, interview data, etc.). Dr. Bork earned her doctorate degree from the University of Michigan’s Engineering Education Research Program. Prior to this, she earned both a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from The Ohio State University.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Developing a survey instrument to measure
students,postdocs, or early-career faculty, they described a welcoming culture of experimentation thatfostered creativity and collaboration.“I was able to propose a new approach that I wasn’t sure would be accepted. Instead of shuttingit down, the group helped me refine it and actually put it into practice.”Possible ChallengesDespite these positive aspects, participants noted some challenges. For instance, participantsexpressed concerns about the sustainability of psychological safety, particularly as the networkgrows and evolves.One participant observed, “It’s great now, but I wonder if we can keep this culture intact as morepeople join and new dynamics emerge.”Others reflected on the initial stages of their involvement in the network, describing
yes, no or I don’t andknow, and use the space below to indicate if FRyou have taken that class or plan to take thatclass in the future)?4. I am excited to be at camp today 2.13 3. I am glad I attended this camp 1.93 4. I would tell my friends to attend this camp next year 2.36 5. Computers and programming are interesting 1.795. I can see myself going to college to study 2.73 6. I can see myself going to college to study some sort 2.64some sort of computing of computing6. I can see myself pursuing a career with 2.67 7. I can see myself pursuing a
higher educationstudents [1]. Rooted in resilience theory, the ARM encompasses key frameworks explainingstudent retention and dropout dynamics within higher education [8], [9], [10]. Individual System Protective Mechanisms Risk Factors Protective Mechanisms Commitment to Protective MechanismsAcademic System Program and Career External System Risk Factors Risk Factors Dropout Retention/Completion
of the ASEE and NSF reports by outlining three persistentchallenges facing the engineering workforce [14]:• Systemic racism and structural inequities in education have historically excluded African Americans, women, and other minoritized groups from engineering, limiting the diversity of the workforce.• The demand for STEM jobs continues to outpace the supply of qualified workers.• STEM careers are evolving rapidly, necessitating adaptable skills and a commitment to lifelong learning.Rapid technological advancements have placed significant burdens on sectors like law, policy,manufacturing, and human resources [15]. While some sectors adapt quickly, engineeringeducation, constrained by traditional practices, has struggled to
Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State University. She teaches writing and information literacy courses and engineering for sustainable development courses in Global Engineering. Her multi-disciplinary research and scholarship interests are focused on professional communication competencies, writing pedagogy, sociotechnical and systems thinking, and teamwork skills.Dr. Deborah Kuzawa, The Ohio State University Dr. Kuzawa teaches the graduate Engineering Research Communications course in addition to working with graduate students in the co-curricular program. She also provides writing consultations to early career faculty seeking grants to support their work
related Understand considerations; select relevant example; translate to another information; explain significance. language. Recall information in situations Retrieve factual information; list where technology is not readily possible answers; define a term; Remember accessible. construct a basic chronology or timeline.In addition to generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, undergraduate engineering students cannow expect to encounter discipline-specific AI and ML tools in their studies and careers. Inthe context of MS&E, the use of domain-specific
institutions have attempted to track student success from their engineering leadershipprograms post-graduation, primarily through surveys. Researchers at U of T evaluated the impactof their curricular and co-curricular program through a survey of over 800 alumni with 25 followup interviews [8]. The ILead program at U of T program is relatively diffuse; students could takeacademic leadership courses or participate in various duration co-curricular programs, from 2-hour workshops to 30-hour cohort-based programs. There was no attempt to assess alumnileadership using any validated instrument; alumni were instead asked to reflect on how theirinvolvement in ILead programming had impacted their career. Alumni reported an impact ofleadership courses on their
thenature of their work. Industry leaders offer students valuable perspectives on the professionalenvironment and the opportunities they will enter after degree completion. Bruno et al., (2016)suggested that career networking and field experience contribute to increase of student interest intheir major. In addition to industry tours and networking with engineering professionals, duringBridge students attend a serios of sessions, namely Major Exploration, during which they learnmore about their major and career options by an assigned coach.Part of our program also includes campus tours, designed to familiarize students with availablecampus resources and organized team building activities inside and outside campus. We expectthat these activities will
