universities will necessarily have different challenges than small private colleges.Whether large or small, public or private, elite or more mainstream, each type of institution canbring something to the discussion. Therefore, when planning panel discussions andpresentations, care should be taken to include representatives from a range of institutions. Page 13.977.9Finally, much of the best engagement in a dialogue-focused workshop occurs outside of theorganized sessions; it occurs at meals, informally in the hallways, and when milling aroundbetween sessions. Thus, such a workshop should leave plenty of time for the participants to talkwith each other
the sophomore design course, studentsurveys, and student anecdotal evidence for making changes to the course content. As we moveforward with our assessment plan, an increase emphasis will be placed on how the sequence ofdesign courses meet each of the programs expected outcomes related to student mastery ofdesign. In addition to continuing the instructor’s self assessment of the sophomore designcourse, we will be surveying the capstone senior design project technical mentors on thestudents’ preparation on applying the design methodology at the beginning of their capstoneproject. (Technical mentors are either practicing engineers or faculty members depending uponthe engineering program.) This feedback will then be incorporated into the
inputs and boundary conditions1, 2. A virtualfacility can have two purposes: a) to facilitate the feasibility study of an engineering systemwhile in the planning stage, and based on the study, designers can adjust the parameters duringtheir final planning so the anticipated system can serve its purpose and b) to study the behaviorand control of a complex engineering system for educational and research purposes withoutbuilding the system. The development of these virtual facilities can involve expertise withcomplex mathematical solutions with tedious software developments and effective graphical userinterface 3. Considering the level of involvement, sometimes it is difficult for an individualinstitution to develop and maintain such
Programming (pgs. 72-82)06/04/2007 (MONDAY)Log Hours (3.0HR)12:30-1:30pmCompiled possible conference listEmailed Frank (co-Author) conference list1:30-3:30pmReviewed Overall Modeling Approach for Software Toolbox Page 13.1173.20Appendix E: 2007 Pre-Program Survey Summer Undergraduate Research in Engineering/Science (SURE) Selected Findings Pre – Program SurveyAt this point in your academic career, which one statement best describes your thoughtsabout attending graduate school?I plan to attend graduate school in the next year or twoI probably will attend graduate school, but not 100% sureI have not made any decisions about graduate schoolI probably will not attend
would beexpected.ComplicationsDistance Of course distance creates problems with scheduling and interactivity. Videoconferencing provided an affordable alternative to a plane ticket. Face-to-face instructionengages students with the material more effectively than watching a TV screen. Ideally, aComposition instructor would provide guidance, while the Engineering instructor deliversthe instruction. Receiving the information from the engineering instructor reinforces thepractical application of these discipline specific lessons.Timing & Planning In the first semesters, the authors taught these lessons as their ideas developed,neglecting a global view of the semester and the course goals, so the writing instructionseemed more like
Laboratory Improvement grant allowed us to extend the curriculum to all 280 freshman engineering students taking ENGR 120 in the fall of 2007. Approximately 400 freshman students have enrolled in the course sequences based on the Living with the Lab curriculum during the current 2007-2008 academic year. During efforts to develop a formal assessment plan to determine the effectiveness of the new courses, we realized that we needed a set of guideposts to help us determine if our strategies were effective not only in teaching students, but also in preparing them for their engineering careers. We realized that the work sponsored by the National Academy of Engineering to identify attributes of “The Engineer of 2020”17 aligned closely with our efforts
Research Council; and ‚ A National Action Plan for Addressing the Critical Needs of the U.S. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education System from the National Science Board. The three reports describe an extensive set of characteristics of "high-quality teaching."When they are viewed through the lens of exemplary teacher preparation and focused within anintegrated system of professional development, an enormous potential for empowering teachersand improving instruction is apparent. The positive effect of better teaching is unequivocal; indeed, the most consistent andpowerful predictors of student achievement in mathematics and science are teachers with fullteaching certification and a college
