, while a factorial analysis yielded an adjustment of factors to 4 dimensions with acumulative explanation percentage of 65 % (with a KMO equal to 0.812 and a Barlett's test ofsphericity equal to 0.000). The Exploratory Factor Analysis performed in this study wasPrincipal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation. Table 2 shows the items of eachdimension and the correspondent Cronbach´s Alpha.Table 2. Items by survey dimensions on sense of belonging, self-efficacy and perceived support from the institution. Dimensions Items Sense of belonging- 1. I feel comfortable asking a teacher for help when I don't understand the subject interactions
, New York: Guilford Pr., 1999, pp. 403–422.[3] R. Brooks, S. Brooks, and S. Goldstein, “The Power of Mindsets: Nurturing Engagement, Motivation, and Resilience in Students,” in Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, Eds., Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, pp. 541–562. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_26.[4] C. Dweck, “Implicit Theories,” in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Sage, 2011, pp. 43–61. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4912667[5] A. K. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, “Cultivating a global mindset,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 116–126, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.5465/ame.2002.6640211.[6] C. S. Dweck
offering online sections of courses to students that want the flexibilitythat they facilitate, if their primary concern is student performance. We found no statistically sig-nificant difference in the overall performance of students that elect to take a course online relativeto those that elect to take it in person. Taking courses online may, however, have a substantialnegative impact on a student’s sense of belonging. This effect is particularly pronounced for un-derrepresented minority students and first generation students, but not present in women.References [1] B. Bizot and S. Zweben, “Generation cs, three years later,” On the Internet at https://cra. org/generation-cs- three-years-later/(visited August 2019), 2019. [2] T. Camp, W. R
, interest, and capability of faculty to teach a course.That said, even when a more diverse instructional team is assigned to teach a course, there arechallenges to be overcome which may prohibit instructors from trying new teaching methods orcourse structures.The first challenge to changing teaching methods and course structures is a two-pronged issue:there is an expectation and momentum towards keeping things the same as years past, as well asthe large amount of work to overturn the traditional teaching methods. In each of the examplesthat were given in this paper, the instructor(s) invested no small amount of effort in revising thecourse(s) to suit their designs. The time and energy required to do these revisions is not alwaysavailable to faculty
Paper ID #37759Learning Styles Impact on Ill-Structured Problem Solving Processes ofEngineering Students, Faculty and ProfessionalsKyle P. Kelly, Michigan State UniversitySecil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University Secil Akinci-Ceylan is a PhD student in Educational Technology in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Xiangxiu ZhangDr. Kristen Sara Cetin, P.E., Michigan State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Associate Professor at Michigan State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Associate Professor at The Ohio
means to be an engineer. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 2(1), 10–20.Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5-6), 302–318.Barak, M., Ginzburg, T., & Erduran, S. (2022). Nature of Engineering. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00402-7Basile, V., & Azevedo, F. S. (2022). Ideology in the mirror: A loving (self) critique of our equity and social justice efforts in STEM education. Science Education, 106(5), 1084–1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21731Bazzul, J., & Tolbert, S. (2019). Love, politics and science education on a damaged planet
structural barriers. Engineering needsto transform into an environment where LGBTQ people can thrive through authenticparticipation if engineering fields hope to benefit in the myriad ways promised by professedvision and value statements throughout the field.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2046233. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, "Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM," Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[2] B. E
. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883- 9026(99)00054-3Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321.Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354.Balven, R., Fenters, V., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. (2018). Academic entrepreneurship: The roles of identity, motivation, championing, education, work-life balance, and organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 21
