Teamwork A Comparative Case Study of Interdisciplinary Product Design Teams. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2011. SAGE Publications.9. Kim, K., et al. Situativity approaches for improving interdisciplinary team processes. in American Society for Engineering Education Southeast Section Conference. Blacksburg. 2010.10. Hofstede, G., Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human relations, 2002. 55(11): p. 1355-1361.11. Hofstede, G., Culture and Organizations. Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival, Software of the Mind. 1993, McGraw-Hill: Great Britain.12. Hofstede, G., Culture's consequences: The dimensions approach. Vol. 5. 1980: sage.13
Paper ID #13484”It’s Too Hard,” to ”I Get It!” – Engaging Developmental Science as a Tool toTransform First Year Engineering EducationProf. Carmela Cristina Amato-Wierda, University of New Hampshire Carmela Amato-Wierda is Associate Professor of Materials Science at the University of New Hampshire. She shifted her research focus several years ago to the area of cognitive development of STEM concepts and practices in grades K-16. She has held NSF funded curriculum projects in General Chemistry and Materials Science, and has recently developed two science courses for non-scientists, titled: The Science of Stuff and
Paper ID #15646Sustainability-Infused CurriulumMs. Diana Lynne Ibarra, ISF Academy Shuyuan Science and SustainabilityPrograms Manager. BS degrees in Chemistry and Chemical Engineer- ing MS degrees in Management and Environmental Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Sustainability Infused Curriculum (WIP)AbstractA recently established school-wide sustainability policy in 2015, explicitly states, “an experimentally integrated,environmentally and ethically sustainable system of science education and conservation practices based on the 2012 JejuDeclaration of the
Chinese institutions to further generalize and buildon the research in cross-cultural settings.References1. Greene, J. D. (2014). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books.2. Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press.3. McGinn, R. E. (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997-2001. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0048-34. Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Taylor & Francis.5. Villegas de Posada, C., & Vargas-Trujillo, E. (2015). Moral Reasoning and Personal Behavior: A Meta- Analytical Review
, participants will have the option of using any form of visuals for theirsubmissions. The following prompt will be used to solicit these images: Reflect on five impactful emotional experiences of any type that you have had as an engineering graduate student here at the [BLINDED]. Please try to capture the range of emotional experiences you’ve had. With these in mind, please select an image to represent each of those experiences. These images can be ones you have taken, ones you take or create specifically for this project, or find online. Please submit each image with a 3-5 sentence caption explaining why the image was included, and if necessary, the URL from where you found the image.These images and
and technology from Virginia Tech.Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year engineering students. Marlena strives to transform the advising experience for students and advisors through communication
communication of learninggoals5 – the knowledge they are expected to know, the skills they are expected to do, and thehabits they are expected to possess.6 In engineering, learning goals can be categorized into fourbroad areas: factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, skills (communication andprocedural), and habits-of-mind.7To foster engagement, schools are turning to active learning methods that stress dynamic studentinvolvement in classroom lessons and activities. Research supportive of active learning points toincreased levels of higher-order thinking, long-term information retention, and intrinsicmotivation.8,9 Strengths of the interactive model are attributed to the hands-on application ofnewly-attained information, more likely to be
/draftsman. He works closely with civil, environmental, and structural engineers on a daily basis; so for him, becoming a civil engineer is his next logical career progression. He brings to the table a fresh mind and eagerness to succeed. It is his opinion that experience can overrule education. He has every intention to reach a point where his education will meet his experience, creating a complete and well-rounded professional engineer. Thompson plans to minor in Chemical Engineering. When coupled with his education in civil and environmental engineering, chemical engineering is a field of study that he believes will lead him to achieving his ultimate goal: earning a Ph.D. in nuclear engineering. Thompson believes his
1Examining The Differences In Grade Point Average For Engineering Students Enrolled In Entrepreneurial Education ProgramsAbstract Undergraduate students in engineering continue to gain exposure to entrepreneurialprogramming through different entrepreneurship education programs (EEPs) initiated in highereducation institutions. While traditionally, entrepreneurship education has been initiated andhoused in business schools; recent programmatic offerings have increased in the engineeringschools. Through various offerings (e.g., full-credit courses and seminars), engineering EEPsfocus on developing entrepreneurially-minded engineering graduates to prepare them to succeedin their future career roles. While research in entrepreneurship
engagement, dedication, absorption, and vigor 9 . This state of mind islinked with burnout avoidance 9 . High Work Engagement is characterized by workers feelingpassionate, enthusiastic, and committed to their work 10 . Low Work Engagement is characterizedby lower energy levels, less eagerness to perform work-related tasks, less engagement withwork-related activities, lack of dedication, and burnout 9 .Social ResponsibilitySocial Responsibility is defined as an individual’s commitment to act with care and objectivity 11 .Canney and Bielefeldt 11 stated that socially responsible individuals are aware of how their actionsaffect others and they consider others’ perspectives.Women in Engineering Student WorkersEvery semester the Women in Engineering
