem- son University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent di- versity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her
Paper ID #20380Incorporating Polymer Engineering in the ClassroomProf. Sarah E Morgan, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Sarah Morgan is a Professor in the School of Polymers and High Performance Materials at The University of Southern Mississippi. She joined The University in November of 2002 after a fourteen year career in industrial R&D in engineering thermoplastics, at GE Plastics locations around the world. Morgan’s current research focuses on polymer surfaces and interfaces, including composites, nanocom- posites, and bioinspired materials. She was named a POLY Fellow by the Polymer Chemistry Division of
the Mechanical and Materials Department at the Uni- versity of Nebraska - Lincoln. He Is the former CEO of the Hexagon Composites, Lincoln operation. Mr. Dick has held various engineering and executive positions in the defense and automotive industries throughout his career. He received a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering and a MS degree in Engineer- ing Mechanics both from the University of Nebraska. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Mechanical Engineering Capstone Projects in Rehabilitation DesignAbstractWe report results of a multi-year project aimed at offering socially relevant capstone designprojects (with a rehabilitation engineering focus) to mechanical engineering