evaluatewhether students’ collaboration with generative AI tools reflects their proficiency in the technicaldomain and provide further insights into how to best prepare students for the rapidly evolvingworkplace.Lastly, it is important to acknowledge the concerns and risks associated with using generative AI,which were a limitation in this study. Some issues were taken into consideration; for example,students were expected to critically examine the responses and refine them based on keyprinciples and concepts of the technical field to eliminate any inaccuracies or oversights.However, other aspects, such as ethical use, bias, and data privacy, were beyond the scope of thispaper. These elements should also be addressed as part of student training on
required to ensure ethical data collection, storage, andprocessing. Mishandling user data can lead to privacy breaches, undermining trust in the system.Adaptability to Evolving Threats − Phishing tactics constantly evolve, making it difficult for static rule-based systems to remain effective. Attackers continuously refine their methods to bypass detection,necessitating a system that can dynamically learn from new threats and adapt in real time. Regular updatesand AI-driven improvements are crucial for maintaining robust phishing detection. These challengeshighlight the need for a more advanced, adaptive approach that integrates multilingual NLP, strong dataprivacy safeguards, and continuous learning mechanisms to effectively combat phishing
defense contractor to develop advanced ceramic materials, radar, and novel electronic fabrication methods applied to the development of guided munitions, electro-optic imaging systems, and medical devices. At GVSU he created and maintains electronic prototyping courses and co-created the School of Engineering’s professional ethics curriculum. Karl received his Ph.D. in Applied Electromagnetics from the University of Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Tuition Equity: Adverse effects of tuition policy on engineering studentsAbstractWhile there has been much research addressing the equity of college access, the equity of tuitionand fees have been less studied. Despite efforts
through leadership training, ethical grounding, and exposure toarts and culture, ensuring our graduates are well-rounded innovators and leaders. As a work inprogress, the authors will continue efforts to conduct an effective assessment of studentoutcomes, incorporating more quantitative data, such as the number of students participating infield trips, coursework, and senior design projects. Additionally, interviews with former studentsregarding their internships and involvement will be included. A change model applicable toLeTourneau University’s business model will also be introduced and implemented. Invitation for Future CollaborationThe authors propose three key aspects for companies and educational institutions
university-based and consulting efforts have led to over $40M in funding for projects to support initiatives in STEM and changes to policies and practices of global engineering organizations. Pearson is a registered Professional Engineer, an ENVISION® Sustainability Professional, and a Commissioner on ABET’s Engineering Accreditation Commission. Among her awards and honors are ABET’s Claire L. Felbinger Award for Diversity and Inclusion, ASCE’s Professional Practice Ethics and Leadership Award, the Society of Women Engineers’ Distinguished Engineering Educator Award, the UT System Regents Outstanding Teaching Award, and ASCE’s President’s Medal, one of the highest honors awarded in this global organization of over
education. Her main research interests include Improving engineering students’ learning, innovative ways of teaching and learning, and how artificial intelligence can be used in education in a creative and ethical way.Ms. Amanda Kate Lacy Amanda Lacy is a PhD student at Texas A&M University in the department of Computer Science and Engineering. Her interests are broad, with an emphasis on applying computing to promote access to information and spaces, both virtual and physical. She holGene Sung-Ho Kim, Stanford UniversityDr. Gibin Raju, Texas A&M University Gibin Raju is a Postdoctoral Researcher at Texas A&M University in the Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering
helpful for the new assessmentprocess piloted for UPSILON and to accommodate the scheduling and constraints of the directorand staff to accommodate changes in the program schedule.Considerations for Focus GroupsWhen planning and conducting the focus groups, several key considerations were addressed toensure a supportive and productive environment. We reviewed relevant literature on focus groupmethodologies and consulted with facilitators who had experience working with similaraudiences [20], [21]. The protocol used for the focus groups is available upon request.Given the age of the participants and the sensitive nature of discussing gender and racial issues,certain ethical considerations were paramount. It was important to create an environment
