methods.The virtual enterprise was named ‘Team Detectors Limited’ and manifested as a web site on acommercial ISP’s web server. It contained four simulated departments: Design Office;Planning Office; Quality Assurance Laboratory; and Administration. Communicationsbetween the virtual enterprise and students was to be carried out in such a way as to mimic asclosely as possible the way that communications are carried out in the workplace. That is, bya mixture of e-mails, e-memoranda, paper documents and data on web site pages.The realia created to add corroborative detail included: ≠ A brief history of the company and its products. ≠ A complete inventory of the capital equipment available to Team Detectors Limited. This
AC 2010-1942: A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORTEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYSteve Macho, Buffalo State College Steve Macho completed a BS at St Cloud State University, and M.A. & Ed.D. in Technology Education at West Virginia University. Steve is a Minnesota farm boy who has been involved in technology his entire life. He worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Highlands University, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Technology Education for at Buffalo State College. He became a member of the Oxford Roundtable in 2008 and plans to present another paper there in 2010
. Carrying out laboratory experiments and generating experimental data, visiting aproject site, and using pencil and paper to produce a schematic, are gradually fading away. Thesetraditional tools were instrumental in developing an engineering common sense. It is argued herethat generating data from physical models is potentially a great learning tool, particularly whenthe model is built by the students. Building a model, testing a model, generating physical datafrom the model, and analyzing said data, help students alternate between inductive andconductive processes, thus broadening their design vision and their understanding of theexperimental approach to engineering design. There is potentially a real need to research theways to teach engineering
AC 2010-2063: A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORTEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYSteve Macho, Buffalo State College Steve Macho completed a BS at St Cloud State University, and M.A. & Ed.D. in Technology Education at West Virginia University. Steve is a Minnesota farm boy who has been involved in technology his entire life. He worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Highlands University, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Technology Education for at Buffalo State College. He became a member of the Oxford Roundtable in 2008 and plans to present another paper there in 2010
, similar to practices they would encounter in engineering industry. The learningobjectives of this course are process-oriented; the professor examines the process the studentshave followed and how they got to their end point. The professor believes that the process of thedesign is even more important than whether or not the final product works. In this particularproject, the professor encourages students to break down a problem, test it incrementally, andeventually put it back together once these individual components are functional.The course allows for frequent engagement with students in a studio session that promotesdiscussion of the progression of their work. Laboratory time is used to introduce students to thetask of system debugging, which
factors, management) were distributed as evenly as possible, considering other factors such as student desire, and the project’s unique requirements. Each team had at least one management major (USAFA) and usually one or more other students from other technical degree programs.At USAFA, design teams worked on a variety of projects ranging from the Society ofAutomotive Engineers Formula Car Intercollegiate Competition to various smaller projectssponsored by the Air Force Research Laboratories (AFRL). Team sizes ranged from 12 (for theformula team) to 6 (for the smallest AFRL team). Half of these groups served as a “control”group, only using 6-3-5 for concept generation. These three teams included the SAE
). Issues discussed include gender, context with Bloom’s taxonomy of learning and Gardner’s multiple modes of learning. Students typically design several lesson plans that include STEM components, possibly in cross- Page 15.1194.6 curricular modes with non-STEM content.Upper level T&E courses are also taken routinely by MST students, primarily by technologyspecialization majors. These courses include Architecture & Civil Engineering, MechanicalSystems Design, Mechanics & Materials Laboratory, Facilities Design, ManufacturingSystems, Prototyping and Environmental/Biotechnology Systems.In New Jersey, MST majors can also qualify for
AC 2010-2414: THE ENGINEERING PROFESSOR OF 2020: THE FORGOTTENVARIABLELueny Morell, Hewlett-Packard Lueny Morell, M.S., P.E., is Program Manager in the Strategy and Innovation Office staff of Hewlett Packard Laboratories (HPL) in Palo Alto, California. She is responsible for facilitating external research collaborations for HPL and lead initiatives focused on R&D talent development, collaborating with external partners (government entities and other corporate labs) to pursue strategies and initiatives of benefit to the research community. In the past, she was in charge of developing engineering/science curriculum innovation initiatives worldwide in support of HPL research and technology