semester, are described that mitigate the chilly climate of engineering as anunwelcome space for women. A new theoretical framework, the BELONG (BecomingEngineers Leading Our Next Generation) Conceptual Model of Engineering Persistence, isproposed that describes the program. The model is based on social cognitive career theory andincorporates program structural supports as model inputs and the sense of belonging constructas a precursor to engineering persistence.As a first step towards model validation, six structured interviews with self-identified womenof Color in the Class of 2028 were conducted to gain a nuanced understanding of their programexperiences during their first semester. Researchers used emergent, focused, and thematiccoding to
with partners ○ Finishing individual weekly homework (Engineering Exercises)Hands-On Philosophy Project-based learning (PBL), such as hands-on laboratories and design-build-testchallenges, has emerged as a powerful pedagogical approach with numerous benefits such as theapplication of theory to practice, enhanced problem-solving and critical thinking skills, improvedcreativity and innovation, development of transferable skills (teamwork, communication, timemanagement), increased student motivation and career preparation, and a more rewardingteaching experience for educators [11-14]. While PBL has gained global popularity, its implementation requires careful design toensure quality learning experiences, efficient use of
technologies. Dishari is also passionate about STEM education research, K-12 energy literacy, and outreach. In recognition of teaching excellence, Dishari received the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Midwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award (2024), ASEE Midwest Conference Best Paper Award (2023, 2024), UNL distinguished Teaching Award (2023), Holling Family Master Teacher Award (2023), Henry Y. Kleinkauf Distinguished New Faculty Teaching Award (2020), and Harold and Esther Edgerton Junior Faculty Award (2019). In recognition of research excellence, Dishari has received the DOE Office of Science Early CAREER Award (2019), NSF CAREER Award (2018), 3M Non-Tenured Faculty Award (2021), American Chemical
learntechnical writing and that their beliefs are influenced by assessment practices. They believe thattechnical writing is important for their careers and they want to learn technical writing incomputer science courses, however, they perceive that technical writing is not assessed often ordeeply enough and shared that course assessment practices affect the learning activities that theyprioritize.2 IntroductionCommunication skills are integral to professional computer scientists’ success [1], [2], [3]. Thesecommunicative skills and competencies are usually integrated into program learning outcomes,which are assessed via students’ course work; recently, assessment in post-secondary computerscience programs is shifting towards the heavier use of
objects is more likely to persistin mastering advanced geometry or CAD design, even when facing initial challenges.3.1.2 Subjective Task Value in STEM ContextsSubjective task value refers to the perceived relevance and utility of a task. For spatial reasoning,students' recognition of its importance in future careers - such as engineering design, architecturalmodeling, or data visualization - directly impacts their motivation and engagement. Students whoperceive spatial skills as essential are more likely to invest effort and persist in masteringchallenging tasks. By incorporating EVT constructs into the conceptual framework for spatialreasoning performance and persistence, this study emphasizes designing interventions thathighlight the utility of
teaching other subjects or from careers in other fields. Among the manyvariations influencing engineering teaching practices is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK),defined as the “the knowledge of, reasoning behind, and enactment of the teaching of particulartopics in a particular way with particular students for particular reasons for enhanced studentoutcomes [1]”. This multiple case study explores the PCK of five middle school engineeringteachers implementing the same middle school engineering curriculum, STEM-ID. The 18-week STEM-ID curriculum engages students in contextualized challenges that incorporatefoundational mathematics and science practices and advanced manufacturing tools such ascomputer aided design (CAD) and 3D printing, while
was only relevant to certain students or was catered forthe mechanical engineering students. These complaints have reduced after implementing the newcontent with plans to continue improving the curriculum in the future.3 CHARACTERIZING THE CURRENT PROGRAMMost capstone programs enroll students in a two-semester fall-to-spring course sequence thatprepares them for their STEM careers by focusing on real-world problems provided by industrysponsors. Over 90% of capstone projects come from industry partners, with approximately 60%being multidisciplinary. For students seeking a December graduation, there is a special section ofthe course informally known as "Concurrent Capstone." This 6-credit hour option allowsstudents to enroll in both Capstone 1
