teaching experi- ence, he also has performed extensive research and published numerous technical papers. He has secured more than $1 million in the form of both internal and external grants and research funding. Foroudastan is the faculty advisor, coordinator, and primary fundraiser for EVP teams entering national research project competitions such as the Formula SAE Collegiate Competition, the Baja SAE Race, the SolarBike Rayce, the Great Moonbuggy Race, and the Solar Boat Collegiate Competition. For his concern for and ded- ication to his students, Foroudastan received MTSU awards such as the 2002-03 Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005-06 Outstanding Public Service Award, and the 2007 Faculty Advisor of the Year
Page 26.1576.4illustrates some of the daily activities and events that provide professional development to theSCCORE students:Table 1: SCCORE Seminar ScheduleMajor Events Workshops Lab Tours/Field Trips Panels/SpeakersOrientation Hazcom Training; Intros Tours of Biology Lab, Transfer Student PanelDinner to: SCCORE, New Plant and and Graduate Student Mexico AMP, and Environmental Labs, Panel Research Methods Physics Lab, Astronomy Presentation and Tour of Observatory
elaboration of standards. Weconclude with a discussion motivating social justice as a value that all engineers can adopt.IntroductionSocial justice is an aspirational value conceptualized in contrast to injustice, and is best definedby those most closely experiencing that injustice. 1 Notions of social justice vary by time and byaffected population. Studying previous social justice movements can provide some examples ofkey principles such as ending systems of oppression like racism, colonialism, classism, ableism,sexism, heterosexism, gender normativities, xenophobia, ageism, and others; resisting thesystematic silencing or discrediting of local knowledges and scientific counter-knowledges thatchallenge dominant ways of thinking, knowing and doing
male counterparts.1–7 As research hasshown that inventions by women are frequently designed to address important social problems,addressing the gap in engagement in academic commercialization activities has growing societalrelevance.2,8 This gender gap can largely be explained by the significant obstacles that womenfaculty in engineering face as they advance their careers and as they engage in academiccommercialization.9–11 Barriers such as gender discrimination, attitudinal and behavioral factors,work-life balance issues, and exclusion from networks impact the ability of women faculty tocontinue in the field, engage in academic commercialization, and ultimately advance theircareers.3,7,8,12–17This paper aims to synthesize relevant literature
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Work in Progress - Innovation through Propagation: Improving and Diversifying PathwaysIntroductionRound 1 of the Delphi study of the critical unsolved problems facing engineering educationresearch, described elsewhere1, included a question on barriers related to “improving anddiversifying the pipeline”. Several respondents pointed out that the pipeline metaphor has beenchallenged in the community for its rigidity and expressed a preference for the “pathways”metaphor, which suggests multiple routes instead of a single route. The pathways metaphor isconsistent with the literature.2,3For round 2 of the Delphi study, the prompt was changed to “pipeline and
application be a real structure beingdeveloped at a major Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Teaming of ProfessionalEngineers from both the industrial and university partners helped to define and execute a large-scale, multi-material structural analysis of a rear end suspension under development by the OEM.Course Progression PhasesThe course development was initiated with the OEM providing jigs and production assemblies fordestructive testing, as well as the full assembly model with geometry, material properties andinterfaces defined (Figure 1). The university provided software, instruction, and actuation/datacollection systems for testing. Figure 1. OEM full assembly model of chassisThe students completed the multibody
want to go down a particular career path. The primary research questions for thepresent study are:1. What are the different ways students think about their future plans?2. What are the motivations that drive students to choose a particular path?3. Are there significant differences between how men and women think about their futures?The EMS survey was sent to engineering juniors and seniors at 27 schools in the spring of 2015;a total of 7,197 students participated. Included on the questionnaire was the open-ended question,“We have asked a number of questions about your future plans. If you would like to elaborate onwhat you are planning to do, in the next five years or beyond, please do so here”, which elicited1,848 responses. Responses
context. Therefore, amajor agenda item for Engineering Education Research is to investigate engineering learningmechanisms [1]. In order to conduct research on how people learn, it is prudent to set a foundation oflearning theory that is relevant to the research questions of any given study. More emphasis isbeing placed on learning theories within the constructivist paradigm, that the learner is not just apassive recipient of knowledge, but is constructing knowledge actively and in different ways [2-4].At present, there is no one comprehensive learning theory by which all disciplines may operate,because each theory has its own applications and limitations. The corollary of limitations oflearning theory is that there is no one research