laboratory for MACILE master teachers. Design planning started in 2009 with the collaboration of faculty and students from the Construction Management Program at BYU. Operations are expected to start in 2011. • Teacher Development Institute (TDI). TDI will train effective master MACILE educators. It will offer professional development for in-service teachers and new graduate to improve quality in the classrooms. A summer program started in 2008. The year- around program is expected to begin in 2011. • Scholarship Program. The main goal of this program is to encourage academic excellence and reduce drop out due to financial hardship. It increases opportunities for qualified students to attend well
engineering through the development of computational and laboratory skills. The course is open to non-majors who typically fill 5% of the class. The course emphasizes programming and coupling math concepts with measurements and data. The second required, 1 credit course is Introduction to Engineering Modeling. This is an introduction to mathematical modeling of physical and chemical systems; verification of mathematical models by experiment; development and interpretation of engineering drawings, process flow diagrams (PFDs), and piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs); use of a drawing program, such as Visiotec; and an introduction to the process simulator AspenPlus. Other courses include a required, 2 credit
emphasize societal relevance of the discipline.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from her experience as a researcher and General Manager at Honeywell Inc. She has developed new assessments to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes. She is currently working on an NSF IEECI grant to bring engineering service learning activities to middle school students.B.L
anything just because. The thing that I was very frustrated with my physics education was that I wasn’t really allowed to put any of myself into it I was just mimicking the professor. All of my labs are open and creative and sometimes my laboratories are just about experiencing.” “The women, they’re a lot more open to working on projects collaboratively. I do try to be somewhat aware of my classroom demographics. For instance, I’ve got a class this quarter that’s all male so we’ve been able to do lots of car things and guy things but if I Page 15.436.11 had women in the class I’d kind of shy away from those
classproduced the same result; MST grades for individual assignments were on par, or better, thanT/PrEE students. This result was counterintuitive because MST majors start the program withclearly weaker skills and lower comfort with laboratory tools. However, MST students tendnot to hesitate in asking for help in understanding a process. A T/PrEE student is often theone providing the help, which also benefits the T/PrEE students since he/she gatherseducational experiences in providing this help.In summary, MST students are not simply passing T&E courses but are actually performingon par or better than the TE students. This is a strong indication that MST students arelearning substantial T&E content. (iii) Technology Education PraxisTM
thehorizontal alignment is explained). The remaining part of this paper details the steps takentowards restructuring the material for highway alignment design covered under the mandatoryTransportation Engineering course offered to civil engineering undergraduate students at a majorMidwest engineering school. This course laboratory covers highway design activities as part of aclass project.Research Questions and MethodThe overall objective of this study was to explore to what degree the use of the framework Page 15.1034.5proposed by the model of threshold concepts can help to improve the learning process in adesign-focused Transportation Engineering
Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from her experience as a researcher and General Manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop new assessments to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes.Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and
teaches courses in science curricula, teaching and learning, and assessment courses with an emphasis on constructivist theory and issues of equity. Her research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching. She has won two awards for her research in these areas. In this work she is responsible for developing assessments and overseeing data collection, analysis, and feedback to the project.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new
, Senior Capstone: Production Laboratory, and Senior Project courses, along with theIndustrial Internship Program.This integration has occurred in various components of these courses. The textbook readings,lectures, and discussions were revised in order to emphasize the findings from the study. Inaddition homework assignments, case studies, and real world experiences derived from the studywere included as individual or group exercises.Homework assignments and case studies related to performance measurements were developedand implemented for the aforementioned senior courses. In each case, the students are to applytheir knowledge of performance monitoring techniques to the particular problem and analyzetheir effectiveness, suggest improvements, and
