identity development through engaging in reflective qualitativeresearch practices. While the student researchers were not the participants who provided the data,their engagement with the research team helped us incorporate a student view directly into ourwork as we made sense of our data, which we believe was beneficial and necessary.In this executive summary and poster, we report on the summer undergraduate researchexperience by detailing the undergraduate research associates (URAs) engagement with the data.We also provide a summary of our key takeaways highlighting the benefits to both the URAsthemselves and to the added quality of the data analysis because of the insight from the URAs.We end with a series of suggestions for researchers working
inclusion and diversity initiatives as well as employing innovative, ethical and inclusive mixed-methods research approaches to uncovering insights about the 21st century workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Opportunities from Disruption -how lifelong learning can help create more connected classroomsAbstractThe coronavirus pandemic has led to instructors worldwide seeking ways to engage studentsbetter through virtual platforms. As the world interacts online, more than ever before, thispaper reflects on an educator’s experience with the virtual teaching and learning spaces pre andduring the ongoing
through meaningful reflection. The result is thatstudents gain more than just the experience of completing a design, but an enrichment andrealization of the methods and skills developed.I. IntroductionMany engineers contend that design is the heart of engineering. Traditional engineeringcurricula were based on the concept that a strong foundation in engineering sciences wouldnaturally lead to better designers. The curriculum would often contain some form of a capstonedesign experience where students would be given a design problem to resolve. The students mayor may not have been taught how to best approach the solution to the design problem. At the endof the allotted time period (a semester or some other number of weeks), the design project
through meaningful reflection. The result is thatstudents gain more than just the experience of completing a design, but an enrichment andrealization of the methods and skills developed.I. IntroductionMany engineers contend that design is the heart of engineering. Traditional engineeringcurricula were based on the concept that a strong foundation in engineering sciences wouldnaturally lead to better designers. The curriculum would often contain some form of a capstonedesign experience where students would be given a design problem to resolve. The students mayor may not have been taught how to best approach the solution to the design problem. At the endof the allotted time period (a semester or some other number of weeks), the design project
challenge is to find meaningful ways to engage freshman in analyzing ethicalchallenges.This presentation explains a collaborative approach to integrating an ethics module intoUniversity 101-Engineering (UNIV 101-E), a freshman course for engineering students at theUniversity of South Carolina patterned after USC’s nationally recognized Freshman YearExperience course, University 101. Sections of the engineering course described here include aclassroom instruction and discussion on the NSPE Code of Ethics and case studies whichstudents gather from specified websites. To support the classroom instruction, the courseinstructor and the director of the College of Engineering’s Professional Communications Centercollaborated in developing a reflective
ofengineering technology can be evaluated for technical merit, practical applicability, or any othercriterion of interest to the instructor or college.Along with achieving program goals for assessment of student learning, portfolios supportstudents in developing awareness of their strengths and weaknesses. In a good portfolioprogram, students collect their work, choose representative pieces, and reflect on this work in thefinal presentation of the portfolio. In this process they can address questions such as: Why was Isuccessful with this project? What makes a good design? How did I perform in group tasks?What else am I learning that builds on this information or skill? How can I change myperformance to better enable me to succeed?In 6 semesters of
learning objectives and compile evidence supporting assessment programming to maintain accreditation. Project Objective: Improve collection of data and evaluation of courses for program enrichment and accreditation assessment. Project Scope: The process being evaluated initiates with course offerings beginning in the fall semester and ends with a semester reflection and program review in the spring. Goal Statement: Develop methodology within the 12-16 weeks allotted that provides consistent data collection and evaluation of courses for program enrichment and accreditation assessment to reduce reactive measures taken to provide assessment documentation. Deliverables: Reflection Packet Template, Data Collection
