Annual Conference. Figure 3. Peer evaluation form. Page 12.1537.13 Sophomore Clinic I Team Experience Survey Please print your name and the code number below on the sheet that is being circulated. Your responses will be reported in statistical form only and you will not be identified. The following statements concern your experience as a team member on the Crane Project in Sophomore Clinic during the Fall of 2006. Mark the response that best reflects your experience.1. My team worked together to DEFINE its project goal(s). Strongly agree
, December, 2005 http://www.ugs.com/products/teamcenter/docs/Aberdeen_- _Global_Product_Design_Benchmark_Report_05-12-30.pdf6. http://www.global-engineering-excellence.org7. Jones, R.C., 2005, International S&T Initiatives for African Development, WFEO Committee on Capacity Building Report to the National Academies, 2005. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/guirr/1Jones.ppt#256,1,INTERNATIONAL S&T INITIATIVES FOR AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT8. Final Report, Engineering for the Americas Symposium: Capacity Building for Job Creation and Hemispheric Competitiveness, Lima, Peru, 29 November – 2 December 2005. http://www.oest.oas.org/engineering/espanol/documentos/Informe_Final_ENG.pdf
. Crawford, “Engineering entrepreneurship: An example of a paradigm shift in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2002, pp. 185-195.4 Lumsdaine, E., “A multidisciplinary approach to teaching invention and entrepreneuring.” Symposium conducted at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2003.5 Fredholm, S., J. Krejcarek, S. Krumholz, and D. Linquist, “Designing an engineering entrepreneurship curriculum for Olin College.” Symposium conducted at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2003.6 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering the
(National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering) and the National Science FoundationCSEMS and S-STEM program. In addition to the scholarships, academic workshops help thestudents with time management, academics (how to learn), resources, and other challenges;especially those faced by lower division students and transfer students. The students in each ofthese programs meet at least six times per semester. The students are encouraged, beginning intheir freshman year, to go to career fairs, to consider internships, and to consider writing aproposal for a research award. For these activities, the students need a good resume.1, 2, 3 Theresume needed for an internship or research position is more demanding than the resume used inhigh school to
generationsserve to motivate students in problem solving? Would caring and concern be engendered? Howwould an environmental theme support skills in graphics, professional interaction, andeconomics analysis?Preparing our Students for Global CareersDowney 4et al., have identified the need to prepare our students for global careers. We felt thatthe environmental emphasis would give us an opportunity to introduce the topics of globalstewardship, environmental ethics, engineering codes and the environment, the possibilities ofworking on international teams, intercultural communication and international problem-solving.Russel C. Jones and Bethany S. Oberst have identified the need for reform in engineeringeducation in the Arab world and all parts of the world
the results of an informal in-class experiment to see whether educatorshave a valid reason to worry.BackgroundABET 2000’s emphasis on communication skills,4 especially vital in the era of the globaleconomy with burgeoning virtual collaboration among colleagues on distant continents, and theprevalence of email in the engineering workplace, means that engineering graduates have agreater need than ever for effective written communication skills.5 Any emailmiscommunication can be costly in terms of job advancement, time, productivity, andestablishing rapport with unseen recipients. Page 12.800.2Unfortunately, miscommunication appears to be an all
First questionnaire (Q1) Delphi Panel of Experts Q1 sent out by 7/05/06 (between 16-20) Open ended questions about each Responses received by 7/15/06 Selected U.S. scholars from identified research themes 70's and 90's generation evaluate data Project Second questionnaire (Q2) Directors Q2 sent out by 8/07/06 Structured questions based on Responses received by 8/17
disquiet5,6concerning skills and knowledge of engineeringgraduates from Australian universities. The trend towards softer skills can be gauged throughjob advertisements7,8for professional engineers. Since the 1970’s the demand for engineeringskills has undergone a major paradigm shift from one requiring high technical competence toone requiring social and environmental awareness, good oral and written communication aswell as teamwork skills. It is understood that the nature of engineering practice is a multi-disciplinary one. It is world-wise and its context is people.The Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council identified5 the changinglandscape of engineering practice. The forces responsible for the change were: 1. Global Integration. The
