interviews were then transcribed.Data analysisTwo researchers performed a thematic analysis of the surveys and interview transcripts toinductively code (Miles et al., 2020) the teachers’ reflections on their perceived differencesbetween students in the two different class sections and their experiences teaching engineering inthese two class sections. The researchers engaged in team coding to read and discuss each of theteachers’ reflections together and identify and code if a teacher’s answer demonstrated (1)teachers’ beliefs about each class section and any differences between the class sections and (2)how the teachers reported that their beliefs led to instructional decisions in each class section.The researchers then looked across the statements
compound or diminish student stress.The combination of stressors experienced by graduate students, as well as the combination ofcoping mechanisms used by graduate students can be characterized using resource networks,similar to social networks created for understanding interactions among people. The major aim ofthis project is to increase the understanding of the stress and coping mechanism networks ofgraduate students, as well as how these two different networks interact. The results will facilitatethe development of better support programs for graduate students.In this paper, we seek to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the primarystressors and coping mechanisms of current graduate students, and (2) What are the
principle proposed in the previous section, what 9would we do differently? What can we do to help students develop theirmental images about the concept of curl? First, let us recall the generalidea. Verbal descriptions and mathematical representations alone are notsufficient. To be added is a continued prodding with questions and problemsfor imagination and for practice of qualitative reasoning. Here we give an illustration of what we mean by an imagery-basedapproach. We use a sequence of images, Figures 1-3, to describe a process ofinquiry. When curl of vector fields is first introduced, students are presentedwith Figure 1., which is adopted from Purcell and Morin14 . We ask thestudents to “see” the curl of
topics covered in this course, and describe the step-based tutoring System, dubbed Circuit Tutor,developed by researchers at the UTEP. The results indicate Circuit Tutor platform can be used as aself-learning tool according to survey answers from students and the increasing passing rate in theCircuits I course.1. IntroductionOne of the most widely taught courses to undergraduate students in electrical engineering, andstudents to other engineering disciplines (also called “electrical circuits for non-believers” by someinstructors) is the first course of electrical circuit analysis (or second course on electric circuits ifthe students has taken an introductory course on electrical engineering). This course has been taughttraditionally in two
robot.Students were asked to (1) view a video on how to access the remote lab, (2) observe how thesystem works, and (3) execute a set of code to understand what will happen. They were thenasked to modify the code to accomplish a more complex object recognition task. Preliminaryresults suggest that while they were very interested in learning more about the Cozmo robotplatform, modifying the existing code to accomplish a new task was not straightforward.Suggestions include providing more explanation about the existing code and providing assistanceas needed throughout the implementation process. Future directions include enhancing theplatform for use in teaching real-time imaging processing techniques such as histograms,profiles, projections, filtering and
technologies, including bioinstrumentation for use in low-resource settings. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Framework for Implementing Design for Additive Manufacturing Methods in First-Year Engineering Curriculum: Investigating the effects of specialized training on engineering design and student self-efficacy Lisa K. Murray1,2, Joseph Ekong 1, Seyed A. Niknam 1, Michael J. Rust 2 1 Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management, Western New England University, Springfield, MA 01119 2 Biomedical Engineering, Western New England University
with properanalytics. The hardware requirements of this project are met with cost-effective workstationplatforms. The student can observe the result of actions taken in an instant cause/effect form ofgrowth learning [1]. The project is made up of modules for self-learning. The softwarerequirements to operate the modules are at no cost. The modules and software form a course planfor one or more classes and laboratory sessions. The software of choice will be video games forwhich the student will develop a reinforcement learning model. These video games are used topique student interest and attention. In addition to serving as an introductory foray into machinelearning, the project will also serve as a platform for student research
