concerns. Students may have learned to recognize “A” levelmastery of the subject matter, and have a good idea of how long it will take to achieve it, but stillhave their plans interrupted by externally imposed changes in work schedules, by sick children(especially in single parent households) or other non-academic factors. These constraints are lesssevere with traditional student populations where traditionally many institutions of highereducation are founded. Going forward, our institution will need to consider that divergentconstraints are greater for the non-traditional student populations that now form the new majorityin higher education [7].According to the 2014 US Census Report, people with bachelor’s degrees in science, technology
a discussion about uniting the two-course sequence in EET with a possibleparallel path for EECS students. There are no present discussions on this topic.Course content continues to be enhanced. The next lab experience being planned is apaper-winding machine using toilet paper. It should be an excellent study of motioncoupled with PID control. There is a prototype of this machine being built at present.Also, a discussion of safety programming has been planned and may be taught thissemester. Hopefully the software will work properly.These courses continue to mature and produce qualified students looking for good jobs inindustrial automation. When tested in the real world, they are believed to be betterprepared after having taken these PLC
for assessing learning are not readilyavailable for many curriculum areas. Since instructors are naturally more willing to put theirefforts into evidence-based teaching practices it is critical that we are able to measure whetherlearning increases have occurred as a result of new practices.Concept inventories (CIs) are available for such engineering topics as statics and dynamics, heatand energy, signals and systems as well as statistics, however there are no proven valid, reliableCIs available for engineering economy. Thus we are interested in developing such a tool. In thispaper we will discuss the development of the Engineering Economy Concept Inventory (EECI),results from assessment of its validity, and plans for further study and
in his mental health. He was immediately dispatched to see amedic and a student counsellor saw him that day; the decision was made almost immediatelyto grant him a year long absence. His parents were contacted and plans made for him to flyhome, which he did within three days of responding to the call to come in and talk about hisproblems. Another two British students, both from Asian communities were also experiencingacute mental health problems. Both had seen the campus medic or counselling services, butboth were unwilling to talk to their families due to the stigma attached to such problems withinBritish Asian (and wider British) culture. Additional support was put into place for suchstudents who were also advised to take a leave of
peer feedback) andtechnological (e.g., mobile device access) needs of the distance learners in their program. Infuture work, they plan to supplement personas with contextual scenarios that reflect the distancestudents’ approaches to learning. Turns, Borgford-Parnell, and Ferro [10] examined the effects ofdisseminating engineering student personas to (a) engineering curriculum stakeholders and (b)graduate students preparing to teach an undergraduate chemical engineering course. Theirfindings revealed personas to be flexible tools that were useful for prompting diverse audiences(e.g., teachers and students) to unpack biases and assumptions and reflect upon personalpractices related to learning and teaching. Turns, et al. [10] also reported that
purpose is for the research team to obtain feedback on the modification process prior toimplementing the measure to approximately 1800 students across 11 middle schools in duringthe third and final year of the larger study. The purpose of the ECA-M8 will be used as oneindicator of intervention impact on student learning along with a performance assessment ofunderstanding of engineering design, forces and motion concept assessment, and assessments ofmotivational outcomes including interest and self-efficacy in STEM. Another purpose of theECA-M8 is for educators to use students’ scores to inform instructional planning, as well asgrowth in understanding.While there are established assessments for students’ motivation in STEM5,6 and
emphasized were those directly useful for engineers in aprofessional/industry environment and included: - Focus on the Customer - Communicate with the customer, understand the customer’s needs, and negotiate achievable needs, conduct interim demonstrations, collaborate with the customer, and deliver the product on-time. - “Do what you say you will do” – Teamwork, division of labor, project planning, task execution, leadership, and responsibility. - Engineering Prototyping – Idea generation, start simple then improve, face high-risk problems first, think through each step in-detail to reduce risk - Grit and Determination – Anything that can go wrong will go wrong – push through
