literature in Engineering and other disciplines on team teaching to betterunderstand this andragogical approach. We determined that Davis’ [1] interdisciplinary teamteaching frame and criteria for teaching evaluation provided a collective lens for examining howwe were working together and how that affects our students’ learning outcomes for all of thematerial we include as part of the course. With this lens in mind, we share the story of ourcourse’s evolution as we reflect on our personal experiences.Stories of teaching experiences provide an important resource for other faculty; simultaneously,stories provide a format for examining ongoing teaching practices for the authors. This paperoverlays stories of our current practices onto Davis’ degrees of
Paper ID #32501Analysis of Online Robotics Challenge Submissions - FundamentalMs. Sara Willner-Giwerc , Tufts University Sara Willner-Giwerc is a Ph.D. candidate in mechanical engineering at Tufts University. She graduated from Tufts University with a B.S. in mechanical engineering and a double minor in engineering education and engineering management in 2018. She is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, which supports her research at the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) on the design of technological tools, learning experiences, and environments for supporting solution diversity
using Labo’s cardboard ones. The effort allowedundergraduate engineering students to develop games, and 3D VR equipment yielding excellentresults where the educational games developed had to work with the VR equipment they alsodesigned and built.Conclusion and Future WorkThe summer workshop engaged the participants effectively in learning game development andVR technology. Three critical observations from the workshop include: 1) a limitation ofimmersion time into the program. Participants observed that the 2-day time frame wasinsufficient for them to learn what was expected. Authors concur and have doubled the workshopto 4 days for similar workshops in the future. 2) inability to ascertain whether the workshopchanged some students minds to
Communication Program at the University ofWashington, including: Tina Loucks-Jaret, Lisa Owen, Kate Mobrand, Mary-Colleen Jenkins,Chris Wrenn, Tamara Neely, and Kevin Shi.References 1. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2). 2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 3. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. 4. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind
helped scholars strengthen confidencein their ability to pursue careers in fields they may not have considered before:"No matter your background, you can do whatever you set your mind to. My mentor is fromMexico and she became an engineer. I think having a story like that is amazing and makes merealize that I can accomplish my dreams." (Cultivate ACCESS Scholar, journal submission, Fall2018).“If you push yourself, everything really is limitless. Coming from a minority background in asmall town sets me apart, but it also sets me up to have the chance to exceed expectations.”(Cultivate ACCESS Scholar, journal submission, Fall 2018).Other development indications from journal submissions showed increased understanding ofcareer pathways. Guidance
Paper ID #19152Work in Progress: A Delphi Study to Investigate the Value of Board Gamesto Teach Teamwork SkillsDr. Kevin Ray Hadley, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Hadley received his BS in Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. At Vanderbilt, he also completed their teaching certificate program and was the first participant to publish the results of his project in a national peer-reviewed journal, Chemical Engineering Education. Afterwards, Dr. Hadley completed a postdoctoral study at NASA. IN 2012, he joined the faculty at South
yet critical mind in the face of huge constraints • Environmental responsibility including sustainable development • Cultural diversity in the world college student populationIn the era of globalization these elements are required for a more complete education of futuregenerations of engineers. Engineering Design and Research challenges include: • Early identification of solvable problems with the potential for significant, measurable impact • Poorly defined markets • Cultural sensitivity • Strong constraints on product costs and pricing • Availability of local materials • Lack of manufacturing and product standards
AC 2007-2741: PROGRAM OUTCOME ASSESSMENT IN AN INDUSTRIALLYSPONSORED SENIOR CAPSTONE COURSENirmala Gnanapragasam, Seattle University Nirmala Gnanapragasam is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Seattle University. She is a geotechnical engineer and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Washington. She is the design coordinator of the senior capstone design program in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department, is active in consulting, in engineering education research, and in professional organizations. Page 12.1190.1© American
; Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.3. Coyle, E., Jamieson, L., & Oakes W. (2005). EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service, International Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 139-150.4. Creswell, J. W. (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.5. Dorst, K. (1997). Describing design: A comparison of paradigms. Ph.D. Thesis. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Vormgeving Rotterdam.6. Duffy, J., Tsang, E., & Lord, S. (2000). Service-learning in engineering: What, why, and how? Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
AC 2007-655: SOFTWARE FOR MATERIALS EVALUATIONRobert Creese, West Virginia University ROBERT C CREESE is a professor in the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department in the College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University in Morgantown, West Virginia. He obtained his BS, MS, and Ph.D. degrees from The Pennsylvania State University, The University of California-Berkeley, and The Pennsylvania State University. He is a member of ASEE and also a member of AACE International, ASM, AWS, AIST, ISPA, SCEA, AFS, and SME.Deepak Gupta, West Virginia University DEEPAK GUPTA is a graduate student in the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department
are taking relevant courses during the same term as the designcourse. Finally, there may be a need for curriculum adjustment with the end-goal in mind. If thestudents will be required to be able to take engineering drawings and interpret them to enable thedesign of green buildings within an engineering economics framework, what should the contentof supporting courses be to allow them to take on this task? The nature of the final projectdesigns change as a function of cognizant faculty interest, external consultant expertise, andproject availability. The challenge is to find an appropriate curriculum that would allow thestudents to move between projects, which at the same time adhere to suggested design courserequirements including exposure to
AC 2007-758: DESIGN TEAM SKILLS CURRICULUM FOR INTERMEDIATELEVEL PROJECT CLASSSteven Zemke, Gonzaga University Steven Zemke is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Gonzaga University. He teaches design classes at the sophomore, junior, and capstone level. His research pursuits are in the pedagogy of design. Steven received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a dissertation on pedagogy from the University of Idaho in 2005. Prior to teaching, Steven was a design engineer and engineering manager for 25 years.Diane Zemke, Gonzaga University Diane Zemke is a Doctoral Student in the Leadership Studies Program at Gonzaga University. Her interests include pedagogy, paradigms
to make curricula morerelevant to professional practice. Industry depends on the ability to hire graduates withdeep technical and broad professional skills.The following sections will describe a university’s program, which was developed withthe above studies in mind; as well as how a university/industry partnership creates arobust design program for its engineering students.Boeing LTD and Dassault Systemes New Educational Research Program InitiativeBoeing LTD’s training and engineering group and Dassault Systemes have initiated aneducational and research proposal for globalization, PLM, and Engineering Education.This is based on their combined knowledge and expertise of global teaming, "system ofsystems," and PLM which accumulated in the
AC 2008-2629: DESIGN AND INTEGRATION OF A CAPSTONE COURSE TOACHIEVE PROGRAM OUTCOMESMohamed El-Sayed, Kettering University Professor of Mechanical Engineering and director of the Hybrid Vehicles Integration Laboratory. He has been teaching at the undergraduate and graduate level for over 30 years. He teaches Machine Design, Automotive Design, Machine Design Capstone, Automotive Design Capstone, Design Optimization, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, linear and Nonlinear Finite Element analysis, and Design for manufacturability. He has been a PI and Co-PI on several research grants and a consultant to several engineering corporations. He has over seventy research papers in addition to several
AC 2009-1788: PROJECT DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS USINGUNIVERSAL DESIGN LEARNING (UDL)Saeed Monemi, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Saeed Sean Monemi is currently a Professor and Graduate Program Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State Polytechnic University in Pomona, CA (Cal Poly Pomona). He is teaching a broad range of Undergraduate and Graduate level courses in electrical and computer engineering. His research areas are: Algorithms and Complex Computations, Energy Management Environments, Operating Systems, Software Engineering and Robotics. Before that, Dr. Monemi was Senior Associate Research Professor and Research Scientist at