Fridaysand our annual STEM challenge. We propose that a model similar to this could be successfullyand beneficially implemented more widely, with the goal of increasing both interest andretention in STEM fields.IntroductionThe goal of Bridges to STEM Careers is to increase retention rates and general interest in theSTEM programs offered by the university.1 The name itself refers to a bridge, reaching fromcommunity college, through university, all the way to a successful STEM career. The primarymethod of achieving this goal has been to forge mutually beneficial relationships among faculty,student mentors, and students. We believe that our goals are best effected on a personal levelrather than an institutional level, and that by focusing on
McCormick.Therefore, McCormick created a different advising model for FirstYear students. The decision was made to move from a prescriptive model to a developmental model. Structure The advising model, as envisioned by the McCormick Administration can be broken into two major components: People and Technology. Each major component is broken down into smaller components. Figure 1 describes how the new model would support students during their first year. Figure 1 Proposed Student Support Network for FirstYear Students The two strongest influencers of students during the first year
the community to re-evaluate how these womendefined success, how these women defined recognition, and therefore challenged the traditionalview of career success as scientists. Taking this approach to understanding Black women’sexperiences, our study is poised to push boundaries such as these in the discipline of engineering,filling the gap of understanding the definitions and importance of engineering role identity forBlack women in the engineering profession.The research questions for this study are: 1. How do Black women define engineering identity in the workplace? 2. How do Black women reconcile their definition of engineering identity with the stereotypical definition of engineering identity? 3. What coping
transcribed 17 of them. The rest of the interviews weretranscribed with the help of undergraduate researchers.The procedures for this study was approved by the local International Review Board (IRBProtocol #15196).ParticipantsThese 26 participants represented a range of academic levels, engineering disciplines, anddemographics (see Table 1). All of the participants’ information was self-reported. Participants’academic levels varied from first-year to fifth-year. Among traditional aged students, there werethree first-year students, six second-year students, six third-year students, six fourth-yearstudents, and two fifth-year students. In addition, there were three non-traditional students whowere older than 23 years of age: one second-year student and
2005, and which has been held annually since that time. The outreachevent takes place in Boise, Idaho, and at the time of its onset was the only outreach or campactivity in the state focused on girls or young women. Across ten years, 510 total girls haveparticipated, with approximately 85% of them coming from the immediate metropolitan area.The program was developed with a mind toward marketing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity; including activities developed specifically from that perspective.1 The specific topic ofthis paper is an investigation into the motivation for volunteers and students to support thisprogram. Our hypothesis is that, in particular, the women found this an experience that helped tocreate community among like
from the freshman to senior examinations.Study ResultsFirst it must be noted that the results presented here are only the averaged student scores fromthe NSPE Ethics Exam as administered in a 100-level CAD course and in the senior capstonecourse. Consequently it is difficult to make a complete determination of the effectiveness of thenew professional ethics program from this limited data.First a baseline of scores was established by taking the average scores from the two courses forthe very first year of the program. That data is given in the table below.Table 1, Baseline data for Comparison taken during first year of new ethics programCourse NSPE Exam score High Score Low Score Standard
, 10 Caucasian;7 STEM teachers, 5 business/liberal arts teachers. Teacher feedback was also used following thisworkshop to further refine the summer design camp logistics and content.The summer Design Camp was held June 15 – June 20, 2015. Teachers were encouraged to bringsix students from their school. Demographics were not mandated, but it was suggested thatschools find students that were representative of the school demographic. The traditional under-represented groups vary depending on the demographics of the school. The Design Camp wasattended by 12 teachers and 34 students from 6 schools. The teacher demographics for the campare: 8 female teachers, 4 male teachers; 1 African-American/1 Hispanic, 10 Caucasian; 7 STEMteachers, 5 business
