, with many of them as first-year freshman students. In this paper, we present preliminary findings of two first-yearenrichment programs in ASSURE-US: the student teacher interaction council (STIC) and thestudent summer research, as well as lessons learned from two years’ implementation of theproject in order to improve the project implementations for future years. 1. Introduction Billions of dollars are allocated every year to fund research, program development, and directservices aimed at increasing the number of women, minorities, and underrepresented populationsentering the STEM major/career pipeline. Nevertheless, disparities in STEM representation ofthe Hispanic community prevail. Hispanics account for 17.4% of the US population, and
goals for the course. The balance of a hybridcourse’s components was variable for (3) courses offered at UTK allowing the professors to createthe most effective teaching and learning experiences uniquely distinct for each course’s objectives.A “Rotating Face-to-Face” hybrid structure and a “Synchronous Simulcast” offering were twohybrid course modalities defined by the university beginning in Fall 2020 and extending throughSpring 2021. Professors were provided the opportunity to offer hybrid course experiences in eitherof these structures, among other modalities, to develop the balance of formal learningopportunities. As shown in Table 1, the engineering communications course design struck a precisebalance between face-to-face engagement and
-calculus. The Campbell School of Engineering allows anystudent admitted to the university to enroll in engineering; students are divided into tiers basedon their math preparation. Tiers I and II have math ACT scores of 24 or below or math RSATscores of 580 or below and start in Fundamentals of Mathematics (Tier I) or College Algebra(Tier II). Those with higher ACT or RSAT math scores are designated as Tier III and start in pre-calculus (or above if they have AP or transfer credits). To recruit for the S-STEM, students wereasked to fill out an application that included the four essay questions listed in Table 1, aiming toget a large number of students applying from Tiers I and II. We also had a kickoff meeting opento the entire engineering school
Learned: College Student Surveys as a Professional Development ToolIntroductionThe development and adoption of student evaluation of teaching (SET) were first recorded in the1920s [1] [2]. Since then, many proponents have researched the practice and suggested ways ofimplementing SETs to improve instruction. Student evaluations of teaching have mostly beenstandardized and accepted as a regular practice of assessing teaching effectiveness in mostcolleges, including my university. SETs have standard features that are described by Sproule [3]. 1. The SET is a survey about course content and teaching effectiveness with open-ended and close-ended questions. 2. The closed-ended questions present a scale of possible values
presented as translations of three course design considerationspertaining to 1) content and learning objectives [1], 2) constructive alignment [2] and 3)inclusive teaching [3]. Table 1 identifies the general course design considerations, the core ideabehind these considerations specific to this course development context, the way the designconsiderations were reframed given the open-ended nature of the course, and the strategy forimplementation for course design and instruction. By considering these translations, the specificlessons learned show how components are applied from course development through instructionleading to three implementable strategies: 1) journey mapping for holistic student experience 2)integrating course content, active
those outside thecommunity. However, within the context of engineering education, there is no shared vocabularyfor discussing the impact of research or a framework that characterizes the impact of federalinvestments in undergraduate engineering education research [1].” Brewer also cites the lack ofshared definitions, particularly related to who is impacted by the research [2]. For these reasons,our work to improve impact statements started with a focus on meanings and language in impactstatements. Specifically, impact statements can be useful to National Science Foundation (NSF)program officers who are often in the position of informing about and advocating for the projectsunder their management. These impact descriptions form the foundation
implications of their future work is an extremely important topic. There are many pitfallswith the traditional large lecture format in which ethics is taught to engineering freshmen. It istaught as an abstract philosophical topic, rather than an act of personal decision making situatedin the nuances of complex real-world contexts [1]. Often, engineering ethics instruction is taughtby a philosophy professor rather than an engineer. It is usually included late in the undergraduatecurriculum, such as during a senior capstone project, and is a relatively short subtopic (module)within a larger array of engineering content. As a result, students often do not see ethics as equallyimportant as other topics. They do not see it consistently integrated