Aconsisted of 19 minutes of silence (34% of the video), whereas when working on the same partof the project, Group B’s recorded meeting had 48 minutes of silence (86.26% of the video).Overall, students spent a large portion of their time together not engaged in codable activity(70%) including sitting in silence, or discussing non class topics, such as schedules and athletics.Data across both groups totaling 16.2 hours was used to make the following table which showsthe percentage of time and the unique number of times that students engaged in a code.Table 5: Activity of Groups A and B Code Total time % of Total % of CodedCode Name Color (s) Unique Times Time
, demonstration of various tessellation resolutions (Figure 3), and a 3-linkmechanism capable of being configured in revolute-revolute and revolute-spherical jointconfigurations (Figure 4). Figure 3: 3D printed teaching aids made for the course. R-R configuration A disassembled view of the 3-link mechanism S-R configuration Figure 4: 3D printed three-link mechanism to demonstrate revolute (R) and spherical (S) joints.These tools were used in the teaching of concepts related to DfAM, mobility and degrees offreedom, CAD (movable assemblies), and 3DP considerations in
addressing the challenges of providing hands-on, experientiallearning in the context of distance learning. By implementing the recommendations arising fromthis study, institutions can help ensure that African American students in laboratory-basedengineering technology courses receive the necessary support and resources to succeed in theireducation and future careers.References [1] S. Bernadin, T. Mulay, and H. Chi, "Creating a Virtual Learning Environment for Increasing Awareness of Blockchain Technologies at a Minority Serving Institution," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[2] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman, Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. ERIC, 2016.[3] S. Asgari, J
designed by Michigan Tech created awareness amongmechanical engineering students. However, experts from Michigan Tech suggested that toincrease engagement in sustainability, the curricula should provide students with more real-worldlearning experiences [9].Similarly, BSU introduced sustainability in the civil engineering curriculum by adding a coursespecifically dedicated to sustainability; this solved the lack of S&R coverage and modified theexisting traditional teaching method [10]. Interviews were conducted with senior civilengineering students to understand attitudes toward S&R concepts better. The interviewquestions were based on students' knowledge by describing their understanding of S&R conceptsfrom the civil engineering
or lack of consideration for thesocial aspect alongside the technical. And third, tacit knowledge focuses on the stance that ethicscannot be taught through formal education but through implicit means such as extracurriculars,values, and beliefs. However, students develop this tacit knowledge in understanding engineeringethics both in and out of the classroom.SafetyBefore we dive into two examples of undone ethics, we want to provide an undeniable standardof engineering ethics – safety. Safety as a public and social value goes back to Cicero’s Creed“[s]alus populi suprema est lex,” or “the health and safety of the people shall be the supreme law[13].” Ever since, safety has been considered paramount for ethical considerations inengineering
-intuitive side effect when the feedback isopaque, resulting in a surge of demand for peer teaching office hours.7.1 Corroborating Prior WorkOur results corroborate the findings of Smith et al. [9]. Both examined computer science coursesat large research universities and use similar web-based office hours queues. Our data set contains105941 records collected from 17 unique courses over more than 3 years at one university, whileSmith et al. collected approximately 3720 records from 3 unique courses during 2 semesters at 3universities. As seen in Figure 2a, our results corroborate the finding that a small percentage ofstudents occupy 50% of all available office hours. Furthermore, Figure 2b shows that our waittime results mirror Smith et al.’s in
, Conference Proceedings, 2010, doi: 10.18260/1-2--16508.[6] E. Gadd, A. Baldwin, and M. Norris, “The citation behaviour of Civil Engineering students,” Journal of Information Literacy, vol. 4, no. 2, 2010, doi: 10.11645/4.2.1483.[7] L. R. Hanlan and E. M. Riley, “Information use by undergraduate STEM teams engaged in global project-based learning,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24300.[8] R. E. H. Wertz, M. C. Ross, M. Fosmire, M. E. Cardella, and S. Purzer, “Do students gather information to inform design decisions? Assessment with an authentic design task
/01/ 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B.[2] S. Matthew and R. Yasha, "Development of a Social-justice Mindset Through Discovery Learning from the Conflict Between Safety and Welfare in Engineering Ethics," Virtual Conference, 2021/07/26. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/36962.[3] S. Stephen, "Putting Diversity in Perspective: A Critical Cultural Historical Context for Representation in Engineering," Columbus, Ohio, 2017/06/24. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/28776.[4] D. Kirsten Heikkinen, D. Courtney, D. Hannah, C. Makenzie, S. Natalie, and B. Elizabeth, "Studying the Impact of Humanitarian Engineering Projects on Student Professional Formation and