usable MEAs to differentengineering disciplines; and extending the MEA approach to identifying and repairingmisconceptions, using laboratory experiments as an integrated component, and introducing anethical decision-making dimension [1].Our overall research goal is to enhance problem solving and modeling skills and conceptuallearning of engineering students through the use of model eliciting activities. In order toaccomplish this goal at the University of Pittsburgh, we are pursuing two main research routes:MEAs as teaching tools and MEA as learning assessment tools. Under the first – using MEAs asa teaching tool – we are focused on three main activities: 1. Development of effective model eliciting activities: The creation of MEAs for upper
Konseyi(MDK). The journal focuses exclusively on scholarly educational research in engineering Page 15.656.3education. We offer a large international readership and a highly cited archive. Its articles covera wide range of subjects including what knowledge and competencies engineers must possessand how they are learned and assessed, how educational methods, materials, infrastructure, andfaculty affect learning, and how to attract, engage, and retain diverse human talent to engineeringDr. Susan Lord directs the Optoelectronics Laboratory at USD. Her research interests are in theareas of optoelectronics and materials. She has worked as a Research
follow: Core Curriculum: The university has a core curriculum requirement which includes 6 semester credit hours of freshman composition (FC), 6 credit hours of “writing within the curriculum” in 300- and 400-level courses (W), 9 credit hours of humanities, literature, and fine arts (HU/L/FA), 9 credit hours of history and social and behavioral sciences (HI/SB), a 6 credit-hour depth (or sequence) study in a discipline in either HU/L/FA or HI/SB, 12 credit hours of natural science (NS) and mathematics (MA) to include 2 credit hours of laboratory (mathematics must be at the calculus I level or higher), and either 6 credit hours of foreign language (FL) or computer (C) in addition to the HU/L/FA requirement (FL courses can count
of twenty-two African American women engineering faculty was held to discuss the challenges andbarriers that affect the tenure and promotion process. The discussion led to the identification ofsix significant factors affecting successful attainment of tenure for Black women faculty inparticular. The most important factor identified by the senior faculty within the group waseffective mentoring. Other factors included support of the home department, community support,and existing laboratory infrastructure. While there were no real surprises from this survey, thelack of resources to follow-up with the group to effect change caused this initiative to go intohibernation. (It should be noted that Dr. Mead was a member of the Leadership Task Force
, is particularly urgent in Texas becauseof a 2006 legislative decision requiring all high school students, beginning with those 15.1277.9who entered ninth grade in 2007, to complete four years of science to graduate under thestate’s default degree plan. This fourth year of science, which must be laboratory-based,may be selected from existing courses in anatomy/physiology, astronomy, advancedbiology, chemistry and physics, environmental systems and research/design, or may be anew course in space science or a new course in engineering. In schools offering anengineering option, this new initiative will put enormous pressure on secondary
-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.Hagen, K. D., “Heat Transfer with Applications” Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.Rolle, K. C., “Heat and Mass Transfer” Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.Leinhard and Leinhard, “A Heat Transfer Textbook, 3rd ed.” free on-line athttp://web.mit.edu/lienhard/www/ahtt.htmlInstructional Laboratory Supervisor Paul B. Golter: 5-9634; email: pgolter@wsu.eduLecturer Baba Abdul: e-mail: davab@wsu.edu, 5-9625Course Details Page 15.1062.17Grading: Project 60% (Group); Case study 10% (Group), Homework 20% (Individual), Final DesignAnalysis (10%). The part of your grade arising from group work will be
(Entrepreneur, etc.) 5 (50%) 44 (33%) Government (Politician, Science Policy Advocate, etc.) 3 (30%) 16 (12%) Industry (Engineer/Research Scientist) 10 (100%) 114 (84%) Research Laboratory (Engineer/Research Scientist) 7 (70%) 67 (50%) Other (please specify) 0 (0%) 3 (2%) *Responses obtained from a survey sent to the 272 GSIs in the College of Engineering in Fall 2009 (~50% response rate)Since EGSMs are advanced doctoral students (many of whom have reached candidacy), whoalso have in-depth training and experience related to effective college teaching, consulting
school students by providing a design project to work on for 5-7 weeksduring or after school, each academic semester. The students build and learn about physics andengineering principles with their college mentors. The design project provides a naturalmechanism to spur a mentoring relationship. After the mentorship sessions, mentees demonstratehow their designs fulfill the design requirements via a competition held during DREAM Day.DREAM Day takes place at the end of the program and includes lectures and panel discussionson financial aid policies, tours of engineering laboratories, and information on STEM careers.Many of the students do not realize the opportunities that engineering and college present tothem, but when the Rice mentors inform