convergent parallel mixedmethod design, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data, simultaneously, to answer tworesearch questions 1) What trends are Program Officers seeing in the Broader Impacts criterionand 2) Which Broader Impacts statements are being addressed in Project Summaries submitted tothe National Science Foundation. The quantitative approach consisted of examining 82 awarded Project Summaries in theEEC division to obtain a quantifiable assessment of the extent to which PIs who applied to EECaddressed the Broader Impacts suggestions outlined in NSF’s Proposal and Award Policies andProcedures Guide. The qualitative approach involved interviews of four program officers from theEEC division regarding the trends in addressing
programming students through various K-12 educational activities. Dr. Estell is a Member-at-Large of the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Partnering to Develop Educational Software Applications: A Four-Year Retrospective StudyIntroductionSeveral years ago, a project
the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Partnering to Develop Educational Software Applications: A Four-Year Retrospective StudyIntroductionSeveral years ago, a project was added to the first-year programming sequence at Ohio NorthernUniversity that focused on
AC 2012-4088: INTEGRATING INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGIES INTO EN-GINEERING ECONOMICS COURSESDr. Naveen Seth, New Community College at CUNY Naveen Seth is a founding faculty member in business at the City University of New York’s New Commu- nity College. He has also taught at Pratt Institute in the Construction Management Program. At Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology, he headed the Aviation Management programs and also taught engineering economics in the B.S. program in engineering.Prof. Donald P. O’Keefe, Farmingdale State College Donald P. O’Keefe has 15 years experience teaching at the college level. He taught courses in engineering graphics, quality control, and project management
professionals isleading universities to adapt their curricula and provide adequate BIM training for the next-generation professionals. The senior design class is a core course for last-year students in manyArchitecture, Civil, and Construction engineering programs. Students are given opportunities towork on a real building project through multiple class activities, BIM software, and lectures bypractitioners. The goal of this research was divided into two parts: 1) Evaluate the teachingmethods for delivering BIM topics in a senior design class. A questionnaire survey was distributedto students; 2) Fill the gap about the need for more research to be conducted on the solutions forimplementing BIM in the AEC industry. The existing research may have
their personal lives. The students aresurveyed after each of seven guest lectures using quantitative and qualitative measures. Resultsshow that students reported valuing these trainings with respect to each category, with the valueto their professional careers being the highest ranked. This study shows students approve oflearning leadership topics through guest lectures even when assigning varying degrees of valuefor each lecture and each of the three categories. However, students do not understand how thesetopics can relate to their project such that they can apply these trainings for the development ofthe skills. This study will help define better practices for leadership education within engineeringcurriculums to help determine whether
(FYEP) to better prepare students to identify problems and develop solutions aspracticing engineers.BackgroundUpon joining the network, our initial EML implementation efforts focused on restructuring thedesign-build project of our standard course sequence in the FYEP by centering it around the 3Cs.This began by visiting other KEEN institutions to understand how EML is implemented in theirfirst-year engineering courses [12]–[14]. Following these visits, various concepts from the 3Cswere explicitly added to the course curriculum to ensure students were becoming familiar withthe 3Cs and actively applying them in their project work.As it currently stands, the standard course sequence consists of two courses where the secondcourse (ENGR 1182) is
Session XXXX 3-4 A Solar Still for Sophomore Design Richard Bannerot Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Houston AbstractA six-week long team project (design, build and test a solar still) conducted in asophomore design course is described. Eight stills were constructed and then testedduring a four-hour period around solar noon under very good solar conditions. Theperformances of the individual stills were
development of newteaching material and activities (courses, student design projects, and research) related to mixed-signal embedded system design11,12. The developed material includes the following: • Complete course material for a one-semester course on embedded mixed-signal systems. The course is designed for senior undergraduate students and first-year graduate students in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). This material is due to be published as a textbook and is available at www.cypress.com . For an evaluation copy please contact cuap@cypress.com. Page 13.927.3 • Related laboratory material was
engineering design projects bring together knowledge from differentsources. They collaborate among themselves, share design knowledge, and negotiate with eachother, faculty members and the client, in order to create engineering artifacts. This process ofteninvolves reuse of previous knowledge and the creation of new knowledge within the context ofthe problem. Such knowledge building is a key process skill that engineers need to acquireduring their education.Ideally in team projects, students co-construct the knowledge necessary to realize their designsthrough the process of proposing, counter-proposing, questioning, arguing, agreeing, anddissenting. A major problem student teams face is learning how to organize and share ideas. Thisfrequently results
. Page 14.1375.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 WIND TURBINES TO TEACH PARAMETRIC DESIGNA project in which teams of students are asked to design and build horizontal axis wind turbinerotors is presented. The goal of each team was to develop the greatest electrical power outputgiven the constraints of wind velocity, swept area, a specified hub and mounting. In practice, thedesign of wind turbines is extremely complex. Therefore, to make the project tractable tosophomore level undergraduates, significant constraints were placed on the problem statement,which allowed calculations to inform teams’ decisions. To evaluate design instances withoutconstructing rotors, the students developed a computer program to predict
