-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarovaˆa C™s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WORK IN PROGRESS: Thinking with mechanical objects: A think-aloud protocol study to understand students’ learning of difficult and abstract thermodynamic conceptsAbstract Since Froebelian time, tangible objects have been used in education to facilitate learningof concrete and abstract phenomena. The efficacy of humanly made artifacts in educationalsettings are widely studied in art, communications, and more recently in STEM education.Physical objects have
Test Blueprints provided a guided way of properly preparingassessment material to capture the intended learning outcomes of the course. Test Blueprintsclearly showed across all courses that faculty were missing some important learning outcomeswhen their assessments were not guided by a Test Blueprint. It was also evident that TestBlueprints varied significantly depending on the nature and the delivery mode of the course.AcknowledgementsThis project is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1821023. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] D. Boud
many other engi-neering mechanics lab courses, is the universal testing machine. As noted in Table 1, 12 of the 14labs involved physical experimentation, and of these, 6 involved the use of a universal testing ma-chine. The custom universal testing machine is shown in Figure 1, and was designed much likeconventional universal testing machines. It has dual lead screws with a crosshead that moves with Figure 1: Custom Universal Testing Machinethe rotation of the two screws. The crosshead supports a 500 kg (1100 lb) s-type load cell, andTable 1: Weekly Laboratory Activities, Feedback Writing Assignments, and Equipment forStrength of Materials Lab Week Lab Activity Writing Writing Feedback
. Senior, “What is AgTech?,” AgtechThinking - technology & entrepreneurship in agriculture, Oct. 12, 2020. https://agtechthinking.com/2020/10/12/the-4th-agricultural- revolution/ (accessed Dec. 13, 2022).[2] S. István, “Messages from ‘industry 4.0’ to agriculture,” in Towards Sustainable Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, A. Nyéki, A. J. Kovács, and G. Milics, Eds. Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd., 2017, pp. 63–77. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aniko- Nyeki/publication/335339931_Towards_sustainable_agriculture_and_biosystems_engine ering_book_Edited_by_Aniko_Nyeki_Attila_J_Kovacs_Gabor_Milics/links/5d765da492 851cacdb2caef0/Towards-sustainable-agriculture-and-biosystems
Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 927–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1462766Faber, C., & Benson, L. C. (2017). Engineering students' epistemic cognition in the context of problem- solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 677–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20183Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, 'big data' and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417Godwin, A. (2017). Unpacking Latent Diversity. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, OH. https://peer.asee.org/29062Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Rohde
. Fathi, M. Iranmanesh, P. Maroufkhani, and M. E. Morales, "Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 302, p. 127052, 2021.[3] K. Rojko, N. Erman, and D. Jelovac, "Impacts of the Transformation to Industry 4.0 in the Manufacturing Sector: The Case of the US," Organizacija, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 287-305, 2020.[4] L. Georgios, S. Kerstin, and A. Theofylaktos, "Internet of things in the context of industry 4.0: An overview," 2019.[5] M. O. Gokalp, K. Kayabay, M. A. Akyol, P. E. Eren, and A. Koçyiğit, "Big data for industry 4.0: A conceptual framework," in 2016 international conference
on one part of the car. • The smallest speed would be B in this one because B is toward the center and A C and D will have the same. • Which has the smallest speed. A B C or D … wow this is what got me in Physics, I really need to review this. Um I think A C and D speed … but B … No they might just all have the same speed if we’re looking at … yeah … I’m going to say they have … I’m going to say E • The “S” and “L” component of velocity based on the tire’s movement. Since it’s in the very center basically everyone one of them is moving at B, the velocity of the car, but each has their own velocity of the tire s well, except for B.Correct Responses • Nothing was said aloud – scored as incorrect
can lead to better performance and less focus onmemorization. Additionally, online students had more positive feedback about the quality of thecourse and instructor compared to the in-person students. From an institutional perspective, onlinecourses can increase enrollment and allow students to access education at their own pace and fit itinto their flexible schedules.References[1] T. Braun, “Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students,” J. Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 63–92, 2008.[2] P. C. Holzweiss, S. A. Joyner, M. B. Fuller, S. Henderson, and R. Young, “Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences,” Distance Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 311– 323, 2014.[3] V. Benigno
suitable forembedded systems courses in engineering and engineering technology programs [5]. Theseprojects required MicroPython with the Pi Pico. Project deliverables included the following. • Executive summary of the results (Word file): o Written description (1-2 paragraphs) of the hardware design (also include OrCAD PSpice schematics) o Written description (1-2 paragraphs) of the software design (also include a flowchart created in Word, ppt, or other s/w) o Testing procedure (numbered step by step testing procedure for each engineering requirement) o Results (1-2 paragraphs) o Signed academic integrity statement • 2-3 minute video (posted on YouTube) demonstrating
recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.ReferencesBarton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning fromMiguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the NationalAssociation for Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871-889.Bowen, C. L., Thompson, L. L., Menezes, G. B., & Restrepo Nazar, C. (2022a).Work-In-Progress: Measuring Systemic Educational Wellness using the Eco-STEM EducationalEcosystem Health Survey. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Bowen, C. L., Heubach, S., & Dong, J. (2022b). Eco-STEM Tools: Changing the Culture ofTeaching and Learning in STEM. In 2022
/s11165-006-9029-2[3] Oermann, M. H. (1999). Critical thinking, critical practice. Nursing Management, 30(4),40C-40F, 40H-40I. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/critical-thinking-practice/docview/231387045/se-2[4] S. Schrader, W. M. Riggs, & R. P. Smith (1993). Choice over Uncertainty and Ambiguity inTechnical Problem Solving, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 10, 1993,https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/46980/choiceoveruncert00schr.pdf?s[5] Furnham, A. & Ribchester, A. (1995). Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Concept, ItsMeasurement and Applications. Current Psychology: Developmental ° Learning • Personality °Social, Fall, 1995, Vol. 14, No. 3, 179-199[6] Furnham, A., & Marks
2015ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[2] S. C. Ritter and S. G. Bilén, “EDSGN 100: A first-year cornerstone engineering designcourse,” in 2019 FYEE Conference, 2019.[3] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, “Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course,” in 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[4] R. W. Freeman, K. Gentry, and J. E. Goldberg, “Changing the Advising Model,” in 2016ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[5] S. Santillan, L. TeMiquel-McMillian, J. Ganley, and S. Tantum, “WIP - 360 Coaching toSupport Whole-Student Advising in the First-Year,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2022.[6] J. K. Brown, N. Stringer, R. K. Anderson, and L. Whisler, “Supporting Student LearningThrough Peer-led Course
where sectionsof the course had teams with: homogeneous, heterogeneous, and random (control) cultural competency. Culturalcompetency was examined using the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale short form (M-GUDS-S) whichmeasures a single construct of Universal- diversity orientation (UDO) with three factors. Team dynamics weremeasured using instruments of team effectiveness at the end of the semester. The paper discusses the evidence ofreliability and validity of the self-reported instruments with an analysis of differences in the team dynamics ofsections based on homogeneous, heterogeneous, and control group of M-GUDs score. The study discusses theimplications of assessing the cultural competencies of students in the context of teamwork
. Further studies will seek to continue this work in conjunction with other comics developedby the research team to help provide best suggestions for other instructors on how these tools can be usedto support their students and supplement their instruction.References(1) Yang, G. “Comics In Education”. Retrieved from:http://www.humblecomics.com/comicsedu/history.html Accessed 13 Feb 2023.(2) Sones, W. Journal of Educational Sociology, 1944, 18, 232-240.(3) Dorrell, L.; Curtis, D.; Rampal, K. Journal of Popular Culture 1995, 29, 223-234.(4) Witty, P. Journal of Experimental Education 1941, 10, 100-104.(5) Witty, P. Journal of Experimental Education 1941, 10, 105-109.(6) Gruenberg, S. Journal of Educational Sociology 1944, 18, 204-213.(7) Wertham, F
main stakeholder impacted by the desired outcome? 4. What are the DEI indicators or metrics associated with this desired outcome? 5. What action verbs make this goal specific, measurable, and attainable? 6. What are the accepted definitions of the DEI indicators identified? 7. What aspect of the DEI framework does this outcome relate to?Table 2: DEI Action Plan MatrixGoal Partner Goal / Stakeholder Indicator / Action RECIPES Shared Definition (s) DEI Type Objective Metric Verb (s) CategoryA In Network Increase the Students Power Increase the ability to control
-assessment, such as offering extra credit orincorporating self-assessment results into the overall grading scheme as used in this study.A we continue to work on this topic, the following future works are in the pipeline: 1) investigatehow different teaching approaches affect self-assessment accuracy, 2) investigate the effect of self-assessment on overall performance, and 3) analyze how different groups of students (such as poorand good students) assess themselves.AcknowledgementsThis project is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1821023. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
Conference, Denton, TX, March 15-17 2023: American Society for Engineering Education, p. in press.[4] G. D. Kuh, High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008.[5] S. Ash and P. Clayton, "Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning," Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, vol. 1, pp. 25-48, 2009.[6] H. Chenette and T. Ribera, "Prediction and reflection activities in a chemical engineering course: Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer," presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June
