; Roy, R. (2007). An introduction to capturing and understanding the cognitive behaviour of design engineers. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600963412Coltheart, M. (2001). Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology: What Deficits Reveal about the Human Mind, 3–21.Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education (pp. 79–103). Elsevier.Crozier, S., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., van de Moortele, P. F., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., … LeBihan, D. (1999). Distinct prefrontal activations in processing
design. They learned about technique and sensibility associated with working with adisabled client. They learned about the importance of client’s willingness and understanding tobe the test subject. In addition, according to Grahame, Freeman, and Levi [18], students gain abetter understanding of the community and become more open minded through service-learning.“They become better engineers.”Future WorkThis was a pilot study to determine the practicality of implementing a multi-year multi-teamiterative service-oriented project. The project was a success. Similar type of projects can beapplied using the basic scaffold. Although the authors did not perform a formal assessment,overall impression and verbal feedback from students were that students
Paper ID #28918Automating Detection of Framing Agency in Design Team TalkDr. Ardeshir Raihanian Mashhadi, University at Buffalo, SUNY Dr. Ardeshir Raihanian is an assistant professor of teaching in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at University at Buffalo. His research interests include user-centric design, sus- tainable design, user behavior simulation and agent based modeling. He also researches and publishes in areas surrounding engineering education. He has won multiple awards, including Design for Manufac- ture and the Life Cycle Technical Committee Best Paper(2017) and the International Life
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.[18] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.[19] T. A. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft, and W. C. Newstetter, “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, pp. 123 – 150, 2011.[20] V. Tinto, V, Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.[21] P.P. Heppner and C. H. Petersen, “The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory,” Journal of
Paper ID #30876Developing a Bridging Language: Design Decisions in Informal MakingExperiencesKathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing a Bridging Language: Design Decisions in Informal Making Experiences1: IntroductionThe complex nature of design practice makes it both challenging to teach and to learn [1].Historically, engineering programs have had difficulty integrating design in their curricula. As aresult, both the positioning of design coursework within the curricula and the teaching practiceswithin this coursework vary
Paper ID #29909Does Playing the Violin Help Science Students Become Better Scientists?Prof. Wei YAO, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University Yao Wei, Ph.D, Professor at Institute of China’s Science Technology and Education Policy, School of Pub- lic Affairs, Zhejiang University. He holds BE and BCom degree in from Zhejiang University, and Doctor’s degree in management science and engineering from Zhejiang University. He is currently interested in engineering education, and innovation management.Mr. Bifeng ZHANG, Zhejiang University Bifeng ZHANG is a PhD student at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. He
manifest in this way leaving opportunities for educators to be mindful inworking toward equal-status in engineering teams. We have highlighted with a few briefexamples what high-status vs. equal-status vs. low-status can look like in a team. We believe it isimportant to be explicit about good teaming behaviors and call out what it can look like whenteammates are not treating each other equally or fairly. For example, in the example wepresented of a high-status member, the actions of Student A could be interpreted as the studentbeing decisive and a leader, behaviors we certainly like to see in students; however, if the studentis not aware of the fact that they are making unilateral decisions, they could begin to alienateother team members. We
that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee.Mrs. Susan Beth D’Amico, North Carolina State University Susan B. D’Amico Coordinator of Engineering K-12 Outreach Extension The Engineering Place College of Engineering NC State University Susan earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from NC State and has worked in the Telecom and Contract Manufacturing Industries for over 25 years as an Industrial Engineer, Process Engi- neer, Manufacturing Engineer, Project Manager, Business Cost Manager and Program Manager. Inspired by coursework she developed and presented as an engineer, her professional path made a turn
other capstoneprograms [8].In the 2016-2017 season, selected topics from The 7 Habits were introduced in two JuniorDesign lectures prior to team formation and reinforced by instructor throughout the course.These included proactivity and using the "circle of influence" as a specific tool to promoteadaptability; building trust by making "deposits" in the "Emotional Bank account"; thinkingabout desired outcomes (and requirements) through each step of the capstone program, i.e., to"Begin with the End in Mind"; and the importance of self-management as a prerequisite formanaging others [6]. In 2017-2018, short writing assignments were added to encourage studentsto reflect on the relevance of these concepts to their work as an engineering
Paper ID #22504Developing an Integrated Curriculum-wide Teamwork Instructional Strat-egyDr. Natasha D. Mallette P.E., Oregon State University Dr. Mallette worked as a design, process and research engineer before obtaining her PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering at Montana State University. She has five years of professional experience and almost four years of chemical engineering instructional experience, including two years at Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. Her current research focus is effective teamwork instruction in engineering curriculum. Her past research explored biofilms and fungal production of fuel