usually exited the military prior to September 11, 2001 and are not eligible for Post 9/11GI Bill benefits. The Post 9/11 GI Bill (Chapter 33) awards veterans serving in the Armed Forces on orafter September 11, 2001, a maximum of 36 months of education benefits. This benefit pays apercentage of tuition, a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH), and a book stipend based on theamount of active duty time served by the veteran. Table 1 is a summary of the award percentageearned based on the active duty time served. This information is useful for understanding atwhat level a specific student veteran’s education is funded. In speaking with a student veteran,two useful questions to ask them are, “How long did you serve on active duty?” and “Are
each student team andcorresponding business with a free, donated commercial energy audit. This allowed the studentsto experience how an energy audit works and provided the businesses with useful energyinformation for their organization. Since these projects and the positive feedback from thebusinesses, the local utility has adopted a new policy where any commercial organization in thecity can get a free energy audit.Six local business owners participated in the 17 projects, meaning that all of the owners hadbetween 2-4 teams working with them over the course of the semester. All of the businessesinvolved volunteered their time to participate in these projects. A brief summary of each is asfollows: ● Local Brewing Company 1 is not even five
Diversifying the field of engineering is an on-going challenge. Supporting and advancingunderrepresented students requires developing and refining targeted outreach, recruitment,support, and academic services for all students. To ensure inclusivity in diversity outreachefforts, we must ask ourselves, “Is higher education serving the higher good?” and “Who are wemissing – who is still underserved by our policies and programs?” A report, sponsored by theJack Kent Cooke Foundation, identified students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds as avulnerable group with significantly lower rates of degree completion in higher education.1 Ourqualitative research was motivated by the belief that attention to students’ income standpoint iscritical to ensuring
SecurityAbstractPhysical security analysts have always sought to overcome challenges in security infrastructureusing novel approaches and new technology. One of these challenges is preset, mechanical lockmechanisms.1 3D printing technology provides a valuable tool for those interested in attacking orbypassing high-security locks. This technology can allow such practitioners to create keyblanks or replicas from key data such as physical key measurements or photographic evidence.IntroductionPreset, mechanical locks are generally vulnerable to a variety of attacks, but due to theenormity of designs and technologies in the world today, each lock typically requires a differenttechnique to exploit or bypass. For example, simple pin and wafer locks can be picked
persisted.1 This gender gap is evenwider in disciplines such as engineering. In 2012, women earned just 22.6% of the 8,110doctorate degrees awarded in engineering.2 During this same year, women compromised 14% oftenured and tenure-track engineering faculty in the United States.3 Research indicates that gendergaps are in part due to institutional climates, including gender inequality and discrimination4,gender bias5, and unconscious bias6,7 that impact the professional success of women faculty.8Other factors such as marital status and parenting young children provide possible explanationsfor the gender gap in tenure-track promotion.1,9 Research institutions in particular havecompetitive environments that demand long work hours to meet publishing
plans for the future. A discussion on theconcept of a polytechnic institution, its definition, and transformative nature is included to clarifythe reasons behind this radical and somewhat unsettling approach to education reformation.IntroductionAcademic institutions of higher learning are facing many difficult challenges, includingdeclining enrollment trends, complaints about costs vs. value, curricular stagnation, and inabilityto adapt quickly to changing environments facing graduating students. Many researchers andauthors claim that the traditional educational methods and structure espoused by universities isoutdated and potentially restrictive to learners. 1, 2 The College of Technology at PurdueUniversity is dealing with these challenges
they will see that methods willdiffer greatly depending on the intent and strategy needed in each type. Instead, research can befocused on what methods and content are most useful in different types of entrepreneurial learning.The two dimensions create four quadrants into which entrepreneurial learning can be categorized.The matrix is shown in Table 1. The quadrants in the matrix contain examples of the types ofprograms that would target each type of entrepreneurial learning. The following sections willdescribe the rationale for using the 2 dimensions, and then discuss the quadrants and the types ofeducational programs or offerings that typify each. Table 1. Categorized emphases in entrepreneurship education goals
