will likely add new dimensions oflearning and research, especially in teaching concepts like machine learning [2].Finally, there is an opportunity for researchers to investigate how the programming of the CRBimpacts productivity, particularly as it relates to block-based programming on the CRB vs.traditional text-based coding on the IRB. Recent research has shown potential in this area [8],[9]. Future work in this area may also consider how AI can assist in coding and applicationdevelopment.ConclusionWhile curriculum and laboratory development conclusions are preliminary, a few things havebecome apparent to the faculty stakeholders. Teaching and learning in an environment thatutilizes both IRB and CRB stations concurrently shares more in
chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in undergraduate engineering education, and retention of engineering students. She leads a research group whose goal is to foster active interdisciplinary research which investigates learning and motivation and whose findings will inform the development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student success in engineering. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Ms. Campbell R. Bego
Session 1253 Elf90 - A First Programming Language Thomas M. Lahey , Thomas D. L. Walker Lahey Computer Systems, Inc./Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityAbstract Essential Lahey FORTRAN 90 (Elf90) is a FORTRAN 90 compiler specifically designed from apedagogical viewpoint to provide a FORTRAN teaching/learning environment that is user-friendly withoutdamaging the power of the language. This paper introduces the language and its design criteria. It alsoexplores the question of what language to teach as a first programming language.Creating a First Programming
academic year (1995-1996), the team teaching concept is to be employed as the teamof professom continue working to develop projects that cross all engineering disciplines with inclusion ofhumanities, social sciences, economics and management. The team of professors are also planning a secondcourse in Fundamentals of Engineering Design for a two semester sequence of FED 101 and FED 102.This sequence is to include more computer applications to enhance students’ skills in the use of their ownPC’s and UNIX workstations in the freshman computer laboratories. SURVEY RESULTS AND STUDENT FEEDBACK Formal and informal student feedback on the course work (and described in their oral reports)indicate that students consistent
anddrive toward improving subsequent iterations of the software.Bibliography 1. S. Tegen, Growing a Wind Workforce: The National Wind Energy Skills Assessment Report (Poster). No. NREL/PO-5000-61251. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO., 2014. 2. “Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States,” https://energy.gov/eere/wind/maps/wind-vision, 2015 (accessed January 2017). 3. AWEA Operation and Maintenance Recommended Practices, http://www.awea.org/Issues/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=4266, 2013. 4. D. Billing, "Teaching for Transfer of Core/Key Skills in Higher Education: Cognitive Skills," Higher education 53.4 (2007): 483-516. 5. E. Lamos, M. Simon, and M. J. Waits, "A Sharper Focus on
addressing the national imperative ofincreasing underrepresented minorities in STEM, it is therefore critical to prepare teachersserving Native American students in STEM and its impact on their communities. Disseminationof the results of RET participants’ research projects through poster sessions and conferences,further increases the efforts to bridge the gap between Native Americans and higher educationstudies in STEM.MethodsIn the RET ROKET program, teachers participate in an AILDI course concerning language,culture revitalization, and teaching methods to improve science education for Native Americanstudents; engage in an interactive ORW to learn optics laboratory techniques, through hands-onexperiments with lasers, fiber optics, solar cells, and
(1995), and he earned his M.S. (1998) in environmental health engineering and his Ph.D. (2002) from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He has completed postgraduate coursework in Microbial Ecology from the Marine Biology Laboratory, Environmental Health from the University of Cincinnati, Public Health from The Johns Hopkins University, and Public Administration from Indiana University, Bloomington. Oerther is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) in DC, MO, and OH. He is Board Certified in Envi- ronmental Engineering (BCEE) by the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientist (AAEES), registered as a Chartered Engineer (CEng) by the U.K. Engineering Council, recognized as a Diplomate of the
incorporating research in the undergraduateclassroom considerably more intimidating. Also, faculty members are usually teaching 5-7classes per semester (as opposed to the 2-3 a year by their four-year counterparts). It can beparticularly daunting to add research students on top of this teaching load.The college will often not have the resources to fund an expensive laboratory or even provide anappropriately-size space for large-scale testing. In addition, in an environment where theemphasis is on instruction, taking on research students in addition to a heavy teaching load canbe quite daunting to faculty.Another threat to research at a community college is the push for courses to be transferrable.Most four-year engineering schools have not
. PowerPoint lectures were interspersed withactive learning assignments. There was also one three-hour laboratory every week that beganwith a brief presentation of the engineering topics that were relevant for that week. All labs wereperformed in groups and followed the project-driven learning (PDL) approach. The details of thisnovel course are described, and the results from the first offering of the course are presented.Survey results from forty-two students from the College of Education regarding the possiblevalue and likelihood of taking a PDL programming course will also be summarized.Infusing computational thinking skills in K-12 education is essential for advancing the teachingand learning of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