project.Although a form of the rubric had been used on capstone design projects, it had not yet beenused on freshman or sophomore projects. Since the new labels for each numbered score had notbeen used previously, raters needed to be mindful that an excellent freshman project may scorelow on the rubric, since the highest standard was how a professional engineer would havedesigned the project. Due to logistical problems, the Documentation competency was notassessed in the fall 2016 semester. After going through the rating process, small adjustmentswere made to the rubric. These changes, such as minor wording corrections and refinements,enabled the rater team to function more efficiently and comfortably in applying the rubric duringspring 2017 semester. The
Paper ID #19293Characterizing Students’ Micro-Iterations Strategies through Data-LoggedDesign ActionsDr. Corey T. Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum Corey Schimpf is a Learning Analytics Scientist at the non-for-profit Concord Consortium, which de- velops technology and curriculum for STEM learning in K-12. One avenue of his work focuses on the development and analysis of learning analytics that model students’ cognitive states or strategies from fine-grained computer-logged data from students participating in open-ended technology-centered science and engineering projects. In another avenue of his work he develops assistive
generations of entrepreneurially-minded engineers. This is achieved by partnering and invest- ing in educational initiatives and programs between industry and institutions of higher learning. Under Michael’s leadership, The Boeing Company has won the multiple Awards for Excellence and Innova- tion for their industry academic partnerships and joint programs Michael has served on various advisory groups including, the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Education, Boeing Higher Education Integration Board, American Society for Engineering Education Project Board and the National Science Foundation I-UCRC Industry University Collaborative Research Center Advisory Board. Michael has au- thored or co-authored over 25
Paper ID #16116’Making’ an Impact: An Ethnographic Approach to University Maker SpacesMs. Meredith Frances Penney, James Madison UniversityMr. James Deverell WatkinsBryan Levy, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept
expectations for engineering graduates to design effective solutions to globalproblems have never been higher3, 4, 5. A wide variety of engineering design methodologies andsupporting tools exist, including TRIZ6, 7, axiomatic design8, mind-mapping7,9, andbrainstorming10, all of which help engineers apply their engineering knowledge to the solution ofcomplex, system-level problems and find the optimal solution to meet multiple requirements11, 12.Recently, engineering design has shifted to a user-centered focus, incorporating principles fromthe field of human-computer interactions13, 14. Within this shift, design thinking has emerged as astrong methodology that encourages user-centered design and the creation of innovativesolutions to complex problems15
Spring 2014 semester is likely due to the move to electronic surveying methods, whichdecreased the student response rate and in the minds of many faculty at our institution, skewedresponses to the negative, based upon the opinion that those students who had a bad experiencewere more likely to take the time to respond. Page 26.184.9On the positive side, the course has also been very well received by members of the department’sIndustrial Advisory Board and company interviewers. Students have discovered that discussingthe course with potential employers and even bringing their Stirling Engine to interviews to beparticularly impactful. One instance
Paper ID #12650Engineering Education meets Human-Computer Interaction (HCI): Explor-ing how the work on ”probes” can guide the design of reflection activitiesMania Orand, University of Washington Mania Orand is a researcher in the field of Human Computer Interaction at the University of Washington. Her research interests are on using reflection in designing web and mobile technologies, user experience, and digital media.Dr. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Dr. Sattler is a Research Scientist for the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) and a Multi-Campus Coordinator for the Consortium to Promote
Paper ID #11163Looking back: A Student Review and History of AerosPACE – a Multi-University, Multi-Disciplinary, Distributed, Industry-University Capstone ProjectMrs. Larissa Cannon, Brigham Young University Larissa Cannon participated in AerosPACE for her Senior Capstone project. She has since graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University and is currently working in the aerospace industry. Her undergraduate experience included three internships at Pratt & Whitney and one internship at ATK. She is the co-author of two published papers and has four years experience of
the educa- tional success of students. She has taught at the undergraduate and graduate level, re-imagining traditional pedagogical practices and engaging students in intra- and intergroup dialogue.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating
Paper ID #15433Multidisciplinary Patient-Centered Capstone Senior Design ProjectsDr. Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Mansoor Nasir received his B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of California-Berkeley. He worked as a research scientist at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. before joining the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He has several publications in the areas of microflu- idics, chemical and biological sensors, and MEMS technology. He is also passionate
, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R., (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington D.C.17. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.18. Bailey, R. (2007). Effects of Industrial Experience and Coursework During Sophomore and Junior Years on Student Learning of Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 662-667.19. Blair, B., Millea, M. M., & Hammer, J. (Oct 2004). The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic Performance and Compensation of Engineering Majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 333-338.20. Nilson, L. (2010). Teaching at