ofenvironments would help the synergy between students and their potentialcreative employers. One of the main determinants in the success or failure of anenterprise is its ability to innovate, which requires creativity.12What all the aforementioned information means is that there are manymotivations for being creative. The phrase “Innovate or Perish” seemsappropriate to succinctly describe the problem scenario we face with engineeringeducation.From Words To Action: Our Approach To Engineering Creatively throughParticipatory Action and Problem-Based LearningJust as we would expect that engineering a solution to a modern day problemwould require a non-linear mind, we would also expect that dedicated research isneeded to come up with new ways to infuse the
– that becomes the hunt for möjligheterfor us as engineering educators.Works Cited1. Sfard, A. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educ. Res. 27, 4–13 (1998).2. Frezza, S. T. A knowledge basis for engineering design. Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 2015–Febru, (2015).3. Eris, O. Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design. (Kluwer, 2004).4. Chi, M. T. H. in Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (eds. Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M.) 209–234 (American Psychological Association, 1997).5. Robinson, K. Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. (Wiley Capstone, 2011).6. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in Context: Update to the social
Paper ID #26716Students’ Perception of Teaching Practice in an Active Learning Environ-mentProf. Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, San-tiago, Chile Angeles Dominguez is a Professor of the Department of Mathematics within the School of Engineering, a researcher at the School of Education, and Associate Dean of Faculty Development at the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico. Also, she is currently collabo- rating with the School of Engineering at the University Andres Bello at Santiago, Chile. Angeles holds a bachelor degree
Paper ID #25477Teaming with Confidence: How Peer Connections in Problem-based Learn-ing Impact the Team and Academic Self-efficacy of Engineering StudentsMs. Marsha Maraj, Imperial College London Marsha has been an educator in higher education for over 14 years. She is currently a Senior Strategic Teaching Fellow in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Imperial College London (ICL) where she teaches mechanical design to third-year chemical engineering students. She is enthusiastic about using collaborative approaches and student partnerships in the scholarship of learning and teaching. Her current educational research
first bend at factor 4 or 5(most often 5) and a second bend at factors 6-8 (most often 7); parallel analysis indicates thecrossing point (maximum possible factors) at 8-10, with 9 as mode and median. Therefore wechose to test models with between 4 and 9 factors, keeping in mind that 8-9 factors seemsunlikely given the tiny eigenvalues, and would be difficult to estimate with our sample size.Table 4. Parallel analysis for engineering log coded items: summary of 20 imputed data sets. Datset #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 # Factors 8 9 10 10 9 8 10 9 9 9 8 10 9 9 9 9 8 8 9 9 Scree bend 1 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
Paper ID #27445Positionality: The Stories of Self that Impact OthersCynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech ynthia Hampton is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as program and student support for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED). While at Virginia Tech, Cynthia has directed summer bridge programs, led peer support initia- tives for underrepresented groups, and served on various commissions, committees, and research groups focused on student support, organizational change, graduate student policy, and culturally responsive evaluation
Children in the Regular Classroom and SpiritualIntelligence: Developing Higher Level Consciousness; coauthor with Susan Israel and Cathy Block ofCollaborative Literacy: Using Gifted Strategies to Enrich Learning for Every Student; and co-author withMichele Kane of Planting Seeds of Mindfulness. In addition, she has contributed numerous articles andchapters in books on gifted education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Application of 3D CAD and 3D printing in RET Program to Enrich Engineering Design Education Xinyu Liua*, Xuejun Fanb, Julia Yooc , Nicholas Braked, , Jiang Zhoub, Xianchang Lib , Dorothy Siskc a
Paper ID #31648CanSat Pico-satellite building workshop as an effective tool for STEAMeducation, a case studyDr. Jorge H Kurita, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion Dr. Jorge Kurita attended Universidad Nacional de Asuncion in Paraguay, where he got his BS in Elec- tromechanical Engineering. After graduation, he spent some time in academia working as faculty. During this tenure he taught courses on heat transfer, fluid mechanics and physics. In 2004 Dr. Kurita was granted the Fulbright scholarship to attend a graduate program on Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Techno- logical University. He has finished his MS and then
