Laboratories, Lucent Technology, Inc. as Member of Technical Staff and Ciena Corp. as Principal Engineer, doing research in photonic networks and optoelectronics. His teaching interest fo- cuses on the project-based learning (PBL) model of engineering education with self-directed learner as enhanced educational outcome. His research area focuses on optoelectronics, semiconductor lasers, and metamaterials.Dr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Associate Professor of physics and engineering at Sweet Briar College in Sweet Briar, Va. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 13 years in industry designing
Paper ID #20401Learning from Engineering Disasters: A Multidisciplinary Online CourseDr. Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University Dr. Halada, Associate Professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Stony Brook University, directs an interdisciplinary undergraduate degree program in Engineering Science. He designs educational ma- terials focused on nanotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and how engineers learn from engineering disasters and how failure and risk analysis can be used to teach about ethics and societal implications of emerging technologies. Halada also coordinates the Long Island Alternative Energy
Lab Satellite Network.Dr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Dr. Michael Grubbs, Baltimore County Public Schools Supervisor of Manufacturing, Engineering, and Technology Education for Baltimore County Public Schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Determining the Engineering
use of advanced teaching tools, such as project-based learning, team-learning, electronic-based learning envi- ronment, and laboratory/visualization-aided teaching. So far his students’ projects have involved with DBF competition and joint project with UML and University of Colorado Boulder. He serves as the academic advisor for AIAA student chapter at DWC. He is enthusiastic about avia- tion/aerospace educations and related applications. He participated AIAA academic conferences as well as student paper conferences regularly.Ms. Jennifer McInnis, Daniel Webster CollegeProf. Linda Marquis, Daniel Webster College Linda Marquis teaches English composition courses at Daniel Webster College and is the communications
(.sldprt) file and the Teaching Assistantdetermined orientation and printing speeds. The students did not a have firsthand involvementwith a 3D printer during this experience.The second experience included more student involvement. The honor students had theopportunity to witness their design being printed on the Makerbot. This included the conversionof their SolidWorks® model to a .stl file for printing, the setup and slicing of their model usingthe printer’s software, and physical encounters with the printer. On the scheduled day of printing,each group was individually brought into the 3D printing laboratory to learn and evaluate theirmodel before actually printing. The students were briefly introduced to the way .stl files work,the different
2006-2564: BRIDGING THE GAP TO THE ENGINEER OF 2020Michael McGrath, University of Colorado-Boulder Mr. McGrath is the Engineering Director at the Laboratory for Atmospheric an Space Physics, and Professor Adjunct in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado -- Boulder. Page 11.286.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Bridging the Gap to the Engineer of 2020The NAE report on the Engineer of 2020 describes the growing separationbetween the needs of industry and the focus of academia, and cites the desireto close this growing gap. At the Laboratory for Atmospheric and
engineeringapplications. This made it possible for the BE curriculum to stay within the legislativelymandated maximum of 128 semester hours while meeting the requirements for ABETaccreditation.BAE 235 had three 1-hr lectures each week that were taught in the BAE Department’s classroomspace and one 3-hr lab that was taught in the same labs used for general biology. A collegebiology textbook1 was used for the course. The laboratory manual2 was the same one that was Page 6.607.1used for BIO 125: General Biology, which also had three lectures and a 3-hr lab each week. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
AC 2012-3314: RUNNING A SUCCESSFUL DEPARTMENT LEVEL PRO-FESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AT A COMMUNITY COLLEGEWITH LITTLE ACCESS TO COLLEGE FUNDINGAnthony P. Dalessio, Erie Community College Anthony P. Dalessio is an Assistant Professor of electrical engineering technology at Erie Community College. He earned a B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering from the State University of New York, Buffalo. His teaching interests include analog and digital electronics, wireless communications, and renewable energy.Dr. Elena V. Brewer, Erie Community College Elena V. Brewer is an instructor of electrical engineering technology at Erie Community College. She received her Ph.D. in physics from the State University of New York at
project, especially its disassembly.Before the cart-tipper project was assigned, the issue of how to communicate necessary projectinformation to the students without providing the orthographic drawings that the students wereexpected to generate had to be resolved. Our solution was to have a graduate teaching assistantmeasure the cart-tipper, then draw and dimension two-dimensional isometric drawings of itscomponents. These drawings were placed on the course server as well as shown on thedistributed paper copy of assignment directions. Digital photographs of the cart-tipper wereloaded onto the course server to provide overnight and remote access to visual aids. Finally, the
the agenda include: proposal goals, projectactivities, size of the college and area high school student body; location; course offerings;instructional needs including teaching staff, materials, equipment and laboratories; possibleprocess/procedures; how to determine priorities; and how the proposed resources would beallocated.The meeting leaders plan an agenda including the following activities: 1. Discussion of the three primary goals; 2. Identify the three most critical activities for each of their colleges, discuss them, and prioritize them; 3. List and discuss the information necessary for each activity; 4. Describe what the activity would need to look like at each site; 5. Identify Summer Programs and develop the concept; 6. Describe
