Students’ Financial Support Patterns Affect Their Times toDegree and Completion Probabilities? Journal of Human Resources. 30: 581-610.9 Lovitts, B. 2001. Leaving the Ivory Tower The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p.131.10 Nettles, M. & C. Millett. 2006. Three Magic Letters Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: The Johns HopkinsUniversity Press.11 Ehrenberg, R, Zuckerman, H., Groen, J. and S. Brucker. 2010. Educating Scholars Doctoral Education in theHumanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.12 Bandura, A. 1986. Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. AmericanPsychologist 1389-1391.13 Gibson, D.E. 2004. Role models
frequently than that in Prototype I (No cues) group. Page 25.1404.7 Table 2. Gaze percentage in each region for Prototype II S Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4 Subject 5 Cost 3.6 5 5.5 2.3 4 Equipment Selection 16.9 25.9 13 12.5 18.1 Process Selection 12.1 8.7 16.1 18.9 7 Time 6.3 12.4 12 16.7 6.8Table 3 shows gaze percentage in each region for Prototype III (Red dots). Gaze percentages
very easy todetermine which product terms are true, and for those that are false to determine exactly whythey are false (i.e. which literal(s) is(are) false). Performing this inspection for all combinationsof inputs for simple sets of equations, or an interesting subset of those combinations for complexsets, can lead to an in-depth understanding of any specific design and of HDL described designsin general. As stated earlier, both combinational and sequential logic are supported inVisiBoole. Combinational assignment equations have only a variable name to the left of anequal sign. Sequential logic assignments use a variable name with a “.d” sufix. When formattedfor the display, the variable name and the “.d” are separated by a space. The
AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, Il. June 20063. Alenskis, Brian, “Integrating Ethics into an Engineering TechnologyCourse: An Interspersed Component Approach,” Proceeding of the 1997 AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI. June 19974. Mindek, R. B., Keyser, T. K., Musiak, R. E., Schreiner, S., Vollaro, M.B.,“Integration of Engineering Ethics Into The Curriculum: Student Performance andFeedback,” Proceeding of the 2003 Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition,Nashville, TN. June 20035. Durfee, J., Loendorf, W., “Using the National Society of ProfessionalEngineer’ (NSPE) Ethics Examination as an Assessment Tool in the EngineeringTechnology Curriculum,” Proceeding of the 2008 Annual ASEE Conference andExposition
Greatly improved Yes Surfing/Skimming Not included in Site dependent. Yes phase ITable 1: Comparison between Phase I, Phase II and Phase III*(Artino and Stephens (2009) stated “ To succeed in autonomous online learningenvironments, it helps to be a highly motivated, self-regulated learner.”) Page 25.1502.43. Methodology3.1 The ProcessThis information was obtained using action research. Action Research is a specific variationof Evaluation Research. McMillan and Schumacher state (2001) ”Evaluation Researchfocuses on a particular practice at a given site(s). The practice may be a program, a product,or a
, aandtest in thee laboratory. An examp ple of one of the student lload cells is shown in Fiigure 4. Theestudents are told thatt the owner is not an engineer, and thherefore theyy must comm municate witth thebusiness owner in terrms that he oro she can un nderstand. Sttudents also write a simpple program m toacquire data d from thee transducer in the laboraatory, and thhen test the eentire systemm to verify ittsfunctionaality. Page 25.1041.7 Figu ure 4. Studen nt built forcee transducer..A short survey s was given
defined KEO(s); must be assessable. One such objective is proposed in a prior section. • Identify the KEEN Outcomes that ABET does not cover (very well or not at all) – mapping process • Identify key DNA attributes that entrepreneurially minded graduates must possess and map to KSOs • Develop curriculum/extracurricular activities to enhance the essential attributes • Ensure alignment of KSOs “up and down” • THEN develop an assessment planBIBLIOGRAPHY[1] website – http://www.keennetwork.com/[2] website - http://www.keennetwork.com/about-keen/theory-of-change/[3] CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS, (2012-2013 Accreditation Cycle), Engineering Accreditation Commission, October 29, 2011[4] Owe Petersen
, June 1997. Paper 1220-06. [3] J. H. McClellan, C. S. Burrus, A. V. Oppenheim, T. W. Parks, R. W. Schafer, and S. W. Schuessler, Computer-Based Exercises for Signal Processing Using M ATLAB 5. M ATLAB Curriculum Series, Prentice Hall, 1998. [4] G. W. P. York, C. H. G. Wright, M. G. Morrow, and T. B. Welch, “Teaching real-time sonar with the C6711 DSK and MATLAB,” ASEE Comput. Educ. J., pp. 79–87, July–September 2002. Page 25.1098.8 [5] T. B. Welch, C. H. G. Wright, and M. G. Morrow, “Experiences in offering a DSP-based communi- cation laboratory,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Digital Signal Processing Workshop and the 3rd
