, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami community, alumni and industry leaders. Starting in 2016 and through her work with the University of Miami’s Engaged Faculty Fellowship program, Dr. Basalo incorporated an academic service component into the final project for a sophomore-level Measurements Lab course
majors since 2005. She has established entrepreneurship capstone, global en- trepreneurship, and women and leadership courses and initiatives at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Prior to her work in academia, Nathalie spent several years in the field of market research and business strategy consulting in Europe and the United States with Booz Allen and Hamilton and Data and Strategies Group. She received a BA from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, an MBA from Babson College, and MS and PhD degrees from Purdue University. She currently serves on the board of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship in the role of Vice President for Research. She is also a Senior
fromthe knowledge, skills, and attitudes of toy Makers to advance teaching in the engineeringclassroom? Findings are presented to inform possibilities for design in engineering contexts anda multi-disciplinary, holistic attitude towards engineering education that is rising fromdiscussions on the future of engineering education.IntroductionIn undergraduate engineering academic programs, engineering design often serves as acornerstone or capstone experience, supplying context and motivations for how to construct andredesign the world. There is usually an undue burden on the instructor to seed such classes withcompelling and technically sufficient projects and provide enough structure to make a goodlearning experience.1 With this concern, it is
, she introduced the first experiential activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Mr. Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.)Mr. Smarth H. ChadhaMr. Shraman Kadapa, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Shraman Kadapa completed his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette. He is currently pursuing a masters’ degree in mechanical engineering and mechanics at Drexel University. He is a research and teaching assistant in the mechanical and mechatronics lab at Drexel. He is also a researcher in Scalable Autonomous Systems Lab. His research interests are mainly in robotics which
capstone course and ensuring better coordination of prerequisites.The second regarded design (synthesis), coordination, and communication as major featuresintegrated into the traditional course structure. The third, and most radical alternative would haveeliminated traditional courses in favor of a design studio sequence, with engineering principleslearned in the context of design project. The faculty opted for the second alternative. Thestructure of the curriculum after the revision is outlined in Table 2.Table 2. The structure of the revised MIT civil and environmental engineering curriculumGeneral and Civil Engineering FundamentalsIntroduction to Computers and Engineering Problem SolvingUncertainty in EngineeringDifferential EquationsProject
provide a working knowledge of nanotechnology in generaland the physics and chemistry employed in nanofiber production specifically.Additionally several modes of assessment were used through out the activity. Inparticular, an attitudes inventory was administered pre and post activity to evaluatechange in perceptions about pursuing STEM careers. Summative assessments were usedto gage student’s learning and performance based assessments were used to enhancestudent’s internalization of the subject matter. The students demonstrated an improvedunderstanding of nanotechnology across the board and girls performed better than theboys on the summative assessment. As a capstone on the project the students producedposters to communicate their findings to
to the quantitative data, qualitative questions are also asked of the students. In theseresponses, the students clearly appreciated the base camp portion of the course, which was theapplication portion. For example, in response to the question, “What did you learn in the coursethat will be of help to you in the future?”, 29% of the 56 students commented on the base campportion of the course as the best for preparing for the future. Comments included the following:What did you learn in the course that will be of help to you in the future? • How to develop base camps • If I ever have to help plan and build a basecamp, I'm prepared. • Base camps are no joke. • How to manage a construction project and what goes into making a base camp
will have the opportunity to work on a variety of hands-on projects, including thedesign and implementation of a simple mechatronic system.2.2 Course TextbookTextbook: Introduction to Mechatronics and Measurement Systems, D. Alciatore & M. B.Histand, McGraw Hill, 5th Edition, 2019.Reference Book: 1. Introduction to Mechatronic Design, J. Edward Carryer, R. Matthew Ohline,Thomas W. Kenny, Prentice-Hall, 2011; 2. Control Systems Engineering, Nise, Norman S, JohnWiley, 8th edition, 2019.2.3 ObjectivesThe overall objectives of the course include, but are not limited to, • Understand the fundamental principles and concepts of mechatronics • Identify and select appropriate sensors and actuators for a given system • Develop control
Paper ID #43012Perceptions of Engineering College Instructors and Their Students TowardsGenerative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Tools: A Preliminary QualitativeAnalysisMr. Dhruv Gambhir, Nanyang Technological University Dhruv is a senior undergraduate student majoring in Computer Science at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. Actively engaged in Dr. Yeter’s Research Team, he specializes in projects at the intersection of engineering education and artificial intelligence (AI). With a unique perspective as an engineering student focused on AI, Dhruv is dedicated to enhancing engineering education in the
Perspectives for Engineers o Learning theories applied to engineering education. o Curriculum design: Approaches to planning teaching. o Writing and reading as scaffolding for learning and teaching. o Capstone projects in engineering education. • Module 2: Teaching-Learning Methodologies in Engineering. o Problem-based learning and projects. o Collaborative learning and teamwork. o Use of simulations and virtual laboratories. o Integration of emerging technologies in engineering education. • Module 3: Formative Assessment and Feedback o Evaluate versus qualify as foci of learning. o Design of instruments, criteria, and guidelines necessary to accompany