Industrial Revolution, Crown Business Publisher.21. Higher Education Makerspace Initiative, accessed at https://hemi.mit.edu/ on January 11, 201722. Makershare, as accessed at https://makershare.mit.edu/ on January 11, 201723. Dougherty, D. (2016), Free to Make: How the Maker Movement is Changing Our Schools, Our Jobs, and Our Minds, North Atlantic Books.24. Forest, C., Hashemi Farzaneh, H., Weinmann, J., and Lindemann, U. (2016, June), Quantitative Survey and Analysis of Five Maker Spaces at Large, Research-Oriented Universities, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.25. Wilczynski, V. (2015, June), Academic Makerspaces and Engineering Design, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.26
Paper ID #21595Transformation of Design Instruction in a Low-Resource SettingMatthew Petney, Rice 360 Institute for Global HealthMr. Samuel Gonthako Ng’anjo, University of Malawi, The Polytechnic Samuel- an Industrial Engineer works as lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Department at The Poly- technic, a constituent college of the university of Malawi. He has over 20 years of experience in teaching Drawing and design, Manufacturing Technology, Quality control and Ergonomics. Samuel was head of Mechanical Engineering Department and in 2017 was appointed National judge for the 2017 National In- novation competition. Samuel
more confident in it because now I know that if I put my mind to it I can get it done. (YS, 2016)Among all the students, only one reported that the impact of the program was negative because itmade her come to the realization that she didn’t want to pursue an engineering career. This summer experience has opened my eyes to the engineer field. It has helped me make the decision not to become an engineer. (YS, 2018)According to a follow-up email sent in January 2019, among the 39 YSs who graduated highschool so far, 24 YSs are pursuing engineering degrees, 14 are majoring in non-engineeringSTEM disciplines, and one has attended trade school and is now interning at SamsungSemiconductor. These results confirm that the YS program
assess how industrial arts programs have transitioned to current technologyand engineering programs. This study compares its findings with past status studies conducted inOhio and nationally in order to describe the program title, content, and instructional methodsemployed in technology education [36], as well as how programs are aligning to ITEA’s case forproviding technology education for all K-12 students [38], [39]. Most importantly, as a means toinform future research focused on the recruitment and retention of minority students and teachersin technology education, this study describes the inclusion of females, minorities, and studentswith special needs in Ohio technology education classrooms. With these objectives in mind, thefollowing
. Lee, and J. Dantzler, “Mathematical Problem Solving For Engineering Students,” 2005.[18] Unity. Unity Technologies, 2019.[19] “Harris Corporation T7TM Multi-Mission Robot on an EOD Mission.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zX2LwiT0xA (accessed Feb. 01, 2020).[20] “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis - Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E. Shannon, 2005.” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1049732305276687 (accessed Feb. 01, 2020).[21] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1980.Appendix A. Two-Joint Robot Arm Simulation Student HandoutPART 1: POSITIONIn this portion of the activity, you will determine whether your
. Capobianco, B. French, and H. Diefes-Dux, “Engineering identity development among pre-adolescent learners,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698–716, 2012.3. J. R. Wieselmann, E. A. Dare, E. A. Ring-Whalen, and G. H. Roehrig, “‘I just do what the boys tell me’: Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 112–144, 2020, doi: 10.1002/tea.21587.4. K. Miel, M. Portsmore, E. Fuller, K. Paul, E. Sung, and A. V. Maltese, “‘Maybe if I put my mind to it’: 5th graders’ receptivity to pursuing engineering careers.” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. 2019.5. A. Godwin, “The
of constraints.13When mathematical and scientific analyses are practiced to achieve competency, the emphasis ison finding the right answers. When they are applied to engineering design, the emphasis is onthe many higher order skills embodied in the above definition: generating, evaluating, andspecifying ideas that meet human needs within various constraints. These levels of thinkingreflect the top tiers of Bloom’s Taxonomy (see Figure 2). The design process involves using thephysical laws to guide the generation of design ideas which are then specified as designsolutions, but must be subsequently evaluated, often using those very same physical laws. Atevery step, however, the designer should have in mind the question: How well does the
AC 2012-3039: EXPERIENCING CAPSTONE DESIGN PROBLEM STATE-MENTSDr. Gene Dixon, East Carolina University Gene Dixon teaches aspiring engineers at the undergraduate level at East Carolina University. He has held positions in industry with Union Carbide, Chicago Bridge & Iron, E.I. DuPont & deNemours, West- inghouse Electric, CBS, Viacom, and Washington Group. He has spoken to more than 25,000 people as a corporate trainer, a teacher, and a motivational speaker. He received a Ph.D. in industrial and sys- tems engineering and engineering management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a master’s of business administration from Nova Southeastern University, and a bachelor’s of science in materials
AC 2010-1441: RAPID MANUFACTURING OF A HANDS-ON LEARNING DEVICEKimberly Warners, Western Michigan UniversityBritney Richmond, Western Michigan UniversityAdam Eaton, Western Michigan UniversityAndrew Kline, Western Michigan University Associate ProfessorBetsy Aller, Western Michigan University Associate ProfessorEdmund Tsang, Western Michigan University Associate Dean Page 15.1012.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Rapid Manufacturing of a Hands-on Learning DeviceAbstractRecent efforts to interest K-12 students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) have increasingly focused on experiential education