do“bridge” the AAS-EET student backgrounds and disposition to the BSEE requirements.The incorporation of bridge courses on the baccalaureate side of the AAS-EET to BSEE TransferTrack forced the scheduling of six general education courses (18 quarter credits) outside of thetwo full-time academic years on the transfer track, which is why the program is not two-plus-two. However, students can opt to take these general education courses at the AAS college,during summers, and/or in an additional term(s) at the end of the program. We have found thatmany students are at the AAS college beyond two years and request the identification of generaleducation courses that can fill their final year there and also transfer to the BSEE degree
introductory communications course. ATC and IFF systems are presented to explain theirpurpose and illustrate the substantial overlap in function (ATC is civilian, IFF is military).8The major emphasis in the systems material is on radar, which is used extensively in EWoperations and is perhaps least familiar to the students. The introduction includes radar’spurpose, antenna type(s), continuous wave (CW) vs. pulsed, and monostatic vs. bistatic.6,1,9 Thistopic was initially planned for two lectures, but was stretched to three lectures because thestudents struggled with the material. After the intro, pulsed and CW radars are treatedseparately, including range calculations for pulsed radar and Doppler shift for CW radars.Finally, radar ranging is covered
importance of the following variables in the decision for admission to your engineering degree program(s). Data from 49 respondents representing 42 U.S. institutions in 25 states plus DC. Important and Neither Not at all Extremely Important nor Important and Top 22 Admission Criteria Important Unimportant Unimportant n % n % n % High school grade point average (GPA) 41 91% 3 7% 1 2% ACT or SAT Math 41 89% 2 4% 3
): for example temperature human and robotics s(t) = s0 + v*t + a*t2/2 regulation in mammals. movements. How to use the software Using feedback theory Use of simulators to(Eductional) solution and for what in Instructional Design. teach about kinematicsTechnology reasons? of robotic movement. Programming solution: Thermostat as a Software development(Software) r1 = (–b+sqrt(Δ)) / (2*a) temperature controller for robot movementEngineering r1 = (–b–sqrt(Δ)) / (2*a) based on feedback
spurred changes to the degreerequirements. The last accreditation visit occurred prior to the curriculum redesign and rollout ofthe co-terminal program. The updated BSCE has not been accredited yet.The civil engineering department functions with five faculty members: four full-time teachingfaculty and one part-time teaching/department chair. In addition, the department includes onefull-time technician who aids in the operation of its laboratory space. With only five facultymembers, the program has four specialty areas: structural, transportation, geotechnical and waterresources engineering. Each of these specialty areas has its own dedicated laboratory space andis directed by the faculty member(s) with the associated subject matter expertise.The
that e-portfolio work could help address.References1. Denecke, D.D., Kent, J., and Wiener, W. (2011). Preparing Future Faculty to Assess Student Learning. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.2. Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.3. Colbeck, C. S. (2008). Professional identity development theory and doctoral education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(113), 9-16.4. Harrison, R. L. (2008). Scaling the ivory tower: Engaging emergent identity as researcher. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 42(4), 237-248.5. Blair, K. L., & Monske, E. A. (2009). Developing digital literacies and
Be Done?. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002 (pp. 1479-1483). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.13. Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1-20.14. Truluck, J. (2007). Establishing a mentoring plan for improving retention in online graduate degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, X(1).15. Huett, J. K., Kalinowski, K. E., Moller, L. & Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through the use of ARCS-Based E-Mails. The American Journal of Distance
Program Criteria for Manufacturing Engineering and Similarly Named Programs.” Washington, D.C.:ABET, Inc. [Available for download at http://abet.org/engineering-criteria-2012-2013/] 2. Danielson, S., Kirkpatrick, A., & Ervin, E. (2011). “ASME Vision 2030: Helping to Inform Engineering Education.” In the Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, IEEE/ASEE, October 12 - 15, 2011, Rapid City, SD. OR ASME. Found at http://www.asme.org/groups/centers-committees/public-affairs-and-outreach/about- engineering-education. Accessed 4-9-2013. 3. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. (2011a). “Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge.” Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers. [Available for download at
size andkind of robots that teams can create to foster creativity among teams. It has no size or numberlimit as long as they stay within the 6m x 4m stage performance area. This leads to surprisingcreations, from complex house-made humanoids and other animal-like machines, to swarmsof simple but synchronized robots, and a hoovering robotic carpet.A dance team can build a robot or multiple robots that move to music, which is up to 2minutes in duration. The creative and innovative presentation and performance of robot(s) areemphasized in the Dance league (figure 10). For the assessment of robotic performances, Page 24.852.9score sheets are used as
back, mastery is good wayto learn statics 6% 6% 26% 38% 23%Open Ended QuestionsThe survey involved three open-ended questions. These questions were administered to both thecurrent and previous students. The first question asks the participants to identify what they likeor dislike about the mastery learning method. The second question asks the participants to Page 24.887.10recommend any change(s) to the current version of the method. The last question asks theparticipants if the mastery learning method had any
