engineering curriculum both challenges and reinforces students’ priorassumptions.The surveys attempted to measure students’ previous experiences with computers and theirassumptions about how to use them, what students thought computers did well, and when,whether, and why they trusted the results provided by computers. The first two tables displayresults about their computer experience for STEM applications and more generally. The finaltables of questions sought to determine the assumptions students have about the ways computersare used and the kind of problems they can solve and to establish the extent to which studentsplace unreasonable trust in computer-generated solutions. TABLE 1. HOURS/WEEK OF COMPUTER USE1. On average
teachers.IntroductionEducators are increasingly aware of the importance of introducing contemporary and globalissues in undergraduate curriculum. Liberal arts programs usually consider contemporary issuesfrom many angles: social, political, ethical, organizational and personal. However, liberal artscourses rarely consider how engineering accomplishments affect society. One can argue that theaverage engineering major knows more about the humanities than the average humanities majorknows about engineering. However, in our technology-driven society, everyone needs to knowmore about engineering, especially its limitations.1 Many engineering advances have had an Page
Page 12.479.5close contact with VBI researchers throughout the course. Near the end of the course, BSCstudents made a visit to the VBI facilities for a tour and discussion of course progress. Thus, theproject required team collaboration and consultation between and BSC faculty and VBIresearchers. For delivery of the learning modules BSC emphasized: (1) introduction to thescenario, (2) introduction to the multiple disciplines, (3) development of strategies, and (4)implementations and conclusions. The first two steps were conducted in the classroom andonline, while the last two were conducted jointly between BSC and VBI. At VBI the CI- TEAMprovided hands-on workshops for BSC faculty and allowed for student discussions with expertsin the
in delivering engineering technologyeducation.The MMET department offers two ABET accredited degrees at the baccalaureate level:Manufacturing Engineering Technology and Mechanical Engineering Technology. The fourconcentration areas within the Mechanical Engineering Technology curriculum are aeronautical,automation, automotive and mechanical. For the aeronautical concentration, the curriculumincludes a course in Wind Tunnel Design and Testing. The course outcomes include thefollowing: 1. A basic understanding of how a wind tunnel operates. 2. Familiarity with wind tunnel measurement systems such as pitot-static probes, pressure transducers, manometers, thermocouples etc
discuss how CEE students at Rowan University are taughtdesign in a multidisciplinary, PBL environment, and to discuss how mechanics andcommunication are integrated into the design projects. Sophomore Engineering Clinic Iand II (SEC I and SEC II) are the innovations that allow this to be accomplished. SEC Iand SEC II afford the CEE students at Rowan University an integrated courseworkexperience for 1) learning and reinforcing material that is directly covered the CEEcurriculum, 2) gaining familiarity with material that is not explicitly covered in the CEEcurriculum, 3) developing formal communication skills, 4) developing into designers, and5) acquiring the so-called “soft skills” reflected in ABET 2000 A-K criteria.Sophomore curriculum for CEE
benefits. A summary of the scoresfrom the exit quiz is shown in the table below. A detailed tabulation is presented in Appendix G. Raw score Score % n n% 7 100 19 35 6 85 14 26 5 71 10 19 4 Fail 8 15 3 Fail 2 6Table 1: Ranked results from ‘Quiz’, Part I of ‘Exit Survey’At least two of the graduating participants have received job offers in clinical research withbiomedical companies, and attribute their success in obtaining that job to their participation
professional staff at the Archer Center for StudentLeadership Development, the two 1-credit experiences (Professional Development I—PD-1and Professional Development III—PD-3, respectively) have become an indispensable part ofthe engineering educational experience of our students. A third part of this experience(Professional Development II—PD-2) is taught independently by faculty from the School ofHumanities and Social Sciences. Development began in the mid 1990s, and starting with theClass of 2001, these courses have been taken by all engineering students. The present paperdescribes our experiences in developing this experience and incorporating it into the curriculum,the assessment process that has been used to redesign the curricular content on a