Curricula to Engender Inclusive Professional Identities in StudentsIntroductionTo identify and solve the wicked problems [1] our society faces, science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enterprises need a heterogeneous constellation ofperspectives, mindsets, and expertise. Diverse teams are appealing because of their documentedcapacity to outperform groups selected based only on ability when facing difficult challenges [2].However, organizational theorists note that equipping people with the skills necessary to worktogether productively on teams composed of diverse members remains a challenge [3].Additionally, the culture of engineering and computer science, in particular, is oftenunwelcoming toward those with
Alamos where he worked on modeling the transient dynamic attributes of Kinetic Energy munitions during initial launch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer working for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground
ofEngineers provide design and analysis of structures to resist blast effects from accidentalexplosions and terrorist or foreign threats. Current code provisions for designing structures underaccidental blast conditions and dynamic loading are given in Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-340-02 (Change 2, 1 September 2014). The field of structural blast safety is uniquely and acutelymore relevant to DOD agencies due to the nature of both malicious and accidental risks.Obviously, terrorist incidents address one component, but the requirement to safely storemunitions on DOD installations sparked the formation of the DOD Explosives Safety Board in1928 after the major accidental explosion at the Naval Ammunition Depot, Lake Denmark, NewJersey. The
structural laboratory demonstrations. While the lecture component covers thetheoretical concepts and derivations using diagrams and simplified drawings, laboratorydemonstrations are known to improve students’ understanding of the concepts through observationand experimentation [1]-[2]. Nevertheless, traditional modes of course delivery leave a gapbetween classroom depictions of idealized structural diagrams and a first-hand experience andperception of the structural members and their load-deformation behavior. This gap can result inreduced understanding of the physical phenomena and can be an obstacle to structural mechanicseducation and learning [3]-[6].An example of classroom drawings of deformation behavior of a simple cantilever beam is shownin
for the JROCT STEM Leadership Academy. He also serves as an assistant coordinatorfor the summer academy. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Leveraging the US Army JROTC Program to Increase the STEM Workforce PipelineIntroductionNumerous reports have documented our country’s critical and growing need for STEM savvyworkers –from technicians and middle-level managers to engineers and scientists. According tothe Innovation and STEM Fields issue of the New American Economy, the number of advertisedSTEM jobs outnumbered unemployed STEM workers by more than 13 to 1 in all but 10 states[1]. Compounding the growing demand for STEM workers
ofchange. In doing so, potentials for scholarship, concientização, and praxis via labor organizing inengineering are elucidated in order to provide direction toward liberation.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering is a field that both shapes and is itself shaped by oppression and inequitable powerdynamics. Engineering education researchers have sought to study facets and intersections ofracism [1-8], heteropatriarchy [4-10], capitalism [5, 6, 10], and militarism and colonization [8,11] within engineering. In many ways, engineering education researchers have shown how thesefacets are fundamental to what is currently considered engineering epistemology. Owing to thathistory, peoples marginalized along many and varied axes of interlocking systems of
Sadegh, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityAbstract Researchers describe a need for increased access to and transitional support into STEMgraduate education for low-income, academically talented, first-generation and/orunderrepresented and minority (LIATFirstGenURM) students [1]. In October 2019, we wereawarded an NSF scholarship grant to build infrastructure and provide support to low-income,academically talented, firs-generation, underrepresented, and minority (LIATFirstGenURM)graduate engineering students. As part of the internal evaluation of the program, we interviewedseven enrolled and funded graduate student beneficiaries to determine if they encountered anybarriers during their recruitment and
experiences, to pursue careers in transportation-related fields;- Expose participating students to STEM topics through a set of pre-designed educational activities;- Introduce participating students to workings of various agencies serving multiple transportation modes through field trips and on-site seminars; and,- Enhance students’ leadership and professional skills through activities designed to introduce them to university life and the main requirements needed to obtain a college degree.The authors had presented a more detailed description of the curriculum (1) and the evaluation of theprogram in the first year. However, the following subsections provide a brief description of each of thesesessions.OVERALL STUDENT DEMOGRAPHY AND RACETable
