information, and periodic review of thecurriculum.Teaching Area Groups (TAG) are formed based on the current teaching interests of faculty.These groups advise the Undergraduate Program Committee on various matters related to thecourses assigned to a particular group. The tasks include choice of textbooks, updating ofcourse syllabi, and the review of assessment information.A number of other committees are involved in improving the quality of academic environmentsuch as student advising, faculty promotion, appointment and contract renewal, scholarship,laboratory, computing facilities, budget and planning. The advising committee is responsiblefor advising and counseling students to ensure a healthy progression towards graduation.Faculty promotion and
components of the arm to bequickly cut out of a single sheet of Lexan. While this approach was effective in demonstratingthe fluid power components used to control the arm, the fluid power system was mechanicallycontrolled, which limits the opportunities to use the tool in a wide range of courses. Figure 4. Excavator Arm Utilizing Layered Lexan Materials Designed at the University of Southern Indiana in 2018 [9]A portable excavator design was developed at Purdue University with the intent of providing atool to teach electro-hydraulic principles in fluid power. This excavator arm takes the approachof providing a small portable demonstrator to students in fluid power laboratories. The designfeatures a lightweight
AC 2007-628: RESULTS FROM A MULTI-CENTER INVESTIGATION OF THEEFFECT OF NETWORK LATENCY ON PEDAGOGIC EFFICACYJames Squire, Virginia Military Institute Dr. James Squire is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute. He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the United States Military Academy in West Point, NY and served in the army as a Military Intelligence officer during Desert Storm. Although his PhD is in electrical engineering, he completed his doctoral work in a biomedical engineering laboratory at MIT and has interests in analog and digital instrumentation, signal processing, biomechanics, patent litigation, and cardiology. At VMI he teaches
authors intend to continue collaboration around building, improving and sustainingexceptional undergraduate ergonomics classrooms and labs to meet the needs of the changingworkforce. Continuous improvement in the classroom necessitates alignment with professionalorganizations and industrial partners. Faculty collaboration and class comparison makes theprocess meaningful.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge colleagues at University A and University B who havecontributed and enabled the development of the ergonomics class and laboratory. Also, thanks tothe many undergraduate and graduate students who have influenced the teaching style andcontent for the benefit of future students. Thank you to the NCEES for expertise and
Paper ID #9940Virtual Community of Practice: Electric CircuitsProf. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteDr. Lisa Huettel, Duke University Dr. Lisa G. Huettel is an associate professor of the practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University where she also serves as associate chair and director of Undergraduate Studies for the department. She received a B.S. in Engineering Science from Harvard University and earned her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests are focused on engineering education, curriculum and laboratory
choosing learning outcomes beforeinstructional methods or assessments. This means one chooses the outcome of the learningexperience first, and let that guide the teaching/learning and the assessment/evaluation. Thismethod challenges "traditional" methods of curriculum planning in which a list of content that isto be taught is created and/or selected first and teaching/assessment methodology usually arelectures and laboratories, with written exams as assessment of learning. In backward design, the Page 26.1354.4educator starts with goals, creates or plans out assessments and finally makes lesson plans.Supporters of backward design liken the
and extracurricular activities.4 The overall competence and effectiveness of faculty members may be judged by such factors as the level of academic achievement; the diversity of their backgrounds; the extent to which they further their own education in relevant areas; industrial experience; teaching experience; being technically current; interest in and enthusiasm for improving instruction; involvement in laboratory development; publication and other scholarly activities; active participation in professional and scientific societies; favorable evaluations from students, graduates, and peers; the ability to
Experiments,” The Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 7-9. 10. Phillips, A., Palazolo, P. and C.V. Camp. “Team Teaching Technical Topics: An Innovative Approach to an Introductory Civil Engineering Course,” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, 2000, Session 473. 11. Engineering Criteria 2000, 3rd edition. Engineering Accreditation Commission. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore, MD Pub. No. 98- AB-7a, 1998. 12. Schmucker, Douglas G. Structures Demonstration Laboratory. http://diamond.gem.valpo.edu/~harvey/models/strdemo.html 13. Schmucker, Douglas G. Manila File Folder Project. http://diamond.gem.valpo.edu/~harvey/classes/ce202/project.html
