Asee peer logo
Displaying results 7801 - 7830 of 9519 in total
Conference Session
Research Methodologies – Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Bahnson, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD), Frontiers in Education (FIE), as well as major psychological con- ferences.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
Paper ID #38301”Better Living through Chemistry?” DuPont & TeflonDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud retired in 2017 as a professor emerita in the Communication Department at Oregon In- stitute of Technology, where she taught classes in writing, speech, rhetoric, and ethics for four decades. She received her BA in 1972 from the University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA, and her graduate degrees from Purdue University: MA in 1974 and PhD in 1980. She became involved in engineering education by joining ASEE in 1983 and is currently active in two divisions: Engineering Ethics and Engineering
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Best Of FPD
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
Program information Connections to peer mentors & supports SJ: Data on belonging in STEM ADEI definitions Identity & Examples of equity in STEM Bias & Prejudice Belonging How identity pertains to engineering Social Identity Wheel (case studies) Story Sharing ENGR: Engineering design process Socially just mindset & contexts How Engineers Role of failure in design Social impact of product/design Make Decisions
Conference Session
Self-Regulation and Learning
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
twentieth centuries. The creation of MIT'sUndergraduate Research Opportunities Program in 1969 encouraged an explosion in popularitysuch that Undergraduate Research Programs (URPs) became fairly common globally by the1990s.Developing and maintaining URPs benefit students, faculty mentors, and the university equally.Incorporating a research component along with a sound academic foundation enables students togain research and professional experience, work on real-world applications, develop oral andwritten communication skills as well as better relationships with faculty and peers [1]. Accordingto Thiry et al. [2], "Through coursework and out-of-class experiences, students describedlearning to work and think independently, to take responsibility for
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 9: Online Learning Environments
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tara Esfahani; David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
efficacy, COVID-19hindered many students’ ability to allocate time for studying and well-being in the same mannerthey had prior to the pandemic, partially due to the way it “distorted [their] flow of time” [4].Students recorded the effects of this alteration in time diaries, writing that “the effort put intoclass feels more intensive yet yields much worse results”, and even when they could completetheir work, “it takes much longer” [2]. These responses suggest that students are no longer gettingthe expected returns from their time spent studying. In [5], a modified version of the TimeManagement Behavior scale [3] was used to evaluate the time management behaviors ofundergraduate electrical and computer engineering students prior to the pandemic
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Alexander Pagano, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
technical writing Written Design Teamwork
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering Division (IND)
transformation: the theory Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) from Feuerstein[23][26] and Maturana’s understanding of learning as a space of transformation for both thelearner and the teacher [27] [28].Mediated Learning Experience. Feuerstein defines the role of the mediator (or agent) asfundamental to promoting cognitive changes in a student. A teacher, a parent, or anadvantaged peer can fulfill this role, depending on the objective of transformation. Themediator must have maturity, experience, and the ability to organize, reorder, group, andstructure the stimuli or information the student receives based on a specific task or goal [26].This means that the agent mediates between the world and the student (subject), transformingthe stimuli the student
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering Division (WIED)
aid in the formation of peer-to-peer relationships[3] through a shared identity as a “maker”.Makerspaces are unique learning environments that center around the act of “making,” a broad term thatincludes almost all forms of creative manufacture such as sewing, woodworking, mechatronics, etc.Communities of practice form within these spaces as the collaborative use of machines and technologiespromote the sharing of ideas, knowledge, and experience[4] and a shared identity as a maker. Hilton[5]found that participation in university Makerspaces led to an increase in engineering design self-efficacyamongst undergraduate engineering students. Tomko[2] demonstrated that engagement in Makerspacesincreased engineering students’ motivation and
Conference Session
ERM: Systematic Reviews!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ethan Geheb, University of Maine; Asli Sezen-Barrie, University of Maine; Karissa Tilbury
, K-12 Education, and Student Learning. For example, #8 in the journalranking list was “Journal of Second Language Writing”, in which one could assume the journalhas to do with english-as-a-second-language (ESL) or english-language-learner (ELL) topicsareas. If the journal title was ambiguous, then we conducted a more thorough investigation of thejournal’s scope or aim from its website, using the inclusion criteria above. During this phase, 140journals were excluded, and 118 journals remained for the next phase of collection andevaluation. The second phase began with a keyword search within each journal database. Werecorded the following information in a spreadsheet: journal ranking, title of journal, number ofarticles, publisher, and
Conference Session
Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jutshi Agarwal, University of Cincinnati; Samieh Askarian, University of Cincinnati; Gregory Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Teri Murphy, University of Cincinnati
universities participated in PFF“clusters” to help graduate students learn about and participate in faculty roles at nearbyinstitutions through seminars, mentoring, workshops, and observations [8], [17]. In their reviewof PFF programs, Diggs et al. [17] listed several distinct types of professional developmentprograms available to graduate students: formal mentoring, formal networking experiences,formal courses, short course/seminar, workshops, reading/writing assignments, teachingpracticum, and research mentoring practicum. Several publications have elaborated on smaller scale initiatives that can be categorizedin the above categories. For example, The Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience(REEFE) founded at Virginia Tech’s Department