with anaggregate sample rate of 250 kS/s and a dynamic range of +/- 10 volts. There are two analog-outchannels with 16-bit resolution, four digital inputs, and four digital outputs. Each USB-6211 hasa custom-designed interface board that allows a common signal source to be delivered to allworkstations (see Figure 2). Figure 1: Individual workstation with National Instruments USB-‐6211 and protoboard.The projects all rely on dissemination of one set of signals from a unique origin. Sensor signalsare connected to a distribution panel that fans out the signal to the 24 student positions. This
heat transfer”, 2nd ed., PA: Taylor & Francis, 19975. F. H. Harlow and J. Eddie Welch, "Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface", Phys. Fluids (American Institute of Physics) 8 (12), pp. 2182-2189, 19656. S. V. Patankar, “Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow” Taylor & Francis, 19807. M. Griebel, T. Dornseifer, and T. Neunhoeffer, "Numerische Simulation in der Strömungsmechanik" (in German), Vieweg, 19958. R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy, "On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics", IBM Journal of Research and Development 11 (2), pp. 215-234, March 1967 [Translation of "Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik
: Another notable theme that emerged was related to the purpose(s) ofstudent learning, albeit with notable differences between how the project partners and otherparticipants saw EPICS influencing students’ careers. Most of the project partners described theEPICS experience as a way for students to learn practical lessons and skill sets that will helpthem function as an engineer. Describing his motivation for promoting educational outcomes,one participant explained: “The academic world is a lot different than the outside world, and I tryto get that point across to them. When you go out into the outside world your boss is going to tellyou that the bottom line is the dollar.” And as another participant stated, “I want [the students] to,at the end of
previous terms, and in-classparticipation grades improved by 4 percentage points. These and other measures showedimproved understanding and engagement from incorporating carefully designed cooperativelearning activities that took advantage of student-owned electronics. Engineering educatorsshould be encouraged to find activities and problems that will benefit from students’ constantelectronic connectivity. In short, there are many benefits to allowing the students to use classtime to ‘play’ with their phones.i Richtel, M., Digitally Aided Education, Using the Students’ Own Electronic Gear, New York Times, March 22,2013.ii Emery, S. Factors for Consideration when Developing a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Strategy in HigherEducation, Masters
buildclarity; and the assumptions that can transfer through multiple stages in project management,amounting to a potentially very serious problem if only detected at the end of the projectmanagement cycle. In some cases, students have recognized this uncertainty and ill definition inthe design and execution stages, which has made an excellent opportunity to ask the student tostate the question/concern in front of the class, applaud her/his insight, and role modelnegotiation of the measure(s) of success with the class. Page 24.1015.6Phase 3: Check and Act (Evaluate)After the activity, students are typically buzzing about what they would have done
provide real world examples that can be used to motivate and educate undergraduates and other students in the master’s program.In order to improve the practicum experience, the faculty are working on the following changes: ― Update the language of the assignments that students needed to resubmit in order to reduce ambiguity. ― Create a forum for students to share their practicum experiences once they arrive on campus for the fall term.Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank the following firms for hosting practicum interns and forproviding feedback for the program and this paper: Barr Engineering Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota Walter P. Moore, Dallas, TexasReferences:Flood, L. S. and Powers, M. E., “Lessons
, fatigue testing, S-N curve and the simplified S-N curve, with fatigue theory under single level of cyclic stress or loading. We assigned the homework to students through implementing failure theories in specific close-end problems. Students were required to extend these concepts in their open- ended design projects.The Part III: The design of mechanical elements included the following topics: Typical machine elements including: bolts, shaft and key systems, gearing theories, spur gear, and bearings. It was well known that the design of typical machine elements were not the simple application of the stress/ strain theory discussed in the mechanics of materials but rather the application of design procedures. The design procedures
–232, June 2002[3]. Hanfmann, E. (1941). A Study of Personal Patterns in an Intellectual Performance. Character and Personality, 9, 315 – 325. Page 24.1215.15[4]. Klein, G. S. (1951). A Personal World through Perception. In R. R. Blake & G. V. Ramsey (Eds.), Perception: An Approach to Personality. New York: The Ronald Press Company.[5]. Witkin, H. A., Karp, S. A. and Goodenough, D.R. (1959). Dependence in Alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 20,493-504.[6]. Kagan, J. (1958). The Concept of Identification. Psychological Review, 65, 296 – 305.[7]. Kagan, J. (1966). The Generality and
their perceptions onthe roles returners can and do play.References1. Peters, D. L. & Daly, S.R. (2011). The challenges of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC.2. Peters, D. L. & Daly, S. R. (2012). Why do professionals return to school for graduate degrees? Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX.3. Peters & Daly, (2013). Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs. Journal of Engineering Education.4. Strutz, M. L., Cawthorne Jr., J.E., Ferguson, D. M
assignment consisted oftwo to three posted homework problems, each having a set of multiple-choice questions withfeedback spaced at different substages of the problem to determine if the student had understoodthe key concepts presented. At the completion of each quiz, the student was provided immediatefeedback on their selection(s). Based on this feedback, students were allowed to retake the quizan unlimited number of times prior to the mid-week discussion session, during which we wouldgo over the pre-assignment problems and address any questions students had in regard to the Page 24.1262.14other homework to be submitted later that week. The only