SkillsIntroduction:Global healthcare immersion is challenging for undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME)students due to travel, costs, and logistics. Yet ABET now requires that undergraduates developthe “ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations andmake informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” Experiences abroad expose students to diverseclinical settings, constraints, and cultural perspectives, boosting problem-solving skills forequitable healthcare solutions. However, many programs rely on short-term extracurriculars,internships, or small capstone cohorts, making large-scale foreign immersion infeasible. Tosupport
Foundation General Chemistry I (CHEM 105), Physics (PHYS 220, 221) Engineering Core Introduction to Engineering Design (ENGR 190), Thermodynamics (ENGR 200), Statics (ENGR 260), Dynamics (ENGR 261), Electrical Circuits I (ENGR 251) General Education 30 credits including English Composition, Public Speaking, and Ethics Implementations Features Category Details Junior Status Guarantee Students receive junior status upon
over time. Also, a comparison between construction and relevant programs (e.g.,architecture, civil engineering, etc.) may highlight similarities and differences. The findingsdiscussed in this paper provide valuable insights for construction education programs andindustry stakeholders. By addressing gender-specific factors in recruitment, retention, andsupport strategies, programs can work towards creating a more diverse and inclusive learningenvironment and, ultimately, a more balanced workforce in the construction industry.References[1] T.-D. T. Nguyen, "Gender Gap in College Enrollment," Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics, pp. 955-957, 2023.[2] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya and L. Jiang, "Why are some STEM fields
struggles with subjective elements suchas creativity, critical thinking, and originality [6]. These limitations raise concerns about thefairness and reliability of AI in grading assignments requiring higher-order cognitive skills.Bias is another critical issue in AI grading. Since AI models are trained on existing data, theymay inadvertently replicate biases in the training datasets [4]. For instance, studies havereported disparities in grading outcomes for non-native English speakers and minority groups,raising ethical questions about the use of AI in academic assessment [11].2.4. Comparing AI and Human GradingComparative studies between AI-assisted and human grading have yielded mixed results.While some studies report high levels of agreement
project was successfully conducted remotelyinvolving parties in different countries.Semi-Structured InterviewTo further investigate group dynamics and challenges in IBL project teams, a semi-structuredinterview was conducted with existing IBL students about their projects. This survey wasreviewed and approved by the university’s Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol number0006441). This study adheres to the ethical standards required for research involving humansubjects. This online interview lasted approximately 30 minutes, involved volunteer participantsfrom the IBL program. It consisted of ten (10) open-ended questions focused on the team projectexperience, based on a validated Self-Efficacy Survey [11]. The questions are listed in Figure 4
also important for students to springboard from theclassrooms and do engineering by engaging in real-world problems in the local community andworking with community members.Among the body of work around students engineering for real community needs, engineeringeducation researchers study community engagement and provide examples of programs whereengineering students did engineering work for communities [5], [6], [7]. These studies identifiedcompetencies that are important for engineering students to engage ethically with communities,such as being willing to listen to the communities, and transforming their assumptions andattitudes towards the communities. Moving forward, more research needs to be done on how tofacilitate students to develop
responsibility assessment (GPRA). Online Ethics Center for Engineering. Retrieved from https://www …, 2019.[14] “Mission Statement.” Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.slu.edu/about/catholic-jesuit-identity/mission.php[15] N. C. Zaferatos, “Environmental Justice in Indian Country: Dumpsite Remediation on the Swinomish Indian Reservation,” Environmental Management, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 896–909, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0103-0.[16] J. T. Boer, M. Pastor, J. L. Sadd, and L. D. Snyder, “Is There Environmental Racism? The Demographics of Hazardous Waste in Los Angeles County,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 793–810, 1997.[17] H. M. Lane, R. Morello-Frosch, J. D. Marshall, and J. S. Apte
and experiences in writing; 3) We aim for you to become familiar with the types of infrastructure, design considerations, ethical considerations, and social, environmental, and cost constraints commonly encountered in CEE and learn how CEE engineers create value for society through their work; 4) We aim for you to develop the ability to think critically about CEE-style problems, drawing on experience you will gain by actively thinking through and observing challenges; 5) We sim got this class to build your curiosity for the profession, such that you will know where to go for more information and will have a better sense of the kinds of classes you might be interested in, the kinds of jobs you will be able