better.Computer Science Curriculum ChangesThe effect of being in a combined department is pervasive, starting in the first year. In mostcomputer science programs, Java has been the choice for the first language. Students coming outof high school with Advanced Placement (AP) credit have taken a test in Java to demonstrate aworking knowledge of the language. While computer engineering has incorporated Java in manyplaces, most text books have examples in C++, and C remains the dominant language forembedded applications. Since both computer engineering and computer science students sharethe first programming courses, we chose to retain C++ as the first language and teach Java in alater course required only of computer science students. If the programs were
AC 2010-4: IDEAS TO CONSIDER FOR NEW CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATORS: SENIOR DESIGNLisa Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa G. Bullard is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chemical Co. from 1991-2000. A faculty member at NCSU since 2000, Dr. Bullard was named an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor at NCSU and was awarded the Outstanding New Teacher Award by the Southeastern Section of ASEE, the NCSU Alumni Outstanding Teaching Award, the COE George H. Blessis
problems. Faculty responsible for this introductorycourse as well as a numerical methods course felt that too much time was being spent on theminutia of programming syntax. Both of these packages can be learned sufficiently quickly totackle meaningful problems in undergraduate engineering within one semester. Each package hasits strengths and a role to play in undergraduate engineering instruction. These strengths will bediscussed in the paper.IntroductionThe Mechanical Engineering Department at NMSU has a long history of teaching programmingat the undergraduate level. As with virtually every other engineering program, the important roleof scientific computing was recognized early on. When one of the authors joined the faculty in1984, FORTRAN was
Session 3130 An Analysis of Freshman Engineering: A Cross-College Perspective J.B. Connor 1, V.K. Lohani 1, E. Bull 3, T.M. Wildman2, S.G. Magliaro 2, T.W. Knott 1, O.H. Griffin, Jr 1 J.A. Muffo4 1 Department of Engineering Education 2 Department of Teaching and Learning 3 Department of Computer Science Office of Academic Assessment
of circuit topologies, prototypeboards, and software are presented. When completed, the converters go to work asdemonstrations in a senior-level course in power electronics. Converters show fundamentalcircuit behavior on ordinary portable laboratory instruments. Common nonideal behavior ofconverters appears and can be used to gain better insight into circuit operation than that oftengained by traditional simulation methods. These converters also were used as a recruiting tool.Methods of teaching with these converters are presented, including some that worked and somethat failed.Introduction Power electronics draws from a host of topics, making it an appropriate vehicle for teachingdesign to senior undergraduate students. One of the
Session 1368 Computer-Based Learning Modules For Rigid Body Mechanics Musharraf Zaman, Anant R. Kukreti University of OklahomaAbstractThe use of computer-based modules in teaching and learning some of the difficult to comprehendconcepts in mechanics can be very beneficial for both students and instructors. The Vectormodule discussed in this paper was developed and used by the authors to introduce the conceptsassociated with the mathematical operations and use of vectors to solve engineering problemsincluding evaluation of vector components, addition, dot and cross products, projection, and
Session 1368 Computer-Based Learning Modules For Rigid Body Mechanics Musharraf Zaman, Anant R. Kukreti University of OklahomaAbstractThe use of computer-based modules in teaching and learning some of the difficult to comprehendconcepts in mechanics can be very beneficial for both students and instructors. The Vectormodule discussed in this paper was developed and used by the authors to introduce the conceptsassociated with the mathematical operations and use of vectors to solve engineering problemsincluding evaluation of vector components, addition, dot and cross products, projection, and
attempt to get the new and at risk students to mingle with mature students and facultywithout enrolling them in a "special" program. The program's key objective is to get students toteach each other with mentors available to intervene only when necessary. In the Fall 2011 term,the project was started with virtually no funding. Laboratory space that was only being used20% of the time was made available to students to study in during the unused 80% of the classschedule.The motivation for this program and its objectives are discussed. Data collected following thefirst semester of operation is presented and discussed. Conclusions are drawn regarding theprograms impact on participating students.IntroductionStudents at every academic level are prone to
design projects ♦ Meet with instructor to select project ♦ Provide for project expenses: Parts, direct costs, lab fees ♦ Give technical assessment feedbackThe university instructor is responsible for accomplishing the teaching objectives for the designcourse, and these objectives include producing students who can: ♦ Create & implement feasible solutions to engineering problems ♦ Understand the iterative design process ♦ Use resources effectively: time, money, parts, lab equipment, information ♦ Learn “team” skillsV. Additional ResponsibilitiesExisting laboratory equipment can support some projects that require the use of softwaredevelopment systems. However
, and a stronger emphasis oncommunication skills. To guide the program’s implementation and evaluation, a comprehensiveassessment plan was developed to ensure that sufficient tools and methods were in place toproperly evaluate the impact of the program. The program is now in its third year, and this plancontinues to be instrumental in evaluating the program’s effectiveness. This paper presents anoverview of the plan, including its tools, methods, and outcomes.1.0 IntroductionIn the Autumn Quarter, 1998, The Ohio State University College of Engineering implemented apilot program for freshman Engineering students with the express purpose of engaging students inan interdisciplinary curriculum that emphasized hands-on laboratory projects
department to participate in writing instruction for its students. Page 22.125.8 3. Department faculty generally will not spend extra time teaching or evaluating writing mechanics. 4. Problem sets, lab reports and design reports are the three main forms of writing done by undergraduate students in mechanical engineering.The writing program has two components: core courses targeted for writing instruction andcourses where writing is valued but where there is little or no explicit writing instruction. Corecourses targeted for writing instruction are ME2011 Introduction to Engineering, ME4031Measurements Laboratory and ME4054