). “Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics,” IEEE Technology and Society, 20(4), pp. 13-20.Martin, M., and Schinzinger, R. (1996). Ethics in Engineering, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.McCuddy, M.K. and D. Tougaw (2005a), “Learning Challenges in Contemporary Society: Fostering Understanding of the Ethical Implications of Advancing Technologies,” presented at the Educational Innovation in Economics and Business 2005 Annual Conference.McCuddy, M.K. and D. Tougaw (2005b), “The Ethical Imperatives of Technological Development: Insights Gained by Using the Individual Human Being as an Analogy for Societies,” Proceedings of the Global Conference on Business and Economics.Nichols, S. P. (1999), “Designing engineers
offer incentives to keep them in the BrazosValley. It is the intent of E4 to have two businesses transition out of the incubator and bereplaced with two new start-up ventures each semester. These start-up ventures provide a focusof interdisciplinary activities through the partnership formed between academia and the privatesector. A reasonable ownership in the new companies will be realized both by the Universityand the private sector partner(s) involved commiserate with resources provided. Through aformal agreement process, team members choosing not to be directly involved in the incubatorprocess, will have the opportunity to participate in the ownership of the new venture throughdirect financial contribution or in-kind commitment.Technology
, we decided to introduce students to commonly followed steps in science andengineering research (Kumar, 2005) and engage them in exploratory project activities.Table 1. Example topics and sponsors of summer camp projects 2004 2005 2006Composite Skateboard Design, Vacuum and Applications, U. Biofuel Production, S. PryorR. Pieri, Mechanical Engineering Bergurhause, Chemistry and D. Wiesenborn, Agricultural and Biosystems EngineeringProduction of Hydrogen Gas Operations Research: Science Water Quality Monitoring andfrom Electrolysis, W. Lin, Civil of Making Decisions, D
). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.8 Gee, J. P. (2001, 10-13 December). The new capitalism: What’s new? Paper presented at the Productive learning atwork, New South Wales, Australia.9 Gee, J. P., Allen, A.-R., & Clinton, K. (2001). Language, Class and Identity: Teenagers Fashioning ThemselvesThrough Language. Linguistics and Education, 12(2), 175-194.10 Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.11 Turns, J., & Lappenbusch, S. (2006, June 18-21). Tracing Student Development During Construction ofEngineering Portfolios. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.12
engineering classroom. Additionally, the inherent goal Page 12.1036.9orientation of different types of courses (e.g., content area or design) needs to be fullyinvestigated in a classroom environment. The subject of motivation in undergraduateengineering programs is ripe for investigation, and will be the subject of subsequentresearch by the authors.References[1] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, "Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-based Practices," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 87-101, 2005.[2] C. Ames, "Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation," Journal of Educational Psychology
organization. We decided tohave interested youth join college students directly within the game courses and work alongsideeach other. If we could demonstrate that this approach would engage the participants, then wecould offer a template for a relatively cheap way to provide an outreach program. Moreover, wecould show how academic groups could partner with local community organizations using games.2.3 The Outreach ProgramOur outreach program found college student volunteers who mentored with apprentices (alsocalled interns). TLW gathered a list of prospective apprentices, screened by the courseinstructor(s). While the college student groups coalesced early in the semester, the instructorcalled for mentors and matched apprentices to them. The
Workshop.Description available at http://www.asce.org/exceed/.10 Center for Teaching Excellence, United States Military Academy. Available athttp://www.dean.usma.edu/centers/cte/11 Bowman, Bruce A. and Farr, John V. (2000) “Embedding Leadership in Civil EngineeringEducation.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice., ASCE,126 (1), 16-20.12 Meyer, K., Morris, M., Estes, A., and Ressler, S. “How to Kill Two Birds with One Stone—Assigning Grades and Assessing Program Goals at the Same Time.” Proceedings of the 2005American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. June 2005.13 Welch, R., Estes, A. and Winget, D. “Assessment of Squishier Outcomes: Open-EndedProblem Solving through Client-Based Projects.” Proceedings of the
