development and evaluation of solutions to engineering and societal problems. 4. Social sciences - Demonstrate the incorporation of social sciences (economics, political science, psychology, etc.) knowledge into the professional practice of civil engineering. Technical Outcomes 5. Materials science - Apply knowledge of materials, such as steel, concrete, wood, soil, asphalt, and composites of materials, used in civil engineering construction. 6. Mechanics - Analyze and solve problems involving solid and fluid mechanics. 7. Laboratory and Field Methods - Conduct experiments in civil engineering according to established procedures, report results, and evaluate the accuracy of the results within the known boundaries of the test and materials. 8. Problem
Overview of activities for the day 9:15– 9:45 Travel to McGhee Tyson Airport (TYS), Knoxville 9:45 – 12:30 pm Airport Activities 12:30 – 1:15 Lunch 1:15 – 2:30 TYS Airport Activities (continued) 2:30 – 3:00 Travel to National Transportation Research Center / STC Lab 3:00 – 4:00 Traffic Signal Systems Laboratory tour 4:00 – 4:15 Travel back to STC 4:15 – 4:30 Day 2 Wrap-up and Evaluations 4:30 pm Adjourn Thursday Activity 8:30 – 9:00 am Recap of day 1 & 2 Activities 9:00 – 9:15 Overview of activities for the day 9:15 – 9:30 Travel to UT’s Tickle Engineering Building 9:30 – 11:30
facilitation tool, AM can be thought of as another piece of laboratory equipment that allowsstudents to explore engineering topics without the constraints that may be imposed by the use ofother manufacturing processes. In these cases the AM capability is simply a tool that can savestudents time and effort and allow more focus on other course content; however, in the processof making the part, the students may learn little or nothing about the AM process. Often all thestudents may know or care about is that they can send a CAD file of a desired part to the AMmachine and within a day or so, they are holding the part in their hands. Examples of utilizingAM as a facilitation tool include the fabrication of wind tunnel test models,3,4 parts for
should share the work load equitably and share the credit; • Accountability- Students should be accountable individually & as a group. Keeping track of knowledge gained by the individual (through the group) should not be overlooked; • Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (computer skills, laboratory skills, data analysis and reduction skills, writing skills, presentation skills, etc.) should be willing to pass it on, and/ or share it with their group members; • Collaborative skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. Such as: leadership, decision-making, trust building, and conflict
one pre-serviceteacher shared in the second check-in, “I struggled thinking of things to talk about that theengineers would know a lot about because of the lack of information I had about what theyactually did.” By understanding what the engineers did, the students discussed it might help to doa better job in developing the science club experiences as they could plan activities to connect toengineering.The other most discussed barrier was the language differences. The pre-service teachersrecognized there are differences in the language used to communicate information. Theengineering students discussed laboratory experiments and content; the pre-service teachersdiscussed the abilities of children and how to plan lessons. As one student
Energy concentration was developed at LakeSuperior State University (LSSU). This concentration is composed of courses such as powerelectronics, power transmission and distribution, and vehicle energy systems. In addition, a newcourse entitled Energy Systems & Sustainability was also developed for this concentration.This new Energy Systems & Sustainability course is designed to provide a broad overview andallows both engineering and non-engineering students to gain exposure to these areas. There isalso a separate laboratory course that is designed for the engineering students, and as suchcontains more technical detail. Only the lecture course is discussed in this work. The primaryobjectives for the course are for students to be able to
respon- sible for funds as PI or Co-PI from 52 separate proposals totaling almost $6,500,000. Courses taught include undergraduate finite elements, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and engineering economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical me- chanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Bradley Davidson, University of Denver Dr. Bradley Davidson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Denver and Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics
Engineering, and Materials at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a position she held from 1984-2008. From 2000 – 2009 she served as the scientific co-director of the California NanoSystems Institute, a joint initiative at UCSB and the University of California, Los Angeles. Prior to that, Dr. Hu worked at AT& T Bell Laboratories, after receiving a Ph.D. in Physics from Columbia University. Her research has matched nanofabrication techniques with the integration of materials that allow the for- mation of structures and devices that demonstrate exceptional electronic and photonic behavior, allowing efficient, controlled and often coherent output of devices. She has participated in and directed a large set of
aboveaverage. Below Average Average Above Average 24-45% 46-70% 71-85% Spring Study 5 3 3 Fall Study 2 2 3 Total % 38.9% 27.8% 33.3%Table 1. Performance Groupings within the Study Problem SetData CollectionData was collected in a laboratory setting. To facilitate this study, students were video-recordedas they took part in the study. Selected participants also participated in video-recorded open-ended post-interviews at the conclusion of the study. During the first semester of the study,participants were asked to solve a number of Statics problems
-Oriented Laboratories in the First-Year Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,” Proc. of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Page 26.194.18
created14 with support from NSF for avariety of topics in Bioengineering15. The method was shown to improve students’ performancewith open-ended problems16,17,18. Inquiry-based learning approaches, such as CBI, have beenfound to be “more effective than traditional science instruction at improving academicachievement, and the development of thinking, problem-solving and laboratory skills”11, and toenhance understanding of critical engineering concepts19,20. A key facet of the CBW approach in heat transfer instruction is the integration of hands-on workshops into the existing course. The integration of hands-on activities into courses hasshown significant learning gains for students across several domains. Faculty have usedinteractive learning
with student leaders on the benefits of actively participating in studentorganizations; lunch with industry engineers with a panel discussion; tours of key engineeringfacilities and laboratories; and a presentation on accessing the LSU Olinde Career Centerservices and preparing a professional resume. This workshop format was repeated for fall 2014and spring 2015 transfers, and the Pathway Scholars contributed to program serving as peermentors and student presenters.SeminarsThe Pathway Scholars were regular participants in the Professional Development Seminars thathave been offered to LSU College of Engineering undergraduates served by the DiversityInitiatives Office. The topics varied from general student networking to career skills
risky strategic orientation from the CEO’s vantage point. Thesestrategic alternatives are currently under investigation as ways that the conceptual framework canbe tailored and modified to help large organizations achieve their innovation objectives.Pilot projects are conducted in our living laboratory to verify the non-linear results. Thenrefinements are incorporated to the detailed business plan that is systematically implemented inconcert with the Check-Act-Plan – Do improvement process that has been successful for the corebusiness. This is significant because changing processes in this manner avoids destruction ofthose approaches that are already contributing to the organization’s success.The need for a total systems approach is underscored
by CA2VES’ include high-impact, hands-on virtualreality and 3D visualizations and also focus on engaging, computer enhanced teachingtechniques, and hands-on laboratory experiences; the combination of which offers student-centered, contextual, authentic learning experiences (see Figure 1). It is difficult to make real-world learning experiences widely available in the classroom to students because ofparameterization issues (too many variables to manipulate) and the availability and cost ofequipment and machinery. The flexibility inherent in e-learning and virtual classrooms offersCA2VES new avenues to not only attract more technology-oriented students but also capacity toreach new students in locations (including areas lacking geographical
Practical Experience: Students will let you do thismaterials and expenses will be normally covered by project if you take charge. Resist the urge to useexisting laboratory sources. Some projects require your knowledge and experience to give themmore extensive (what is not normally in our labs) short-cuts and a path to a quick finish. You shouldmaterials and fabrications. Students are directed in use little of your brain on this. It is their project,the Capstone handbook to provide a bill of materials their design. If they do something stupid, theyand an assembly drawing with their requests for learn. If they continue to generate stupid design,purchases. Additional instrumentation and or special they