the educational process. The program is called the SecondaryScience and Mathematics Teachers' Program5 (SESEMAT). The subsequent adoption of theprogram made biology, chemistry and physics compulsory for secondary students. TheSESEMAT program also recognized the limitations that the Ugandan educational system has in Page 15.551.3trying to meet the need to add the applied science component to the educational process; namely,the lack of resources (lab infrastructure, lab equipment and supplies, etc.). One component ofthe SESEMAT program is the development of applied laboratories using readily availablesupplies and to teach the teachers how to use
routers, and associated on-line vendor basedcurricula, such as CCNA, CCNP, are now readily available. This approach to networktechnology education requires an understanding of switch and router operation. However, anextensive analysis of educational materials in this area has indicated that these devices aretypically treated as 'black boxes'. Such an approach may not be best suited to the promotion oflearning as students are required to construct their own mental model of the internal operation ofsuch devices and which may, or may not, be correct. To address this problem a state model hasbeen designed for both switches and routers which allows complexity to be controlled and hencecan be used as a basis for teaching both introductory and advanced
active and collective, their information literacyskills can improve dramatically.Typically, students respond well to hands-on computer laboratories in which they search variousdatabases and retrieve electronic information. McGuigan (2001) notes that the Web is often thefirst source students explore when researching a topic. Davis (2003) also reports that students areusing fewer scholarly references, but that this trend can be reversed with properly constructedassignments.Active and peer learning are strategies often employed to teach a variety of topics. Theeffectiveness of these strategies is especially important because Manuel (2002) reports that thestudents at California State University viewed the “words of caution said by the instructor
interactivetechnology used in the industry. Chandler Gilbert Community College and Mesa CommunityCollege will teach the laboratory portion of their Associate of Applied Science Degree in theMTF beginning in spring semester of 2002.A key component in the utilization of the MTF by ASU East and its community college partnersis the need for a comprehensive and robust curriculum. A curriculum development team withfaculty representatives from the community colleges and ASU East has been formed to developand pilot the curriculum materials and resources that will be used in the MTF. Each communitycollege will co-develop their curriculum and teach the laboratory portion of their course in theMTF, beginning in the fall of 2002. The curriculum materials will be developed
, Teaching Stream)Nikita Dawe PhD Candidate, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education, University of TorontoRubaina Khan Rubaina Khan is a doctoral candidate at the University of Toronto, Canada. Her research interests lie at the intersection of engineering design, learning communities and reflective practice. Prior, to pursuing graduate studies, Rubaina spent 10 years in autonomous marine vehicles research and, teaching robotics and design to engineering students in Singapore. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Conceptualizing First Principles
/j.compedu.2013.10.013.[34] D. C. Lagoudas, J. D. Whitcomb, D. A. Miller, M. Z. Lagoudas, and K. J. Shryock, “Continuum Mechanics in a Restructured Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum,” Int. J. Engng Ed, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 301–314, 2000.[35] P. Piergiovanni and S. S. Moor, “Experiments In The Classroom: Examples Of Inductive Learning With Classroom Friendly Laboratory Kits,” in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2003, p. 8.557.1- 8.557.10. doi: 10.18260/1-2--11569.[36] B. Bender, “Concepts for Purposive and Motivational Teaching and Learning in Engineering Design Courses,” Int. J. Engng Ed., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 336–341, 2001.[37] M. van Manen, “On the
Paper ID #35495The Next Frontier: Integrating Spatial Reasoning into a First-YearEngineering CourseDr. Kristine K. Craven, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Kris Craven is currently an Associate Professor in the General and Basic Engineering (GBE) Depart- ment at Tennessee Tech University (TTU). I have been employed by TTU since 2000 primarily teaching in the Basic Engineering Program. I have also been teaching junior level courses for the Mechanical En- gineering department for several years. In addition to ASEE, I am a member of the Society of Women Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Sigma Xi
Engineering. Until recently, she served as a research faculty member of the department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering (NAME). Through her tenure in the NAME department, she became an integral and managing member of the department’s Ocean Engineering Laboratory, and more recently the Marine Hydrodynamics Laboratories. Her main research experience and interests lie in the development of understanding of the influence of physical processes on the nearshore zone. Most of this work has focused on the Great Lakes and associated larger inland water bodies, with some work on ocean coastal regions as well. Many of the research projects in which she has been involved host an
AC 2009-2294: FACULTY EXPERIENCES WITH CRAFTING ON-LINE EXAMSIN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYAli Mehrabian, University of Central FloridaTarig Ali, University of Central FloridaWalter Buchanan, Texas A&M UniversityAlireza Rahrooh, University of Central Florida Page 14.626.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Faculty Educational Experiences with Crafting Online Exams in Engineering and TechnologyAbstractIn recent years distance education and learning have emerged as a popular method ofinstructional delivery in engineering and technology-related fields. Many faculties ofengineering and technology may found themselves teaching