• Social Aspects of a Group • Structure and Clarity Around Tasks & Personal EngagementGoals: • Build a Community of Practice. What exists now and what needs to be added? • Identify short and long-term opportunities for collaboration in education and researchGroup Topic: Semiconductors, Applied AI, 5G, Cybersecurity & Cloud Computing, GreenEnergyList Facilitator, Scribe, Presenter, Participants.Discussion Notes, Plans for future meetings, Report out bullets.Collaboration Template (Guidance developed at previous workshops): 1) Identify area(s) ofcollaboration (sample areas: learning modules, senior design, joint speaker series,student/faculty/staff exchanges, research, joint advising, industry internship, DEI training
mentoringrelationship. This innovative training model can well be a useful component of any mentoringprogram that nurtures generations of researchers in academia.Reference[1] B. Anderson, M. Cutright, and S. Anderson, "Academic involvement in doctoral education: Predictive value of faculty mentorship and intellectual community on doctoral education outcomes," International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 195- 201, 2013.[2] J. L. Brill, K. K. Balcanoff, D. Land, M. Gogarty, and F. Turner, "Best Practices in Doctoral Retention: Mentoring," Higher Learning Research Communications, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 26-37, 2014.[3] B. E. Lovitts, "The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and
and self esteem in university students,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 323–330, 1994.[10] K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems Thinking Assessments: Approaches That Examine Engagement in Systems Thinking,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/systems- thinking-assessments-approaches-that-examine-engagement-in-systems-thinking[11] M. Guerra and T. Shealy, “Teaching User-Centered Design for More Sustainable Infrastructure through Role-Play and Experiential Learning,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 4, p. 05018016, Oct. 2018, doi
-class and out-of-class correlate to programs that are largely studio settings witharchitectural components and the number of credit hours for the course(s) is greater. Two schoolsindicated that for the large ranges those were often in bursts for just a few weeks. If we break thisdown further and look explicitly at team-focused activities, the full team time for discussion,planning, and working collectively on the project varies substantially. For an individual to discussand plan, the statistics are a minimum of 1 hour and a maximum of 9 hours per week, with a meanof 3.17 hours and a mode of 3hrs. For full teams to collaboratively work on the project, the statisticsincrease by a minimum of 1 hour and a maximum of 3 hours per week, with a mean
: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/[4] K. C. Aquino, E. Kim, C. Bilen-Green, C. M. Ray, and C. Anicha, “Working it backwards: student success through faculty professional development,” in Disability as Diversity in Higher Education: Policies and Practices to Enhance Student Success, 1st ed., New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2017, pp. 122–137.[5] S. Bassler, “‘But you don’t look sick’: Dismodernism, disability studies and music therapy on invisible illness and the unstable body,” Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, vol. 14, no. 3, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.15845/voices.v14i3.802.[6] S. Lindsay and K. Fuentes, “It is time to address ableism in academia: a systematic review of the experiences and impact of
specifications, and facilitymanagement strategy.Keywords: Facility engineering, Facility condition assessment, engineering management,engineering educationIntroductionOrigins of the facilities engineering profession can be traced to organizations supporting the builtenvironment. The industrial revolution in the early 1900’s brought to creation a diverse array ofbuildings, factories, and equipment to support the evolution of the United States of America. Toaddress the challenges associated with a rapidly growing industry, in 1915 thought leaders in plantengineering assembled a forum in Boston, Massachusetts of mechanical engineers, mastermechanics, and chief engineers in plants. This forum discussed common problems and facilitatedthe exchange of ideas in
within the framework of University of Toledo IRB protocol 201808.DisclaimerOne of the authors may receive royalties from sales of the zyBook detailed in this paper.References[1] A. Edgcomb, F. Vahid, R. Lysecky, A. Knoesen, R. Amirtharajah, and M. L. Dorf, "Student performance improvement using interactive textbooks: A three-university cross-semester analysis," in ASEE Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24760.[2] A. Edgcomb, J. S. Yuen, and F. Vahid, "Does Student Crowdsourcing of Practice Questions and Animations Lead to Good Quality Materials?," in ASEE Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2016, pp. 1-15, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23899.[3] K. E. Chapman, M. E