Paper ID #32470The Transfer of Learning Between School and Work: A New Stance in theDebate About Engineering Graduates’ Preparedness for Career SuccessAbstractMr. Logan Andrew Perry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Mr. Perry is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds a Master’s degree in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from North Carolina State University. He currently studies learning in the engineering workplace and is also working to better understand innovative new teaching strategies for engineering education.Dr
pressure to be interdisciplinary is only going toincrease with time. Companies are learning that people won’t buy products that onlycomputer scientists and engineers can understand and use. They will fail to becompetitive if they do not get on the HF bandwagon. Eventually HF training will be a jobrequirement for engineers and technologists. Training in HF leads to better designs(Bailey, 1993) and in the global competitive market, money trumps trolls. HF instructorsneed to be aware of the trolls, but keep in mind they are probably only fairy tales. Theonly acceptable course of action for the HF instructor is to be brave.ConclusionHF is liberating and crucially important. Systems engineers are not inhibited and canchoose to study any field. By its
started in 2004) withstudents and teachers have consistently shown that among Alimentos Divertidos educationalbenefits are: Hands-on, minds-on learning models, students work in teams to completelaboratory exercises to learn engineering and science principles; Learning that science andengineering are fun career fields, addressing national and international studies2, 20 showing thatinterest in engineering and science can be enhanced during P-12 school years; Breaking downbarriers, students of diverse ages, gender, ethnic and economic backgrounds, and academic skilllevels come together to exchange ideas on how to solve a science experiment or engineeringdesign. They also learn that there are other students interested in becoming engineers and
psychology from Teachers College, Columbia University (1999). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 What activities and practices sustain the engagement of highly diverse communities of young engineering students in an out of school fellowship program?AbstractThis paper reports on the process and findings of a participatory action research project with adiverse group of high school youth who were participants in an engineering design fellowship ata major urban science center. Participants were trained in action research techniques, exploredthe “engineering habits of mind” (National Research Council, 2009) as a framework forunderstanding their own work with visitors
advancedimaging/video functions. 3.3. User Interface The suit has integrated many fancy interfacing devices for the user to customize the controlof various functions. This also serves the experiential learning purpose for students to getexposed to different technologies. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Conference 3.3.1. Mind Control A bio-sensing device Neurosky [8] headset from Mindware is selected for the function ofmind control of the suit. The headset is embedded in the helmet. It can sense the brainwaves tomeasure the levels of concentration, then wirelessly transfers the result to the central controllerthrough BlueSmirf [9] the
College of New York since 2001.NADINE MACAULEYNadine Macauley holds a Bachelor and Masters degree and is an ABET accreditation specialist at theSchool of Engineering of the City College of the City University of New York.ARDIE D. WALSERArdie D. Walser is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and the Acting Associate Dean of theSchool of Engineering at the City College of the City University of New York. Dr. Walser is presently theDivision Chair of the Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND) of the American Association ofEngineering Education (ASEE). He was the treasurer of MIND from 1996 to 1998, and the MIND ProgramChair from 1999 to 2000. He has collaborated in the creation and direction of numerous facultydevelopment workshops
assessment to track their understanding of the impact that their futureengineering roles might play. From the compiled results, the student response to the moduleswas positive, leaving many students empowered, curious, and excited. The module seriesaccomplished the goal of helping students be more prepared in understanding their role indesigning materials with their end-use in mind, thus infusing technical and social engineeringskill sets.IntroductionTraditionally, the engineering canon focuses solely on technical skills; but there is growingindustry and academic demand for engineers who design solutions with “sociotechnical”perspectives [1-4]. The term “sociotechnical” blends the social impact of technical engineeringprinciples; it is a concept
website with theperceptions of KEEN legacy leaders to establish a baseline for further exploration. A contentanalysis of the site was undertaken, followed by interviews of KEEN legacy leaders to ascertaintheir perceptions of each C and their reactions to each C’s conceptualization obtained from thecontent analysis. This information will be used to determine the most appropriate search termsfor each C when performing a future scoping literature review and eventual Delphi study.Literature ReviewThe need for entrepreneurially-minded individuals to contribute to the growing needs of societyhas prompted growth in engineering EM education research over the past two decades [5], [13]–[15]. Educators have designed EM interventions encouraging engineering
Paper ID #15178Using an AR Drone Lab in a Secondary Education Classroom to PromoteQuantitative ResearchMr. Henry M. Clever, New York University Henry M. Clever is a second year Ph.D. student and NSF Graduate Research Fellow in Mechanical Engi- neering at New York University. After receiving his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Kansas, Henry began research with Prof. Joo H. Kim in energetics of humans and machines, and design and control of wearable robots. In the 2014-2015 school year, Henry lead the robotics club and co-taught in a quantitative research class at a high school in Brooklyn, New York as an
Paper ID #38005Redesigning Soil Mechanics as an Inclusive CourseManish Roy Manish Roy is an Assistant Professor in Residence in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He obtained his Bachelor of Engineering degree in Civil Engineering (Hons.) at Jadavpur University in India. He obtained his MS and Doctoral degree in Civil Engineering at the West Virginia University and the University of Connecticut, respectively. He worked for nine years in the industry as an engineer/manager in India and Bangladesh before starting his graduate study in the US. He started his career as