National Science Foundation (NSF)under awards 722221 and 0939065. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] Bernold, L. E., Spurlin, J. E., & Anson, C. M. (2007). Understanding our students: A longitudinal study ofsuccess and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 263-274.[2] Denning, P. J. (1992). Educating a new engineer. Communications of the ACM, 35 (12), 82-97.[3] Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated engineering curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164.[4] National Research Council (Ed.). (2002
increase the level of design complexity without risking overwhelming some otherstudents. The final recommendation is to use the newly designed 3.3V compatible trainersthroughout the course of the labs, which means replacing the traditional TTL 74LS family withthe newer 3.3V compatible 74HC family.References:1. J. Hill, Y. Yu, “The CPLD Provides a Third Option in Introductory Logic Circuits Course,” AC2012-5302, ASEE National Convention, 2012, session W5162. K. Hill, “Schematic Capture – ISE 13.x”, http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/kmhill/suppnotes/isetut/ise13x1/schem.htm3. K. Hill, Y. Yu, “Use of a CPLD in an Introductory Logic Circuits Course,” AC2013-7987, ASEE National Convention, 2013, session M4164. M. Radu, C. Cole, M. Dabacan, and S
idea of possible selvesand identity play to examine this process.Interactive Response and InteractionsFrom our early observations of the students’ use of the portfolios, we could see that identitywork and play occur in a variety of contexts, mediated by individual reflections as well as theresponses and interactions of other individuals. These observations informed our categorizationof “Interactive Response” (IR) as a site of learning mediated by diverse interactions with bothpeople (instructors, peers, friends/family, clients) and symbolic artifacts (e.g., professional codesof ethics). In this conception of IR, we pick up on Hattie and Timperley’s broader notion offeedback as provided by multiple “agent[s]”[8] in response to a particular
what anyone of the institutions could accomplish individually. The sharing of resources and opening thegateway that it creates makes this a project perfect for collaboration. More time and efforts arestill needed to justify the effectiveness of this project beyond joint collaboration to improvedstudent learning.References1. Marken, S., Gray, L., and Lewis, L. (2013). Dual Enrollment Programs and Courses for High School Students at Postsecondary Institutions: 2010–11 (NCES 2013-002). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 15 February 2014 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
). “Key Competencies for US Construction Graduates: Industry Perspective.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 138(2), 123-130. 2. Chan, E. H. W., Chan, M. W., Scott, D., Chan, A. T. S. (2002). Educating the 21st Century Construction Professionals. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(1), 44-51. 3. Pries, F., Doree, A., van der Veen, B., and Vrijhoef, R. (2004). “The Role of Leaders’ Paradigm in Construction Industry Change.” Construction Management and Economics, 22(1), 7-10. 4. Skipper, C. O., & Bell, L. C. (2006). “Assessment with 360° Evaluations of Leadership Behavior in Construction Project Managers.” Journal of
means that all due dates in a chapter are past. Aright pointing triangle indicates that there is at least one assignment left, but it is more than aweek away. A red “.10 Silverstein, S. (2006). Why go to class? Just go online: even friends’ notes no longer needed.The Los Angeles Times, January 25.11 Sheppard D. (2013). Blended Learning: Traditional lecture learning to be replaced with onlinelectures and group work sessions, how will you adjust? Wisconsin Engineer. Retrieved fromhttp://wisconsinengineer.com/magazine/272/263/.12 Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
MOOC, the colleges gained significantinsight into the challenges and opportunities associated with the technology and pedagogyassociated with MOOCs. In particular: There are a variety of reasons to offer MOOCs including: marketing / organizational awareness, outreach, providing professional development, support enrollment in “traditional” programs, etc. It is imperative that the goal(s) be clearly established early so that appropriate decisions regarding design and development can be made which support the goals. Very careful attention to content management minimizes issues when the course is offered. Video accessibility issues need to be carefully planned and managed. The visibility and positive attention generated for
Engineering”. Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 2. Saltzman W. Drug Delivery. Oxford University Press, 2001. 3. Truskey G. et al. Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 4. Farrell S. et al. “Drug Delivery Education Using Microsphere Technology,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. 5. Gu F. et al. “Sustained Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Alginate Beads,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2004, 96(3): 463-472. 6. Gombotz W. et al. “Protein Release from Alginate Matrices,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1998, 31 (3): 267-285
normally experienced inthe classroom. Quality control is also needed to assure that the content of the online course issimilar to what is taught in the classroom.References 1. Haugen, Susan; LaBarre, James; Melrose, John, “Online Course Delivery: Issues and Challenges” International Association Computer Information System (2001). 2. Song, Liyan; Singleton, Ernise S.; Hill, Janette R.; Hwa Koh, Myung, “Improving Online Learning: Student Perceptions of Useful and Challenging Characteristics” Internet and Higher Education 7 (2004): 59–70. 3. Kearsley, Greg, "A Guide to Online Education" (1998) Web 1 Jan. 2013. 4. Kearsley, Greg, “Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace”, Belmont, CA, Wadsworth