Biomedical Engineering and a MS and BS in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech. She has been founding faculty of two brand new U.S. engineering undergraduate programs and is leading change across diverse contexts. She has been PI on many NSF awards (include a NSF CAREER) and currently is PI on a multi-year Kern Family Foundation KEEN award targeted at ”Educating the Whole Engineer” through innovation (entrepreneurial mindset) and character. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Transforming Undergraduate Education to Educate the Whole Engineer: Implementing 100% Experiential Learning at Wake Forest Engineering Through Grounding to Learning Theories, Motivation Theories, Strategic
within a mechatronics major in the literature was presented by Marshalland Ham [7] in 2017 for the Kennesaw State University Mechatronics Engineering program.However, this work summarizes an isolated industry project and not a comprehensive twosemester senior design course sequence. Thus, there is a lack of literature around undergraduatemechatronics senior design for mechatronics engineering majors. This gap in the literature posesa challenge for educators aiming to design meaningful experiences that align with industrydemands and prepare students for the multifaceted nature of mechatronics careers. Creating an undergraduate mechatronics capstone experience poses challenges whencompared to implementing a disciplinary capstone experience
findings further illustrate librarian andcaregivers’ goals and motivations for offering engineering learning opportunities whilehighlighting engineering-related, online-related, and other challenges. Implications for designinga culturally responsive online engineering program that leverages rural participants’ funds ofknowledge are presented.IntroductionGiven that children’s career aspirations towards—and away from—engineering start as early as10, it is critical to provide opportunities to understand what engineering is from an early age [1].However, rural districts are often excluded from federal initiatives and lack resources toimplement engineering curricula [2]. Research shows that informal science education canpositively impact children’s
majors and careers. To promotesustainability with the community partner, the project team has partnered with The GraingerCollege of Engineering Office of Outreach and Public Engagement to assist with facilitatingfuture collaboration.Professional DevelopmentAllies in STEM (Phase I & II), 2020 – 2024, PIs: Graduate studentsDescription: This project was a collaboration between the Graduate Society of WomenEngineers (GradSWE) and the Society for Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics & NativeAmericans in Science (SACNAS) that presented opportunities for graduate students to developskills to become lifelong allies for diverse and marginalized STEM communities, fulfilling a gapof targeted allyship programming for the STEM communities and graduate
mentor,reduces stress and anxiety, enhances participation and engagement in the academic community,and adds value to student outcomes. Similar outcomes are discussed in [12] and [13]. While ourwork generally focuses on the short term benefits that being mentored and being a mentor canhave on engineering students during their first and second year in College, another studyindicated that being a mentor can have long lasting objective and subjective career benefits [14].Experimental Methods/Materials/Project ApproachThe primary goal of the layered mentorship program is to improve success rates for first-yearstudents, while also recognizing the benefits that second-year student mentors gain from theirleadership roles. To understand the efficacy of
Technology. Dr. Panchal’s research interests are in (1) design at the interface of social and physical phenomena, (2) computational methods and tools for digital engineering, and (3) secure design and manufacturing. He is a recipient of CAREER award from the National Science Foundation (NSF); Young Engineer Award, Guest Associate Editor Award, and three best paper awards from ASME; and was recognized by the B.F.S. Schaefer Outstanding Young Faculty Scholar Award, the Ruth and Joel Spira Award, and as one of the Most Impactful Faculty Inventors at Purdue University. He received the Distinguished Alumni award from IIT Guwahati. He is a co-author of two books and has co-edited one book on engineering systems design. He has
that both participation in formal campus groupsand peer relationships positively impacted persistence when the groups provided a counterspace(Appendix I). Student groups, mentorship programs, and peer-to-peer relationships were mostfrequently cited as helpful to students' persistence [15]. In another study, the importance formentors near the beginning of a program was highlighted, with the caveat that same genderfaculty and mentors were preferred by students [16]. Women identified students noted thatsame-gender faculty and mentors were more approachable and made them believe they couldaccomplish more in their chosen field. Studies indicate that the undergraduate experience can influence the decision of studentsto enter a career as an
