.” Mechanical Not a BOK “better equip mechanical engineering graduates… not only [9] with a solid technical foundation, but also with creativity, strong professional skills, and leadership within engineering and society.” (p. 15) Software 15 knowledge areas Professional practice. 2. Group dynamics and psychology. Engineering {leadership not explicitly identified as a skill} [10] Civil Engineering 16: 6 foundational, 12. Leadership. Plan, organize, and direct the efforts of a Technologist 3 technical, 7 group and self
purposes of this paper,we work from the perspective that learning is at the core of institutions of higher education.As we began our efforts to systemically advance innovations in teaching across campus, we(teaching and learning center staff) learned from preliminary interactions that faculty werestruggling to make sense of what we meant by various educational terms. Additionally, mostfaculty had no pedagogical training and little to no understanding of cognition and how to1 In an earlier paper the theoretical perspectives that inform our work is described in greater detail [6].2 We did take into account external factors in the design and planning of the interventions, but that was a secondlevel consideration and will not be addressed in this
Learning, by Brown, Roediger, and McDaniel6, has recently made this ideapopular as a guide in improving both teaching and learning practices. There are many tactics forshattering this illusion and enabling more permanent learning, many of which can be summed upby the three “big ideas” put forth by Make It Stick: 1. Learning works by getting it out, not getting it in. 2. Difficulty is desirable. 3. A growth mindset motivates.In this paper, an engineering course is examined for symptoms of illusions of learning, andimprovements to the curriculum and teaching methods are incorporated and reviewed. Thecourse of interest is MFG 480: Manufacturing Process Planning and System Design, a 3-creditengineering course for seniors that has been taught for
homework questions.Timeline of RedesignFigures 1, 2, and 3 depict the current timeline for the curriculum redesign and plan for fullimplementation. Figure 1. Redesign timeline for ENGR 120, the first course in the LWTL series. Figure 2. Redesign timeline for ENGR 121, the second course in the LWTL series. Figure 3. Redesign timeline for ENGR 122, the third course in the LWTL series.Note in Figure 1, the quarter of the initial ENGR 120 curriculum redesign there was one sectionof the course that was experiencing the redesigned content as it was being created while twosections were experiencing the course without the redesigned content. Similarly, as seen inFigure 2, in the Fall of 2017 one section of ENGR 121
Figure 1: This is a caption for the first figure 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of ColumbiaConclusions and Future WorkWe believe that online programming practice tools have a positive impact on student’s learning.We also believe based on our preliminary data that it helps them in their exam grades, as theyhave more opportunities to practice and get immediate feedback. Also they can easily review theproblems where they struggle and reinforce those skills. We plan to expand this work bystudying the effect in multiple sections of the course, as well as including data from otherprogramming courses.References1. Bergin, S. & Reilly, R. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on
, service-oriented learning experience for students to develop communication,collaborative, and critical thinking skills.References1. Sisson, P. From Rust Belt to Brain Belt: Can Former Industrial Cities Turn Into Future Innovation Hubs? Curbed: Urban Planning, 2016.2. Cybulski, J.S., J. Clements, and M. Prakash, Foldscope: origami-based paper microscope. PloS one, 2014. 9(6): p. e98781.Anne SchmitzAnne Schmitz has a doctorate in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering Program atGannon University. She teaches bioengineering lab courses, biomechanics, and researchmethods. Her research focus is computational joint modeling.Nick
equations. Figure 1: Brittle (Chalk) vs. Ductile (Tootsie Roll) Failure (a) Pure axial force applied to a brittle material (chalk) (b) Pure axial force applied to a ductile material (Tootsie Roll) (c) Pure torsion applied to a brittle material (chalk) (d) Pure torsion applied to a ductile material (Tootsie Roll)Ductile to Brittle Transition Temperature (DBTT) can also be incorporated into the chalk andTootsie Roll demonstration. However, it does require access to a freezer in the immediate vicinityof the classroom, plus a little bit of prior planning. For this demonstration, Tootsie Rolls must befrozen ahead of time. After the