, France, July 9-11, 2014, Proceedings, Part II 14, Springer, 2014, pp. 415–422.[3] M. Marschark et al., “Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students’ Classroom Learning,” J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 421–437, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1093/deafed/enl013.[4] Angrave, L., Lualdi, C., Jawad, M., & Javid, T. “ScribeAR: A New Take on Augmented-Reality Captioning for Inclusive Education Access”. 2021 Illinois-Indiana Regional Conference, 2021. https://peer.asee.org/38276[5] L. Lawrence, S. Shehab, M. Tissenbau, T. Rui, and T. Hixon, “Human-Centered Design Taxonomy: Case Study Application With Novice, Multidisciplinary Designers”. 2020. doi: 10.3102/1690347.[6] N. Dehak, P. J
give rise to the observed phenomenon (p. 175).In summary, Russ et al.’s (2008) framework foregrounds the distinct elements of a mechanisticaccount - what learners say about the phenomenon’s entities and their characteristics and actions,and Krist et al.’s (2019) framework foregrounds scalar levels - how learners describe what ishappening at a scale other than the observed phenomenon. Previously, we conducted a study ofthe mechanistic reasoning expressed spontaneously in elementary students’ discourse whilebuilding and testing prototypes (Authors, in Preperation). In that study, we found that a subset ofRuss et al.’s seven levels and a subset of Krist et al.’s three heuristics fully described the waysthat students used mechanistic reasoning as
from teachers across West Virginia.Data Collection For this research, in-person interviews will be performed with seven K-12 teachers in WV.The participants (i.e., teachers) would be selected based on simple random sampling. Eachparticipant was chosen independently with no correlation to the preceding or proceeding subject.A total of seven participants were ultimately chosen. A qualitative study will be implementedbased on teachers’ shared experiences, training, and activities provided by The NEED Project. PartI of the survey contains demographic questions about the teacher’s gender, age, years ofexperience, education attainment, teaching grade(s) level and subject(s), etc. Part II of the surveyincluded issues/challenges questions
Evolutionary Biology. My expertise is in teaching and learning in STEM, peer education, international programs, assessment, and building networks and collaborations.Dr. Lisa Schneider-Bentley, Cornell University Lisa Schneider-Bentley has been the Director of Engineering Learning Initiatives in Cornell Univer- sityˆ C™s College of Engineering since 2002. Learning Initiativesˆ C™ programs enhance the educa- a a tional environment of the College by facilitating opportunitie ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Peer led collaborative courses develop a sense of belonging and community for undergraduate
(accessed Feb. 26, 2023). [2] S. Patel and L. Tutchenko, “The refractive index of the human cornea: A review,” Cont Lens Anterior Eye, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 575–580, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.04.018. [3] SmugMug, “A beginner’s guide to pinhole photography.,” Medium, Oct. 28, 2020. https://news.smugmug.com/a-beginners-guide-to-pinhole-photography-ce7cf6b06fcb (accessed Feb. 26, 2023). [4] S. D’Souza, S. Annavajjhala, P. Thakur, R. Mullick, S. Tejal, and N. Shetty, “Study of tear film optics and its impact on quality of vision,” Indian J Ophthalmol, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2899–2902, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2629_20. [5] R. Machiele, M. J. Lopez, and C. N. Czyz, “Anatomy, Head and Neck, Eye Lacrimal
greatly assisted in theresearch and writing process, enabling the author to gather and organize information for their analysis.References[1] S. Rajala, "Beyond 2020: Preparing Engineers for the Future," Proceedings of The IEEE - PIEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1376-1383, 05/01 2012.[2] J. Froyd, P. Wankat, and K. Smith, "Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1344-1360, 05/01 2012.[3] N. Abbas, J. Whitfield, E. Atwell, H. Bowman, T. Pickard, and A. Walker, "Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education," International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 41, pp. 308-326, 2022/05/04 2022.[4] F. Clarizia, F. Colace, M. Lombardi, F. Pascale, and D
-group interaction-process quality during the murder mystery. Theexperiment ended with informing the participants about the experiment`s background andanswering their questions.3.2. Measures3.2.1. DemographicsThe demographic survey consisted of 17 items to assess the participants’ age, gender, enrolleddegree program, semesters spent in higher education, the degree of familiarity in each small-group, the participants’ personality traits, and the device used during the experiment. Thedemographic variables were used (a) to describe the sample in detail and (b) to ensure theinternal validity [24] of the experimental approach by capturing possible systematic participantrelated differences between the sub-samples of the three experimental conditions
, Practical Synthetic Data Generation. O’Reilly Media, Inc, 2020.[3] N. Gürsakal, S. Çelik, and E. Birişçi, Synthetic Data for Deep Learning. Berkeley, CA: Apress L. P, 2022.[4] N. Patki, R. Wedge, and K. Veeramachaneni, “The Synthetic Data Vault,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2016, pp. 399–410. doi: 10.1109/DSAA.2016.49.[5] A. Singh, S. Karayev, K. Gutowski, and P. Abbeel, “Gradescope: A fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work,” in L@S 2017 - Proceedings of the 4th (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051466.