the primary focus is directing students toengage with the tool to reflect on their experiential learning activities such as project teams,study abroad or research so they can build a story bank of their growth and development toprepare for interviews or other employer interactions. In the business school, the tool isintegrated into the undergraduate curriculum, and students achieve different levels of eachcompetency through the courses they take, with some direct interaction with the tool. Lastly,public health has fully integrated the tool with a masters program, where students use the tool toexplore the pathways to different careers as they gain proficiency in various skills, and much ofwhat happens in the tool is automated through the
, and develops student leaders to embody the principles of professional academic advising and leaders within their academic, professional, and social communities. These student leaders serve as invaluable resources for their peers, offering guidance, support, and insights into the biomedical engineering experience. Grounded in student development and servant leadership principles, the PALs program fosters ethical and inclusive leadership, building strong peer-to-peer relationships that facilitate knowledge transfer and personal growth. Dr. Paige’s unwavering commitment to guiding and educating students in higher education drives her to advocate for the development of critically reflective students, scholars, leaders
cognitively but also in the affectivedomain, fostering students’ identity as engineers who have an entrepreneurial mindset. We presenttwo accounts of how story-driven learning and focused team development were integrated intodifferent courses and highlight how they can amplify the impacts of activities fostering curiosity,connections, and value creation (the 3Cs), which nurture entrepreneurial mindset. In one, thisresults in students who have more clarity regarding their own engineering identity and the uniqueperspectives their peers can contribute. In the other, students learned and applied principles ofeffective teaming and used stories to reflect on their experiences. Student reflections, individuallyand in teams, show augmented self-awareness
for making a difference in their community and world or personalagency. Personal agency is a capability that every individual holds; it is described by Bandura asan individual’s beliefs about their capabilities to exercise control over events that affect their livesthrough purposeful and reflective actions. Agentic actions allow students to explore, maneuverand impact their environment for the achievement of a goal or set of goals. This study identifieshow cognitive processes of forethought, intention, reactivity, and reflection shape a students’agentic behavior and together influence first-generation college students’ goal of making adifference in their community through their engineering degree.Data for this study came from a large-scale
cultural upbringing. The reaction to this realization can be emotionallydistressing, as noted, but it can also provide the opportunity for transformative learning, as it hasbeen described in the literature on adult education.Transformative learning occurs when students are able to reflect critically on the culturalassumptions, values, beliefs, and behaviors that guide their everyday activities. As Mezirow putit, it is: a rational process of learning within awareness as a metacognitive application of critical thinking that transforms an acquired frame of reference - a mind-set or worldview of orienting assumptions and expectations involving values, beliefs, and concepts - by assessing its epistemic
will beshared in the study) also expose students to another aspect of the pedagogical framework: Amindful awareness of the AI Usability Spectrum. For instance, while Bloom’s revised taxonomyis instrumental in the creation of Human-AI learning outcomes and course content, theframework also encourages faculty to reflect upon the AI Usability Spectrum. To maintainacademic integrity and embrace the full use of Human-AI learning, faculty can engage studentsin the learning process, determining the ‘right’ amount of AI usage for every task. This practiceincludes breaking down tasks into categories pertaining to writing, critical thinking, and researchwhile classifying AI use into low, medium, and high intensity. This interactive processintroduces
activities that can be used throughout various engineering andcomputer science courses from first year to upper division [5].As part of this project, the University of Denver (DU) has developed and implemented severalactivities, including a group-based hairdryer design task for second year thermodynamicsstudents. The pilot of the activity took place in spring of 2019 and this initial experience waspresented at ASEE in 2020 [6]. Since then, the activity has been run four times and iterated tohelp strengthen the goals of the activity and assess its effectiveness. Changes since the initialpilot have included options for remote courses, added reflection time, and a focus on overalldesign process instead of detailed mathematical questions. The current
undergraduate students over the years. Next, we will introduce and discuss the twoclasses (Freshman Engineering and Electromagnetism) where we deployed the method. We willalso highlight the students’ work and introduce their journeys by sharing their reflections andsome examples of their activities and challenges. The main question that we are trying to ask andfind evidence for is, "Can we re-engineer mistakes and use them as an important part of thelearning, changing, and adapting to the process, examinations, and growth of the students?” Wefound that providing low-stakes learning opportunities is impactful in encouraging collaborationsamong the students and allowing them to openly engage in their own identity, discuss, examinetheir knowledge and not