:00 0.30 286.54 9:20:05 122.39 9:40:00 0.00 425.13 9:20:39 FALSE 9:20:49 TRUE 9:22:05 152.32 9:24:05 157.06 9:26:05 161.63 9:27:49 FALSE 9:28:05 161.78 9:30:05 152.13Ideally, CLICS is used by instructors in a range of disciplines for extended homework,laboratory experiences or projects. It is expected that these experiences require 21st century skillsto complete rather than simple plug and chug applications. It is the higher-order critical thinkingskills that are expected to be enhanced from using relevant, real-world data. In the Fall 2014semester, several classes considered the use of LED lighting and daylighting
(social, economic, aesthetic, intellectual, etc.) to the classroom, campus and world”. The group secured funding from the president of Bucknell and appointed two faculty as Fellows to help coordinate efforts to fund projects and people who are enhancing the innovation ecosystem, most often by engaging in a highrisk, highreward project and/or one that will engage a diverse group of faculty, staff and students. To date, the group has funded 46 projects, many of which can be found on the group’s blog at www.bucknellinnovationgroup.blogs.bucknell.edu/ . The University has long had fabrication facilities in the form of an Art Barn, a Product Development Laboratory and a Craft Center. But with a few exceptions over the years, these
laboratory work). Website or other electronic locations for the course (i.e., Blackboard) may be listed here. • Units/time dedicated per week (i.e., meets on T, Th at 4:00 – 5:15 PM) • Prerequisites/co-requisites – should include course names and numbers according to institution catalog so that they can be easily identified. B. Instructor information • Instructors’ names and preferred name – name or names and their function in relation to the course, along with degrees and credentials (i.e., Dr. John Doe, P.E., instructor; and Smith, L., Ph.D candidate, teaching assistant (TA)). The instructor prefer to be called Professor Doe, and the TA prefer to be called Mr. Smith) • Office hour – indicate where and how students should
computing. The delivery of computing resources or services over the Internet.Collaboratory. Coined by the National Science Foundation to identify a laboratory consisting of collaborating colleagues.Cyber security. The discipline of securing computer resources and information.Hypervisor. Computer software or hardware that manages and executes virtual machines.IaaS. Infrastructure as a Service cloud resource. Azure is an example of an IaaS. The provisioning of virtual machines with Microsoft operating systems, as its first priority, is one of its services.Infrastructure. Physical computing hardware and resources that are part of a network, a cloud, or the Internet.Maestro. A SaaS cloud service provider that provisions SQL-related software
thevariety of potential learning activities and structures for delivering and assessing the coursecontent. Forty percent of the remarks included some discussion of particular in-class activitiesand assessments, including, but not limited to in-class demonstrations, projects, presentations,labs, competitions, and example problems.Grace’s Mechanics of Materials course, for instance, “had a laboratory component, where [she] explored phenomena discussed in class in the physical world - this helped [her] link equations and concepts learned in lectures to how materials physically deform.”Victor, on the other hand, was impacted by the problem-based learning experience he had inSystem Dynamics & Control: “I believe that I devoted
quality, accessibility and breadth.Engineering education has lagged behind other fields in adapting online teaching methodologies (10, 11, 12, 13) . Reasons for this lag include the Five Pillars of Quality Online Learning need for hands on engineering experiences in laboratories with often expensive equipment and substantial computing power (10). Until recently, this type of computer power was not Effectiveness
Paper ID #12215A Student Design, Develop, Test & Deploy Project: Perseus II - Developmentof an Unmanned Marine System for an Underwater Unexploded OrdnanceMissionMr. Michael DeLorme, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Mr. Michael DeLorme Mr. DeLorme has 11 years of professional experience as a Research Asso- ciate/Engineer at Stevens; Davidson Laboratory, DHS National Center for Secure and Resilient Maritime Commerce (CSR), and Systems Engineering Research Center. Research concentrations include exper- imental marine hydrodynamics, unmanned marine vehicles, the implementation of hydro-acoustics for the detection of
University. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics, predominantly di-electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned aNSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within herMedical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development ofDesktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi-ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committeeand PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributedto 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles
often work in laboratory settings –there are significant differences in the nature of their work and education. Pinelli explains thesedifferences in the work of engineers vs. scientists in great detail,3 but for our purposes whatmatters is how this plays out in terms of library use. As users, engineers behave differently thantheir peers in other disciplines. Many of them simply don’t use the library, physically orvirtually, and are unaware of library resources and services. Neither group is known to askreference questions in the traditional sense or request mediated searching. Tenopir states, “Evenwhen they do use a library, engineers like to search for information themselves rather than gothrough a librarian or other intermediary.”4
the professional engineer. Whenconfronted with the views of other disciplines on the field of engineering in his reflectionpaper, he was “taken aback by the picture they seemed to be painting of engineers anddesigners throughout the paper. An uneducated reader would imagine the engineer as ahermit locked inside a laboratory, receiving “problems” in the form of papers slid under Page 26.1724.6his door, and zealously working out solutions by distilling the information in theproblems into a set of constraints to be followed like a mathematical formula.” Hefurther evaluates the importance of “ the working with approach” as he articulates therole of
(1), 21-51.3. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education.4. Linenberger, K., Slade, M.C., Addis, E.A., Elliott, E.R., Mynhardt, G., & Raker, J.R. (2014). Training the foot soldiers of inquiry: Development and evaluation of a graduate teaching assistant learning community. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(1), 97-107.5. Bohrer, K., Ferrier, A., Johnson, D., & Miller, K. (2007). TA training workshops. In K.L. Chase (Ed.), Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE) Proceedings, 29, 67
Illustration of the fringe pattern on a loaded sample in the Stress-Opticon Kit [17] .The Stress-Opticon KitThe Stress-Opticon (SO) is the kit used in the photoelasticity lab. The kit is a unique pocket-size“photoelastic laboratory” designed for qualitative demonstration of photoelastic stress analysis,mechanics principles, stress concentration and the behavior of structural elements[17]. Theapparatus is shown in Fig. 2. When a specimen is loaded inside the kit, the polarizers allowvisualization of the fringe patterns that correspond to the pattern of stress distribution in theloaded sample.Assessment of Results and DiscussionDuring the quarter, the photoelasticity lab was conducted one week and the FEM lab wasconducted the following week. Each lab
socialimplications in terms of diversity (an overly used, minimalist justification) or some form ofdissemination into K-12. Yet they rarely find a way to connect course content with socialproblems, particularly those related to SJ. For example, and existing REU Site grant titled “FluidMechanics with Analysis using Computations and Experiments” is aimed at mentoringundergraduate students in “the current need for basic and applied research in fluid mechanicsacross a range of engineering disciplines as well as the training of undergraduate students instate-of-the-art laboratory environments.” And in traditional fashion, the grant justifies meetingCriterion 2 “by enhancing and diversifying the pool of students considering a research career inengineering
engineeringdesign and align more practically with problems encountered in the real-world.Engineering design tasks are typically neglected in school science due to time constraints.17,18 Inthe U.S. high stakes testing and national and state science standards drive the curriculum. Eventhough textbooks include technological and engineering applications,17 these activities are oftenoverlooked to meet assessment goals. Design tasks promote authentic learning because theyaligned with what professionals actually do in practice. School science is typically presented asa set of individual context stripped problems isolated from laboratory activities.Recently the NGSS6 were revealed as the new U.S. national standards for science education.The NGSS complement the
Technology Education Laboratories. Journal of Technology Education. 2005; 42.16. High School Engineering Program, http://www.pltw.org/our-programs/high-school-engineering-program, January 4, 2014.17. Engineering by Design, http://www.iteea.org/EbD/ebd.htm,18. Singhose W and Donnell J. Introductory Mechanical Design Tools. Department of Mechanical Page 26.844.12 Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009.19. Engineering Design Process, http://www.teachengineering.org/engrdesignprocess.php, January 4, 2014.20. NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington