technically savvy, but also possess strong leadership, creativity, and communication traits [1].These skills, along with high ethical standards, dynamism, agility, resilience, and flexibility,have been defined by the National Academy of Engineering as key professional skills successfulengineers need. In response to this requirement, engineering programs have incorporated teachingprofessional skills through courses, workshops, and incorporating real-world experiences in theclassroom through service learning [3]. The challenge of teaching of professional skills has beenacknowledged by engineering educators, particularly for assessment methods [4]. Examples ofproposed assessment methods include tests and examinations, measures of attitudes
that the former includes professionalskills and competencies such as industrial engineering and management, communicationskills, ethics etc, whilst the latter focuses on preparing students for a future academic career.Serving all needsAfter five years of studies, a student following the system(s) described above could be entitledto three degrees. These degrees have slightly different learning goals. In order to award allthree degrees, the university needs to assess and assure that the learning goals are achieved.How can this be monitored, and is it even possible? Some previous publications [3, 4] suggestthat it is possible but requires a lot of effort in adapting program goals to course goals andensuring a high standard in the curriculum
usability, and ethics; and producing effective writing in ashort time period. This paper describes a new design project implemented in Fall 2015 as analternative to a project implemented in Fall 2005.Course History Since 2004In Fall 2004, students worked in teams on a semester-long design project, in which they designeda crane to lift the heaviest weight with the least amount of building material in the crane4. Whilethe project had many successes, faculty observed that students did not quantitatively analyzedesign alternatives and chose a final design with only qualitative justification5. As a result, inFall 2005, the sequence of design projects given to students was modified to include a simpler,four-week startup project that involved building and
year may provide a foundation that will solidify and integrate student’s education [8].III. Redesigning ‘Foundations of Engineering’ Course As evident from the literature review teaching should combine theoretical knowledge with practical skills, while understanding its social, cultural, and ethical implications on learning. This philosophy involves going beyond classroom-type, lecture- based education, and emphasize practical skills in real world projects. In general, first year engineering students are fascinated by how industrial products are made and are curios regarding novel methods for making products. Exposure to advanced manufacturing technologies and the need for integration of technologies from several
exist outside of classroom but that maynot be leveraged by already time-constrained engineering students. By embedding elements ofcareer development and professionalism into the engineering curriculum, students are exposedfrom freshmen year on to the key professional skills that employers seek from graduates asmodelled by the industry professionals themselves, including: critical thinking/problem solving;oral/written communication; teamwork/collaboration; information/technology application;leadership; professionalism/work ethic; career management [8]. With more than 70% of openpositions being secured through networking [9], it is important to introduce students to this skillas early as possible in their college career, and to ensure that
20.7 Liberal Education 5 17.2 Multidisciplinary Engineering 4 13.8 Educational and Research Methods 3 10.3 Engineering Economy 2 6.9 Engineering Ethics 2 6.9 Engineering Management 2 6.9 Industrial Engineering 2 6.9 NSF Grantees Poster Session 2 6.9 Aerospace Engineering
forinstitutions to follow in undergraduate engineering programming includes: engineeringknowledge; problem analysis; design/development of solutions; investigation & experimentation;modern tool usage; engineers and society; environment and sustainability; ethics; individual andteamwork; communication; project management and finance; and lifelong learning15. Guidelinesto assess these (or similar) competencies are created within each of the oversight organizations.The overarching purpose of these guidelines is to aid in the relevance and technical strength ofengineering students’ preparation for professional practice. Subsequently, educators andresearchers globally have applied the recommended guidelines and assessment frameworks togauge development of
: Committee on Undergraduate Science Education Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, "Transforming Undergraduate Student Education in Science Mathematics, Engineering and Technology," National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.[8] National Research Council: Committee on the Fundamental of Assessment, Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment, J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky and R. Glaser, Eds., Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.[9] A. El-Zein, A. Airey, P. Bowden and H. Clarkeburn, "Development of a Course on Environmental Sustainability, Ethical Decision-making and Communication Skills in Engineering," in International Conference on Engineering Education, 2007
student responses to the case studyimpressions survey.MethodologyEach course used two cases. “A Case in Point: From Active Learning to the Job Market,”published at the National Center for Case Studies Teaching in the Sciences (NCCSTS), served asthe common case to acquaint students to the NCCSTS pedagogy. Each participating facultymember also selected a second case that matched a lab or interactive hands-on modulecorresponding to content typically covered in their course. NC A&T developed a case to presentto the students the concepts of e-waste and risk assessment. The case was designed to teachstudent about disposal practices in the US versus third world countries for E-waste and discussenvironmental ethics and justice. In this case, students
