Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
18
10.18260/1-2--40519
https://peer.asee.org/40519
463
Jodi Bolognese is the Engineering Librarian at Northeastern University, where she serves as liaison to the College of Engineering. Previously, she worked in product management for learning technologies at Pearson Education, and provided research and information architecture support for Strada Institute for the Future of Work. Jodi holds a BA in English and American Studies from Fairfield University and a MS in Library and Information Science from Simmons University.
Bridget Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical & Industrial Engineering department at Northeastern University. She holds a BS in Chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Her research interests include capstone design and lab pedagogy, , effective methods to teach technical communication, and integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion concepts into engineering courses.
Mechanical Engineering students at Northeastern University are introduced to research skills and information literacy at several points during the undergraduate curriculum, including a recently introduced first-year engineering workshop and a required technical writing in the discipline course. There are also two writing intensive courses that require background research to inform lab reports and research presentations. When students reach Capstone Design, project reports show vastly different levels of proficiency in information literacy skills. The goal of this study was to assess which information literacy skills were poorly learned and retained by the students, in order to inform potential adjustments in the earlier curriculum. Additional support in Capstone Design may also be developed based on these results.
A sample of 26 reports from a Capstone 1 class conducted in Summer 2021 were rated using a customized version of the VALUE rubric for Information Literacy (IL). Results show that students were most proficient in paraphrasing from sources, selecting high quality sources, choosing a variety of information sources, and citing sources accurately. They struggled more with higher order, more contextually dependent skills like determining the extent of information needed and synthesizing information from multiple sources to achieve a specific purpose such as justifying a course of action. Additionally, project type was observed to have more of an impact on IL rubric scores than students’ previous participation in IL workshops or writing intensive courses. Results suggest that more practice with higher order skills in context of the engineering design process at additional points during the curriculum may be necessary to enable students to retain these skills. Additional recommendations based on the analysis include making IL requirements in the Capstone grading rubric more explicit and granular, and combining engineering subject matter experts and engineering librarians to collectively score students’ work. This may be a path to enabling more rubric-based assessments of IL in the engineering discipline.
Bolognese, J., & Smyser, B. (2022, August), Assessing Information Literacy in Capstone Design Projects: Where are students still struggling? Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40519
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015