). Scott admires the ways Lewes insists “the mind bestudied not only as an individual but as a unit in the social organism” (p. 11) and the fact thatLewes looks at “literature successively from three points of view, the intellectual, the ethical, andthe aesthetic” (p. 13). In “literature in the true sense,” all three must be addressed simultaneouslyand in relation to each other (p. 13). Scott sees in Lewes’ work an approach to literary criticism. ..based on “the eternal principles of the human mind” (p. 15). Once these principles have been 7articulated, they provide a rational basis for both instruction and assessing the effectiveness
enhanced educational experience.Beyond technical objectives, this project aimed to provide a rich educational experience. Forengineering students, it offered opportunities to apply theory to an integrated system combiningCAD modeling, prototyping, and environmental control. Biology students engaged in appliedplant science, pest control, and light optimization. The hands-on nature of the work fostered softskills such as collaboration, adaptability, and creative problem-solving. This project aligns withconstructivist and experiential learning theories, as students learned through doing, reflection,and peer feedback.Applicable StandardsThe project adheres to the NSPE Code of Ethics, emphasizing safety, health, and welfare of thepublic. To address
(2019).12. Millman, K. J. & Aivazis, M. Python for scientists and engineers. Computing in Science and Engineering vol. 13 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.36 (2011).13. Goktas, P., Karakaya, G., Kalyoncu, A. F. & Damadoglu, E. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Allergy and Immunology Practice: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 11, (2023).14. Ray, P. P. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber- Physical Systems vol. 3 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 (2023).
topics such asgeography and natural resources, African history, culture, science, inventions and innovations. Thecybersecurity and AI/ML test covered a range of topics, including Integrity, Cyber Ethics, Cryptography,Online Safety, and Artificial Intelligence. These content areas were assessed through the use of multiplechoice question prompts on both tests. Data were analyzed using SPSS to compute descriptive statisticssuch as percentages. To assess changes on the summative knowledge tests, paired (repeated-measures)t-tests were computed to see if there were statistically significant differences between average participantscores before (pre) and after (post) the UACI STEM camp program. For the participants whose pre- and post-summative
discussions the students could test each other’sunderstanding of the course content, through the group debate the students could developawareness regarding their social and ethical responsibilities as engineers. Through the debates, thestudents learned to consider the pros and cons of controversial topics like gene editing, human-animal chimera, brain organoids, and so on, and got the opportunity to learn how to be respectfulto those with different perspectives. Before beginning the group activities, the students submitteda teamwork contract. The students read online articles and watched a YouTube video on effectiveteamwork before filling out the contract, where they discussed their individual roles in the team,preferred methods of communication
, students take a practicum exam where Python serves as a vital componentof the assessment. While generative AI tools are not required or explicitly taught for the Pythonprogramming assignments, students are encouraged to use them for validation, debugging, andimproving code efficiency. Students also engage in a dedicated ethics assignment to explore theethical considerations surrounding the use of generative AI in power systems analysis anddesign.To measure the perceived effectiveness of these hands-on Python exercises, the course includes anindirect assessment in the form of midterm and end-of-term surveys, gathering feedback on thestudents’ learning experiences.A vital feature of this approach is the coupling of Python with PowerWorld, a widely
these skills, they have yet tofully adopt or integrate them into their professional practice. In addition, the lack of specific,actionable plans for skill acquisition reflects a gap between awareness and action. While studentsacknowledged the need for continuous improvement in ICC, they did not consistently providedetailed strategies for how they would develop these competencies further. This is particularlyimportant in engineering, where the ability to engage effectively with diverse perspectives isessential for designing solutions that are culturally relevant and ethically sound.Providing students with more guidance on creating actionable development plans could helpbridge this gap and ensure that they are well-prepared to apply ICC skills in
Institutional Review Board (IRB) and deemed exemptunder educational research guidelines. Ethical considerations, including informed consent andvoluntary participation, were followed to protect student confidentiality and ensure compliancewith institutional policies.ImplementationCHE CALCULATOR®’s application is best illustrated through specific examples of its use inchemical engineering courses. In the Thermodynamics course, students used the tool to calculatevapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) properties for multicomponent systems. It is an innovative, Excel-based computational tool designed to streamline the process of determining thermodynamicproperties. It eliminates the need for students to conduct extensive searches across multiplewebsites or