confirmed this. The pilot test replicated all aspects of the lecture and lab planned forweek one of the full course. Data were collected by means of two separate online surveys; onepertaining to the online lecture portion of the training and the other to the traditional lab portionof the training. Both surveys addressed the delivery of the blended-learning course, specificallythe format and technologies used. The goal was to assess whether or not the course could beeffectively taught using the established delivery mechanisms. The lecture survey consisted of sixLikert-style responses and five open-ended questions. Participants were asked to supply theiropinions on areas such as: audio and video quality, ability to follow along, performance of
Modesto, CA; responsible for materials management and process controls. On campus, she serves as president for the student chapter of the American Society for Engineering Management, and as treasurer for the Society of Women Engineers and Tau Beta Pi. She is also a student advisor for the University and enjoys coaching youth volleyball. She will graduate with a B.S. in 2009 and plans to attend graduate school for a M.S. in Engineering Management.Cherian Mathews, University of the Pacific Cherian P. Mathews is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of the Pacific. He received a B.E degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Anna University
is the Director of the First Year Engineering program in the Faculty of Engineering at McMaster University, Hamilton, ON. Her responsibilities include supervising staff and instructors in the ENG1 Program, curriculum development, and planning and implementing programs to enhance retention. She is also a Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and is a registered professional engineer in the State of Michigan. She has her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from Harvard University and is co-author of the textbook, Principles of Environmental Engineering and Science (McGraw-Hill). Page
the results when applyingthis approach to a senior-level software course. We plan to assess the learning experienceof the students and compare the results with the two hardware courses many studentshave taken earlier.IntroductionSince the 1990s, streaming videos through the Internet has become widely adopted forentertainment as well as education. Today’s college students are familiar with thistechnology. Our institution started podcasting in several classes in August 2005, butmany universities have not exploited using streaming videos to enhance learningexperience. One objection is the belief that learning should be interactive among studentsand instructors.A few Purdue University Electrical and Computer Engineering faculty members1 startedan
thatallow for engineering service learning programs to expand into schools outside of the metroAtlanta area. Plans have also been developed for an engineering design competition thatincludes ethical elements aimed at the high school/middle school audiences. Details of theprograms mentioned as well as lessons learned and a study of the impact on participatingstudents is presented in the following sections.BackgroundSTEP Program/Georgia TechThe Student and Teacher Enhancement Partnership (STEP) Program started in 2001 and partnersadvanced Georgia Tech undergraduate and graduate students with metro-Atlanta area highschools in teams that are led by master teacher-coordinators. The program seeks to improve theteaching-related communication and
’ disposition, so-called meta influencesand various extra-curricular elements. The cluster of learning environment for examplecontained a category for communication and as a subordinate category for the communicationbetween the students and their teachers (Figure 1).Similarly, the work situations were grouped in clusters of categories of accounts where thestudents described ways in which their work impacted on their social life, various practicalitiesof the industrial context, instances of collaboration in the workplace, aspects of planning, typesof technical work, and issues concerned with responsibilities and regulations. Each cluster againcontained categories and subcategories, for example, to classify collaboration with various typesof counterparts
havingthem read the same Web pages from differing perspectives which promotes positiveinterdependence. If the 21st century goal is to prepare students for a real world collaborativework environment that includes the use of various assisting technologies then a WebQuest is atool that can be used to achieve that goal.A WebQuest embraces the constructivist's approach to teaching by allowing the teacher to serveas a coach while working with individuals or small groups. If the teacher has created a wellthought out WebQuest or chosen one planned by someone else, they will experience first hand areal life learning experience. Cooperative learning strategies are then applied to necessitate eachstudent's input. By running several WebQuest groups in the same
to the instructional lab was identified. This room hadpreviously been used as an autoclave room. It was in substantial disrepair, containing three non-functional autoclaves, an old chest freezer, rotting cabinetry, and significant amounts of asbestos.As we designed the renovation of this space for installation of the autoclave, we observed thatthere was no reagent grade water (18 MOhm) on this floor of the Science Center, requiringteaching assistants to transport 50-liter jugs of water from other floors. Plans were made toinstall a water purification system and a glassware washer to reduce the work load of theteaching assistants. The schematic for the complete room is shown in Figure 2. The totalrenovation costs including the autoclave