Page 12.44.2course with basic exposure to manual machining. Hardware familiarization takes place duringweeks 4-10 of the classes.Integration (CAD/CAM and CNC): The integration of software and hardware is introducedduring weeks 6-10 and in parallel to hardware familiarization. During this period, studentsdownloading the programs into the CNC machine controller, verifying the cutting toolpath on themachine's monitor, modifying the programs on site or at their computer stations, and setting upthe machine for cutting operations (Fig.1). Tooling selection Design idea Machining condition Program
, and technology, but do not have familiarity with the material4. During the2005-06 academic year, a team of Multidisciplinary Senior Design (MSD) students set out todesign, build, and test a series of hands-on activities intended to increase awareness of andinterest in engineering as a field of study. These activities all centered on a theme of howengineering work can be related to energy and the environment. During the 2006-07 academicyear, a second team of Software Engineering students is working to design an interactive Page 12.1505.3companion website to the TEAK activities.The objectives of the TEAK project are as follows:1. Encourage middle
Page 12.544.2final phase of the competition and judge the students’ projects. Fig.1 Winners of the Digilent Design Competition, first edition contest at TUCN, ROInspired by this successful experience, the first author of this paper decided to organize such acompetition at Rose Hulman Institute of Technology, and asked Digilent, Inc for logisticsupport.Organizing the Competition, First Edition at RHITThe competition is sponsored by Digilent, Inc., which produces state of the art FPGA boards.The emphasis of the competition is on conceptual design, implementation and validation of theprojects using FPGA boards and Verilog as HDL2.Due to the specificity of the school, mainly dedicated to undergraduate education, the contest isopen to
duringthe spring 2006 semester in order to assess student learning. The new hardware will beintroduced for the first time in the spring 2007 semester. The concept inventories included bothROBOLAB (graphical) and pseudo-code (text-based) questions. The pseudo-code componentwas deemed important in order to quantify the student’s ability to transfer knowledge betweendomains. The key concepts included in the inventory were: goto’s, conditionals, loops, nestedstructures, variables, functions/arguments, and subroutines/subprograms.1. BackgroundThere is a vast history of using LEGO® bricks in education. Projects that use the RCXprogrammable brick have included a wide variety of projects and courses ranging from robotcompetitions1-3 to laboratory
increasing at a fast rate. To respond to the industry needs of FPGA designers,universities are updating their curriculum with courses in FPGA logic design. As a result, theSchool of Technology at Michigan Technological University is stepping up to this challenge byintroducing the FPGA design course.The new course will be the third in series of digital logic design, it introduces the students totechniques needed for the design of very-large scale digital systems, including computers basicbuilding block. The paper discusses the goals of this course and relates the goals to industry needs ofhighly trained FPGA designers.1 IntroductionThe applications utilizing FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) as a design medium arepredominant [1]. FPGAs have been
theCommunity College of Allegheny County. Those with the appropriate background will be able totest out of the first three semesters. The schedule of courses for the first three semesters is asfollows:First Semester Introduction to Parametric Modeling (3 credits) Introduction to Electronics (3 credits) Engineering Seminar (1 credit) Mathematics for the Technologies 1 (4 credits) Technical Physics 1 (3 credits) Technical Computing (3 credits) Total Credits 17Second Semester Introduction to Chemistry (4 credits) English Composition 1
12.824.2execution will be presented.CurriculumThe students that participate in the Engineering Summer Program are thrust into a week-longitinerary that consumes their time from 7 am until 10 pm each day with activities that aredesigned to achieve the objectives previously mentioned in the introduction. A more detaileddescription of the core program objectives is provided in Table 1. A general description of thedaily activities is provided below. Following each description, the outcomes from Table 1 thatrelate to the activity are listed.Team building exercises – The Engineering Summer Program participants represent the top,rising high school seniors from around the state. They have diverse geographic, educational,ethnic, and family backgrounds. The students