themes.There are also key differences that illustrate the unique needs and wants of the variousstakeholders. The common themes and differences are identified. Together they serve as afoundation for adjusting the course to make it more effective and sustainable. Additionally, thereflections examined here shed light on how an Introduction to Project Based Engineering in atraditional setting might be improved.1. IntroductionOffering a university-level engineering course in a prison for the first time can be compared to anexpedition. Examining such an experience encourages considering new spaces for engineeringeducation, inspires opportunities for improvements in traditional settings, and highlights theimpact of incarcerated education on all stakeholders
apositive impact on students’ success.One of the strategies to decrease the DFW rate is to decrease the class size from almost 60 to 30or lower. Most studies show that this would help the students to be more engaged in the course,and the instructor can have more opportunities to monitor students’ learning progress [1], [2].However, the logistics of this change is out of instructor’s hands as adequate funding, additionalinstructors and classrooms must be available. All of these are current challenges of theuniversity, but are being discussed and gradually implemented. Additionally, multipleresearchers have studied factors that could decrease the DFW rates in Circuits. These studiesinclude web-based homework system [3], identifying at-risk students
with specialization in Construction Management. His research focus is in the area of contract administration on heavy civil projects. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction management, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construction cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comConfiguration and Use of Lightboard System in Online Environment: Lessons Learned
StudentsIntroductionIncreasing achievement of underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) is a critical and difficult task [1]. Underrepresented students make up asmall fraction of the STEM workforce (13%) compared to white students (71%) [1]. Mentorship,particularly research mentorship, plays an important role in the development of scientific identity[2] and improves students’ moral, performance, and retention rates [3]. Therefore, mentoringunderrepresented students in research is critical for increasing their achievement. Students whoreceive research mentoring have described mentors as colleagues who provided them anopportunity to flourish. These students were more likely to identify as scientists, whereas thosewho did not
bioengineer”, “my family sees me as a bioengineer”.Growth Mindset:The theory of Mindset, introduced by Dweck [4], is about students’ beliefs of where intelligencecomes from and how these beliefs influence behavior in the face of challenges. The GrowthMindset Scale [4] assesses student’s mindset by asking 3 questions on a Likert scale of 1 to 6(“You have a certain amount of intelligence, and you can’t really do much to change it.”, “Yourintelligence is something about you that you can’t change very much”. “You can learn newthings, but you can’t really change your basic intelligence.”). Students with Fixed Mindsetbelieve that you can’t really do much to change intelligence and would score high on the scale.Students with Growth Mindset would score low
largedata sets. This study demonstrates the value of collaboration between multiple academicinstitutions, and how educational programs can benefit from collaboration with industry partners.IntroductionSupervisory Controls and Data Acquisition (SCADA), as the name makes explicit, is a systemwhich acquires data and facilitates supervisory control. SCADA is a type of automation controlsystem that is a core technology for the operation of many industrial processes, including oil andgas refining, food and beverage production, water treatment, electric power production, andmany other production, manufacturing and distribution industries [1]. SCADA is a centralizedsystem that monitors and controls individual processes and entire sites. At the site or
graduation [1].These trends have led to considerable growth in the number of engineering students participatingin global educational experiences, along with continued innovation and growth in new anddifferent program formats [2]. While international sojourns involving study, research, and/orinternship experiences abroad remain prevalent and are often viewed as most impactful, on-campus and online/virtual learning experiences have also been developed and offered toengineering students at many schools. Such programs tend to be more scalable and resourceefficient as compared to travel-based programs, potentially allowing more engineering studentsto receive some amount of exposure to global engineering without needing to leave their homecampuses [3
significantly improved students’grades in a statics course [1]. Multiple attempts at homework problems have been shown toprove the scores in an economics class [2]. Magalhães et al. [3] provide a literature review of thebenefits and pitfalls of online homework. They noted that others found that the ability forstudents to try again may encourage students to practice to achieve mastery [4] and thatrandomization of exercises is likely to reduce cheating [5]. One drawback of online homeworkthat they reported is that it emphasizes the final answer rather than the process. [6] Cooke and AlFaruque saw mixed results in implementing Mastering engineering in a Strength of Materialscourse [7]. O’Neill et al. [8] saw a slight improvement in using Mastering