discuss real-world examplesof the different power generation technologies. For the renewable half of the class, there weretwo guest speakers. The first guest speaker came in to talk to the class about the levelized cost ofelectricity and the social, political, and ethical impacts that come from variations in the cost ofelectricity and power consumption. The presentation focused on hospitals and health care andhow they are affected by these variations, especially with and without backup power systems.The second guest speaker was an engineer for a battery recycling company. Their presentationfocused on the ways that batteries are recycled and what can be done with the recoveredmaterials. Part of the presentation included information about utilizing
collaboration for successful project delivery [10]. They also have to balancemeeting technical requirements with considerations of ethical and social responsibilities. Inaddition, new technologies such as smart materials, artificial intelligence (AI), and data analyticspresent new opportunities for civil engineers to add greater value to the built environment. Thesetools, technologies, and techniques allow the management of projects to be more efficient, whilethe stakeholders can also collaborate and make decisions more effectively [10]. Civil engineersneed to work out optimal designs that minimize waste and ensure better performance ofinfrastructure [11]. As the industry continues to evolve, it becomes requisite that civil engineersadopt these
economical, environmental, and on developing interfaces; prototyping and ethical aspects of a proposed design. Main topics include: design for manufacturing. An idea of patents detailed design of a mechanical systems, modeling and and intellectual property, and economics of simulation in design, materials selection and materials in design, product design will be discussed. reliability/safety, economic decision making, and communicating the design and applications. Figure-1 Course descriptions of two of the design-stream coursesA typical set of activities involved in the engineering design process is shown in Fig-2. Design is
adoptstandards conservatively, mandating multiple levels of basic science, engineering sciences,technical mechanical courses, lab experiences, plus humanities, social sciences, and professionaland ethical responsibility requirements. The outcome is often a double-layered curriculum thatcan be difficult to streamline.By contrast, CS tends to be more flexible, as the CC/Course value indicates. Accreditationframeworks for computing, while existent, are generally less prescriptive and less universallyadopted as it is often considered optional [24]. These differences may explain why many of thetop-tier CS programs in the United States are not accredited [24]. Accreditation can addstructural complexity; for instance, one study found that students in
isimplemented to teach the human skeletal anatomy. Thus, visualization and interaction of abstractscientific concepts are carried out. In this paper, an interactive learning tool that complements thelessons of the school syllabus is presented. It is an outcome of a research collaboration betweenthe University of Sheffield, England and Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, and it has beenimplemented in different environments in England, which contributes to being evaluated fromdifferent perspectives [10]. The research work uses AR technology to further users’ learningexperience. Additionally, responsible and ethical applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) areperformed.Literature ReviewQuality EducationBased on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of
sectionfocuses on the quantitative analysis of the data. Section 4 contains the qualitative results heavily 2relying on the video recorded interviews. The last part of our work focuses on the conclusions andpossible future work that can be undertaken by other educators and researchers.2. Research MethodologyThis study was conducted at a public university in the Northeastern United States by a PrincipalInvestigator (P.I.) and a team of five research assistants. The research was approved by theInstitutional Review Board (IRB) to ensure that human rights and ethics are applied properly. Asurvey and follow-up interviews were conducted with the participants
thesupport provided by an expert to learners, continuing their engagement in learning activitiesbeyond their current abilities; for example, to help students solve a problem and justify anunfamiliar method [19], [20]. Here, scaffolding support will be provided by an AI agent. However,our goal is to explore how researchers have delineated students' problem space in a way that stillallows creativity and agency. We want AI agents to respect the complexities of the problem whilesupporting it, motivating students to be interactive.Previous systematic reviews of design thinking and AI have focused on other issues. For instance,[22] considered justice, bias and ethics embodying AI in the design process, with a focus onbusiness design. Chen et al. [28