the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Jumoke ’Kemi’ Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Dr. J. ’Kemi Ladeji-Osias is Professor and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore. Dr. Ladeji-Osias earned a B.S. in electrical engi- neering from the University of Maryland, College Park and a joint Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Rutgers University and UMDNJ. Dr. Ladeji-Osias’ involvement in engineering curricular innovations includes adapting portal laboratory instrumentation into experiments from multiple STEM
enter professional practice. Students whopursue graduate school directly upon graduation are recruited by a number of schools andhave been very successful. The department faculty is a relatively young, dedicated, and col-legial group that is regarded as exemplary throughout the university in terms of teaching ef-fectiveness and in professional development.The existing curriculum at UWP is typical of conventional CEE curricula. Students completebasic mathematics, science, and general engineering courses in the first two years followed bycivil and environmental engineering courses in the remainder of their studies. The CEE pro-gram includes a significant laboratory component and practical design projects in the upperlevel classes. The program
the 15 desired student outcomes in engineering education.I. Introduction This work is Phase III of a continuing effort to identify a comprehensive summary of andthe links between the student learning outcomes desired by engineering education stakeholdersand the most effective teaching and learning strategies associated with those outcomes. In PhaseI of this project we identified, through a thorough review of engineering education literature, anadditional five learning outcomes not specifically included in ABET’s 3a though k criteria [1].Although many more outcomes were mentioned in the literature, each of the five learningoutcomes was cited at least 16 times, which was also the number of times the least cited ABETEAC criterion was
engineeringprogram are exposed to a variety of courses that emphasize real world content. The four authors areresponsible for teaching courses in the industrial engineering specialization. This paper presents anoverview of the authors' efforts to include real world content in several upper-level industrialengineering courses. The activities include hands-on manufacturing, company interviews, theFord/Firestone case study, work space design projects, and the use of commercially-availablesoftware tools. The paper concludes with a description of several successful industry-inspiredsenior design projects.I. IntroductionIt is essential to educate undergraduate engineering students both in theory and practice so that theyare well prepared to meet the challenges in
tolearning of just memorizing a collection of formulas, diagrams and algorithms. Whereaswhat is needed is a well-organized meta-cognitive self-management (planning, andexecution-monitoring)strategy if they are ever to be able to generate deep coherentunderstandings of how specific techniques are derived from basic principles andcontextual constraints(boundary conditions).In addition, teaching in Engineering has come under pressure from the new technologicalenvironment and the new industry demands and constraints:(a) “Just in time, just on topic” instruction is increasingly demanded by students and potential employers.(b) Modularity and adaptability in the selection and organization of course topics are highly desirable.(c) Breadth of
developed with the students. They were learning to be engineers atthe same time that a former engineering manager was learning to become an effective teacher.Both learned a great deal from each other and together.Then the second academic year began bringing with it an entirely new set of challenges andopportunities. Instead of the activities becoming easier and perhaps somewhat routine, they wereeven more complicated and time consuming. New obligations required extra time and effortincluding committee involvement, starting a new series of courses, implementing new programs,planning for an additional new academic program, the pursuit of tenure, and of course teaching afull load of classes. How could all of this be accomplished?The second year
week and attends a weekly seminarfocused on research opportunities, graduate school issues and career development topics.Undergraduate students gain engineering and research experience while earning engineeringcourse credit. Graduate students participate in mentor training and skills developmentworkshops while gaining teaching and supervisory experience and enhancing theircommunication skills.The GLUE program has been very successful at UT Austin and has expanded rapidly from 13undergraduate student applicants and $4,500 in funding in 2003 to 68 applicants and $53,000 infunding in 2005. Although the program is open to both male and female students, the programhas successfully attracted a high percentage of female participants. Feedback from