and its placement within the course structure.The 2019 reinforcement lesson provided a mid-semester opportunity for teams to revisit thescholarly and authoritative sources module from early in the semester. A short group writingassignment asked students to reflect on sources they had found and used thus far. It also providedan opportunity for faculty to remind students about related help materials in the course’s libraryresearch guide. The new mid-semester lesson was piloted in 6 course sections; deployed andgraded via Canvas, the university’s learning management system (LMS).A sampling of course faculty, both those who piloted the lesson and those who did not, wereinterviewed about their perceptions of the success of the pilot and the role
, affordances within a learning managementsystem (LMS) were used to highlight student learning outcomes, require foundational coursecontent to be completed before attempting more complex topics, provide mastery-orientedfeedback, allow students to track their progress, and promote metacognitive reflection. Thispaper describes the use of these options within the Canvas LMS. Additionally, this studyinvestigated whether student self-regulatory behaviors changed during the course. Students wereasked to complete a survey about their metacognitive self-regulatory activities related to studyingfor this course. The first survey was completed during the fifth week of the course, after moststudents had completed two reflection assignments. The same survey
evaluation of the educational benefits of service-learning projects byfocusing on one case study. The most recent endeavor of the Tufts University Engineers WithoutBorders (EWB) Chapter involved a Green Building Initiative in Ecuador. During the summer of2007, six students accompanied by a professor embarked on a month-long project in HaciendaPicalqui and El Cristal, Ecuador. During the project, students evaluated their own skill sets byfilling out Pre-Travel, Post Travel, and Post-Post Travel surveys and reflected daily on events,health and progress. Comparisons of the Pre and Post-Travel surveys verify substantialadvancement in leadership, teamwork, communication and problem solving skills; however, dueto the debatable reliability of self
teachers, because it helpsteachers think through all the necessary pieces of teaching an exemplary lesson. Knowing howpreservice teachers write lesson plans will inform the support that teacher preparation programsprovide. For this study, data was collected from a group of junior level STEM educationpreservice teachers to understand their lesson plan writing process. Specifically, we wanted toknow where preservice teachers struggled in the process. To accomplish this goal, we collectedthe preservice teachers’ lesson plans, reflections, log of their steps, and screen capture video.Because the data collection was coupled with the preservice teachers’ class and we did not wantto interfere with the course, we were not able to collect a full set of
Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular Electromagnetism and other classes that are mathematically driven. His research and activities also include on avenues to connect Product Design and Engineering Education in a synergetic way. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing a Multi-Cycle
which all engineering freshmen work on real design projects for real clients.Prof. Adam GoodmanMs. Koshonna Brown, Northwestern University Center for Leadership Koshonna Brown is a Life Science doctoral student at Northwestern University. As a fellow with North- western University’s Center for Leadership, she analyzes the date collected through the Center’s online assessment tools. Such assessments allow students and faculty to reflect and develop their own leadership and apply lessons and insights gained to current leadership challenges and positions. Page 24.1048.1 c American
hierarchies.This paper describes a research design that integrates participant-centered methods such asnarrative inquiry, reflective journaling, and member-checking to ensure participants’ experiencesare authentically captured and interpreted. Additionally, the design includes interviews withparticipants’ self-identified mentors to provide a holistic view of the mentorship dynamics thatsupport early-career success. By situating the research design within NSF’s broader mission todiversify STEM fields, this paper serves as a foundational resource for researchers committed toconducting inclusive, asset-based studies that advance equity in engineering education andpractice.Importantly, this paper does not present empirical findings; instead, it is a detailed
created over time, toshow the changes and advancement of their writing skills. These two types of portfolios areconsidered to be the basis of the portfolios used in engineering discipline.Besides these two commonly used portfolio models, there are several other types of portfoliomodels being suggested and used in the practice. Cress and McCullouogh-Cress1 designed astudent portfolio as a collection of student goals for learning, works in progress, peer andinstructor feedback, and reflections on the work and processes. Gottlieb2 pointed out thatportfolio designs, contents, and purposes could take on many forms, all of which areeducationally defensible. In order to clarify the variety of portfolios, he proposed adevelopmental scheme, which includes