Paper ID #16230Parents and Roles in Informal Making Education: Informing and Implica-tions for Making in MuseumsMatthew Dickens, Arizona State University Senior Robotics Electrical Engineering Student at Arizona State Universities’ Honors College interested in engineering education, and the entertainment and edutainment industries.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of
Paper ID #42611Eliminating Sources of Information Asymmetry in Transfer ArticulationProf. Gregory L. Heileman, The University of Arizona Gregory (Greg) L. Heileman currently serves as the Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Arizona, where he is responsible for facilitating collaboration across campus to strategically enhance quality and institutional capacity related to undergraduate programs and academic administration. He has served in various administrative capacities in higher education since 2004. Professor Heileman currently serves on the
. Selected strand providers submitted a syllabus, lesson plans,alignment to STEM learning standards and practices, and material lists for a classroom “kit” ofup to $250 of supplies required to implement their curriculum for each of the strand participants.The supplies were provided to each strand participant using additional funding provided bybusiness and industry. The strand providers also submitted a content/subject knowledge testaligned with the STEM concepts taught in their strands, which were vetted, modified for clarity,and used to pre and post-test their participants.The i-STEM strands focused on integrated STEM and included elements of scientific inquiry,engineering design, mathematical modeling, 21st Century skills 21, hands-on/minds-on
. These questions weredesigned with the goal of assessing several critical facets of DEI, ranging from awareness aboutdiverse contributors to the field of computational science to beliefs about personal belongingwithin this field. The specific survey prompts are detailed in Table 1. Topic Assessed Specific Prompt(s) Awareness of Jot down the first few (< 5) names that come to mind when you think important members of a “computational scientist or engineer.” of field Sense of self- (1) I find that I am good with computers for everyday tasks. efficacy (2) I find that I am good with computing. (3) I find that I am good with mathematics. Beliefs about career (1) Computational
Paper ID #15304Impact of Engineering Curricula and Student Programming on STEM Atti-tudes among Middle and High School Students (Evaluation)Dr. Jennifer B. Listman, New York University Dr. Jennifer Listman is the Assistant Director, Program Development and Evaluation, Center for K12 STEM Education, New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering. As the Center’s resident re- search scientist, she conducts and publishes assessments and outcomes evaluations of Center programs for stewardship, research, and development purposes. Dr. Listman received her B.A. in Biology from the University of Pennsylvania in 1991 and her
Paper ID #41416Community College Undergraduate Research using a Student-Driven andStudent-Centered ApproachDr. Elizabeth A Adams P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Elizabeth Adams is an Assistant Professor at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo, California. She a civil engineer with a background in infrastructure design and management, and project management. Her consulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering
training modules to reduce theload on faculty . While mentorship is important to the success of undergraduates in research,Davis et al. point out that faculty will not be encouraged to participate in mentoringundergraduates unless there is perceived institutional support for this activity.Research and Entrepreneurially Minded LearningBoth faculty and students need to connect research with the concepts of EML, or morespecifically curiosity, connections and creating value. Research and engineering education areoften thought of as separate topics but they are linked. Involvement in research, for eitherstudents or faculty, addresses the need to develop curiosity and the ability to ask the rightquestion. KEEN [12] developed a framework to supplement
PerformanceAbstractThe NSF-funded Studying Underlying Characteristics of Computing and Engineering StudentSuccess (SUCCESS) project is exploring how non-cognitive and affective (NCA) factors relateto retention and broad definitions of success for undergraduate engineering and computingstudents. The main tool used in this study is the SUCCESS survey which provides insight into astudent’s Big5 personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness,Openness), Grit (Consistency of Interest), Engineering Identity (Recognition, Interest), Mindset,Mindfulness, Meaning & Purpose, Belongingness, Gratitude, Future Time Perspectives ofMotivation (Expectancy, Connectedness, Instrumentality, Value, Perceptions of Future), TestAnxiety, Time and
skills sets that contribute the growing field known as Public InterestTechnology (PIT). PIT describes a new brand of civic-minded engineering graduates who can apply high-end technology skills along with public policy to better serve the interests of the for the overall good ofsociety. Moreover, as a consortium of 21 universities and funded by the Ford Foundation and NewAmerica, the PIT University Network (PIT-UN) is committed shaping educational course a curriculum tobetter integrate technology, public policy, and social sciences.In this paper, we described the creation, implementation and first-pass assessment of mini modules designto teach Project management as the added value skill set and to indoctrinate the students to Public Sectorover a
the literature and be critical of the methodology and findings.The instruction was devised with the purpose of a critical lens in mind and gave students theopportunity to explore the information available and the assignment asked the students to thinkcritically about their chosen field of research.Literature:IL is a critically overlooked by many students and instructors alike. In the field of engineering,this endeavor takes on a whole new ripple; how do you show students that a degree that can seemlargely transactional in the first year, needs to be paired with deep synthesis and informationseeking? Perceptions of students, as well as faculty must be adjusted to understand theimportance of IL and ensure that it is not left to the English