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 9 - Design Across the Curriculum
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rubaina Khan, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto
is the development of students' professional identity. To bettersupport students' professional identity development, we must understand what motives, values,and experiences across the curriculum contribute to its construction.This study reports on our recent interactions with instructors, alumni, and students of anEngineering Science program. The data was collected through interviews and focus groups thatallowed us to understand how each group of participants understood the role of engineeringdesign education. The data analysis showed us that to have a nuanced understanding of thepurpose of design courses, we need to ask students to reflect on how they connect their designexperiences to their professional identity through reflective writing
Conference Session
ETD - ET Curriculum and Programs I
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashis Nandy
Orientation• Undergraduate research experience (URE) and internships• Strengthening K12-college pipelineThe student support initiatives of URE and internships, and strengthening K12-college pipelinewere especially very fruitful with our continuous and ongoing efforts with enrollment andretention. This was possible because of the high-level of faculty engagement in writing andsecuring grants that are targeted to enhance program capacity and student learning through varioussupport mechanisms (e.g., NSF S-STEM, NSF IUSE, NSF INCLUDES). Faculty were encouragedto pursue these educational grants and were supported by the institution through grants office andby providing some release time from teaching and other service activities.Targeted Faculty
Conference Session
PCEE Session 9: Virtual Summer Programs
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of Minnesota; Annika Gehl, Oregon State University; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
specifically looking at STEM disciplines. Despite anincrease of students at the center of merging underrepresented identities enrolling inpost-secondary education institutions, their involvement in STEM programming is stilldisproportionate to straight, cis, white, peers [5]. As educators, we often think about the ways in which a student’s educational experience thattakes place many years before a student enters the workforce or a post-secondary institutionimpacts these graduation and employment rates in the STEM fields. The National ScienceFoundation Report on Science and Engineering Indicators (2018) demonstrates that thediscrepancies in STEM fields regarding gender begin before students leave high school. Of the12 Advanced Placement Courses reviewed
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 4 - Global South Engineering
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rodrigo Martinez-Duarte; Sallie Turnbull, Clemson University; Tim Guggisberg, Clemson University; Juan Dobarganes
,and writing / presenting. The faculty was familiar with most students due to instruction ofprevious courses in the program. UG faculty provided pairs of student names which they deemedas complementary, while CU faculty did the same for groups of 3-4 students. These UG + CUgroupings were combined to form teams of 5 or 6 students. The program was held entirelyonline, and the official language was English. The course was a requirement for graduation forall students.The educational content and supporting activities of the course were structured as follows: Theclass was scheduled 5 days per week, for 2 hours per day. Core content to support the designprocess was delivered as “refreshers” on topics students would have practiced in detail during
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 1: Adapting to COVID and other Design Challenges
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Orser, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lorraine Francis, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Sartori; Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Brody Hultman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lauren Linderman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Aaron Massari, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; R Penn, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
challenges with teams.Nonetheless, the teams established before the pivot persisted throughout the semester andprovided students with sounding boards and peer feedback in breakout room sessions. The fearedattrition was minor, with only six students (~3%) dropping the course after the pivot to online.The most significant change was eliminating the team project and introducing two individualprojects. This change was made to avoid possible problems with teamwork in light of the pivot toZoom, such as hampered communication, team members dropping the course, or difficultysharing hardware. For the sections with 3D Printing, the individual projects were based on CADand the design of conditions for 3D Printing using slicing software. For sections
Conference Session
ERM: Engineering Identity: (Identity Part 1)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelsey Scalaro, University of Nevada, Reno; Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno; Derrick Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Ann-Marie Vollstedt, University of Nevada, Reno; Jeffrey Lacombe, University of Nevada, Reno; Mackenzie Parker, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno
deductiveapproach to the data in which the existing theory of performance/competence was used tosupport the analysis [43]. The themes were shared with the second and last author, discussed,and refined until a consensus was reached. The other authors on this project were part of the PIteam, helped with the project's implementation, and contributed to the writing of this paper andthe interpretation of results to change programmatic features.Finally, we developed an individual narrative that illustrates a common path participants tookbetween the themes using the themes generated. This narrative presents an individual accountof identity development and brings chronological order and meaning to the data [46]. We focuson how all major themes manifest separately
Conference Session
ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joyce Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Amanda Griffith
