7.938.1* For a “virtual tour” of the ITLL visit http://itll.colorado.edu. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationAE 2000, midway through year five. The sophomore course ASEN 2002 Introduction toThermodynamics and Aerodynamics is discussed in detail to illustrate horizontal integration,hands-on experiments, design projects, and implementation of the proactive philosophy. Finally,challenges and compromises in maintaining the AE 2000 are discussed.Engineering Knowledge, Curriculum, and a ProActive Philosophy Engineering curricula are continuously revised and updated in the United States
Page 25.356.7their prospective advisors. However, simply discussing expectations and work preferencesopenly during recruiting phases can give students and advisors better information on which tobase their decisions. Another tool that participants suggested was to hold a seminar series aboutgraduate school as part of an undergraduate capstone course. Prospective students will thenunderstand what is expected of them before beginning a research project with the advisor.Knowing what is expected of the student before beginning research will limit the number ofcases where they subsequently leave the group due to a mismatch between student and advisorexpectations. Participants also suggested that even if advisor and group expectations are madeclear
required of all TEE undergraduates at CCSU and studentsmust have taken at least one practicum course in the program and achieved junior status prior toenrolling.Similar to the online course, students will work to solve three STEM PBL Challenges, first as astructured problem, then as guided and open-ended. As a capstone project for the course,students will use the pedagogical strategies and technical skills they acquire throughout the Page 22.397.17semester to develop an original multimedia PBL Challenge on a STEM topic of their choosing.As a result, a collection of STEM-related PBL learning tools will evolve and will bedisseminated through the
Paper ID #9492The Use Of Peer Evaluations In A Non-Traditional First Year System DesignClassMr. Joseph Pow, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, RIT Joe Pow is the Associate Director of the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science at the Rochester Institute of Technology. He was the designer and first instructor of a new non-traditional project-based course for incoming Imaging Science freshmen which has had a transformational impact on the Cen- ter. Prior to his arrival at RIT, he was a project manager for the Department of Defense, where he was responsible for the development and production of a wide
Facilities and Instructor in the Chemical Engineering De- partment at Michigan Technological University. He received a B.S.Engineering degree from Michigan Tech in 1982 and has also worked as a Training Specialist, Project Engineer, and Project Manager. He has over 25 years experience instructing and coordinating Unit Operations and Plant Operations Labora- tory, implementing distributed control and data acquisition systems, and designing pilot-scale processing equipment.Charles Nuttelman, University of Colorado at Boulder Instructor, Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringPablo LaValle, University of Michigan Senior Engineer. Chemical Engineering Dpt. Undergraduate Instruction Laboratories.Naoko Ellis
, Cost/Risk tech risk, safety, uncertainty, whistleblowing, NA 8 NA / 89 Lg, R1 elective, So- environmental protection, organizational Grad, Ind3 Cv25 ethics, IP / discussion, videos, current CS25 events, case studies, reflection Sci-Elect Public, Elective, FY to energy, climate change, NA 35e NA / 40 Lg, R1 Grad, mainly sustainability/lecture, discussion, group non-STEM projects, discussion of contemporary controversy from multiple perspectives SrDsn-Env Public, Capstone Dsn
- environmental protection, organizational Grad, Ind3 Cv25 ethics, IP / discussion, videos, current CS25 events, case studies, reflection Sci-Elect Public, Elective, FY to energy, climate change, NA 35e NA / 40 Lg, R1 Grad, mainly sustainability/lecture, discussion, group non-STEM projects, discussion of contemporary controversy from multiple perspectives SrDsn-Env Public, Capstone Dsn, workplace professionalism, code of ethics, 25 15 e 69 / 42 100 Lg, MS Sr, Env
Intro Activity 1 M&R Intro Activity 5 :45 Hardware Discussion 12:00 Hands-on: Intro Activity 1 Hands-on: Intro Activity 5 :15 :30 Software Discussion :45 Summary & Reflection Summary & Reflection 1:00 M&R Intro Activity 2 Curriculum Discussion 2 Breakout Groups 1 :15 :30 Hands-on: Intro Activity 2 BG1 Report-Out Capstone Project Discussion :45
] D. K. Sobek and V. K. Jain, “Two instruments for assessing design outcomes of capstone projects,” in Proceeding of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004, pp. 1–13.[47] C. J. Atman, O. Eris, J. McDonnell, M. E. Cardella, and J. L. Borgford-Parnell, “Engineering Design Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 201–226.[48] A. Godwin, “The development of a measure of engineering identity,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[49] A. Godwin and W. Lee, “A Cross-sectional Study of Engineering Identity During Undergraduate
. "Online Collaborative Design Projects: Overcoming Barriers toCommunication." International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, 189-196.9 Paulik, M. and M. Krishnan. "A Competition-Motivated Capstone Design Course: The Result of a Fifteen-YearEvolution." IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2001, 67-7510 McMasters, J. and S. Ford. "An Industry View of Enhancing Design Education." Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. No. 79, No. 3, 1990, 526-529.11 Culver, R., Woods, D. and Peggy Fitch. "Gaining Professional Expertise Through Design Activities." Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1990, 533-536.12 Ernst, E., and J.R. Lohman. "Designing Undergraduate Curricula." Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 79
assignment was utilized to allow students an opportunity to creatively expresstheir understanding of a particular topic(s) that had been discussed in class. This activity wasgiven near the end of the semester and in some ways served as a “capstone” project for thestudents. Students were allowed to select a topic(s) based on the course readings, class lecturesand discussions, any of the video segments, or topics brought up through the guest lectures. Inaddition, students were encouraged to consider the topic of their short paper as a springboard fortheir creative projects.Students were required to submit a proposal, in 250 words or less, that included an overview oftheir proposed project. Abstracts were submitted electronically through Blackboard. In