(2) published,peer-reviewed literature articles for each technique intended for use as a point of reference.Copies of the journal articles were provided with summarized background information on eachtechnique along with a defense for the decision made for the choice of method (as assessed in theCSU Critical Thinking Value Rubric).Proposed Approach: Student apprentices were to build the proposed framework for theirindividual testimony from an instrument based tool box to use as a road map to the get to the rootcause of the PBL scenario. They needed to identify the key skills and competencies required toconduct their analyses, such as research ethics, content knowledge and informational literacyskills; practical and problem-solving skills
associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Incorporating IMU Technology to Demonstrate Concepts in
swiftly doing process oriented tasks (Problem-Based) and also the big picture perspective anddetermination to deliver a quality end product (Project-Based)—and all of this happens as a member of ateam, subject to uncertainties and ethical dilemmas, likely in a global environment.Returning to issue number 5, this is where partnership with industry can help bring in the practicalexperience which is critically needed. Having experts help craft meaningful learning experiences which canprovide a real world perspective on how these intangible issues are dealt with in a controlled environment.In doing so, graduates are better prepared to jump into industry ready to be put straight onto a task withoutmonths of training to develop the professional skills
ethics, effective communication, and team-work to enable them tobecome successful engineers.From that, also linking the class with the ABET requirement, the following learning outcomeswere proposed for the course: 1. The ability to apply the knowledge and tools learned in the undergraduate curriculum. 2. The ability to use constraint based engineering design process to generate design options. 3. The ability to design and conduct engineering experiments in support of design or development using literature search. 4. Ability to select appropriate tools. 5. The ability to form a team and to participate effectively, communicating clearly, and managing a task oriented project. 6. Effective individual and team communication
Education, 2014, Vol. 42(2) 130-140. [4] T. S. Harding, M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli and D. D. Carpenter, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates’, Ethics & Behavior, 17(3) (2007), pp. 255–279. [5] Widmann J. and Shollenberger K. “Student use of textbook solution manuals: Student and faculty perspectives in a large mechanical engineering department.” In: Proceedingsof the 2006 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition,Chicago, Illinois, 2006, pp.11.1168.1–11.1168.9. Washington, DC: ASEE.
listed in the acknowledgement section and notas an author. In the end, the Abu Dhabi scientist was added as an author, only after thePrincipal Investigator demanded so. Although this appears to be more of a question ofresearch ethics than electronic lab notebook failure, the Abu Dhabi scientist isunderstandably now hesitant of adding any of his research online in order to prevent asimilar or worse situation.All of the above comments refer to the professional edition of Lab Archives. The Librarysubscribed to the classroom edition as well and received feedback from one physicsinstructor. He was initially very excited to use the classroom edition as he was lookingfor a more streamlined and easier solution to the organization and submission
) Scooping the regolith simulant and (b) Dumping the simulant into storage bin This project followed seven Student Outcomes which are used for the VSU ComputerEngineering Senior Design Course18. STEM Student Outcomes assessed were: abilities to design andconduct experiments, analyze and interpret data; design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints; identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; an understandingof professional and ethical responsibility; and communicate effectively. The report results were 85% ofStudents Outcomes which met the assessment target. The STEM abilities students acquired include (1)circuit designs for relays, linear actuators, conveyer, Wi-Fi shield/Arduino board
Adjunct Faculty for the Transportation Systems and, the City & Regional Planning programs at MSU. Her research interests include engineering education, student success, online engineering pedagogy and program assessment solutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, bicycle access, and ethics in engineering. She has several published works in engineering education and online learning. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of City & Regional Planning at Morgan State University (MSU), Baltimore, Maryland. She completed a B.S. Management Studies, at the University of the West Indies (Mona), Jamaica.Dr. Jumoke Oluwakemi Ladeji-Osias
is to provide students with thenecessary advanced knowledge, research skills, creativity, ethics, critical thinking and problemsolving to be able to respond to engineering challenges and needs, of our ever-changing world,for professional competence and life-long inquiry-based learning. The primary educationalobjective of the PhD in Engineering Program is to produce engineers with terminal degrees tomeet the needs for highly educated engineers with advanced technical and research skills in theworkforce. Each of the eight emphasis areas has their own specific objectives. Specificobjectives of the Coastal Engineering emphasis area follow: To prepare students with advancedknowledge and skills in coastal engineering (including coastal natural
, traffic mangement and monitoring, and ethical hacking. Such fundamental modules should be accompanied withreal-world lab experiments and exercises to provide students with a better opportunity for understanding and mastering courseconcepts and material [3]. As there are various types of cyber security laboratories [4], Willems and Meinel [5] introduced software to assesscyber security lab experiments through a virtual machine technology (an online-based laboratory). The solution offers anefficient parameterization of experiment scenarios as well as a dynamic toolkit implementation virtual machine configuration.Meanwhile, Xiong and Pan [6] discussed an approach to integrate ProtoGENI, a GENI testbed resource, into computer scienceand