balance conflict with safety. Too much or the wrongtype of conflict can be detrimental to learning. The techniques we used, some of them borrowedfrom professional leadership training programs, had a positive impact on the students, asrevealed by their weekly reflective essays and by individual communication with them duringand after the course. Students, perhaps subconsciously, created conflicts that enabled them tolearn lessons they needed to learn.One aspect of safety is how to limit the damage of mistakes while encouraging learning frommistakes. To that end, we chose not to have a real-world customer whose dependence on theproject success would have increased the damage from a potential project failure. Our focus wason the learning – in the
projectthat directly influences performance. With this intervention, we intended to cultivate a learningenvironment where students truly improved their ability to maturely and equitably handle a largeintegrated hands-on project. To measure the success of this initiative, the team analyzed the collectedpeer evaluations to examine the data provided by the tool and data obtained from reflective reports bothpre and post-intervention to provide comparative insight on the success of this intervention.Additionally, the paper describes the use of the software in various projects and analyzes the outcomes,offering recommendations for broader implementation. While acknowledging the complexity andnuance of team dynamics, we anticipate this research will
. The Integrative GraduateEducation Research and Traineeship on Magnetic and Nanostructured Materials (IGERT-MNM)is a collaboration between Purdue University, Cornell University, and Norfolk State Universityto train interdisciplinary science and engineering doctoral students for future roles as leaders inthe materials science and engineering fields. As part of this socialization into future careers,students proceed through a variety of modules. This paper specifically covers student learning ina pedagogy module, which introduces students to best practices in teaching and learning.Graduate student reflections on the development of high-school level student and teacher scienceand engineering activities were analyzed via thematic coding methods in
run of a faculty development program called WritingAcross Engineering (WAE). The program draws heavily on the Writing Across the Curriculum(WAC) and Writing in the Disciplines (WID) literature [2], [4]–[9], but differs in three key ways.First, WAE is grounded in a sustained interdisciplinary collaboration designed and led by a teamthat spans Physics, Engineering, and Writing Studies. Second, rather than the typical one-offintensive workshop model, WAE organized weekly meetings of a small cohort over a semester,similar to a faculty learning community. Meetings introduced technical faculty to best practicesfrom Writing Studies and promoted reflection and discussion about how those practices could beadapted most effectively for each faculty
communication (ICC) and cohort-building before traveling abroad over spring break,where they engage with researchers and practitioners during tours, site visits, and lectures. Using a combination ofsurveys and reflections from four cohorts, we discuss participants’ pre- and post- trip assessments regarding their holisticunderstanding of sustainability, perceptions of their engineering disciplines, and their global, intercultural, andcommunication competencies. We assert that short-duration SA is an efficient, effective, and non-disruptive approach toproviding engineering students access to the high-impact benefits of SA experiences. Additionally, our preliminaryfindings align with prior research showing that combined ICC instruction and SA can improve
reflect upon and assess diversity and inclusion efforts within ECE [2].To interrogate students’ perceptions of diversity and inclusion, we interviewed 13 current or pastundergraduate ECE students. With nearly 40 percent of the undergraduate ECE studentsidentifying as international students, such a significant international population posestremendous learning opportunities as well as challenges related to diversity and inclusion. Thus,formal efforts within ECE have been made to bridge cultural differences, develop interculturalcompetencies, and promote inclusion of internationally and domestically diverse ECE members.However, these efforts have met with mixed results. Our analysis of the interview data suggeststhat these efforts often were not
gender. The high numbers in Mechanical Engineering reflect the overall size, relativeto Chemical Engineering (second largest), and Civil Engineering. As can be seen from the bottomof Table 2, the average school wide GPA was 2.57. The average GPA in the programs follows thesame order as the aforementioned minimum entrance requirements by program. This result is tobe expected, as those who did the best in first year would be expected to continue to achieve highresults in their second year. On the other hand, the material in Dynamics is more aligned with theinterests and strengths of Mechanical and Civil Engineers than with Chemical Engineers. Thisalignment may indicate that students are not necessarily enrolled in the program that is bestaligned