residency, students prepare and present research posters at a formal symposiumattended by faculty, peers, and members of the public. With over 150 attendees at the 2024 event, theprogram’s visibility and impact have grown significantly. By integrating practical research withtheoretical learning and professional development, the URSR equips students with the tools they need forfuture academic success and career readiness. 3. Educational SeminarsThe educational seminars in the 2024 URSR program are meticulously designed to address criticalaspects of research, equipping students with the foundational knowledge and skills required for success inacademia and beyond. Each session delves into a specific topic relevant to aspiring researchers
questionsguiding our work are:1. During the EJF program, what changes occur in the ways that Fellows think about the interactions between technology, society, culture, and the environment?2. How do EJF Fellows utilize sociotechnical perspectives when carrying out engineering projects?3. How do EJF Fellows’ sociotechnical perspectives interact with their motivations for studying engineering, career goals, and identities as engineers?4. What are the educational and career trajectories of EJF Fellows who participate in the program? 2We are especially interested in exploring how the EJF program promotes educational equity byexamining how the
communitiesmay lack access to qualified physics instructors. Persistent stereotypes and implicit biases againstunderrepresented groups, including women, Indigenous peoples, and visible minorities, maydiscourage these students from studying high school physics. By the time students become awareof engineering as a potential career, it may be too late to fulfill the physics requirement.In 2019, the University of Calgary (UCalgary) began offering an alternative admissions pathwayto first-year engineering for motivated students lacking the physics prerequisite. Students areconditionally admitted to UCalgary based on their high school biology grades in place of theusual physics grade, provided they successfully complete the Bioengineering Summer Institute(BSI
engineering careers? The hypothesis is the project, focused on asustainability problem on campus, will improve self-efficacy and interest in programming,especially for underrepresented students. To test this, a multistep project was introduced into arequired sophomore level course for civil engineers. The impact of the project is assessed usedmixed method analysis using data from surveys and student reflections.2. MethodsThe CourseOne section of Computer Applications for Civil Engineers is offered each year and is a requiredcourse for sophomore Civil Engineering Students at Santa Clara University, a midsize, primarilyundergraduate private university. The course introduces civil engineering students to computerprogramming through MATLAB with an
Rutgers School of Engineering (M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering). Lorne is an ardent steward of STEM with a passion for supporting and mentoring Women in Science and Engineering.Dr. Hayet Bensetti-Benbader, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Dr. Hayet Bensetti-Benbader is the Director of Computing and STEM Career Initiatives and the Computer Science LLC. She is known for her international, multi-cultural background. She has several years of experience in finance and 10 years of teaching experience. She is a technology steward with a mission to improve learning experiences through instructional design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025
role model and a learnerincreases the likelihood that that model will raise the learners’ beliefs in their own capabilities11.Identity-based role models have been shown to influence career choice by providing anopportunity for learners to evaluate their own abilities and conception of what is possible forthem in the future, empowering learners to envision themselves in the place of the role model12.Expectancy-value theory states that learners are motivated to complete tasks that they believethey can complete and that they believe have value, including utility value for their future13,14.When students connect with an identity-based role model, their expectations for value and taskfeasibility may increase, leading to increased engagement
has a unique set of experiences. Theyoungest author has thirty years of experience in engineering education, the oldest oversixty. Over our careers we have served on committees, participated in strategic planning, andused technology to reshape our classrooms; in hindsight much of this work seems to be acomplete waste of time. We come to these debates not just as scholars, but as people whosecareers have been devoted to the advancement of engineering education, and who are at points inour careers where being retrospective comes naturally. This is both a privilege and a limitation,as our deep involvement can make it harder to see beyond established norms or challenge theorganizational status quo; we are seeking to expand our scope.At this time