areconsidered to have potential for success in the engineering program, but likely did not haveaccess to adequate preparation in math, chemistry, and/or physics prior to college matriculation. This setting allows us to examine the impact of remedial courses on the progress ofengineering students and their persistence. In particular, we are interested in whether thesestudents continue in engineering, declare their engineering major on time, and graduate in thesame length of time as their non-remediated peers. Research findings will help informengineering programs, university administrators, and other stakeholders regarding the role ofremedial education in engineering and whether it aids students from academically disadvantagedbackgrounds to pursue
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sylvia Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Jennifer Tygret; Jasmine White; Valerie Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Comas Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kinnis Gosha
Increasing Minority Presence within Academia through ContinuousTraining (IMPACT) mentoring program. The IMPACT program paired Black engineeringfaculty with primarily White emeriti faculty for career-focused mentorship, networking, andadvocacy. Mentees were primarily recruited from the Academic and Research LeadershipNetwork, a database of minority STEM faculty; the mentees mainly selected their mentors, butnone held a previous formal relationship, nor were any located at the same institution. Thementoring matches were based on the specified goal of the mentee, such as moving into adepartment chair role or seeking grant-writing support, but not disciplinary or demographicmarkers as is the traditional mentoring match rationale. Expectations were set
Collection
2023 Rocky Mountain Section Conference
Authors
Angela Bielefeldt; Daniel Godrick; Joan Tisdale; Melissa Davis
context. This paper describes a course derived fromthe Wright State model, which has evolved significantly over time. The course includes moderate-intensity active learning, with 1 hour of lecture, a 2-hour studio, and 2-hour lab each week. Dataon student perceptions and performance from the most recent offering of the course in Fall 2022are presented. A large number of students were batch enrolled into the course in summer 2022, butthen subsequently withdrew early. The students who dropped had lower math confidence, lowerself perceptions of science and math ability compared to their peers, and lower STEM identity,compared to students who remained in the course. Among students who earned overall coursegrades of D or F, the majority were taking
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 3 Capstone Design
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chelsea Salinas, Colorado School of Mines; Joel Bach, Colorado School of Mines; Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines
DeliverablesEach step of the design phase requires the completion of a team-based oral or written assignment.Additionally, the course requires individual assignments to fulfill program requirements in writing,peer evaluation and reflection on learning. Team-based assignments contribute 55% of the overallstudent grade, with individual assignments making up the remaining 45%. While assessment has beenidentified before as a challenge for studio models, particularly in assessing individual studentcontributions, each team and individual assignment is graded on a rubric developed for the capstonecourse as a whole, enabling consistent grading across both the traditional capstone students and thestudio students [12] [15, 16]. To ensure that students are
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashish Hingle, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering
addition, students employed an ethical reasoningprocess to create a group consensus with their peers, supporting the overall goal of developing amore situated understanding of ethical decision-making.1. Introduction Engineers leverage a combination of skills, knowledge, and experiences to innovate andcreate technologies across domains. Through a micro-view, these technologies have the potentialto affect change by making processes more efficient or cost-effective. When taking a macroperspective, engineers can alter how society interacts with the world around them. Engineersmay work in a breadth of diverse fields, but ethical responsibility is a primary tenet thatunderlines professional engineering. When the result of engineering decision
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nikhith Kalkunte, University of Texas at Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; Lindsey McGowen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Madiha Qasim, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
themes were identified, the supporting text was then used to develop a deeperunderstanding of participant responses related to those themes. For example, some womenstudents described how their contributions are not always valued in team projects for theirengineering courses. These themes identified (Belonging and Climate, Diversity Imperative, andCOVID-19) through qualitative analysis were helpful in organizing the report and presenting the19 quantitative items in smaller, strategic groupings. The full extent of these groups can be foundin the larger report.Climate Study Report Writing and StructureTaking this mix of quantitative and qualitative data, the next step was to synthesize findings inthe form of a climate survey report to be submitted
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
tina Cartwright, Marshall University; Julie Lynn Snyder-Yuly, Marshall University; Wook-sung Yoo, Marshall University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
conducted on how female and low-income students function in a cooperative,learner-based studio environment and advance understanding of the role different levels ofmentorship (peer, senior members, assistants, and faculty) play in the PWS model and how itimpacts the performance of female members of the cohorts. By working together in a team-basedenvironment, the PWS built strong connections among the PWS scholar cohort. The PWS isdeveloping well-rounded students who are afforded hands-on experiences, and the opportunity towork in multi-disciplinary team environments and gain exposure to real-life projects in computerscience, engineering, and technology. These experiences, combined with professionaldevelopment and mentorship, will enable scholars to
Conference Session
Computer Science Education and AI research