be arranged as modules, depending on the course and program.• Lecture and/or lab topics - describe the topic or theme of the lectures/labs. Topics may be subcategorized by lecture hour or by week. Topic should be descriptive enough so that students may best prepare for in-class time.• Events, assessments, and due dates: The schedule should include all assessments for lecture/lab; due dates for projects, special projects, and presentations. Also, include dates that are holidays, days in which classes will not be held due to instructor’ s absence or due to other reasons.F. How learning will be assessed• Grading procedure – this generally include in-class (i.e., exams and quizzes) and out-of-class assignments, multiple-choice
respond to questions. The clients used the final review as a basis forselecting students for a monetary award or summer internship.Mechanical engineering design: a semester long mechanical engineering capstone design coursefor teams of undergraduate students in their final year. As a capstone course, the syllabusemphasized integrating various engineering sciences in an authentic, practical, and open-endeddesign project with real clients. Students were encouraged to treat the instructor like a boss andtheir teammates as colleagues. Students had a dedicated laboratory work area where they couldbuild and test prototypes. Funding for prototypes was available with instructor approval. Therewere three design reviews (a preliminary design review that
to have all its undergraduate engineering, computer science, and cybersecurity degrees to be accredited by ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology). Pursuant to this goal, a capstone project course was added to the updatedcurriculum of the BSCS degree. Even though the six Educational Student Outcomes (ESOs)prescribed by ABET [6] are addressed by the core courses in the curriculum, adding a capstoneproject course to the core curriculum brings together all the six ESOs in one course in a polishedand refined manner for students to see the relationship among all six ESOs. The capstonespecifically focuses on ESO #3 (communication skills), ESO #4 (legal and ethical principles), andESO #5 (teamwork). The foundational block in the
Paper ID #38699Indigenizing the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programmed EngineeringEducation Curriculum, Challenges and Future PotentialsDr. Bahar Memarian, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Bahar Memarian is an interdisciplinary researcher and educator with more than 10 years of research and teaching experience at the intersection of applied and social sciences. She has designed and executed research projects as both a team leader and a member. She has also developed and delivered learning modules and courses in the areas of STEM, design, and engineering education at the secondary and
Corporate CS Math/Stat Capstone Project (Optional) Certifications Figure 1. Cyber Security Degree ArchitectureTo complement education with training, the degree also requires students to pass two industrycertifications before they graduate. The course number for each certification is CYBI-3101-xxwhere xx stands for the student’s choice of certification such as Net+, Linux+, Security+, etc. Apool of certifications was carefully studied and approved, and we are
students will build on the results from the quantitative phaseand provide further understanding and interpretations.References[1] D. Patnaik, Wired to care: How companies prosper when they create widespread empathy. Ft Press, 2009.[2] G. Guanes, L. Wang, D. A. Delaine, and E. Dringenberg, "Empathic approaches in engineering capstone design projects: student beliefs and reported behaviour," European Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 1-17, 2021.[3] N. W. Sochacka, K. M. Youngblood, J. Walther, and S. E. Miller, "A qualitative study of how mental models impact engineering students’ engagement with empathic communication exercises," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 1-12, 2020.[4] J
. (2019, June). Intercultural competency differences between US And central asian students in an engineering across cultures and nations graduate course. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.11. Sanger, P. A., Ziyatdinova, J., Kropiwnicki, J., & Van Nguyen, P. (2015, June). Changing Attitudes in Cross-Cultural Diversity Through International Senior Capstone Projects. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-341).12. Ziyatdinova, J., Bezrukov, A., Sanger, P. A., & Osipov, P. (2016, June). Cross Cultural Diversity in Engineering Professionals—Russia, India, America. In 2016 ASEE International Forum.13. Imbrie, P. K., Agarwal, J., & Raju, G. (2020, October). Genetic Algorithm Optimization
; Research, iii. CSCM 1030 Public Speaking & Persuasion, iv. CSCM 2040 Professional Communications in Workplace.These 4 communication skills courses lay the foundation for a segment of student personaleffectiveness, also allowing students to apply what they learned in those 4 courses in engineeringcoursework where communication skills are needed, i.e. for researching and developing aresearch agenda, writing a technical paper or a capstone project report, or prepare a provisionalpatent application. These engineering courses are deemed to be communication intensive besideserving their own purposes for technical development of prospective engineers. Table 3 also Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference
lab (Fig. 5). These stations are multi-functional areas. The equipment at these stations can be used for circuit board manufacturing,experiments and simulations. At this point these stations have been very helpful for groups ofundergraduate students in Electrical and Computer Engineering who are completing requiredsenior design projects (i.e., capstone projects). This space has also been used for graduate andundergraduate research in applied electromagnetics. In particular, software programs on thecomputers have been used to simulate the radiation from printed antennas, and the testequipment at these stations has been used to develop and test various flexible sensor networksbeing applied to phased-array antennas.Fig. 5 also shows a very