serious goal of increasing interest in and awareness of informationtechnology among high school students. However, the end of the year competition which iscalled IT-Olympics downplays the competitiveness in an effort to make the whole experienceenjoyable. The target audience for this project is high school students, especially those studentswho previously have not exhibited an interest in studying IT. The authors have found thatcollaborative real-time challenges where teams from different schools are required to shareresources and join forces on design challenges are very successful. The students exhibit moresocial interaction after these collaborative real-time challenges and this adds to the "party"atmosphere of the entire competition
associated the acquisition of data skills withprojects and labs. However, upper-class students recognized that all forms of assessments playeda role in becoming more data proficient, emphasizing the importance of experience in data skilldevelopment. Machu Pichu, in particular, highlighted the unique benefits of experiential learningon his intuition: “I believe that intuition plays a significant role in my school experience, particularly as an engineering student who engages in practical activities. The capstone projects provided me with the opportunity to apply my skills in a tangible, real-world context. However, in most of my other classes, there is not much room for intuition. It is more about following the
flow velocity where VIV occurs is known asthe lock-in region. A floating offshore platform can lose its stability under VIV, which is theobjective to be investigated in our study. This project was completed for the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth MechanicalEngineering Senior Capstone project and the team, in collaboration with business students fromSt. Bonaventure University to compete in the 2021 Marine Energy Collegiate Competition(MECC) that was sponsored by the Department of Energy. The MECC provided the challenge touniversity students to develop a market-research-supported business plan, pitch their plan and havethe option to compete in the build and test portion of the competition where the proposed energydevice is tested
, reported two weeks later an officialdiagnosis by a specialist of “borderline right axis deviation” from a clinical 12-lead ECGrecording. We disclaim in the course that we are not trained physicians and should not make anyhealth diagnoses in class, yet it is gratifying to observe consistency between clinical and student-made ECG measurements.Impacts of the lab activities are seen in later years as well. For example, senior-year capstonedesign projects and junior-year biomedical design projects increasingly incorporate Arduino-based instrumentation. Whereas no biomedical engineering capstone projects used Arduinosystems before introducing them in the bioinstrumentation class, after four years, 11 of 29projects used them in successful design projects
Paper ID #40330Board 140: Work in Progress: Exploring Innovation Self-Efficacy inNeurodiverse Engineering StudentsDr. Azadeh Bolhari P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Bolhari is a professor of environmental engineering in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Ar- chitectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broad- ening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the boundaries of
around in a circle to answer the question. If you don’t want to answer a question, feel freeto pass. The audio is being recorded for transcription purposes but will not be shared publicly. Ifyou’re more comfortable chiming in via chat, go for it, nod your head, add thumbs up.Guiding Questions: 1. What is your program (major, minor concentration), and why did you choose it? [Round Robin] 2. What makes a good learning experience for you? 3. What are some strategies you use to balance coursework and life? 4. For those of you who've completed a capstone project and/or a research paper, can you talk a little bit about the preparation you received that was most helpful and what you wish you knew before you started
), Oct. 2000, vol. 2, p. S1D/13-S1D/18 vol.2. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2000.896621.[11] M. R. Forte-Celaya, A. Sandoval-Correa, and L. F. Reséndez-Maqueda, “Perdurable and Long-term Knowledge Retention Using Project-based Learning,” in 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Apr. 2020, pp. 1428–1433. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125365.[12] J. R. McConville, S. Rauch, I. Helgegren, and J.-H. Kain, “Using role-playing games to broaden engineering education,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 594–607, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2015-0146.[13] K. P. Kubelick, R. L. Gleason, J. K. Rains, and J. B. Stubbs, “Capstone During COVID-19: Medical Device Development at Home to Solve Global Health
Dr. Beyerlein has taught at the University of Idaho for the last 34 years. He is a former department chair and collaborates the college of engineering introduction to engineering course, the inter-disciplinary capstone design course, and the FE review course. Dr. Beyerlein has been active in research projects involving engine testing, engine heat release modeling, design of curricula for active learning, design pedagogy, and assessment of professional skills.Mr. JJ Petersen, University of Idaho American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Transforming Introductory Engineering Courses to Match GenZ Learning
core.When designing such a course, the selection of a particular microcontroller is a very importantdecision. The selection should consider not only what microcontrollers are currently popular, butalso the ease of project development using the system, the availability of support to students, thecosts of starting up a lab, and the flexibility of the platform to fit into a course with multipleobjectives. This paper reports on using Cypress Semiconductor’s Programmable System on aChip (PSoC) as the basis for a microcontroller systems design course. The experience ofselecting the PSoC, designing a curriculum around it, designing laboratory exercises andmanaging the course are described. Furthermore, considerations such as the technical andfinancial