(Work in Progress, Diversity) Richard Hill1 and Jocelyn Bennett-Garraway2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering and 2Department of Counseling and Addiction Studies University of Detroit MercyAbstractThis paper describes the development of an engineering pathways program for underserved highschool students. The innovating Detroit’s Robotics Agile Workforce (iDRAW) program isadministered by the University of Detroit Mercy and is in its third year of working with two localhigh schools. The students are predominantly low-income and from populations historicallyunderrepresented in STEM. The goal of the program is to increase interest in STEM-relatedcareers while
the app as well prompting an article fromthe student run newspaper to be written and published. The successful development of this appopens the door to future development efforts that include adding in resources to help students getconnected to resources on campus related to learning disabilities and other situations that canmake a difference in student success on campus.1.0. IntroductionPoor mental health in post-secondary students can cause a host of issues including (but notlimited to) unsatisfactory academic performance [1]. This issue only becomes exacerbated bythe current COVID-19 pandemic. Students faced a whole host of additional stress factors duringthis time because of the confusion and chaos caused by the pandemic [2]. Now more
in a graduate degree program, and/orseek professional engineering (P.E.) registration. Florida is one of several states that provide apathway to professional engineering licensure to those who earn B.S. in Engineering Technology(not Engineering) degrees. According to the Florida Board of Professional Engineers (FBPE)there are 3 requirements, education, examination, and experience to sit for any of theprofessional engineer exams and several ways, Table 1, to meet each requirement. The A.S.degree Career Pathway within the Florida State College System that includes aProfessional Engineering License program with its options and its strong focus on theflexibility required to handle students with various A.S. Engineering Technology
end with lower scores than the non-URG students. Weconclude that the Developing Spatial Thinking curriculum is improving the spatial visualizationskills of all students, yet is unfortunately not closing the gap between the two groups.1 Introduction and BackgroundThe Fast-Forward Engineering Program is a scholarship program at Louisiana Tech Universityfunded by the National Science Foundation that allows rising sophomore engineering students tocontinue their curriculum ahead of schedule [1]. Eligibility is based on unmet financial need andon-track degree progression to achieve a 4-year graduation. Eligible students apply in the winterterm of their first year when they are taking Calculus I and Engineering Problem Solving II.On-track
funding has been obtained for a five-yearcollaboration that will (1) create opportunities for natural science majors from Spelman Collegeto study data science; (2) equip faculty from both institutions to integrate data science into theirteaching and research, with a particular focus on using data to address social justice issues; (3)support mentoring, professional skills training, career development, and community-buildingactivities to foster student success. The project encourages both students and faculty to engage inexperiential learning; to build skills for leveraging big data in teaching, research, and industryactivities; and to experience the cultures, communities, and opportunities of each campus.A key component of this effort is a new
-economic status. The initial enrollment in each group was: Cohort 1: 16, Cohort 2: 17; Cohort 3:19. Students take two years of a program related seminar and receive a scholarship untilgraduation as long as they are meeting a GPA threshold. To date, seven students from Cohort 1have graduated, with five taking jobs in industry and two entering a doctoral program.Below, we articulate some of the results we have found in our research on the mentoring processand relationships. Specifically, we show the results of discourse analyses based on surveys,mentoring journals, thank you notes sent to mentors and funders, and short-answer responsesfrom participating mentors. First though, we highlight the theoretical lens that guides ourunderstanding of
government/private projects with the use of Robotic Manufacturing to create metal castings. These projects start from 2D drawings to fully casted final metal castings, with and without the use, of physical patterns. Richard also works together with Putnam Vocational Technical Academy here in Springfield, and helps pave a way to introduce High-School trade students to the manufacturing world through Co- op opportunities at Trident Alloys. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A framework for Industry 4.0 workforce training through project-based and experiential learning approaches Joseph Ekong 1, Vedang
