withmicrocontrollers does not mean that students will respond positively. Instructors used the “buzz”about the Arduino to motivate students, by indicating that the students were using a new andpopular technology. Instructor observations of student reaction showed that students were notuniversally inspired by or interested in the technology. This makes sense because the definitionof “cool” is not uniform for engineering students. Assessment was performed with an end-of-term survey of student attitudes toward thecourse and how it affected their career plans. Students were asked whether the use of theArduino platform changed their attitude toward computer programming and electromechanicalsystems. The complete survey is included in Appendix B. Results from
), or to pursue a career in academia, or to become a specialized researcher in agiven field (a doctoral degree). While this is true of many individuals, there is also an emerginggroup of ―adults in America today – and [potentially] even more so in the future – [who] cannotstop learning‖ 4. In many cases these are individuals who have been working professionally formany years before returning for advanced degrees for a variety of reasons – the desire forprofessional advancement, a career change for personal reasons, or a need for retraining causedby a shift in the labor market – yet there is a dearth of research regarding what these returningstudents bring with them to graduate programs. It is probable that professional non-traditionalstudents
statements and presentation outlines). Student responses indicated that theworkshop content could be informed and improved both by better tailoring the content to thecourse and assignment and by improving the instructor‟s (librarian‟s) approach to delivering thecontent. It was determined that more opportunity for students to do hands-on exploration andactive learning, at the likely cost of imparting less content in a lecture format, would beappropriate for a delivery design change. Respondents nearly unanimously agreed that the kindsof skills covered in the workshop were going to be of moderate importance or very importantboth in their academic careers and in their future professional careers, irrespective of their levelof satisfaction with the
individual schools and programs have begun to demonstrate the feasibility andthe benefit of integration, and many have been showcased at the Symposium on E&LE.63, 121Next steps are to provide tools that empower more faculty to act, to create a national communityof practice, and to demonstrate how the integration of E&LE elevates engineering students’capacities for innovative and entrepreneurial careers.3. EXAMPLES OF INTEGRATION OF E&LEExperiences and activities presented in this section all represent existing integrative activities.They illustrate ways to leverage expertise from non-engineering disciplines into importantcomponents of the engineering education spectrum. Study of these successful activities will leadto the insights and
. Page 22.429.2In terms of context, our approach is focused on leveraging the relatively young, sometimesreferred to as game-changing, paradigms of mass career customization, mass collaboration, openinnovation, and crowd sourcing. From an educational and instructional perspective, ourapproach is anchored in the theory of collaborative/collective learning, the paradigm of masscustomization applied to course design, and the concept of competency-based learning.2. Globalization 3 and the world of near tomorrowOver the past two decades web-based technologies have brought about revolutionary changes inthe way organizations conduct business. Organizations are increasingly transforming intodecentralized supply and demand networks. According to Friedman
Page 22.469.4somewhere in the student’s academic career and its limits must be determined. As an old Welshproverb says: An early stumble saves a later fall. Open-ended design problems provide motivation and an opportunity for students to develop good judgment and confidence in theirabilities as an engineer. Table 3. Learning Objectives – Design Methodology for Mechanical Engineers 1) Instill the philosophy that real engineering design is often an open‐ended, ill‐defined process 2) Provide students with in‐depth practice in design and the use of a structured approach to design 3) Develop and practice teamwork, critical thinking, creativity, and independent learning 4) Develop and practice communication skills
establishing the validity of a direct methodfor teaching and measuring undergraduate engineering students’ professional skills. Proficiencyin engineering professional skills (Table 1) is critical for success in the multidisciplinary,intercultural team interactions that characterize 21st century engineering careers. Yet, programsacross the nation have struggled to define, teach and measure professional skills since theirintroduction as ABET criteria for engineering programs in 20001,2,3,4. In fall 2006, theWashington State University College of Engineering and Architecture partnered with anassessment specialist to create an innovative, direct method to teach and measure the ABETprofessional skills simultaneously. No direct method for teaching and