the Classroom, 1999, The Free Press, New York, New York.4. Feisel, L.D. and G.D. Peterson, “A Colloquy on Learning Objectives for Engineering EducationLaboratories,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference andExposition, 2002, ASEE, San Diego.5. Florman, S. C., The Existential Pleasures of Engineering, 2nd Edition, 1976, St. Martin’s Press, New York,New York.6. Petrosky, H., To Engineer Is Human : The Role of Failure in Successful Design, 1st Vintage BooksEdition, 1992.7. Karp, W. and L. Lapham, Buried Alive: Essays on Our Endangered Republic, Franklin Square PressJanuary, 2003.8. Becker, Ernest, Beyond Alienation: A Philosophy of Education for the Crisis of Democracy, GeorgeBraziller, Inc., 1967.9
skills that have been acquired in their pursuit of a Bachelor ofScience Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University,Calumet.The paper examines in detail the previous research and development schemes that were used increating the structure(s), housing of the electronics and propulsion systems of typical remotelyoperated vehicles. The paper focuses on the advantages and benefits achieved in the currentdesign of the Internet Controlled Underwater Vehicle.The paper elaborates on the electronics used in the control and communication between the enduser and the vehicle. Furthermore, details of the of the propulsion system, control system, andthe necessary communication protocols are furnished.I. IntroductionThe
experience many of the common traits of industrial problems1 therebyproviding the learners both technical and non-technical skills that are needed to succeed inindustry.Bibliography1. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., Lee, C. B., April 2006. Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2), 139 – 151.2. Hillier, F. S., Lieberman, G. L., 2005. Introduction to Operations Research, Eighth Edition. McGraw Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.3. Castrogiovanni, A., Sforza, P. M., 1997. A Genetic Algorithm Model for High Heat Flux Boiling. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 15, 193 – 201.4. Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., Rivard, H., 2005. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green
. • Outputs: Product or service delivery/implementation targets you aim to produce. • Customer: User of the products/services. Target audience the program is designed to reach. Outcome Structure • Changes or benefits: resulting from activities and outputs. – Short-term (K, S, A) – Changes in learning, knowledge, attitude, skills, understanding – Intermediate (Behavior) – Changes in behavior, practice or decisions – Long-term (Condition) – Changes in condition Page 12.1425.5The evaluation design is formulated with the program’s underlying logic structure serving as
B wind C Wind Speed Wind (m/s) Wind (m/s) Fault 1 0
. Measurements and Calculations: Frisbee's will be mounted to the shaft of an electric Page 12.1374.5motor instrumented with load cells and positioned at different angles ranging from -20o to 20orelative to the wind speed; wind speeds that range from 3 to 30m/s will be explored. Publishedwork will guide the development of the experimental hardware and their experimental data onforce and moment coefficients will be used for quantitative comparison.[5,6,7] A pressuresensitive paint will also be applied to the upper and lower Frisbee surfaces to quantify the surfacepressure distributions using a CCD camera (calibrated against a standard load versus color
Studies in Manufacturing Technical Group and have produced and circulated the initial survey. The survey and other investigation conducted by the authors seek data on demographics, size and productivity, and topical concentration of a wide variety of programs that teach manufacturing subjects. This paper will present some background history, summarize the data collected and offer some conclusions that point towards results that can be useful to any interested college, department or program.Historical Context: For about the past twenty-five years, the Society of ManufacturingEngineers has sponsored and supported a wide spectrum of works in a particular vein with aconsistent thread. From the early 1980’s, SME has issued nearly a dozen
Interdisciplinary Collaboration," The Hybrid Vigor Institute, San Francisco 2003.[15] Borrego, M., "Discipline-Based Views of Collaboration in Engineering Education Research Partnerships," Proceedings, 2006 Frontiers in Education.[16] National Center for Education Statistics, "Digest of Education Statistics," U.S. Department of Education 2005. Page 12.714.10[17] West, M. and J. Curtis, AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators 2006, Vol. . Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors, 2006.[18] Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln, "Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research," in Handbook of Qualitative