the motivation for thisevent, its planning, its execution, and its assessment.MotivationIssues facing the electric power industry Page 26.1232.2 1The electric power industry is facing the most serious issue it ever had which is the aging of itsworkforce (1). Since 1990, the Utility workforce has dropped more than 23% and it is estimatedthat the U.S. energy industry may experience as much as a 50% turnover in power and energyengineers over the next five years (2). The expert power engineers are retiring and there are fewnew electric power graduates to pass the knowledge onto. Compounding the problem
STEAM-inspired interdisciplinary studio course. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Atlanta, GA.6. McCord, R., Hixson, C., Ingram, E. L., & McNair, L. D. (2014). Graduate student and faculty member: An exploration of career and personal decisions. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Indianapolis, IN.7. Delamont, S. (2007). Arguments against auto-ethnography. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (Vol. 5, p. 8).8. Holt, N. L. (2008). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 18-28.9. Ellis, C., Adams, T
disciplines, not just thosemajoring in Mathematics. Certainly students in engineering programs arean especially important sector for whom a relevant, applications andcomputationally focused mathematical education is desirable.The MaC II workshop picked up where the first workshop left off in manyrespects. The report from MaC I1 is available online at www.siam.org/reports/modeling_12.pdf. Themajor recommendations from the first workshop can be categorized as fitting four different categories: • Expand modeling in K-12 • Develop a high school one semester, or one year modeling course (with stratified content) 1 School of Arts & Sciences, Clarkson University
facilitate moreoff-campus study and reduced out-of-pocket expenses for transportation and childcare forstudents who otherwise would be required to return to the college to use computers.S-STEM, Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (formerlyCSEMS, Computer Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Scholarships) is a National ScienceFoundation (NSF) funding program that supports scholarships. The S-STEM program, like theNSF-funded CSEMS program that preceded it, “seeks to increase the success of low incomeacademically talented students with demonstrated financial need who are pursuing associate,baccalaureate, or graduate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM)”1 The S-STEM program is funded by H-1B
and skills necessary to efficientfunctioning in the life of society. James A. Banks stated that “ethnic, cultural diversity is apositive element in a society because it enriches the nation, gives individuals moreopportunities to experience other cultures and thus to become more fulfilled as humanbeings” 1. The aim of cross-cultural education is to provide the learners with “globalawareness – an integrated worldview”, necessary to achieve active and full participation insociety and, as a result, to form “intercultural personality”.Nowadays much attention is paid by the scholars to the development of the context of theintercultural education. In this paper different approaches to the cross-cultural education areconsidered for high school
supports high schoolstudents interested in advancing to STEM degrees at institutions of higher education, and itprovides a near peer mentor experience that can assist the Junior Chapter members as theyproceed through the process of seeking and transitioning to university studies. We are workingto help students advance what we call the “SHPE driving pillars:” (1) academic development, (2)professional development, (3) outreach/community service, (4) leadership development, and (5)chapter development.The UTEP MAES/SHPE Student Chapter welcomes Junior Chapters with student membershipfrom all ethnicities for the purpose of increasing the number of Latino youth that enter andcomplete Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) related careers
life skills. However, it is necessary to deliver a high-quality education withcomparatively low spending. Therefore, public education, which should provide equaleducation access for all citizens, has to find ways to do so.K12 and the Current EducationIt is important to point out the importance of K12 education at present, since professionalpractices have changed tremendously and the requirements are not only very differentfrom the previous professional generation, but they also keep changing, and quickly. It isimperative to develop means and ways to provide good quality K12 education, no matterwhat the economic level of the country is FIG 1 K12Although challenging, many countries are making efforts to
—some which required the Engineering Economics course forprogram completion. The Texas Board of Higher Education added Engineering Economics to theLower Division Academic Course Guide Manual (ACGM) during the fall semester of 2011 and,although the course is generally included within the schedule of an undergraduate’s junior year(within a four-year program), our college offers the course during the students’ sophomore year.The course’s learning outcomes were also provided in the ACGM, which are the following: 1. Apply different methods to calculate the time value of money. 2. Construct cash flow diagrams for a given problem. 3. Estimate total revenue, total cost, and break even points. 4. Calculate the uniform series payment