emphasis onfour key non-technical skills of Engineering emphasized by Professional Engineering andAccreditation bodies in the approval and recognition of Engineering and Technologyprograms.Theme Three Research Questions: What are the perceptions of transatlantic exchangestudents on the difference in the degree of emphasis between “home” and “study abroad”institution on the following skills and behaviors (which are recognized as important in thedevelopment of Engineering careers?) Page 22.190.5 (i) Good Health and Safety Practice (ii) Good Environmental Practice (iii) Effective Communication Skills (iv) Behavioral
evidence that this was going on but there was no systematic harvestingof assessment data by the instructors.During the course anecdotal feedback was provided to individuals both by the instructors and bypeers as circumstances permitted, usually initiated by the student (e.g., “How am I doing?”).Grading of presentations was avoided intentionally during the semester despite many students’requests for graded feedback (e.g., “How was that presentation – maybe a 3.5?”). Weconsistently emphasized the concept of self-directed professional growth as the way the studentswould have to learn to improve during their careers; we argued that the self-directed reviewapproach was an excellent opportunity for them to practice while in school. We also tried
in1941 and worked for Curtis Wright Aircraft Co. during World War II. Following this service tothe country, he returned to the University of Wyoming in 1946 for a teaching career thatspanned 38 years. He was awarded the professional EE degree in 1958, was selected the SigmaTau Outstanding Faculty Member in 1961 and was a past president of the Wyoming EngineeringSociety. During his tenure Mr. Beach was noted for his dedication to his students and over theyears Professor Beach and his wife, Charleen, have made generous contributions to the next Page 22.765.11generation of engineers through scholarship endowments
skills will be more important intheir careers. In addition, they may assume that a project that doesn’t work will hurt their finalgrade much more than a poorly written final report. Finally, our students have had fewopportunities to practice and develop their technical writing skills in our curricula.Therefore, we adopted new strategies to improve the quality of technical writing in our capstonedesign course. Our goals were to: 1. Encourage students to work on their writing earlier and throughout the semester 2. Engage every student in the class in the writing process 3. Use writing as a tool to improve students’ understanding of the clinical problem that they are addressing and how their design addresses their client’s needs 4
value can bemade. Page 22.845.10References1 Carlson, C., and Wilmot, W. “Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want,” CrownBusiness, ISBN 13:978-0-307-33669-9, 2006.2 Thursby, M., Fuller, A., and Thursby, J., “An Integrated Approach to Educating Professionals for Careers inInnovation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 389–405, 2009.3 Sager, B., Fernandez, M., and Thursby, M., “Implications of a Multidisciplinary Educational and ResearchEnvironment,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, pp. 57-69, 2006.4 Kingon, A. I., Thomas, R., Markham, S. K., Aiman-Smith, L., Debo, R.. “An
rural communities my career.” people’s lives in rural areas and in throughout the world, it is quiteThe benefit of this program is that it creates and enhances cross-cultural connections by offeringa joint course but more importantly allowing US graduate students to learn first hand the impactNSE can have on the developing world. With a strong SEI connection, the course places NSE inthe context of the developing world and encourages a global perspective to the graduateparticipants.SummaryNanoscale science and engineering is believed to be a technology that will have an impact on allareas of society from the development of new medicines and drug-delivery systems to changingthe workforce. As part of its mission, the
extreme events on critical power infras- tructure which included performing damage assessments after several natural disasters, such as hurricanes Katrina (2005) and Ike (2008), and the 2010 Maule, Chile Earthquake. Dr. Kwasinski is also an active participant in Austin’s smart grid initiative: the Pecan Street Project. He was a member of the Executive Committee of the Argentine Electrotechnical Association during the years 1994 and 1995. In 2005, he was awarded the Joseph J. Suozzi INTELEC Fellowship and in 2007 he received the best technical paper award at INTELEC. In 2009 he received an NSF CAREER award. Dr. Kwasinski is an associate editor for the IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion
little as 30percent6.Group 1 participants persisted in their SLS majors at a rate approaching the averages reportedelsewhere (Table 4). By year 5 of their academic career at HSU, 22% of those who had not yetgraduated remained on a STEM pathway: One student graduated who had come in with collegeunits that were part of high school home schooling.Table 4: Group 1 STEM Pathway Persistence Group 1 SLS National STEM Final Graduation Rates *Persistence % n Year 2 (Fall 2008) 59% 19 Year 3 (Fall 2009) 25% 8
AC 2011-48: INFORMING COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT THROUGHCITATION EXAMINATION OF THE CIVIL ENGINEERING RESEARCHLITERATUREScott A. Curtis, University of Missouri - Kansas City Scott Curtis is the Research and Instruction Librarian for Science and Engineering at the University of Missouri - Kansas City. He most recently held positions as a Bibliographer for Science and Engineering, the Head of Reference Services, and the Search Service Coordinator at Linda Hall Library of Science, Engineering, and Technology. Prior to his library career, he worked in engineering and management roles in electronic instrument and refractory materials manufacturing companies. He has a BS in Physics from the University of Pittsburgh, an MS in
will be evaluated according to pre-defined rubrics as described in earlierpapers1,3 . The deliverables and rubrics used to measure team’s progress greatly impact thesuccess of the Hardware completion by keeping the team on schedule and target. Utilizingindustry-standards deliverables prepares students for future careers related to design. Table 1provides a history of team’s performance in competitions, while tables 2 and 3 show teamsperformance in class using the capstone course rubrics.Table 1: History of the UNC Charlotte IEEE team performances March 2007 March 2008 March 2009 March 2010 March 2011Theme Basketball Moon Surface Pick up trash Solar Respond in
allowed participants to provide more detailed feedback regarding programhighlights and areas for improvement. Examples of laudatory verbatim statements fromqualitative survey items include: “The RET program has transformed my teaching career andtaken it to new heights;” “This experience was exactly what I wanted. It will translate directlyinto my teaching;”and “I loved the RET experience. I gained many opportunities that wouldotherwise be unavailable to me in my home county. I will share my experience with mycolleagues, friends, and family. I was prepared for the amount of work that was requested of me Table 5. Program component ratings
. Rebecca has spent the past 5 years involved in STEM high school programs at Villanova University and The School District of Philadelphia. Ad- ditionally, she has helped coordinate numerous robotics competitions such as BEST Robotics, FIRST LEGO League and MATE.James F Keller, University of Pennsylvania James Keller is currently a part-time Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Penn- sylvania and a staff engineer in the GRASP lab. He received his Bachelor degree from Drexel University in 1981 and a Master degree from Stanford in 1986. He enrolled at Penn after a 20+ year career in heli- copter flight controls and handling qualities with the Boeing Company. Over the years, he has supported
and emotions people are really sending with their body language. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.Helweg-Larsen, M., Cunningham, S. J., Carrico, A., & Pergram, A. M. (2004). To nod or not to nod: an observational study of nonverbal communication and status in female and male college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 358-361.Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (1992). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Leathers, D. G. (1992). Successful nonverbal communication : principles and applications (2nd ed ed.). New YorkMacmillan.Matsumoto, D. (2006). Culture and nonverbal behavior. In V. L. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The
design and implementation diverged from their initial plans.While students do not necessarily, and are not expected to, master formal software engineeringtechniques and methodologies, they gain valuable skills in addition to a significant team-basedproject experience. Through their work on requirements and design definitions, students gainexperience with carefully identifying and documenting the features their system must exhibitbefore beginning their implementation, which is likely the first time in their careers as computerscience students that they are required to do so. Through the elaboration of their team’smanagement plan, students are forced to consider their own personal strengths and weaknessesas developers in order to reach effective