natural product of the learning process, and one of themost commonly used cognitive strategies to promote students’ thinking21, 22. A question reflectsthe level of thought entailed to answer it and therefore they can be ranked23. Questioning iseffective in facilitating thinking21. Various studies showed that questions were effective foreliciting metacognition in terms of planning and reflection in web-based learningenvironments24, and that questions were effective in fostering ill-structured problem solving Page 13.622.4processes20, 25. Additionally, problem solving is influenced by various factors including cognitive andmetacognitive
, we believe the knowledge andskills that learners acquire in this curriculum will be more readily transferable to theworkplace. However, as the curriculum is currently in a very early phase of deployment,these beliefs have yet to be supported by any data. At present, an evaluation plan is beingimplemented and initial formative evaluation data are being collected. The findings fromthese data will be reported in future publications.ReferencesAnderson JR, Reder LM, Simon HA. Situated Learning and Education. Educational Researcher 25: 5-11; 1996.Bareiss R, Osgood R. Applying AI models to the design of exploratory hypermedia systems; Seattle, WA; 1993: p 94-105.Barnett SM, Ceci SJ. When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy
varioussystem objectives, the student teams identify a preferred solution to be implemented. Sensitivity analysisis performed to determine the effect on solution ranking of variation in either the decision-maker’srelative priority assigned to functional objectives or in the estimated system performance of designs onkey evaluation criteria. The recommended solution design, lifecycle cost estimates and the results ofsensitivity analysis are then presented to the client for an implementation decision.In Phase 4 of the SEMP, the client’s chosen solution would be implemented. This is generally beyond thescope of course activity. However, student teams are required to draft an implementation plan thatidentifies appropriate outcome monitoring approaches to
varioussystem objectives, the student teams identify a preferred solution to be implemented. Sensitivity analysisis performed to determine the effect on solution ranking of variation in either the decision-maker’srelative priority assigned to functional objectives or in the estimated system performance of designs onkey evaluation criteria. The recommended solution design, lifecycle cost estimates and the results ofsensitivity analysis are then presented to the client for an implementation decision.In Phase 4 of the SEMP, the client’s chosen solution would be implemented. This is generally beyond thescope of course activity. However, student teams are required to draft an implementation plan thatidentifies appropriate outcome monitoring approaches to
. Morerigorous evaluations are completed mid-year and year-end to gather qualitative data and solicitsuggestions for future programs. To further foster the networking mentoring among theparticipants, the GMP leadership team (LT) also plans social activities outside the academicsetting, sends monthly newsletters, and continually updates the GMP website. To provide moreopportunities for the participants to engage in networking mentoring, two new components wereadded to the GMP in Fall 2007; Monday Munchies and Mentoring Groups. “Monday Munchies”is a weekly event held to encourage students to take a break from their busy schedules andsocialize with other GMP members. The Mentoring Groups are department-based and encourageparticipants to meet with the other
focused on details and quality. They plan ahead, constantly check for accuracy, and what to know "how" and "why".Once people conduct the DISC tests with several survey questions, they can get theirpoints in each dimension, which is called DISC profile. Based on the DISC profile, Page 13.1221.3people can be grouped in one or two personality dimensions.3. Material Engineering term projects and team assignmentThe mechanical engineering program at WSU Vancouver offers a 3-credit materialscourse, which is named ‘Mech 309, Introduction to Engineering Materials’ which dealswith material structure, phase equilibrium, phase transformations, and
13.1166.5one we developed for this purpose. More labs related to DC/AC circuit, control, DSP, datacommunication and so on will be developed. This plan will provide us lot of project ideas.The Final ProjectThe final project is to build a resistor calculator with Java GUI and Applet. The project tasks arelisted as follow: 1. Use Java applet to develop a GUI that is similar to the reference webpage17. 2. Display the resistor image. 3. Make the color band change when selecting the different colors in the Como Boxes. 4. Make the webpage have two modes: learning mode and quiz mode. If the user selects the learning mode, the webpage function is similar to the reference webpage. When the user picks the quiz mode, the computer