Paper ID #28642Correlating the student engineer’s design process with emotionalintelligence.Dr. Ryan H Koontz, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Ryan Koontz received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1999 and an M.S. degree in mechanical engineering in 2002 from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSMT). In 2004, Ryan joined the Center of Excellence for Advanced Multi-Disciplinary Projects (CAMP) as the manufacturing specialist. He currently instructs students of CAMP through the design and manufacturing process and helps produce parts for the co-curricular teams of CAMP. He completed
Paper ID #23448Human-Centered Design Incorporated in the Freshman Year through an Ac-tive Learning Engineering Design Lab: Best Practices, Lessons Learned, andProposed ImprovementsDr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson, Lipscomb University Dr. Kirsten Dodson is an assistant professor in the mechanical engineering department in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. She graduated from Lipscomb University with her Bachelors degree before moving on to Vanderbilt to finish her Doctoral degree. Upon completing her research at Vanderbilt, she joined the faculty at her alma mater where she has focused on thermal
contribute to thecurrent syllabus content related to learning outcomes and aimed at exploring the student mind-set.The Department expected the experiences gained through interclass collaborations and activefeedback would enable a better EDM and SDP course structure. The integrated activities wouldalso improve syllabus material drawn from surveys to afford the students’ subject mastery.I. IntroductionAcross engineering departments in universities, the Capstone Design course is arguably the mostinfluential course for engineering students. Fundamentally, the Capstone Design course is thesummative assessment of the engineering curriculum, which pushes students to reach the createlevel in the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy [1]. In addition, many universities
Paper ID #25959Design and Development of a Modular K-12 Cybersecurity CurriculumDr. Giti Javidi, University of South Florida Dr. Giti Javidi received her BS from University of Central Oklahoma and MS and PhD from University of South Florida, Tampa. Prior to joining academia as a faculty, she worked for industry for several years including IBM as a software engineer. Dr. Javidi has more than 18 years of experience in teaching, research, industry and consulting services. She Joined USFSM IT program in fall 2016 as a n Associate Professor of Information technology and Cybersecurity, from Virginia State University (VSU
Paper ID #26535Evaluating the use of a Personalized Learning Management System to In-crease Student Enrollment in High School Physics (Evaluation, Diversity)Dr. Meera N.K. Singh, University of Calgary Meera Singh obtained her PhD. from the University of Waterloo, Canada, specializing in fatigue life prediction methods. Following her PhD studies, she joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Manitoba, Canada, where she was a faculty member for 12 years. During that time, she conducted research primarily in the area of the fatigue behaviour of composite materials, regularly taught courses in applied
Paper ID #26485Building a Functional Cardiograph Over Four Semesters: Part 2 – Program-ming a MicrocontrollerDr. Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago Dr. Gail Baura is a Professor and Director of Engineering Science at Loyola University Chicago. While creating the curriculum for this new program, she embedded multi-semester projects to increase student engagement and performance. Previously, she was a Professor of Medical Devices at Keck Graduate In- stitute of Applied Life Sciences, which is one of the Claremont Colleges. She received her BS Electrical Engineering degree from Loyola Marymount University, her MS
interventions are intended to promote ideation flexibility,one’s ability to switch between preferred and non-preferred methods of concept generation aspreferred by the problem. Given insight into how the three interventions impact idea quality,engineers, educators, and students will be able to make informed decisions about whichinterventions to use under different conditions with different concept generation goals in mind.1.1 Concept GenerationConcept generation or ideation is the primary means by which solutions are created. Thesesolutions to engineering problems, frequently referred to as ideas or concepts, undergo a vettingprocess to select which solutions warrant further development. The outcomes of conceptgeneration and selection can have far