enrollment trends, including: • Poorer instructional quality. Many faculty have become increasingly more interested in research and thereby less interested in teaching and laboratory instruction. As enrollments have increased, some faculty have turned away from detailed problem solving to easier ways to assess student performance. Finally, many faculty expect less from their students while, at the same time, continuing to inflate grades. • Less prepared engineering graduates. Poorer quality of instruction and lowered faculty expectations, coupled with an observation that fewer students are entering the university with hands-on experience, may result in a larger number of graduates that are not well
energy absorption, which leads to usefulness in many applications. Dr. Waters is also known for her engineering education efforts. She has past and current NSF funding with several facets of engineering education and these include: Assessment studies of classroom material science pedagogical implementations; Just in Time Teaching with Web-based Tools of Material Science; Case Studies in Material Science and Various Engineering Disciplines and; Engineering Faculty Barriers to Adopt Evidence-Based (or nontraditional) Teaching Methods. She has been invited to speak at confer- ences (MRS, MS&T, and ASEE) worldwide on the topic of Material Science education. She serves as the College of Engineering liaison to ASEE and
Engineering for Honors program, he is heavily involved with teaching and developing laboratory content, leading the in-house robotics controller maintenance, and managing the robotics project development.Mr. Michael Schulz, The Ohio State University Michael H. Schulz is a teaching assistant with the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program at The Ohio State University. He is currently the lead developer of the robot course software development team, of which he has been a member for three years. As a Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) student, he will graduate in May, 2017 with his B.S.C.S.E and a minor in Music, Media, and Enterprise.Ms. Clare Rigney, Ohio State University, Engineering Education Department Clare has
)Instructor’s ability to teach course online (Instructional limitations, Seeking help, IncreasedWorkload), 2) Student’s ability to learn online (Time Management, Lower engagement andmotivation, Harder to absorb material, Hard to focus, Worry about performance), 3) Difficultiesoutside of class (Technology issues), and 4) No concerns. Students seemed more concernedabout their ability to learn the material (48% of responses) than the instructor’s ability to teachthe material (36% of responses). The instructional limitations or lack of instructional support(22% of responses) and time management (12% of responses) were among the major concerns inthe sub-categories.The results from two-item scale indicated participants' s confidence in their ability to
Paper ID #33285Improving In-Service Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Engineering andTechnology Content and Pedagogical Knowledge (Evaluation)Emel Cevik, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three
to serve as teaching assistants. Teaching assistants at Dartmouth are typicallyundergraduate students themselves who have done well in the courses for which they serve asteaching assistants. Responsibilities of the teaching assistants include running problem sessions(optional evening help sessions), grading problem sets, and helping to set up and rundemonstrations and laboratories. Teaching assistants are not responsible for grading quizzes,exams or projects. As shown in Figure 4, the percentage of women serving as teaching assistantsin undergraduate engineering courses for the past six terms has been quite high, ranging from47% to 55%. 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Fall 2017 Spring 2017 Winter 2017
binding proteins in cancer and in promoting and assessing undergraduate learning. Susannah has taught classes in biochemistry, molecular biology and cell biology as well as general biology, human biology and cancer biology for engineering and science students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Case studies offer opportunities for us to show the “real world” of engineering and science in the classroomAbstract- Much of the teaching of science can seem unlinked to the application of the material to realworld problems. This can make it much harder for some students to engage with the information inways that help them to retain it and to see value in
-tenure period, when they likely have a greater set of outsidecommitments than younger new faculty members; and leveraging their skills developed inindustry for success in the classroom and research. This article explores the experience of twofaculty members who each made the move after over fifteen years in industry, one who is nowearly in that transition and the second moving toward full retirement. These experiences are usedto outline not only ideas on best practices for being successful in the transition, but pitfalls andtraps to avoid.IntroductionThe motivation of this article is to explore the transition from industry to teaching from both aspecific and general viewpoint. The specific context explores the perspectives on theexperiences of