arecollected at the due date of the assigned section(s).Students from five cohorts at a public research university generated the data presented here.Cohorts during the Spring semester of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 included 98, 98, 94, 66,and 57 students, respectively. Students withdrawing from the course were not included in theanalysis, which differs from some previous work [25]. The majority of the students were in theirfirst year (freshman) majoring in either chemical engineering or environmental engineering. Thedata are presented in aggregate for one or more cohorts, which may be a limitation as thediversity of the individual learner is lost. The modality of the 2018, 2019, and 2022 cohorts wasin person. The 2020 cohort was partially in
Competency standard for professional engineers," Engineers Australia, 2019. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/publications/stage-1-competency-standard- professional-engineers[3] R. Lawrence, "The promotion of future opportunities and possibilities for engineering graduates," Australian Council of Engineering Deans, 2020. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aced.edu.au/downloads/Engineering%202035%20report.pdf[4] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, "Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science," in 2011 Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. F1C-1- F1C-5.[5] J. Burdett, "Making groups work: University students
originallydeveloped elsewhere to align with their institutional culture and approach, as well as studentexpectations. Because educational interventions may affect student learning, implementing aninnovative instruction should value individual instructors’ pedagogical decisions as experts intheir institutional context. This single-participant study reveals that this Freeformimplementation at an institution quite unlike the institution of Freeform’s origin is associatedwith significant adaptation to local institutional context. References[1] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics.,” National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.[2
Research in Science Teaching, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 679-693, 1994.[16] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt and M. P. Wenderoth, "Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[17] K. D. Könings, S. Mordang, F. Smeenk, L. Stassen and S. Ramani, "Learner Involvement in the Co-Creation of Teaching and Learning: AMEE Guide No. 138," Medical Teacher, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 924-936, 2021.[18] C. T. Lystbæk, K. Harbo and C. H. Hansen, "Unboxing co-creation with students: Potentials and tensions for academic libraries," Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher
significance of teachers’ Well-being and the use of faculty developmentprograms. Nevertheless, there lies the need for a basic approach to address the Well-being ofteachers. In regards to this review study, there are heterogenous range of programs thatsupports the Well-being of teachers.References[1] Guerriero, S. (ed.) (2017), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.[2] Williams, K.C. and Williams, C.C. (2011) “Five key ingredients for improving student motivation,” Research in Higher Education Journal.[3] Schleicher, A. (2018), Valuing our Teachers and Raising their Status: How Communities Can Help, International Summit on the Teaching
improved including additional possible addendum to the articulation agreement. Tofurther assess the viability of the Program, Wright College will lead the expansion of the HPATmodel at its sister colleges and will implement the model at another 4-year transfer institution.Similarly, IIT will explore implementing the model at another 2-year partner institution(s) and theexpansion to disciplines other than engineering. 11ACKNOWLEDGMENTJ. Waranyuwat, B. Haffercamp, S. Lemons, J. Mandolini, M. Bauer, J. Alvarado, Wright CollegeEngineering Team (L. Huertas, M. Llopiz, S. Calabrese, G. Baird, K. Jones, M. Haptas, B.O’Connell), M. Angara and in memoriam
outcomes. Engineering a welcoming space where women canfind each other—to lean on and learn from each other—seems like a good place to start.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by the Institute for Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access in the GraingerCollege of Engineering, University of Illinois, grant number GIANT202005.References [1] J. Ehrlinger, E. A. Plant, M. K. Hartwig, J. J. Vossen, C. J. Columb, and L. E. Brewer, “Do gender differences in perceived prototypical computer scientists and engineers contribute to gender gaps in computer science and engineering?” Sex roles, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2018. [2] J. Hunt, “Why do women leave science and engineering?” ILR Review, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 199–226, 2016. [3] S. S. Silbey