are almost twice aslikely to drop out of high school as their peers [1]. The lack of high school graduation for thesestudents can be attributed to several factors such as school engagement, home and classroomenvironment, social and peer pressures, and academic problems [2]. Additionally, minority studentsand women who persevere in high school and elect to attend a college or university may selectScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) majors; however, they tend to choosefields such as life and health sciences. The underrepresentation of women in engineering and earthsciences is chronically low at 20% and 40% of these majors, respectively. Black and Hispanic/Latinxstudents’ representation is less than half of what would be
might suggest that there is a benefit to reforming teams mid-semester in each course to give students additional experiences to apply what they have learned tomore teams. 1. INTRODUCTION Research on improving teamwork skills has been conducted in various disciplines from differentperspectives. Providing teamwork training for trauma resuscitation staff could improve the clinicalcare of trauma patients [1]. Research in plant construction shows that adopting training policies andproviding motivators to the company’s staff help them achieve better performance and to improveteamwork experience [2]. Organizational competitiveness could be enhanced by using a frameworkintegrated and emphasized on teamwork [3
, ingeneral, and the ethical and social aspects of such practice, more specifically. Furthermore,various stakeholders have increasingly identified the role of engineering degree programs ascritical in preparing graduates for these realities. For example, the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) in their Educating the Engineer of 2020 report called on engineeringprograms to “educate technically proficient engineers who are broadly educated, see themselvesas global citizens, can be leaders in business and public service, and who are ethically grounded”[1, p. 51]. Other reports have likewise called on engineering programs to intensify their focus onethics, professional responsibility, engaged citizenship, and allied themes (e.g., see [2-3]). Inaddition
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Q Longitudinal Study of a Project-Based Learning Methods Replacement for Lecture Based Courses Introduction Incorporating project-based learning into first year experiences for engineering studentshas been shown to improve student motivation and success [1], [2]. Using hands-on projects [3],interdisciplinary projects [4], or implementing project-based learning approaches in courses [5]during the first-year of an engineering curriculum also improves student retention [6]–[8].Project-based learning enhances student learning, improves student self-efficacy [9] and betterprepares students for workplace challenges [10]. However
writtenin any modern-day programming languages and provides an excellent educational and pleasingpedagogical assignment for students in engineering and computer science that promotesinterdisciplinary knowledge transfer.IntroductionInterdisciplinary approaches to engineering education are widely recognized as necessary fortoday’s engineers to meet the societal challenges before them [1]. Among these societalchallenges are the opportunities presented by diversity, both demographically anddisciplinarily. A key goal of current engineering education practice is to “promote and sustaindiversity” [2]. However, despite recruitment efforts, women remain a minority in engineeringfields in the U.S. and conceptualizations of interdisciplinary pedagogical
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Low-Barrier Strategies to Increase Student-Centered LearningAbstractEvidence has shown that facilitating student-centered learning (SCL) in STEM classroomsenhances student learning and satisfaction [1]–[3]. However, despite increased support fromeducational and government bodies to incorporate SCL practices [1], minimal changes have beenmade in undergraduate STEM curriculum [4]. Faculty often teach as they were taught, relyingheavily on traditional lecture-based teaching to
printedparts for which the design files are publicly available (see Concluding Remarks). The total costfor this kit is less than $100 USD retail. Data acquisition and hardware interfacing are conductedthrough industry-standard computational packages like MATLAB/Simulink, LabView, orArduino IDE and the system allows for sufficiently fast sample rates (350Hz - 450Hz) with noproprietary software or plugins. This paper describes the design and educational outcomes of asub-$100 take-home 2nd-order mechatronics kit designed to match the learning objectivesafforded by a traditional laboratory experiment.Dynamic SystemsExperimental platforms such as Educational Control Products (ECP’s) torsional 1 and rectilinearplants 2 (Fig. 1) are examples of traditional
study is informed by the need to address the well-documentedunderrepresentation of low-socioeconomic status (SES) and minoritized students in engineeringand other related careers [1]–[3]. Researchers advanced that, in addition to intellectual andscientific reasons, low-income students are attracted to the major by the potential prospect ofemployment after completing a degree [1], [4]. Financial considerations are critical for low-SESengineering students; this includes considerations of financial aid and differential tuition [5].Programs such as the National Science Foundation Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) have beenimplemented to address financial assistance of low-SES students. This study is part of alongitudinal five-year S-STEM project