2.314.5THE ROAD SHOWThe AMS-107 Mini CIM Cell is a complete mobile computer-integrated manufacturing systemconsisting of robot, parts feeder, programmable logic controller (PLC), sensor package, CNCmilling machine, and system software, which allows us to teach the fundamentals aspects ofindustrial automation, robotics, controls, CNC, sensors, systems integration, and computer-aidedmanufacturing. The system consists of industrial grade components that can function together tomanufacture parts automatically in a laboratory or demonstration setting. It is designed so thateach subsystem of the total system can be used as a stand-alone teaching tool and the entiresystem is contained on an anodized extruded tubing frame mounted on casters with
the program with the current eight full-time facultypositions, and more importantly, the eight faculty who fill those positions. These facultyare responsible for teaching a 3-2 load during an academic year (three courses onesemester and two courses the other semester) where there are typically 15 to 25 studentsin each class. Faculty members also are responsible for teaching laboratories.The committee identified several general options for incorporating computer engineeringinto the Electrical Engineering Department that ranged from making a simple departmentname change to adding a separate fully accredited degree program in computerengineering. The options and their advantages and disadvantages are briefly describedbelow.Option 1: Change the
discussed.Given the multidisciplinary component of the new curricula, junior and senior level studentsfrom different engineering majors will be able to register for the course.The course will also contain several lab practices for hands-on learning. There will be differentlab assignments; using the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewables (HOMER®)which is a free computer software developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory(NREL) used to model on and off-grid power sources. By using this software, students willexperience ways to evaluate and analyze different design options for intelligent hybrid powersystems. It will allow students to explore what renewable technologies are the most cost-effective and evaluate their impact on the
research centers that work withmore interdisciplinary approaches, the discipline oriented departmental system of education hassurvived. Pressure from existing budget regulations, established professional chambers,perceptions and expectations from the community prevents overturning "the pseudo barriers" thatexist between departments.As the economical conditions in the world change, the graduates find themselves coping withaltogether foreign problems. Since future developments are unpredictable, continuous learning -alifelong process- is the solution to the adaptability which is needed when new situations arise.While promoting the teaching the art of applying scientific tools to problems that require the useof natural resources for the convenience
WWW: http://www.acsl.org/.9. H. Said, “The Effect of Programming Learning Center on Students in First Year Programming Sequence,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2004.10. A. Azemi, “Teaching Computer Programming Courses (Using the Internet) in a Computer Laboratory Environment,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2002.11. Squeak Smalltalk. Squeak Oversight Board. Available WWW: www.squeak.org.12. Squeak Smalltalk Tutorials. Hawthorne Center for Innovation. Available WWW: www.hawcenter.org/squeak.html
revenue from research - Generates revenue from teaching- Graduate programs focused on technical - Graduate programs focused on depth/teaching continuing education for practitioners- Full time students are research/teaching Assistants - Students are mainly part time and- Delivered in a classroom environment work full time - Delivered using many methodsDemonstrated growth and potential are key for resource allocation within any university. Thus,we chose to initially pursue off campus programs to justify hiring more faculty and to grow theinfrastructure. Because of our growth, our administration
New Haven (UNH) had the opportunity to enroll in such a course. The initial preparation for the onlineclass was time consuming because of the amount of materials made available to the students. It has alsobeen found from experience that it takes much more time to teach and administer online courses. Otheronline course developers agree that teaching and maintaining an online course takes a considerableamount of time [4]. However, the time is well spent since the material developed in the online courses can 1also be used in the regular classroom. Student satisfaction is about the same in the traditional course andthe online courses. Furthermore, the composition of the student population at
New Haven (UNH) had the opportunity to enroll in such a course. The initial preparation for the onlineclass was time consuming because of the amount of materials made available to the students. It has alsobeen found from experience that it takes much more time to teach and administer online courses. Otheronline course developers agree that teaching and maintaining an online course takes a considerableamount of time [4]. However, the time is well spent since the material developed in the online courses can 1also be used in the regular classroom. Student satisfaction is about the same in the traditional course andthe online courses. Furthermore, the composition of the student population at
New Haven (UNH) had the opportunity to enroll in such a course. The initial preparation for the onlineclass was time consuming because of the amount of materials made available to the students. It has alsobeen found from experience that it takes much more time to teach and administer online courses. Otheronline course developers agree that teaching and maintaining an online course takes a considerableamount of time [4]. However, the time is well spent since the material developed in the online courses can 1also be used in the regular classroom. Student satisfaction is about the same in the traditional course andthe online courses. Furthermore, the composition of the student population at
education points to hands-on experiences asof fundamental concepts during undergraduate engineering a necessary ingredient in the learning process. A participant ineducation. We describe recent experience at the University of the recent 2013 ASEE University/Industry perspectivesMassachusetts in introducing a laboratory component into the workshop stated this succinctly, “Students must experience aFundamentals of Electrical Engineering course taken by 170upper-level mechanical and industrial engineering hands-on example of every fundamental taught in order toundergraduate students. The lecture part of the course exposes reinforce it