the ten questions, three questions covered the firstand fourth quadrants with two questions in each of the second and third quadrants. Page 12.373.6Questions were also ranked on two separate but related scales to measure the focus of a student’stechnical work as shown in Figure 2, below. One scale was formed by level of specificity ordetail the question asked for. A high level of specificity (S) or detail required detailed technicalknowledge of the system. At the other end of this scale general (G) questions asked for anoverview of the system’s function. One would expect a student who played the role of a projectmanager to have more general
, where he is also Director of the Minor in Environmental Studies. He received his Ph.D. from U.C. Berkeley and has also been a faculty member at Ohio State University.Thomas Ruehr, California Polytechnic State University Tom Ruehr is a professor in the Earth and Soil Science Department at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. He has a Ph. D. from Colorado State University. He has received the University Distinguished Teacher award, served the U.S. Department of Agriculture as national co-chairman of the committee for Agricultural Ethics and Public Policy Curriculum Development, and helped lead the U. S. Agency for International Development world conference on Agricultural Systems
:30pm (M-F) ANYTIME (S-S) Figure 15. Sample of a Construction Drawing Table 5 Brief Description Of The Construction Sequence Of ActivitiesTimeframe Description02-16-01 - 2-22-01 Placed median barriers southbound02-23-01 - 03-13-01 Placed median barriers northbound03-20-01 Closed Natchez Trace Parkway (NTP) Bridge & West ramps of NTP10-03-01 - 10-12-01 Placed median barriers southbound to put traffic on newly constructed inside lane (becomes shoulder when complete)11-01-01 - 11-09-01 Placed median barriers northbound to put traffic to the newly constructed inside lane
, electronics, digital circuits, power, and facilitate understandingof electrical systems such as sensors and industrial instruments. The book should balance therequirement of math, theory, and engineering applications.VI. SUMMARY Page 12.205.12The article describes the experience of developing and teaching an electrical engineering coursein a general engineering program. It examines coverage of the electrical topics, discussesteaching approaches and encountered difficulties, and presents possible improvementopportunities. The authors believe that offering electrical engineering course(s) in a generalengineering curriculum is important. Successful
.) as furnished by the mill?• When using lock wires to secure bolted connections, what are the recommended type and diameter(s) of the wire?• What is a gathering operation in forging?• In 2002, when did Daylight Saving Time begin in Europe? Answer to be date and GMT.Expert systemsExpert systems are used in many applications, particularly in business, to simulate theknowledge of an expert in a field and respond to the input of a user with suggestions based onthis expert knowledge within a narrow, well-defined domain. A system is designed to provide an Page 12.1106.4inexperienced user with information and assistance with a problem
sections: presentation and competition. For presentation, allteam members had to participate in giving a 10-min. oral presentation to the class. Three facultymembers judged all the presentations in one day and gave their individual scores to each team.An average was then taken as for the presentation score.For competition, each team ran their vehicle twice in the main hallway of the engineeringbuilding. Scores were given to the vehicles for each run and later averaged using:SCORE=15L+10V-5D-10C+20Pwhere: L: distance, measured from the start point to the end point in one direction, inch (0.1” increments) V: velocity, measured distance over the recorded time in one direction, inch/s (1 sec increments) D: deviation, lateral distance
Program (2+2) started in the mid-80’s, with a handful of universitiesparticipating, provides students from all over the state to complete the first two years closer tohome before transferring to the junior level at Georgia Tech. Currently 14 colleges anduniversities throughout the state of Georgia participate in this program. Students also canparticipate in the Dual Degree Program (3+2), where they have to spend an extra year at ASU toobtain an additional degree in a science major upon completion of the engineering degree atGeorgia Tech. Over 90% students of ASU belong to the African American community as well asthe entire group of engineering students which currently stands at around 50. Though theprogram was primarily designed for transfer to