College andMiddlesex Borough High School, both for providing a rich and innovative environment, with astrong focus on student outcomes and success.Bibliography1) http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/2) http://www.bls.gov/oco3) J. Sinn, S. Walthour, and D. Haren, “Technology-Based Math and Science Applications”. The TechnologyTeacher, October 1995, p. 16-24.4) http://www.mos.org/eie/5) http://www.mos.org/educators/classroom_resources/curricula_and_research&d=20206) http://www.awim.org/7) http://www.mos.org/etf/8) D. Perin and R. Hare, Community College Research Center, CCRC Brief, June 2010.9) K. Spang, “Teaching Algebra Ideas to Elementary School Children: Robert B. Davis’ Introduction to EarlyAlgebra”, Doctoral Thesis, Rutgers University
, performenergy modeling, possess a knowledge of ecology, and perform building life cycle cost analysis.Analyzing the new developments affecting construction management practices is important. Page 25.1145.10They continuously need to be integrated to respective construction management courses’contents. By bringing the latest developments into classroom, students will not only benefit from the new knowledge but also develop awareness about different qualities expected fromconstruction professionals.Bibliography1. Gunhan, S. (2009). The Last Decade Analysis and the Near Future Trends in International Construction. Proceedings of the 2009 ASCE
projects. Therefore, if they have not already done so, other CEMprograms should be encouraged to establish formal faculty mentoring programs for theircapstone projects. Efforts should be made to move the mentoring beyond the role of merelymonitoring student progress or performance to one of coaching that contributes real value tostudent learning. Faculty are the professional experts; the challenge becomes how to usementoring effectively to impart some of that knowledge and experience to students.ReferencesLikert, Rensis. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psychology, 140 (1- 55) 1932Somerton, C. W., Thompson, B. S., and Gunn, C., The Role of the Faculty Advisor in the Capstone Design Experience: The Importance of
60000 50000 40000 30000 C a s h F lo w ($) 20000 10000 0 -10000 0 5 10 15 20 25 -20000 -30000
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. EEC-1106529, Research Experience for Teachers in Manufacturing forCompetitiveness in the United States (RETainUS). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Chiodo, J. D., Billett, E., & Harrison, D. (1999 February). Preliminary investigations of active disassembly using shape memory polymers. Paper included in the Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (Eco Design ’99), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 590-596.2. Chiodo, J. D
limitations. Results from the implementation of thelegacy cycle will be compiled and shared in teacher conferences.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. EEC-1106529, Research Experience for Teachers in Manufacturing forCompetitiveness in the United States (RETainUS). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or Page 25.1204.11recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES[1] Peel, L.D., Lingala, M, “Testing and Simulation of Stress-Stiffening Extreme Poisson’s
(CSV) Specifications,” http://www.patriot-products-inc.com/csvspecsht.htm (Oct.30, 2009).[5] Yu. V. Rubtsov, G. V. Konnova, V. S. Shchetinin and S. V. Zolotoreva. Improving the Cutting Mechanism of a Disk_Type Wood Chipper. Russian Engineering Research, 2011, 31(1): 28–30.[6] The International Association for Natural Gas Vehicles, Natural Gas Vehicle Statistics (Revised: Apr.10, 2010).[7] The Alliance for Collaborative Research in Alternative Fuel Technology, Goals and Objectives, http://all-craft.missouri.edu/goals.php (Nov.20, 2010). Page 25.1223.10[8] O. Pupier, V. Goetz, R. Fiscal. Effect of cycling operations on adsorbed
Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004. 3. Rawat, K. S.; Riddick, G. B.; Moore, L. J. Work in Progress – Integrating Mobile Tablet-PC Technology and Classroom Management Software in Undergraduate Electronic Engineering Technology Courses. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. 4. Enriquez, A. Developing an Interactive Learning Network Using Tablet PCs in Sophomore-Level Engineering Courses. Proceedings of the 114th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007. 5. Huettel, L. G.; Forbes, J.; Fanzoni, L.; Malkin, R.; Nadeau, J.; Ybarra, G. Using Tablet PCs to Enhance Engineering and Computer Science Education. In The Impact