gathered for all the tools used in the process plan for the target parts.During the evaluation phase, several programming pitfalls were found. These included severalpoorly designed toolpaths, poor contour surface finishes and cutting parameters that did notutilize the full capability of the machine. In the redesign step, the information gathered from theprocess analysis, as well as the machine cutting baseline tables, a new manufacturing processplan and “draft” CNC program were generated. For example, optimizing the face-millingoperation by increasing the depth of cut while maintaining a high federate, increasing the peakspindle load to over 140% (projected), provided a significant gain. This change reduced the sub-operation time to about five
creativity, implementation,features and ease of use. Student peers found the tools attractive and engaging as well.Since the perspectives of students are directly embedded in the development process thetools reflect varied learning styles that resonate well with the students. Since the toolswere created by the students for their peers there should be no need for significant timeinvestment in learning how to use the courseware, and to take advantage of the benefitthey offer. Another set of quantitative assessment is planned for the next class of 30students this spring that would have no prior exposure to the learning tools before thecourse.VII. CONCLUSIONSFour interactive learning tools presented in this paper were developed by studentsenrolled in an
affect the learning ofthose individuals?MethodologyResearch questions, indicated above, require a comprehensive multi-method data collection. Thedata collection and related results will be presented in a series of publications. This paper is thefirst in the series. Below first we summarize plans for data collection and related instruments forthe comprehensive study. Then, we provide details on the completed pilot study.Overall, students will be asked, through surveys and focus groups, what type of technologicalcommunication, if any, they currently use to complete group work, if they have had anyexperience with remote group work, and their perceptions on incorporating group work throughtechnology into the engineering curriculum. These data will
the next 15 years[1]. It is necessary that science and technology graduates develop a good understandingof this rapidly expanding technology. They should be able to integrate the key conceptsof nanotechnology into their knowledge bases. Academic programs in nanotechnologyshould be interdisciplinary in nature and must include several academic disciplines suchas chemistry, materials, biology, mechanics, and electronics.Realizing the need for providing nanotechnology education and training at theundergraduate level to technicians and technologists, Excelsior College, a well respecteddistance learning institution in higher education, has recently embarked upon a plan todevelop and implement an on-line 4-year nanotechnology degree program
such as geology and chemistry also take MATH 310 even though it is not required Page 13.1157.3for their degree. These students are highly motivated as they plan to pursue a graduate programin their field of study. Therefore, they influence the classroom dynamics in a positive manner asstrong players. Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Computer Engineering
team of juniorsis composed. This means that the only persons who continuously are involved in the FS-projectare the faculty advisor and the supervising experts, Figure 1. To be successful in the very shorttime for planning, engineering, manufacturing, testing and preparing for the contest, the studentsmust develop special knowledge transfer methods. Page 13.1040.3From the kick-off meeting to the winner's rostrumIn the second phase of MS-PBL the students have to use not only a broad spectrum of technicalknowledge and engineering tools, they are also able to apply the trained capabilities andexperiences colleted in the first phase of MS-PBL1,2.The
. Page 13.144.4 Figure 1: Mixed PowerPoint and notes.The hand written and drawn comments were made during the lecture. The polygon withnumerous points was drawn in response to a question about a figure that would cause theclipping algorithm problems (i.e., a pathological case).Figure 2 provides an example of a “panel” that was written completely by hand during thelecture. In this case, there is a mix of drawing and equations (both are relatively simple, butnonetheless demonstrate the capability). This panel was developed over about a five minuteinteractive portion of the lecture, where the lecturer drew the coordinate plan and theslope/intercept line equation and asked the students to draw the resulting line as it
mentoring relationships.Bringing together a large group of female attendees also helped to develop a network of peers,many of whom share similar concerns. The large number of female faculty presenters offered anintroduction to women who had negotiated these issues in their own careers. The participation ofmale faculty expanded the mentoring network and demonstrated broad-based support fordiversifying the academic ranks. Several other institutions have recently hosted workshops withsimilar goals, including the University of Maryland at Baltimore County, Virginia Tech, andGeorge Washington University.The workshop planners did not anticipate the extent to which planning and executing the