reviews? • What impact did the camp activities have on the performance of the participants as they return to their secondary school, form both the student and parent perspectives? • What impact did the camp activities have on the higher education and career plans of the participants? • What were the demographic characteristics of students enrolled in each type of activity and how do they compare with demographic characteristics of students in the department as a whole?Specific Evaluation ResultsGeneral TrendsOverall these programs coincided with a rise in our new student and continuing studentpopulations as compared from Fall 2004 thru Fall 2006, as indicated in Table 1, as well as aconcurrent rise in the
prepare them for theconference. This includes an annotated bibliography, a refined version of which is Appendix A.The TC researched and discussed the meaning of vision. Some vision definitions discoveredduring this process are: • “A mental model of a future state of a process, a group, or an organization.”1 • “A cognitive image of the future which is positive enough to members so as to be motivating and elaborate enough to provide direction for future planning and goal setting.”2 • “A mental image of something that is not perceived as real and is not present to the senses” “…produced by the imagination.”3 • “An image (not just an idea) of an attractive (compelling) future state unique to a group
teami For an exception, see Seat, E. and Lord, S. M., “Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Page 12.564.2Interaction Skills,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct. 1999, pp. 385-390.pedagogy) is that students find themselves in patterns of unproductive team communication thatcan lead to conflicts. What is more, they may be ill-equipped to manage or resolve thoseresulting conflicts, and thus find themselves inadequately prepared to handle team issues in theworkplace.1-2The Department of Mechanical Engineering at a large Western University recently adopted aformalized, integrated communication and engineering
cleardistinction between the different technologies. The learning objectives of such a course modulewould include the following:1) Understanding the key concepts of each technology2) Understanding the application domains of each technology3) Being able to differentiate between the application domains for each technologyThese objectives need to be incorporated into a complete computer technology educationalsystem. Students learning these technologies need a background in basic computer architectures,basic networking, and some skills in configuring networks. At this stage of market acceptance ofthese technologies they could be used as an optional module in an existing networking orembedded systems course or could be expanded into a complete elective course
/Project Lifecycle /1/. Since the curriculum leads into the Page 12.575.2capstone design sequence, a schematic displaying the different project phases with its corresponding classes is shown in the following table /Table 1/. It is clear that credit hour constraints make it difficult to take all in depth classes before the actual design sequence starts. The simulation concept understanding and simulation building process is shown in the last row. FORMULATIONPhases Pre-Phase A Phase A Phase B Advanced Studies Preliminary Analysis
Junior – Interdisciplinary Design and Industrial Partners (3 hrs) Sophomore – Design and small mechanical/structural applications (1 hr) Freshman – Introduction to Design (3 hrs)Figure 1.0: The Design Curriculum at UTCThe goal of the design curriculum is to graduate students who understand and can apply thesteps of the design process to various interdisciplinary and discipline-based applications. Thefirst step toward meeting this goal is to introduce the steps of the design process in UTC’s 3credit hour freshman level course Introduction to Engineering Design (IED). The design processemphasized at UTC is shown in Figure 2.0.The freshman IED course
significant advantage over object-oriented languages, such as Java, in that it allows for aninterpreted mode. Code can be edited directly on the target system over an ftp link and then runusing the ‘irb’ interpreter. The tedious steps of compiling and porting from the developmentsystem to the target system step can be eliminated, allowing for much quicker developmentcycles.The Development ProjectThe class project requires that students design and build a small autonomous robot. A typicaldesign from a previous class is shown below Page 12.1572.6Figure 1 Miniature autonomous robot, showing overall structure and camera. The computer platform is visible