place at LSU followed by guidedfield trips to the campus research facilities. The instructional model described for the sustainablestructures challenge is applied to the bioreactor design challenge to meet the designed bioreactorsystems requirements of: 1) Characterize the organism(s) is/are used in the solution; 2) Explainthe rationale behind selecting this particular organism; 3) Describe the growth requirements ofthe organism(s) used in your solution; 4) Identify and explain those parts of the system providingthe necessary growth requirements; 5) Detail the characteristics of your technological system--the parts and how they work; 6) Provide an explanation of any/all mechanisms (sensors, etc,)used to monitor your system; and 7) Provide a
), 768- 772. 5. King, I. (1915). An inquiry into certain aspects of the study habits of university students. School and Society, 2(49), 824-828. 6. Bailey, M., Floersheim, R. B., & Ressler, S. J. (2002). Course assessment plan: A tool for integrated curriculum management. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 425-434. 7. Hayes, R., Kotovsky, K., Kozbelt, A., & Weissman, A. (1999). Where does students’ time go? Center for Innovation in Learning at Carnegie Mellon, Research Brief, 1(2), 1-4. 8. Ressler, S. J., & Lenox, T. A. (1996). The time survey: A course development tool that works! Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
and renowned professor in Academic circles in the coun- try and abroad. His academic record wise he has obtained B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) degree from Osmania University, Hyderabad, M.Tech from IIT Madras, and Ph.D from IIT, Delhi. Commencing his academic career in Research and Development as the Senior Scientific Officer in ARDE (DRDO), Pune from 1976-78, then moving onto the Post of Development Engineer of M/s Hyderabad Industries, Hyderabad from 1978-1980. His first stint in academic career began from 1980-86 when he took up the Faculty assignment in the year 1980 in Mechanical Engineering Department, Osmania University. Scaling up the academic ladder, Dr. Reddy got promoted as Professor in 1991. From 1991
Z80 was selected for the CPUrather than an 8086 for several reasons. First and foremost, the 8086 is no longer manufactured.Second, the Z80’s clock is DC-coupled, allowing students to single-step through instructions fordebugging (the 8086 requires a 2 MHz minimum clock speed). Third, the Z80 is a popularprocessor among hobbyists and in industry and is supported by a rich set of peripheral interfacecomponents and projects. Fourth, the Z80 provides completely independent data and addressbuses; on the 8086, the lower eight bits of the address bus are multiplexed with the data bus,which students can find confusing. In addition, since the Z80 is based on the 8080, Z80instructions are very similar to basic x86 instructions. As an added benefit
. Shih, P. Schrader, “Use of Scenario-Based Learning Approach in Teaching Statics,” in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20 – 23, 2004.3. Newcomer, J. L., Many Problems, “One Solution Method: Teaching Statics without `Special Cases’”, Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA, October 27 – 31, 2006.4. Yang, E. and B. Withiam, “Efficient Statics Lecture Through the Use of Worksheets,” in Proceeding of the Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Philadelphia, PA, October 15-16, 2010.5. Danielson, S. and Mehta, S., “Teaching Resources for the New Millennium: Statics as an Example,” Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 2, No. 1
have already been developed. The primary objectives of thisproject grant follow: • Create an enhanced version of CPRTM (Version 5), both to allow for the input and review of visual and oral (video) components by students and also to permit the expansion of this functionality to the 2500 assignments that have already been developed by the 100’s of faculty in the 950 institutions who have current CPR accounts on the UCLA server. • Train engineering faculty at the collaborating institutions in the development and use of visually rich CPR assignments. • Develop pedagogically driven assignments for a set of core engineering courses. • Assess the impact of the integration of writing and visual
depictingdisciplinary diversity in that they belong to broad disciplinary areas (in addition to engineering)such as: Languages and Communication, Anthropology, Education, Teaching and Learning etc. Page 25.864.17Table 9Top Authors of Single-authored Papers Author names Discipline Single-authored article count Cismas, SC Modern Languages and Communication 9 UDD, JE Mineral and Energy Technology 9 Ghosh, S Computer Science 7 Kitto, KL