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lily R. Liang, University of the District of Columbia; Briana Lowe Wellman, University of the District of Columbia; Rui Kang, Georgia College & State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
, technical support, and encouragement. • GiggleBot programming workshop. One ExCITE student volunteer demonstrated three GiggleBots [16] to the CS I students. Three CS I students and five ACM/ACM- W members participated. Among these five students, two were freshmen, and three were upperclassmen. The presenter demonstrated how to drive a GiggleBot with a pre-programmed Microbit [17] and then let the participants do the same. The students also plugged markers into the GiggleBots, to let the robots draw lines on the papers on the floor by moving. Then the students were divided into groups to write programs for the robots on the computers in the lab and then download their code to the robots to
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Session: Exploring Learning and Development in Engineering Courses
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Lorna Treffert, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Alexis Gillmore, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Isabel A. Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Chulin Chen, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
criticism include forums where methods, ideas, assumptions, and reasoning can beevaluated and critiqued by the community. In the context of EER teams, these venues could beformal (e.g. an advisory board meeting or peer review process) or informal (e.g. a hallway con-versation or sidebar conversation during a meeting). They might be internal, only including groupmembers, or external to the group. The modes of communication in a venue may be spoken (e.g. ameeting or phone call) or written (e.g. an email or peer review). Additionally, the venue could havevaried degrees of collaboration involved in the critical activities (e.g. a team discussion regardingthe solution to a problem vs a team delegating tasks to be completed). We anticipate that
Conference Session
Statics and Dynamics Topics
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carmen Muller-Karger, Florida International University
/a9WRjsG9SeE).The single short concept video approach is aligned with the new modality of receivinginformation, where students can either watch the video several times or skip it if they alreadyunderstand the topic. The learning glass represents a powerful tool that shows the instructortalking face-to-face writing on a glass board giving the sensation to the students as if they werein the same room (see figure 1), and the Solidwork animation with the problem solutions are avery effective representation of the problem (see figure 2), this later resource has been used onlyfor one term and no assessment on student perception has been done. a) Statics b) Dynamics Figure 1
Conference Session
MASS: Mastery, Assessment and Success of Students
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brad Gregory Davis, United States Military Academy; Kevin Francis McMullen, United States Military Academy; J. Adam Pegues, United States Military Academy at West Point
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
and representative example problems would be a valuable learning tool. In a recentcourse assessment, students highlighted the necessity of frequent assessment: “I felt that my class should have allotted more time to complete individual board problems. We did complete a board problem as a class each lesson, but I felt that I was lost when it came time to complete lessons on my own” “I learned the most during the beam lab when [the instructor] had us go to the boards in groups and went to help each group work through the problems to completion. I learned a lot from my peers that way. Going to board by myself doesn't help at all if I don't know what I'm doing”Students also struggled differentiating
Conference Session
Capstone Design
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jamie Gravell, University of Texas at Dallas; Robert Hart P.E., University of Texas at Dallas; Todd W. Polk, University of Texas at Dallas
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
(FDP) showing their approved final designs to their peers. The FDP is done toprovide students with experience presenting formally to a large audience. It is not intended to bean opportunity for in-depth critical evaluation of designs; however, students are provided withinstructor and peer feedback on the quality and content of their presentation. The next keydeliverable in the second semester is the Acceptance Test Plan. Teams are expected to validatethe performance of their prototype against the project requirements and this is formalized in awritten test plan that is reviewed and approved by the Client.The latter half of the second semester includes the second and third internal design reviews, theProject Readiness Review (PRR) and the
Conference Session
Engineering Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Patricia R. Backer, San Jose State University; Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University; Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
difficulties with online writing tools” [7, p. 3].Computer Science faculty were surveyed in June 2020 by Bizot et al [8]. 450 faculty respondedto the survey which had been distributed to the Computing Research Association (CRA) and theACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) mailing lists. Thefaculty reported that they changed their pedagogical techniques after the move online. Beforemoving online, 250 faculty had used active learning in their classes. After moving online, 34.9%discontinued active learning, 43.4% made minor changes and 21.3% made significant changes.Collaborative projects and labs were also impacted by the move online. Of the 180 faculty whoused collaborative projects, 13.9% discontinued them, 71.7% made
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kai Jun Chew, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., E4S, LLC
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
develop the skills and writing habits to complete doctorate degrees in engineering. Across all of her research avenues, Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 12 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award with her share of funding be ingnearly $2.3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 21 journal publications and more than 70 conference papers. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty, an Outstanding Teacher Award and a Faculty Fellow Award. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University, an M.S. in Materials Science from the University of Connecticut and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Cheryl Carrico