it stands now, this course is designed toexamine economic issues regarding energy systems, plants, and processes. Engineering Page 12.513.12Design Methodology is designed to be somewhat of a reverse engineering course inwhich students learn to apply methodology in the design process. This course is listed asa significant writing component since the course will be very project based and willrequire writing of reports, memorandums, or progress updates.The final semester has only one required mechanical engineering course, entitled FinalDesign Project. This is commonly referred to a “capstone” course, in which studentsapply their knowledge in a design or
projects outside of laboratory class time. It also spreads the cost of the studentlearning kit over three courses. To support students who do not purchase a kit, our introductorycourse laboratory is equipped with HCS12 modules and project boards. In addition, theDepartment subsidizes the initial cost of the kits purchased by the students. The student learningkits are also used extensively in our senior capstone project course. Depending on the instructor,some of the introductory laboratory assignments have adopted the POGIL approach assignedabove.It is early days in our implementation of the POGIL methods in our laboratories. Although noformal assessment has been done at our institution, as it has at other universities17, we are findingthat after
was an Associate Professor at the University of Georgia, where she was co-director of the interdisciplinary engineering education research Collaborative Lounge for Un- derstanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER). In her research, she is interested in understanding how engineering students develop their professional identity, the role of emo- tion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplary engineering faculty who have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at
well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Dr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different
educationalopportunities. The area of T-shaped education, that touches several of the key competency areas,will be used as an example.Collaborative ProcessFigure 1 illustrates the four schools that came together as a “dense network”3. The process tochoose these schools was the result of an exercise at the 2011 annual winter meeting of KEENthat challenged the group to seek dense networks of schools with synergistic opportunities.Baylor, University of Dayton, University of Detroit Mercy and Villanova recognized that eachengaged with industry in varying and complementary ways. The University of Dayton had anextensive industry sponsored project system tapping local industry in the Ohio area; theUniversity of Detroit Mercy had extensive co-op and industry-sponsored
, the biomedical engineering department at NorthwesternUniversity has hosted 2-4 engineering faculty from the University of Lagos (UNILAG) and theUniversity of Ibadan (UNI) – See Table I. For 3-4 weeks the faculty remain in the United Stateswhere they experience the following: Participation in the annual meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES). This includes submitting an abstract to the conference and giving a 20 minute presentation on that topic (examples of submitted titles for the 2014 conference are shown in Table II). Participation in upper-level BME courses at Northwestern University, including the capstone biomedical engineering design course. Visits to Chicago-area biomedical engineering departments
definition. This offering will provide acertificate for the experience and provide central administrative office assistance in developingmore of the opportunities. Most of the students utilizing this form of practicum have gottenbehind or out of sequence from the standard plan of study and need specific senior coursesunavailable every term. This program will allow them to effectively utilize their remainingacademic time and complete some form of professional work experience. The IntensiveInternship work experience provides a significant benefit to the student and the potential for anindustrial based capstone senior project. A certified Internship program has been approved by the faculty that will providestudents with an internship certificate
evaluating the student learning outcome,(4) collect the exam or assignment,(4) Using the rubric, score the artifact and review the results, Page 15.326.5(5) Use the results for program improvement. The advantages of course-embedded assessment are multiple and diverse: (1) it is a process ofusing student activities, rather than nationally normed tests or surveys to assess skills andknowledge, (2) it builds on the daily work (assignments, tests, projects) of students and faculty,(3) it gets students to participate more fully as this is not a voluntary activity but part of theircourse work, (4) it is not "added on" to faculty work but is a part of their
to develop beta-testing, inunder-developed countries like Cameroon, of culturally designed products/solutions, fromengineering senior capstone projects or with products launched thru “Engineers for the GreaterGood (EGG)” entrepreneurship competitions.Additionally, we are looking to recruit and expand this opportunity by inviting students from theNortheast LSAMP Alliance to participate. This will bring students from University ofConnecticut, University of Rhode Island, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, University ofMassachusetts Amherst and Northeastern University, all members of the NELSAMP, to providethis global experience to a larger number of underrepresented minorities across the three-statealliance.In conclusion, this culturally
on density and porosity in single-action compaction, 2) the spatialvariation of density and porosity within a part prepared using double-action compaction, and 3)the effect of sintering atmosphere on densification (using Fe and Cu metal powders).3. The ExperimentHigh-purity alumina (doped with 0.05% MgO) was chosen for the student project because it isthe best studied ceramic. The alumina powders specified as RC-HPF DBM were provided byReynolds Metals Company (Bauxite, AR). The average particle size (from sedimentationanalysis) was 380 nm, and the specific surface area (from the BET method) was 8.19 m2.g-1;these data were supplied by the manufacturer. The powder size analysis from sedimentation testshows that ∼60% powders are finer than