Civil Engineering at New York City College of Technology. Karla recently joined the Peer-Led Team Learning organization at her college. The PLTL program has showed her how satisfying and important it is to share your knowledge with peers on a similar path as you. Besides helping others succeed in their college courses, the PLTL program has made her a better individual and student. After graduating with her associates degree, Karla plans to pursue a field inspector position in order to obtain experience for her future career.Dr. Janet Liou-Mark, New York City College of Technology, CUNY Dr. Janet Liou-Mark is a Professor of Mathematics and the Director of the Honors Scholars Program at New York City College of
Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Edu- cation. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 Best Paper Award for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Michelle M
,BestPracticesandQualitativeDataCultivating225EMIXinternswith15sponsorsovertwelveyearshasyieldedbestpracticestoeffectivelynavigatethechallengesinherentlypresentinthecomplexEMIXinitiative.Anarray of complexities potentially impacts intern success and retention including studenthousing,transportation,andgeographicculture.Practitioners should be forewarned that it can be a challenge to identify appropriatehousinginasafelocationthatwillacceptanaffordableshort‐termlease.Asimportantly,notallinternshiplocationsfeaturepublictransportation,andmanystudentinternsdonothave access to a vehicle. It is advised to inquire about transportation during the studentinterviewprocesstofacilitatetransportationplanningforinterns.Lastly, it can be a challenge to attract a young professional to a very rural geographiclocation unless the company plans to orchestrate weekend activities. It is not necessarythat the location be urban, but undergraduate interns
Paper ID #242002018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Experiments in Adopting Computer-Aided Learning in Electrical Engineer-ingDr. Majid Poshtan, Cal Poly Dr. Majid Poshtan obtained his PhD in EECE from Tulane University, New Orleans, USA in 2000. Dr. Poshtan has over 20 years of wide-ranging experience in EE academic and industry. He is an expert in electric power systems, transmission planning, short circuits studies and protection, condition moni- toring of generators, induction motors, transformers and power cables, substation design, power system computer simulators, and Real Time simulator. Dr. Poshtan
Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Mr. William Michael Anderson, Virginia TechMs. Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year
. I am a former member of Dallas Robotics Group at the Dallas Makerspace, and plan to enroll in the National Stem certification program. I have completed PLTW and Robotics and Automation certificate programs, and attended Ar- duino Project and Raspberry Pie. I have been a mentor for the College Readiness and Leadership Program (CRLP) with the goal of implementing student leadership in our school. In addition, I like to work with 3D printing and design, and am a member of Enabling Hand, a team that creates and assembles prosthetic arm designs.Dr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He
bring them together as a group and a CoP [with a community, a domain, and apractice] begins to solidify.As the new community forms, the PEPS research team must support the new core whileallowing them the autonomy to make their own decisions. The PEPS researchers areproviding support by hosting a webinar where partner schools will get a chance to meet 3each other and learn about the results of the PEPS results for their respective institutions.This webinar becomes the first step for planning the joint symposium that will be the firstproduct of the new CoP. At the symposium, information about the new practice (usingresearch-based decisions to inform the design of career services and programs) will
students andsubsequent choice of engineering as a major and career. To develop engineering-specific theories of how engineering identities are formed, thispaper describes the methodological plan for understanding interest and identity development ofthree middle-school populations participating in engineering summer camps offered by theCollege of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno, NV: (1) women in engineering (2)first generation students and, (3) open-enrollment engineering camps. The research designleverages existing quantitative surveys along with focus groups and observations based on aselected set of questions from these surveys.Research Design, Methods and InstrumentsThe research design for this project is based on
development of the MEA curriculum is guided by content experts to ensure that thecurriculum is culturally relevant, connects with the community, aligns with state content standards,and is developmentally appropriate for middle school students.Objective 2: Teacher Professional DevelopmentTeacher professional development (TPD) on the use of CR MEAs is conducted for seven teachersin grades four through six. The TPD is designed to focus on increasing teachers’ knowledge, skilland confidence in using an instructional method that is math and science rich and culturally andcommunity relevant. The TPD is designed to encourage teachers’ collaboration in planning,teaching, observing, revising, and sharing lessons learned from the implemented CR MEAs.Objective
. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Diversity of College Engineering Degrees: The Roles of Geography and the Concentration of Engineering Degree Production Executive SummaryIntroductionTo meet the growing demand for a larger technological and scientific labor force in the UnitedStates, a prominent policy goal is to expand and broaden participation in science and engineeringcollege programs (e.g., [1], [2]). Previous
-course survey also emphasized the effectiveness of thisnew method in terms of addressing the learning objectives of the course (Figure 1).Future developments To further deepen this research, we plan to (1) maintain and further develop the active learning aspectsof the course by enriching the teaching with other voices and perspectives and (2) design a robust andobjective method of assessment of the active learning elements of the course. To address our first objective, we will update the papers that are studied on a regular basis to keepthem current. We will also introduce new perspectives by developing a system of online annotation of thepapers. The instructors will use annotations to draw the students’ attention on the ideas of
resulted (last column of Table 1). Some groups that included reactantrecycle reported only minimal improvement in conversion associated with the recycle. In thecase of a vinyl chloride process (performed by two different groups), hydrochloric acid generatedas a by-product of a third reactor was recycled back to the beginning of the process where it wasutilized as a reactant in one of the first two parallel reactions. Besides reactant recycle, threedesign groups included recycling of non-reactant chemicals added for the express purpose ofproduct recovery (triethylene glycol for water recovery, paraffin oil for isobutylene recovery, anddibutyl phthalate for maleic anhydride recovery). In the future, the instructor plans to requestthat the students
environment with other students and the course instructor.We plan to utilize evidence-based evaluation techniques to assess the effectiveness of the course(and individual features of the course) toward student learning. Possible evaluation methods willbe discussed, and feedback from the audience will be encouraged.Keywords: Chemical Engineering, Engineering Education, Bridging Course, Online Course,Continuing Education1. INTRODUCTIONChemical engineering graduate programs often receive applications from students whoseundergraduate degree is in chemistry, physics, biology, or another engineering discipline. Thesetypically are excellent students with undergraduate research or work experience, but their lack ofchemical engineering background can present
applied project-based experiences among lower development, etc. In addition, lectures on entrepreneurshipdivision courses causes many students to lose interest and were integrated during Winter quarter to allow students toleave engineering during the first year, without understanding develop a business plan related to the quadcopter project.the importance of rigorous training in math and physical Lab sessions were designed for students to apply thesciences. Many programs implemented innovative first-year technical contents to their project and were co-instructed bycourses to enhance engineering curriculum and increase graduate teaching assistants and laboratory staff. Studentsstudent retention [1
there was a statistically significantAdditionally, communication is in the top three most difference in the students’ performance in UN1015 andimportant competencies ranked by engineering graduates ENG1102. For both of these comparisons, a significance(planning and time management is first; problem solving is level α of 0.01 was chosen prior to data comparison to testsecond). Yet communication remains one of the skills the null hypothesis of no difference in the means.engineering students struggle with the most, often failing“to appreciate that written words, not just calculations, An additional analysis was performed on 105 students withexpress engineering content” [3]. The assumption is that
manufactured andtested their design towards a final project showcase. As teams transitioned from their design justexisting in CAD to a physical manifestation of their ideas, they participated in a second designreview where they presented a draft of their educational materials and plans for manufacture.Two out of three of the parents that participated in the first design review returned for the seconddesign review. Figure 3 provides a visual of the parts that were 3D printed for the fuel cell carexample and the final product after manufacture. Figure 3: The 3D printed parts created in the design phase (left) and the final design after fabrication (right). The final design was functional, using the fuel cell for forward movement.MethodsAfter