STEM educationkeeps students engaged and results in improved retention of knowledge on topics taught [2], [4].While traditional lectures are still the most common way of teaching, many universities arefocusing more attention on more student-centered activities.Engineering education highly relies on practical applications. Laboratories are the most commonway of practicing engineering theory. Knowledge gained from engineering laboratories is beingused for applying engineering applications to real life design of processes and development ofproducts [5]. Building bridges to transfer theoretical skills to industry applications is important interms of improving future employee quality for [6]. However, the most common pedagogicalmethod is to use
printing will be given to students enrolled in CHEG 4310 Polymer Science and Engineeringelective course. Students will build knowledge through actively making some artifacts. Theproject aims to teach students scaffolds' design and operation techniques and other creativemodels with various 3D printing platforms. The primary goal is to find the impact andeffectiveness of 3D printing on student interest, motivation, and engagement. The evaluation willbe carried out through pre- and post-surveys from the students.Elective Course: Introducing 3D PrintingPolymer Science and Engineering is a new elective course offered in Chemical Engineering. Thiscourse aims to provide a broad overview of polymer science and engineering. The emphasis is onthe structure
engineering courses.Approximately 75 students take the course annually. Most are civil engineering majors atUSAFA, but approximately one-third of the students come from other military colleges andReserve Officer Training Corps programs from around the country. The course includes fieldtrips, lab exercises, and hands-on activities intended to give students a practical frame-of-reference that is helpful in subsequent analysis and design courses.Most activities consist of some pre-reading, a short classroom lesson, the hands-on portion, andfinally a quiz or laboratory practical exercise. Both the quizzes and practical exercises serve aslow stakes assessments. Faculty develop the course materials and teach the classroom lesson,but to execute the hands-on
Assistant Professor of Writing Arts at Rowan University. She received her Ph.D. from Purdue University. Her interests include gender and communication and information literacy.Chenguang Diao, Rowan University Chenguang Diao obtained his PhD from University of Maryland Baltimore County in 2004, received post-doctoral training in Carnegie Mellon University from 2004 to 2005, and is currently an Assistant Professor at Rowan University.Roberta Harvey, Rowan University Roberta Harvey is an Assistant Professor of Writing Arts at Rowan University and has been teaching writing to engineering students for over ten years and has been a part of Rowan’s Sophomore Clinic team since 1998. She
Corporation researching the use of flow control in aggressive engine inlet ducts. After graduation, Dr. Vaccaro held a lead engineering position with General Electric Aviation in Lynn, Massachusetts. There, he designed the fan and compressor sections of aircraft engines. He frequently returns to General Electric Aviation as a consultant. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York where he teaches Fluid Mechanics, Com- pressible Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Heat Transfer Laboratory, Aerodynamics, Measurements and Instrumentation Laboratory, and Senior Design in addition to conducting experimental aerodynamics un- dergraduate research projects.Dr
Paper ID #27792An Interdisciplinary Research-based Education Program for Engaging Plant/AgricultureSciences, Chemical Sciences, and Engineering Students (iREP-4-PACE) atMinority InstitutionsDr. Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Old Dominion University Sharan Asundi, a native of INDIA, is a Ph.D. from University of Florida working as an Assistant Profes- sor of Space Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University (ODU). Currently, he is engaged in several teaching and research activities, largely focused on furthering the Space Systems Engineering Program at ODU. He has
and hands-on training is animportant part of their education. VR research projects and laboratories are excellent teaching aidsfor providing students with opportunities to implement the theory they learn in class. Educatingthe younger generations about sustainable and clean energy sources is vital to living in a clean andbright environment in the future. Design tasks were performed by teams of students in theengineering and engineering technology programs after completing the same prerequisites. Eachteam was asked to select wind or solar energy generation technology based on their interest andexperience. Students began their projects by identifying the main components of a given systemand building CAD models. Based on the loading type and the