Powered by www.slayte.com The role of neoliberalism in the development of the ‘new’ engineer “…children are not the ‘supply’ that meets any ‘demand’ however urgent. They are individual human beings, and the primary concern of the schools should not be with the living they will earn but with the life they will lead” [1].Universities have traditionally been viewed as places which allow students to broaden theirminds, the Latin ‘universus’ meaning ‘the whole, aggregate’. Today, universities can beconsidered to operate as businesses in competition with one another, their primary purposebeing to produce the next generation of workers who aid in maintaining globalcompetitiveness
of higher education aseveryone had to adapt to lock-downs and abrupt transitions to virtual learning. Research on theeffects of this transition have explored the experiences of academics [1], student strategies [2],and academic stress and emotional well-being of students [3]; providing a few but not anexhaustive set of examples. Focusing on the transition to virtual-learning, instructors wererequired to redesign course content, alter evaluation strategies, integrate new technologies intotheir workflow, and adapt to students changing needs. Each of these requirements is expected tohave increased the course preparation and delivery time commit by instructors to their courses(in comparison to its delivery in face-to-face format). As noted in
(approximately 83%).Introduction:For nearly a century, ABET provides quality assurance of the educational programs through theirrigorous accreditation programs for college and university programs in the disciplines of appliedand natural science, computing, engineering and engineering technology at various levels(associates, bachelor’s and master’s). Today, academic programs across the world strive for ABETaccreditation as it certifies the academic rigor and high-standard of the program, as well asprofessional preparedness of program graduates for the competitive global workforce requirements[1, 2]. While ABET accreditation is a highly sought-after affair, it appears as a daunting task tomost academic programs, especially when the personnel in charge of
succumb to “shortcuts” such as these.One common digital method that instructors use to ensure timely return of feedback is “auto-grading”. Due to the overwhelming number of students enrolled in a course, many instructorshave designed their homework assignments using digital sources that will grade a student’s workas soon as they answer a question. Based on student survey responses, previous studies haveindicated that this method of assessment may be more suitable for multiple choice questionsrather than “problem solving” questions as the grading is focused primarily on the final answer,not the solution steps [1, 17]. Engineering coursework is typically focused on the steps andprocesses required to arrive at the correct solution; rather than the
National Academies have long emphasized the importance of developing strong professionalskills in the modern workforce [1]. Learning to communicate effectively, work in teams, solveproblems collaboratively, and make decisions by building consensus are essential skills forpersonal and professional success [2], [3]. These intrapersonal skills are particularly important ininterdisciplinary contexts, where solving problems often requires gathering input from andcoordinating the efforts of individuals with disparate backgrounds, experiences, and skillsets. Forexample, the selection criteria for National Academies Fellowship programs include disciplinaryexpertise, as well as the ability to communicate effectively with broad audiences; experiences
benefiting both students and instructors. In thispaper we will describe the challenges we faced and the solutions we came up within theElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, as well as the student reaction to the COVID-19 laboratory experience. The learnings from the affected 2019 - 2021 capstones provide anopportunity to both apply methods to normal, post-pandemic instruction and to be prepared forpotential future interruption of capstone team-based laboratories.BackgroundWhile flipped classroom approaches have been studied extensively portraying a generallypositive potential impact to the student population (Bergman and Sams 2012) [1], theirapplication during a forced external event like a pandemic has been very limited. The 1918
students as evidence of merit.Introduction Project Based Learning (PBL) has many advocates for classroom motivation andlearning. Blumenfeld et. al. [1] presents an argument for PBL helping students learn. Alsoexamined in this study is the sustainability issue with regards to PBL and motivation. Wilkersonet.al [2-3] has shown good student motivation in learning new topics using PBL in a capstonedesign program. In these efforts it was shown that students will self-motivate and therefore gainmore in-depth knowledge then what might be found in a typical classroom environment whereonly specific areas are covered. Strobel et. al. [4] research indicated that PBL is superior forlong-term retention. However, in this same study traditional