project success to upfront organization, group planning, and/orgood time-management. The references to the elements of technology, whether hardware orsoftware, were divided as to whether these elements attributed to the shortfall of the project or tothe project successes.DiscussionWhile the specificities and depth of student responses varied across both projects, the resultsnevertheless revealed that students did see value in a breadth of technical to non-technicalengineering attributes from the onset through to the completion of the course. This findingsuggests that the instructor found at least some success in implementing a human-centereddesign project towards the end of the semester in a way that did not de-emphasize or neglectpreviously
major choice at the end of the fall semester. Future work will include a think-aloud interview protocol asking students to explain what they were thinking about their major asthey were responding to the survey. We anticipate two general outcomes of this work. First, thiswork will help improve the language used in surveys for FYE students to ensure that participantsare consistently interpreting prompts that evaluate fit, satisfaction, and anticipated plans tocomplete the program. Additionally, this work will also help elucidate how students in FYEprograms see that program relating to their discipline-specific engineering curriculum and howstudents begin to build their engineering identities.ConclusionsThis study begins to unpack how
imaging of solar cells (cont).Figure 12d. Thermal imaging of solar cells (cont).Figure 12e.Educational ImplementationThis work was developed and performed by undergraduate and graduate engineering students inEngineering Technology, Electrical Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering as specialproblems and student research projects. Dissemination of this work is planned as follows. Wewill develop laboratory modules (2 to 3 hour session) for combined imaging, thermography, andlaser scanning in courses for materials science, renewable energy, measurements, and qualityassurance. We are also developing topics for Senior Design Projects and undergraduateindependent study. This work offers opportunities for students to work with image processingand
was and showing briefexamples. Then students had fifteen minutes to work individually on generating their maps usingpencil and paper. They were told that their maps would be collected but not evaluated for agrade. Electronic copies of the maps were made, and maps were offered back to the students inthe last day of lecture for the semester.As a preliminary start to this work in progress, ten maps chosen at random from the 2016 and2017 semesters were evaluated in random order according to the holistic rubric from Besterfieldet al. It is also planned to use a more hierarchical rubric to reevaluate the rubrics. Ultimately thiswill be done for each of the approximately 90 mind maps from both the 2016 and 2017iterations. Scores on the maps will be
between fall or spring semestersor over the study period years. The video server system was also able to provide information on the operating systembeing used on the students’ devices. This allowed us to understand whether the students weretypically watching videos on Windows laptops/computers, Apple Mac devices, Androidsmartphones/tablets, Apple iPhones/iPads, or Chromebook laptops. Understanding the deviceand device screen size allowed us to move towards continuous improvement plans of the videosas smaller items would be difficult to present on small device screens. Figures 6 and 7 showthat, a Windows laptops/computers were generally used to watch the videos and this did notchange over a typical semester. This usage pattern was steady
question tailored to the class in which they are enrolled. This is accompanied with aninventory list to allow students to begin to formulate their planned investigative experiments. Proposalsare reviewed by both teachers and the graduate student instructor assigned to their student team, inadvance of their lab trials. After their first lab visit, students debrief with their graduate studentinstructor and determine areas for improvement for the next visit to complete a usable data set. Studentsconclude the program by providing an assessment of their findings and a quantitative recommendationto address their assigned problem in the format of a poster presentation as part of the final symposiumheld at the IBBME. The chronological timeline of
75 10,275 2018-2020 Yrs 2-4 participant feedback; augment evaluation plan*Estimatedbasedontheaveragehighschoolteacherbeingresponsibleforabout137studentseachyear[4]To develop the NEET program, NEWT’s educational team hosted 15 environmental scienceteachers for a two-day brainstorming session to determine the educational needs of teachers andidentify the ERC nanotechnology topics to be incorporated into the pilot NEET program.Teachers were selected to participate in the brainstorming session based on years of teachingexperience in environmental science and teaching in a high-needs district. The session includedpresentations of NEWT research, instructional practices and strategies discussions, and a hands-on lesson