completes its four-year academic program. Within this program,students are free to select one of a number of academic majors, many of which fall in therealm of the liberal arts. Because of the stress on breadth of the experience, those studentsdesiring to major in a non-engineering discipline are required to take, as a minimum, asequence of three courses from one of the engineering programs. They may select fromChemical, Civil, Electrical, Environmental, Mechanical, Nuclear, or Systems(Management) Engineering. Table 1 depicts the courses included in the MechanicalEngineering (ME) sequence. Table 1. Mechanical Engineering Three-Course Sequence Course Content
needs of a varied student population in any given classroom.Introduction"Three principles from brain research: emotional safety, appropriate challenges, and selfconstructed meaning suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to classroom instruction isineffective for most students and harmful to some." 1 Still classroom teaching/instructionat most colleges and universities is carried out with the one-size-fits-all approach. Whilemost school districts in the United States of America implement DI in their publicschools that will address students with diverse needs, abilities, strengths, experiences andinterests in order to best support their learning, most colleges do not adopt this technique.So what is differentiated instruction? According to
lower levels are required for studentsuccess at higher levels; however, engineering students typically have varying degrees of Page 12.412.3abilities in all six levels. The six levels, their corresponding demonstrable skills, and verbs thatcan be used to form learning objectives are presented in Table 1:Table 1. Levels in Bloom’s taxonomy of learningLevel Skills VerbsLower level cognitive domain:Knowledge The student can recall information. arrange, define, duplicate, Ability to recall facts, definition, jargon , label, list, memorize
flourish. The longer range goals of this Collaborative are to serve as a model thatcan be replicated in other technological sectors and to serve as a platform for the economicdevelopment in Western North Carolina.BackgroundThe Western North Carolina region is made up by the 23 western-most counties of NorthCarolina (shown in red in figure 1). This region is larger than eight U.S. states and isapproximately the size of Maryland. The demographics of the region are largely rural with arural population of almost 60% as compared to the entire state ratio of 39.8% (North Carolinaranks the highest in ruralpopulation among thetwenty most populousU.S. states). As areference the highestpercentage of ruralpopulation in any U.S.state is 61.8% 16. Thus,Western
!∀∀# ∃ % & ∋( ∃ ) + , % + + % & − %& . % & ∋/ 0 ) 1 2 ∋3 ) 1 2 ∋4( ) 1 + 2% + + + %( + % 5 + 1 6# 7∀ !7 7∀2 , + %0 0 !∀∀6 ∋ )6 8 % + 69#:!% + ; ∋ < ) + %&
of operations:generate, capture and pulse-width-modulation (PWM). Our students were able toimplement a PWM controller, or an input capture function to measure the period orfrequency of an input signal and generate real-time interrupts.We used the book [1] to provide reading material for the SHC. We discussed the typicaldesign flow of SHC: partitioning, scheduling and implementation. Among the three co-design classifications: SHC of embedded systems, SHC of instruction set processors, andSHC of reconfigurable systems, we studied only the SHC of the embedded systems. Weused several embedded systems as case studies: a car dashboard system, a real-timespectrum analyzer using FFT calculations, MP-3 encoding and decoding, and MPEGencoding and
cornerstone of engineering education is design education. Accredited programs are required toprovide a capstone design experience in which students integrate knowledge gained from theircoursework. For many engineering programs, design education begins in the freshman yearwhere students are introduced to the design process.1, 2, 3, 4 Following this freshman experience,many students are not required to implement the design process in a systematic fashion until theyperform their capstone project . Integration of design across the curriculum is challenging sincethe outcomes of most lecture courses rely predominately on mastery of subject matter.Both freshman and capstone design courses for biomedical engineering students often involvethe design of
bachelor and nine master-level project management degrees in 1994, whereas by 2006, morethan 284 degree programs at 235 worldwide institutions existed. The GAC states that the“programs have broadened to be part of degree offerings in business, management, construction,engineering, and architecture.” This interdisciplinary focus is a core element of many programs.Thinking globally, but acting locally, The Citadel School of Engineering listened to constituentinput concerning the need for graduate level education programs in the Charleston, SC area andestablished a graduate certificate program in Technical Project Management (TPM). Theobjectives of this program 1) delivered a knowledge and performance-based curriculum focusedon the knowledge, skills