AC 2011-1786: WORKING TOWARDS THE STUDENT SCRUM - DEVEL-OPING AGILE ANDROID APPLICATIONSThomas Reichlmayr, Rochester Institute of Technology I am an Associate Professor in the Department of Software Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Prior to transitioning to my academic career, I worked as a software engineer in the process automation industry in a variety of roles over a span of twenty five years. My teaching and research interests include the development of undergraduate software engineering curriculum, especially at the introductory level. Of primary interest is the study of software development process and its application to course curriculum and student team projects
graduates ill-prepared forthe professional career [8]. An instructional media that is more effective and engaging must needfor students’ learning complex engineering concepts. It has been proven that learning through amedium that combines course materials with interactive visualization can be powerful tool forengineering education.It has been found through NSF funded projects that students learn the best when (i) presentedwith organized information that relates in some way to their own experiences, and (ii) they aregiven the opportunity to test themselves on their own understanding and to work to develop theirunderstanding with other students [9]. High school or undergraduate students in the 21st centurygrow up in an era where interactive role
project team was involved in the study of the AFM and the techniquesinvolved in AFM analysis through participation in training events, webinars, review of technicalapplication notes and other workshops sponsored by AFM manufacturers and others anddemonstrations of various systems at local and regional colleges. These activities included visitsto the Penn State Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge 11 (NACK) Center,College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering at SUNY Albany State University 12, SyracuseUniversity 13 and other facilities, visits from AFM vendors, and discussions with faculty from Page 22.1668.4other universities and
workforce. Currently, he investigates the effect of a novel program to increase the retention of first-year undergraduate students enrolled in an engineering college. The program also aims at increas- ing engineering student success, enhancing the sense of community and belonging by the students, and improving the transfer of knowledge in the engineering disciplines. In order to succeed in his research endeavors, Dr. Grau frequently collaborates with social scientists and educators. Prior to his academic career, he worked for more than seven years both leading an engineering department and managing com- plex industrial projects in South and Central America, and Europe. He is a registered Industrial Engineer in Spain and
2006 he was tenured and promoted to the rank of Associate Professor. Mike gained 10 years of industrial and academic research lab experience at 3M, FMC, and the University of Minnesota prior to embarking on an academic career at Rochester Institute of Technology (3 years) and Minnesota State University, Mankato (2 years). Mike holds a Bachelor of Mathematics from the University of Minnesota (with distinction), an MS in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. He is also a member of ASME, SIAM, and ASEE. Page 22.1046.1
before taking the course.This provides immediate feedback on the success of the course in meeting its objectives. Toassess the long-term impact of the course, information will be derived from several sources. Forundergraduate participants, information from senior exit interviews can be used. Additional datawill be collected on the career choices of students who have taken the proposed course and theiroverall employment rates.SummaryThe new transdisciplinary program based on the biomedical instrumentation laboratory to bedeveloped is described in this paper. The main participants in this development are the School ofTechnology and Professional Studies, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and HealthSystems, and the College of Nursing and
AC 2011-1893: USE OF HIPELE APPROACH IN A SPLIT-LEVEL CHEM-ICAL ENGINEERING ELECTIVE COURSEAdrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Technological University in 1998. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedi- cal microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER award; her group has published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Lab on a Chip, and had an AIChE
use of impromptudesign exercises across the engineering curriculum. The paper concludes by describing a pilotstudy on impromptu design exercises being conducted by the authors.1. Mind the gapThe call for more design experience in engineering curricula draws attention to a problem indesign education that engineering educators have noted for quite some time. Traditionalengineering programs lack curricular coherence when it comes to design. Students typicallyhave design experiences during introductory coursework (or “cornerstone” courses2) as freshmenand then again later as seniors during capstone projects or seminars. Thus, design experiencescomprise disjointed bookends in students‟ college careers. Their sophomore and junior years aredevoted