student’s education, that ofcommunication. Long before ABET made it a point that had to be addressed, instruction inwriting and oral production were included in multiple courses. Students practiced their writtenskills in fluids, controls, vibrations, design, heat transfer, and capstone courses. Communicationwas not an add on to all these courses it was an integral part of the curriculum. Short writtenassignments culminating in formal reports allowed students to experience a path that they wouldfollow in their careers. The important element was making sure that this writing experience washappening on a regular basis throughout the curriculum, not as a one-time affair and quicklyforgotten. Over the years, students showed that continuous practice of
, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing teamwork skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his
engineering Page 13.883.6technology were provided. Second, approximately six weeks into the semester, facultyvisited all EDSGN 100 classrooms to again explain the EMET program, and to encouragestudents interested in the degree to meet with program advisors. In fall 2007, a DVDintended to illustrate the applied nature of the program was shown to students in each ofthe classes as well.Footage for the DVD was compiled in May 2006 and includes interviews with students,faculty, alumni, and industry representatives. The DVD also features equipment used inthe program courses as well as senior capstone design project demonstrations. In order toeffectively market
ability ofpiezo materials to both deform under an electrical stimulus and to generate a voltage under amechanical stimulus allows them to act as both a solid state actuator and sensor. Further, thinsheets of PZT can be surface bonded or otherwise structurally integrated into a system, allowingfor easy implementation in a dynamic system, and the nearly linear proportionality between themechanical strain and the applied/sensed voltage allows for easy control of PZT behavior.The Flexible Beam SystemA horizontal and a vertical flexible beam have been developed as educational tools. The verticalbeam presented here is based on the horizontal beam system developed in previous work 9, 10 andwas developed as a senior capstone design project. The vertical
learning. In the past, such opportunities were generallyrestricted to laboratory courses and to capstone design, but much more will be expected Page 13.1189.2in the future. The engineering classroom of the future will almost certainly requireactive/collaborative learning components in most engineering courses. Thesecomponents will include team based projects, service learning components, technologyenabled support components, inverted classrooms, and a better integration of curricularand co-curricular components. Herein lies the challenge. To do this effectively is goingto require resources and faculty time. System constraints work against this. At a
include Curriculum Assessment, Exit Exam, and Capstone Course. Theindirect tools include Internship Advisor Survey, Industrial Advisory Board Survey, StudentsExit Interview, Alumni Survey, and Employer Survey. The objective of this paper is to present indetails the framework developed for the curriculum assessment. Figure 1: CE Program Outcome Assessment Framework Page 13.41.4Table 1: Relationship between Program Outcomes and Program Educational Objectives CE Program CE Program Educational Objectives
letters or memos.Perhaps shorter pieces of writing will accomplish the same purpose and better suit the goals ofthe course. Documents such as abstracts, a series of short report memos, and annotatedbibliographies are all valuable exercises and help keep students in the practice of writing. Theyalso can be evaluated quickly, with minimal grading anxiety.Some courses, such as senior capstone projects, require longer reports, and students certainlyneed to know how to write longer technical papers. But longer papers, of course, increaseevaluation time. The following suggestions will help faculty cope with assessing long papers:& Do not attempt to grade a whole set of papers at one sitting. Grade three or four and then do something else
turning 50 on a daily basis.3 Thiscalculates to over four million each year.These 40- and 50-year olds can boast about being the best-educated generation in history.4 Thefocus team members were no different. Over half had a 4-year university degree, with just underhalf having graduate degrees. Almost 20 percent had doctoral degrees.The participants who responded to the income survey question made over $100,000 annually.Over half were employed in the technology business, with a few employed in engineering firms,and one employed as a defense contractor. Almost half were engineers. The rest had thefollowing job titles: program manager, project manager, chief engineer, or quality and missionassurance director. They represented companies such as
Engineering Education, 2017 Entrepreneurship, Engineering, Innovation and Libraries: Empowering Innovators with InformationAbstractsNearly two-thirds of millennials aspire to start their own business or have already done so. Innovation andentrepreneurship are dominant forces driving innovation in a dynamic global economy, and universitieshave an essential role in cultivating the innovators and entrepreneurs of the future. In most universities,capstone senior design courses have an entrepreneurship component. We describe a cross-institutionworkshop designed to heighten student awareness of university resources supporting entrepreneurship.Drexel University and University of Pennsylvania STEM libraries
Paper ID #31759Combining Strategies for Leadership Development of Engineering StudentsDr. Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Nayda G. Santiago is professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM) where she teaches the Capstone Course in Computer Engineer- ing. She received an BS in EE from the University of PR, Mayaguez in 1989, a MEng in EE from Cornell University in 1990, and a PhD in EE from Michigan State University in 2003. She leads the Southeast region of the Computing Alliance for Hispanic Serving Institutions (CAHSI). Dr
groups to uncover their own thought and biases before discussing difficult orcontroversial topics surrounding engineering innovation with the class as a whole. While thecourse is taught specifically with engineering design in mind, the course has attracted studentsfrom varying majors which has fostered collaboration and creativity in idea generation. Thecombination of critical thinking methodology with innovation concepts has led students to notonly expand their knowledge of potential applications of engineering, but has lead severalstudents to initiate communication with faculty members regarding their ideas for researchopportunities, innovation competitions, and initiated their own projects via applying forUniversity Innovation Fellows