medicalresearch are available in the market such as EnvisionTEC 3D-Bioplotter, however they areusually extremely expensive. Collaborating with the medical school, this project will design andbuild new extruding systems on a low-cost RepRap machine. One RepRap Prusa i3 printer ismodified able to extrude independently two different hydro-gels dedicated to the stem cellresearch. The modification is expected to utilize other 3D printing methods to create parts. Thisis a team's Capstone Design Project with students involved to promote and extend theapplications of 3D printing. Student working processes of design, hardware modification, as wellas testing procedures will be observed and recorded. The project activities, the testing results,and the students
increasingcomplexity through initial exercises and subsequent assignments; they reported that studentsshowed significant gains in their abilities to perform the skills targeted with these assignments. 5Linder et al. used a modified version of the first approach and employed scaffolding inredesigning an introductory computer science course to keep students interested in their selectedmajors and better prepare them for higher-level classes. 6 Their scaffolding structure includedclassroom activities and short one-week assignments that target the skills needed in a largerassignment, which was the final class project. They observed that with the instructionalscaffolding approach followed in structuring and conducting assignments, the weaker studentswere able to
also interested in research in improving undergraduate engineering education; including development of student design projects, hands-on activities, professional skills development and inclusion and outreach activities.Dr. Julie M. Hasenwinkel, Syracuse University Senior Associate Dean Professor, Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering College of Engi- neering and Computer Science Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244Ms. Carol Elizabeth Stokes-Cawley, Syracuse University Ms. Stokes-Cawley is the STEM Outreach Coordinator for the College of Engineering & Computer Science and provides administrative support to the Best Management Committee of the ECliPSE grant on faculty teaching & learning
a start-up academic institute, how SCUPI, learning from excellentmakerspaces world-wide, launched innovative maker education activities based on theexisting resources and characteristics of Chinese students. These activities include: 1. Regulartechnical lectures for training makers 2. Hands-on projects based on engineering courses 3.Supporting students in STEM competitions; 4. Involved in feature events and outreachactivities of SCUPI 5. Guiding students to take part in academic research 6. Establishment ofan online maker sharing community. As a result, SCUPI has initially created a dynamicmaker education system based on this small-scale makerspace, which provides guidance tobrainstorming, CAD model simulation, prototype manufacturing and
Paper ID #24799Engineering Leadership Development using an Interdisciplinary Competition-based Approach with Cross Functional TeamsDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Gerald Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Ohio Uni- versity’s Coal Research Center, part of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Envi- ronment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute and director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project) He is engaged in the development of energy and environmental technology
created, as part ofthe software termed Virtual Mechanics Laboratory (VML). We have created VML as a unifiedvideo motion and deformation analysis tool that can be used in both dynamics and mechanics ofmaterial course projects. In the project with VML mechanics of material module, first, studentswill capture a digital video image of a plate-shaped elastic object subjected to a plane-stressloading with a high-resolution digital camera that is widely available nowadays. Subsequentlyin the computer laboratory, students will select target region of interest (ROI) to “measure” thepixel displacement and material deformation within the ROI, using the digital motion trackingalgorithm termed “Digital Image Correlation (DIC)” algorithm built in the VML
interest are promoting student en- gagement via techniques such as hybrid teaching, flipped classroom and problem-based learning. Page 26.1026.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Introducing Software Specifications to an Undergraduate Software Engineering ProgramIntroductionThe complexities of developing clear and well-defined specifications and their important role inthe success of a software project are widely recognized. This recently led to increased attentionin corresponding courses in the Software Engineering curriculum. One of the challenges
License (Illinois), and has published over 90 technical papers and book chapters. Schubert has managed research projects from USDA, NASA, DOE, and DoD.Mr. Steven Anthony Zusack, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Mechanical Engineering student. Current research includes renewable energy in the form of ethanol fuel cells and solar power. Aspirations of pursuing PhD in the field of Aerospace Engineering with a focus on Spacecraft Design.Mrs. Emily Carol Rosales, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Emily Rosales is an undergraduate student at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, work- ing on her bachelor’s degree in Energy Engineering. She is actively involved in student
both undergraduate and graduate level Mechanical Vibrations and Multimedia Engineering Analysis, and undergraduate level thermodynamics, Measurement Systems, Engineering Mechanics and Introduction to Engineering. One of Professor Orabi's most recent projects involves the development of Learning Modules on the web. These modules provide information, not only about particular course material, but also about more general topics relevant to engineering. He is also working on Computer-Aided Experimentations using LABVIEW. Professor Orabi has received a number of research awards from the State of Connecticut and Untied Technologies. He has established two Laboratories: the Materials Testing
different formsof involvement by the employer constituents, including course projects, senior capstoneexperiences/projects, and advisory boards. These directly address ABET‟s criteria that studentsare prepared for engineering practice through a curriculum incorporating appropriate engineeringstandards and multiple realistic constraints[2].IntroductionDemonstration that graduates of an engineering program have met the student learning outcomesa-k is required to be compliant with ABET expectations for accreditation. There are many waysthat the learning outcomes can be demonstrated, and most commonly is accomplished throughassessment of some course-related activity including homework assignments, exams,laboratories, and projects. Some of the learning
chemical engineering programand completed their junior level courses in Transport Phenomena I (Fluids) and II (Heat and MassTransfer). As part of their Transport Phenomena II class, the students were given their originalfreshman engineering design reports and were required to provide an analysis of their design. Theanalysis assignment was two-fold: the students were required to submit a group report re-analyzingthe technical merits of their heart-lung design project and the students were required to submit anindividual reflection paper. The group report analysis included: significance of design criteria,engineering design process and theoretical analysis of data collected. The idea behind the reflectionassignment was to help the students clarify
languageprogramming, digital devices, or analog devices. As such, the first half of the course has tradition-ally been devoted to the development of assembly language programming skills and interfacingconcepts for digital and analog devices. Consequently, many of the more complex, high-level con-cepts such as polling, interrupts, state machines, and control algorithms are not introduced untillate in the course. This late introduction limits the students’ exposure to these concepts and oftenprevents the students from employing these concepts in their final term projects. This paper de-scribes changes being implemented for the next offering of this course that are intended introducethese more complex topics earlier. The motivation behind these changes is to
Session 2158 Developing Information Technology Career Path Awareness through Student Online Portfolios Ed Crowley, Susan L. Miertschin University of HoustonIntroductionAt the University of Houston, the College of Technology operates a relatively young InformationTechnology (IT) program that, like other similar programs, continues to develop its identity.Most IT students at UH are developing their own professional identities as well. To foster thisdevelopment, IT faculty designed a learning focused portfolio project with a primary goal
) coupled with several engineering design projects/competitions (bottlerockets, solar cars, bridge building, catapults, hovercrafts, and robotics) help students see therelevance of their summer STEM courses. The percentage of students who participate in theprogram, attend college, and graduate in STEM fields has been tracked throughout the programshistory. The success of the program in attracting above average numbers of young men andwomen to pursue engineering and other STEM fields is presented and related to the programmethods. Several key factors influencing the success of the program, which has grown to serveover 350 students per year locally, are identified presented as a model that can be duplicated inan effort to increase the number of
approaches to engineering education" are being well served by program assessment underEC2000. In particular, those faculty who strive to make engineering curricula more authentic by using open-endedproblems in classes and embedding inquiry-based learning in course labs and projects know that they are helpingstudents to develop knowledge and skills that variously include "(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments,as well as to analyze and interpret data; (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; (f) anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) an ability to communicate effectively; (h) the broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context; (i) arecognition
AC 2011-2025: THE INSIDE STORY: REVEALING THE CONTENTS OFCAD’S BLACK BOXHolly K. Ault, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Holly K. Ault received her BS, MSME and Ph.D. degrees from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1974, 1983 and 1988 respectively. She has worked as a Manufacturing Engineer for the Norton Company and Product Development Engineer for the Olin Corporation. She is currently Associate Professor of Me- chanical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, co-director of the Assistive Technology Resource Center, and director of the Melbourne Global Project Center. In the fall of 2001, she was invited as the Lise Meitner Visiting Professor, Department of Design Sciences, Lund Technical University, Lund
company in Florida. He has also worked as a research engineer for the National Association of Home Builders Research Foundation where he was a project manager for the EER energy efficiency research and demonstration residence. He recently completed his Ph.D. concentrating on reconstruction and demolition with a cognate specialty in education. He currently teaches in and administers the Purdue Department of Building Construction Management’s Demolition and Reconstruction concentration, the first college level program in the nation with an emphasis on the management of demolition projects
The Senior Design Process at Purdue University Vincent P. Drnevich, P.E., Ph.D. Purdue UniversityAbstract This paper examines the participation of practitioners in senior design based onexperience at Purdue University where senior design involves all seniors in their last semesterbefore graduation and is titled “Civil Engineering Design Project”. It is described in the catalogas “Planning, design, and analysis of a civil project; an integrated and realistic group projectinvolving as much as possible all major aspects of the civil engineering profession.” This highenrollment course (30 to 100 students per semester) has been taught
for senior design. Micro and Nano Manufacturing, asenior elective and graduate level course was identified as one of the courses though whichABET student outcome 7 could be assessed. This was implemented in the form of assignmentswith different learning strategies: weekly discussion board and midterm project that studentswork on individually and a group presentation on emerging technologies. This paper discussesthe implementation of these assignments and student performance on each of these assignmentsin three sections spread across 2023 and 2024. The weekly discussion and group presentation onemerging technologies focus on the acquire knowledge sub outcome whereas the midtermproject focuses on both the sub outcomes, acquire and apply. The