Paper ID #21928Using a Grounded Theory to Determine the Motivational Factors of Engi-neers’ Participation in Public PolicyMrs. Sarah Bouazzaoui, Old Dominion University Sarah Bouazzaoui is a Ph.D. candidate and an adjunct instructor at Old Dominion University. Her re- search interests include Engineering Ethics, socio-political engineering, Motivation theory, Leadership, and System complexity. Her email address is sbouazza@odu.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineers’ Motivation to Influence Public Decision Making: A Grounded Theory Approach
, fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and engineering economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical me- chanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 What Can DISC and Motivation Profiles Disclose About Student Retention in Engineering?AbstractIn 2015 the engineering departments at the University of Denver (DU) partnered with theIndigo Project to perform an assessment of the freshman engineering students using DISCand Motivation profiles. These profiles are a part of the overall Indigo Assessment, whichhelps educators observe the non-academic traits of their students. The multi
to develop a research plan, ethics of research, and communicatingfindings and implications.Third year. Junior year brings a focus to service when students enroll in Service-Learning inSTEM. The learning objectives of the course include identifying a STEM-related communityneed and working collaboratively in teams to develop a solution. Year three is when studentsbegin their practical training in STEM, taking four credits selected from two of the followingfour areas: teaching, mentorship/leadership, research, and internship. These practicum coursesdevelop students’ career and research skills.Fourth year. Senior year promotes leadership. Women’s Leadership in STEM focuses onunderstanding leadership theory, identifying challenges of women in
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Sustainable Engineering Education in Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Dr. Huihui Qi, Grand Valley State UniversityIntroductionSustainable development is a global goal nowadays. Engineers play an unreplaceable role in theglobal sustainable development. As a result, the importance of sustainable engineering educationhas been widely recognized by engineering educators. In addition, ABET [1] has two studentsoutcome criteria for sustainability: students should have (c) an ability to design a system,component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical
3 Social and Behavioral Science 3 Engineering Ethics 3 Math and Science Engineering Calculus I 4 Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 526 Engineering Calculus II 4 Math Elective 3 Engineering Chemistry 4
) Introduction to the Guide with Scenarios that Illustrate Successes or ChallengesParticipants will be prompted to open their Critical Research Questioning Guides.A note on the guide: we at CERSE created this list of questions, that is meant to hold usaccountable to research with integrity. An Institutional Review Board serves the purpose ofprotecting research participants and centering research ethics. Our aim is to go a step further, andexamine how our research is achieving social justice aims (or not). Often we will ask ourselves these 3sorts of questions informally, but in this workshop, we are inviting you to help flesh out a guide formaking
Paper ID #25027Diversity and Inclusion and Research Partnership Development: Can SeedInvestments Really Help Promote Trans-Institutional Collaborations?Mr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include critical thinking, ethics, and process design and training.Ms. Christine Tysor, Virginia Tech Chris Tysor is a Program Manager as well as the Diversity and Inclusion Coordinator at the Institute for
, Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an OccupationalColor Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.[4] E. J. Woodhouse, “Curbing overconsumption: Challenge for ethically responsible engineering,”IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, v ol. 20, no. 3, pp. 23-30, 2001.[5] M. Chua, “Unstable equilibrium: The privilege of being oblivious,” ASEE Prism, S eptember2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee-prism.org/unstable-equilibrium-sep/http://www.asee-prism.org/unstable-equilibrium-sep/. [Accessed December 3 2018].[6] joint submission at ASEE conference, omitted for blind review since these professionalcommunities overlap.[7] J. B. Bennett, Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism
Criteria & Supporting Documents.https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/ (accessed on 12/01/2019)[2] Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016).Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self‐efficacy: A validation study. Journal ofEngineering Education, 105(2), 366-395.[3] Newberry, B., Austin, K., Lawson, W., Gorsuch, G., & Darwin, T. (2011). Acclimatinginternational graduate students to professional engineering ethics. Science and engineeringethics, 17(1), 171-194.[4] Li, H., Jin, K., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A Curriculum Innovation Framework to IntegrateManufacturing related Materials and Quality Control Standards into Different Level EngineeringEducation. The 2018 Annual
Paper ID #30427Making Large Classes Work for You and Your StudentsDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Making Large Classes Work for You and
mechanical engineering technology problems, and to fosterin students personal development to ensure a lifetime of professional success and an appreciationfor the ethical and social responsibilities of a mechanical engineering technologist and a worldcitizen. To realize such goals, especially for the education of Millennials and Generation Z,faculty need to have deeper understanding of “our” students. The characteristics of Generation Zmay include that they are the most diverse generation, grew up with smart devices, demonstratemore current online behaviors, expect modern experience but take tech for granted, are morelikely to try and figure out problems on their own first, etc. [1-5]. Such understanding will enablefaculty to develop more confidence