AC 2012-3084: INTEGRATING THE CHARRETTE PROCESS INTO EN-GINEERING EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY ON A CIVIL ENGINEER-ING DESIGN CAPSTONE COURSEDr. Michelle Renee Oswald, Bucknell University Michelle Oswald, a LEED AP, is an Assistant Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Her focus is in sustainable transportation planning and sustainable engi- neering education. She completed her doctoral degree in civil engineering at the University of Delaware, along with a master’s of civil engineering degree, and a master;s of arts in urban affairs and public policy. She received a bachelor of science in civil and environmental engineering from Lafayette College.Dr. Arthur D. Kney
one was in charge! (Thisauthor stepped in and changed that one!) Clearly, without proper team structure even initiallyenthusiastic and highly motivated team members can later come to believe that no one owns theproject and that no one cares about their success or failures. When no one is accountable toanyone then no one is responsible for anything.The likelihood of a successful team throughout the project and the team’s performance at thecompetition significantly improves if the students feel that their advisor(s) is genuinely interestedin the project.19 This interest and caring, on the part of the advisor, can successfully bedemonstrated in several ways, even when the faculty advisor allows the students to run their ownproject. For example
practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.14. de la Rocha, O. (1985). The reorganization of arithmetic practice in the kitchen. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 193-8.15. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9-40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.16. Bissell, C. & Dillon, C. (2000). Telling tales: Models, stories, and meanings. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(3), 3-11.17. Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2002). The mathematical components of engineering expertise: The relationship between doing and understanding mathematics. Paper submitted to the
services we provide these students.At the very least, this justifies why we should ask the questions in a guided, open-ended format.This project builds upon two predominant concepts in adult learning literature; self-directedlearning and experiential learning. One of the fundamental concepts of andragogy is the conceptthat adult learners are more inclined towards self-directed learning than their youngercounterparts.12 Dating back to the 1930’s, education pioneers such as John Dewey recognizedthat ‘all genuine education comes about through experience’ and this is echoed by modernliterature that emphasizes the need for adult education programs to capitalize on this lifeexperience that adult students bring to the classroom (p.162). It is important
media can support the IT methods associated with goodm-learning such as high retention graphics, video and animation with voiceovers; and it does thisat the same time as it maintains the ubiquity of SMS-based text-only dissemination. That is,continuing education materials can be pushed out to the cell/smart phones of PEs’ registered forcourse(s) without their intervention (e.g., no browsing for information) regardless of the phonemodel, calling plan, or wireless service provider they own.In particular, this paper will discuss the following topics: 1. Existing models of university-company collaboration so as to introduce an atypical university-company collaboration in which the partnering company is a start-up which owns a
has contributed publications on women in engineering in collaboration with the College of Engineering at Pukyong National University. She is a postgraduate student at Universiti Sains Malaysia where she is pursuing her doctorate. Page 25.1036.7The Case in the USIn the 1950’s women represented less than 5% of the graduating classes in schools of law,medicine and engineering in the US. 8 During the intervening years, despite overt and covertdiscrimination, US women fought in both the courts and public opinion forums to be admittedinto schools of law and medicine (human and veterinary) without funding by the federalgovernment or professional
framework for the methods can be broadly applied to other programs.IntroductionFaculty members know that engineering employers place significant value on graduateprofessionalism. In the late 1990’s studies such as the Society of Manufacturing Engineers’“Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering Graduates” 2 begancalling for increased communication and teamwork skills in engineering graduates. RecentlyNorman L. Fortenberry, Executive Director of ASEE, argued in an article in MechanicalEngineering, The Magazine of ASME, that “To operate effectively, next-generation engineerswill require a panoply of interpersonal and management skills, in addition to technicalproficiency.” He notes that the 2003 National Academy of Engineering