-layer or point by point gradually, providing increased freedom ofdesigning the model of the complex structure, rapid customization, lower production waste, rapidprototyping, and the use of materials for printing which includes metal alloys, composite ofpolymers, concrete, and ceramics. Due to the widening of the horizon of the uses of 3D printing,machine learning (ML)-based technologies have been used to improve 3D printing processes. 3Dprinting technologies have been widely applied in many fields, including aerospace, medicine,industry, and beautification. Also, additive manufacturing has been used in biologicaltechnologies, known as 3D bioprinting, which will be widely used for medical or daily purposes[1],[2].In-situ defect detection is
learning experience for students.1 Introduction and GoalComputer numerical control (CNC) mill is vital for many engineering and manufacturing practices.However, learning to use it, especially for a beginner with little to no experience, can bechallenging. A virtual simulation can serve as a good learning tool for operating a real CNCmachine. That way anyone could learn the process of using a machine such as this without thesafety hazards that could happen if certain precautions are not taken. A virtual CNC machine wouldhelp students with learning how to operate a physical machine in practice. Not only is thesimulation safer to learn, but it is more engaging. Allowing students to have interaction with themachine will vastly improve the learning
well as its ability to adapt to challenges and crises. This response could be seen fromindustrial manufacturing facilities that developed protocols and procedures to remain openthroughout the pandemic to continue producing a number of essential items [1]. Manufacturingeducation faced a challenge as well namely, how to continue providing experiential learning tostudents under the restrictions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. At the New Jersey Instituteof Technology (NJIT) this required addressing the operation of the NJIT Makerspace, whichserves as a platform for manufacturing and experiential education. The NJIT Makerspace is an advanced manufacturing and research and developmentfacility [2]. This 10,000 square foot facility not only
literature findings indicated the commonality of challenges faced by capstoneprograms regardless of timing, engineering major, program profile, or type of institution. Among thesurvey results were the following: (1) Due to COVID-19 conditions, 44% of the respondents reportedcomplete cancellation of this event while 56% reported conducting some form of virtual exposition. Thework represented in this paper supports an intention to be agile enough to adapt to any situation along thiscontinuum - and likewise be posed to adjust when our capstone programs must react to emergingcircumstances in the future.IntroductionCapstone Design flourishes when teammates, clients, advisors, and instructors are face-to-faceand are physically working hands-on at their
BackgroundInstitutional culture change has been an important topic in higher education for manyyears, but this is keenly felt in STEM fields, where much research has documented thebenefits of student-centered pedagogies and the simultaneous struggle to promote thespread of such teaching methods [1, 2]. Evidence based instructional practices (EBIPs) andstudent-centered learning are two key aspects of institutional change [3, 4]. Literature hasshown that when instructors have a fixed mindset, they are less likely to be successful inimplementing classroom changes [5].Reflective faculty peer observation has been a focus of recent culture change efforts in agroup of Northwest universities [6–8]. The work has confirmed that discussions betweenfaculty about teaching
onlycreating relevant, contextually fit solutions for clients, but also by providing resilient responsesto the changing constraints and opportunities external and internal to the organization.Unfortunately, the value-adding role of designers and indeed design project successes can behindered by inadequate management of organizational tensions that persist over time and arewidely experienced as paradoxical. Adopting the concept of ‘polarity management’ by BarryJohnson, this paper aims to unpack the nuances of two particular polarities: (1) Design Rigourvs. Cost Effectiveness, and (2) Collaboration vs. Efficiency.The data are drawn from a larger grounded theory study on sociotechnical knowledge integrationin engineering design. Semi-structured in-depth
studypresented the different types of uncertainty faced by students, how they managed them, as wellas how that impacted their design performance. Implications of this study include a betterunderstanding of the various ways students dealt with uncertainty, suggestions for how educatorscan help students manage uncertainty more effectively, as well as increased knowledge of waysthat CAD can be used to help students manage uncertainty in engineering design tasks.Keywords: uncertainty, engineering design, CAD, design thinking.Introduction Engineering design is a complex process that typically involves open-ended and ill-structured problems that often come with uncertainty, such as insufficient information or unclearrequirements [1], [4]. In