a M.E. and Ph.D. from the University ofCarlson, et al. follow this up with “… it is not simply enough Virginia in 1998 and 2000. His research areato teach students about handling incoming data, they must is nanoscale materials design and synthesis for catalytic applications with an emphasisknow, and practice, how to develop and manage their own on structure/property relationships and in-situdata with an eye toward the next scientist down the road.”[2] characterization.Federal agencies (e.g., NSF,[3] NIH,[4] and USGS[5]) are alsorequiring the submission of a Data Management Plan (DMP
AC 2008-1474: ENERGY AWARENESS EFFORTS AT BAYLOR UNIVERSITYKenneth Van Treuren, Baylor University Dr. Van Treuren is a professor on the faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Baylor University. He teaches the capstone Mechanical Engineering Laboratory course as well as courses in heat transfer, aerospace engineering, fluid mechanics, and wind power. His research interests include energy education and literacy and gas turbine heat transfer. He can be contacted at Kenneth_Van_Treuren@baylor.edu.Ian Gravagne, Baylor University Dr. Gravagne is an assistant professor with the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Baylor University. He teaches the Engineering Design II
Paper ID #21117High-Fidelity Digitized Assessment of Heat Transfer Fundamentals using aTiered Delivery StrategyDr. Tian Tian, University of Central Florida Tian Tian is an Associate Lecturer of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida, which she joined in 2013. She has been frequently teaching undergraduate lecture and laboratory components of Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics. Her educational research interests focus on project-based learning, online learning, and the digitization of STEM assessments. She received the Teaching Incentive Award, Excellence in Undergraduate
University, University Park Amine Lehtihet is Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Penn State with teaching and research interests in Design and Manufacturing.Dr. Vittal Prabhu, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Vittaldas Prabhu is currently a Professor in the Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engi- neering at Penn State. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin- Madison. Professor Prabhu works in the area of distributed control systems with a focus on manufactur- ing and service enterprises consisting of discrete-events, physical processes, and service processes. He teaches courses in manufacturing systems, service systems, and
chemistry course online, but must still go tocampus at a specified time every week or two to still use the laboratory to gain the knowledgelearned in the classroom through experimentation. We, as scientists, pride ourselves onexperimentation and say that without quantitative values, technology is meaningless. We shouldpass the same things onto our students, teach them how to use their senses, teach them how touse technology as an aide, and teach them to love what they do.Conclusion Educators must be aware of the changing trends that our future generations are growingup with. We must give credence to new ways of learning the same concepts. Students findsignificantly that hands-on labs, more so than technology alone, will give them the
University as senior lecturer in 2002. In 2012 he recieved his Ph.D. from Stellenbosch University, and in 2016 he moved to the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) as Associate Professor. At DTU, Dr. Randewijk has built up three undergraduate laboratories at DTU to aid in the teaching of electrical machine, power systems, and in the field of power system protection and substation automation. Dr. Randewijk is a senior member of the IEEE.Dr. David Navarro-Duran, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Virtual Globalization: An experience for engineering students in the Education 4.0 FrameworkAbstractIn
intended outcomes, and the context of thework in some detail.Our data regarding outcomes of the experience for both mentors and mentees come from surveysconducted at the end of the semester, though we recognize that self-reported information fromthe end of the semester is not the perfect tool[7] . In the future, we may collect informationthroughout the semester to see how students’ and mentors’ perspectives change over time.This study follows a scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) process. We seek to evaluatesomething we are doing in the classroom; we did not begin with a theoretical framework likeengineering self-efficacy or teaching self-efficacy, though we believe both are relevant to thisstudy.How we use peer mentors in our first year
, statutes, and technology e. Develop new skills in the use of modern engineering tools4. Current in their field a. Able to design using current standards, statues, codes b. Society membership, regular chapter meeting participation and attendance As may be typical with a new engineering program, we initially focused on our missionand creating a list of courses to teach rather than on our Educational Objectives. We “compiled”a curriculum using “off the shelf” courses from civil, mechanical, and electrical engineeringrather than building a curriculum that supported our objectives. In fact, we ended up creating ourinitial objectives and Mission Statement after the curriculum was designed. Having beenthrough one
complete the project.Based on the description by Krajcik, effective PBL classes have the following key features: (1)PBL projects are the central component of the curriculum with teaching and student learningorganized around the project; (2) Driving questions are used to motivate students to interact with“central issues, concepts, and principles of a discipline”; (3) During the project, students mustengage in a “constructive investigation”. Students must “investigate and transform knowledge”if a curriculum is to be considered PBL; (4) Projects must involve collaboration among thestudents; (5) Projects are based on “student-centered instruction”. While projects are to beguided toward the important content, they should not be scripted or teacher led
architecture, electric drives, and power electronics. He also focuses on engineering education research and engineering outreach activities. Dr. Yilmaz is a Member of the Eta Kappa Nu Electrical Engineering Honor Society as well as IEEE and ASEE.Dr. Selahattin Ozcelik, Texas A&M University, KingsvilleProf. Nuri Yilmazer, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Nuri Yilmazer received the B.S. in electrical and electronics engineering from Cukurova University at Adana, Turkey in 1996, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from Uni- versity of Florida and Syracuse University in 2000 and 2006, respectively. He worked as a post-doctoral research associate in the Computational Electromagnetics Laboratory