, and D. S. Thomas, “An roi comparison of initiatives designed to attract diverse students to technology careers,” Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 105, 2016. [8] M. K. Ponton, J. H. Edmister, L. S. Ukeiley, and J. M. Seiner, “Understanding the role of self-efficacy in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 247, 04 2001, copyright - Copyright American Society for Engineering Education Apr 2001; Last updated - 2023-02-15; CODEN - JEEDEQ. [Online]. Available: https://login.proxy.lib.duke.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ understanding-role-self-efficacy-engineering/docview/217958437/se-2 [9] C. Pannier, C. Berry, M. Morris, and X
development", Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.25 No. 1, pp. 5-32. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590110380614 [Accessed April 10,2023]. [4] Kaya, N., Aydın, S. ve Durgut, S. (2016). Training performance evaluation using the360-degree feedback method. 19th EBES Conference. s. 623-628. [Online] Available:http://acikerisim.maltepe.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12415/2875 [Accessed February 28, 2023]. [5] Phuong, T.T., Foster, M.J. and Reio, T.G., Jr (2020), Faculty Development: ASystematic Review of Review Studies. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human ResourceDevelopment, 32: 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20294 [Accessed February 10, 2023] [6] Draper, L. (2022, August), “Lessons Learned: Boosting Faculty
.[3] Hartman, H., S.Lezotte, R.A. Dusseau, T.R. Forin, and S. Farrell, 2020. Transfer Students inUndergraduate Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #29472.[4] Meardon, S, Our Community College Engineering Students are Your Transfer Students.2019. ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.[5] Bloom, N.E., J. Johnson, J.M. Duis, and P. Entin, 2019. Facilitation Transfer Student Successin an Engineering Baccalaureate Program. ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #26328.[6] Laugerman, M., D. Rover, S. Mickelson, and M. Shelley. 2019. The Middle Years inEngineering: An Effective Transfer Partnership Drives Student Success in STEM. Advances inEngineering Education, Fall.,[7] Manteufel, R.D., and A. Karimi. 2023. Analysis of Transfer Credits in
the articles andthe design of the comment template. We believed that the reading assignments have helpedimprove students’ reading comprehension, writing techniques, and critical thinking skills.References1. S. A. Lei, K. A. Bartlett, S. E. Gorney, and T. R. Herschbach, “Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives,” College Student Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 219- 229. 2010.2. D. Pecorari, P. Shaw, A. Irvine, H. Malstrom, and S. Mezek, “Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes,” Quality in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 235- 256, 2012.3. C. M. Burchfield and J. Sappinton, “Compliance with required reading assignments,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 27
. Someinstitutions (20%) have design courses throughout the curriculum in addition to the capstonedesign sequence, but more programs (40%) have design projects within non-design coursesthroughout the curriculum. The course or courses in the capstone design sequence are primarilyoffered only once a year (78%) with a slight edge to the spring semester/winter quarter (80%)over the fall semester/quarter (72%). Most institutions (78%) include instruction in software orprogramming as part of the course(s). The culminating design project is most often a theoreticaldesign (68%) as opposed to one based on experiments (3%) or resulting in a prototype (7%), andmost institutions do not use the AIChE Design Competition problems (70%). Professional skillsare mainly