-learning skills. Neutral respondents make up the remaining 10%. We further investigated onhow the programme helps our students to become good lifelong learners by inviting them toshare their biggest learning gain in this regard. Students mentioned that they have learnt todesign an efficient study plan under a tight time constraint. (e.g., “Dealing with the variousdeadlines, preparing run-downs and drafts as well as gearing up for the challenges that layahead constituted a unique experience.”; and “My time and resource management skills weretested and polished during this stage of our expedition.”). Students also became aware thatfinding the right experts and asking the right questions are essential in the learning process.(e.g., “I tried my best
ongoing or planned projects – Including recruiting campaigns 29 30 Enabling student-driven entrepreneurship• In most institutions, research initiatives and entrepreneurship were the domain of faculty and graduate students – New research initiatives often required high-level institutional support• The maker culture and availability of Makerspaces encourage initiation of research by student groups – A bottom-up approach sometimes coupled with availability of nearby incubators 303131
introductory biology course into an active learningexperience that resonates with a wide range of undergraduate students. Backward course designled to an innovative curriculum that (1) is based on biology’s big ideas, (2) has measurablelearning outcomes, and (3) encourages development of higher order thinking skills. Our studioclassroom design maximizes interactions; cantilevered workstations distributed throughout theroom encourage student-instructor and student-student interactions. Group discussions occur atwhiteboards as students solve problems, create concept maps, plan experiments and interpretexperimental data. Workstation computers and dual monitors support whole-class instruction aswell as student-led group explorations. The classroom design
Regional Planning, So- cial Work and Gender and Women’s Studies.. She is currently a faculty member at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology and a faculty affiliate at the Institute for Computing in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Women and Gender in Global Perspective, and Gender and the Cline Center for Democracy. She is the recipient of the Richard and Margaret Romano Professorial Scholar for outstanding achievements in research and leadership on campus. She is also a Grand Challenge Learning Teaching Fellow in the Health Track. Mendenhall’s research focuses on racial microaggressions in higher educa- tion. She examines how living in racially segregated neighborhoods with high levels of violence
), **>.30 (medium effect), ***>.50 (strong effect)(2) Cohen’s d significance levels: *>.20 (weak effect), **>.50 (medium effect), ***>.80 (strong effect)An important difference also appears in the average age of Starters (22.85 years) versus Joiners(22.08 years). This difference is significant with a p-value of .10)between Starters and Joiners, as summarized in Table 6. First, the experience to participate in abusiness or entrepreneurship club was reported by 17% of Starters versus only 4% of Joiners (p-value < .00, phi = .16). Second, 11% of all Starters versus 4% of all Joiners participated in abusiness plan, business modeling or elevator pitch competition (p-value < .00, phi = .13).Moreover, 6% of all Starters took part
from an engineeringperspective is sparse. Based on the information that is available, two distinct possibleconstruction methods have been developed to describe the creation of St. George’s Church:MEOI (Measure, Excavate, Outside, Inside) and MSOI (Measure, Simultaneous excavation,Outside, Inside) [1]. The MEOI construction method begins with measuring out, on the surfaceof the rock, the plan dimensions which the 12 meter x 12 meter church and the 25-meter squaretrench that surrounds the church. Once the measurements were taken, the soft volcanic tufa couldbe carefully marked or scored such that the outline of the trench and the church were clearlydelineated. After the plan view was “drawn” on the surface of the soft volcanic rock
teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(6), 12-26.Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., Henderson, C., & Froyd, J. E. (2013). Fidelity of Implementation of Research‐Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 394-425.Council on STEM Education. (2013). Federal Science Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education 5-Year Strategic Plan: A Report from the Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council: Executive Office of the President National Science and
community committed to developing engineers who are innovative leaders in a global society. The Center broadens participation, increases academic performance and provides personal support for diverse students from all backgrounds. Mr. Scott is a former business executive, retired from the Procter & Gamble Company after over 32 years of service. His background includes demonstrated leadership in strategic planning and analysis, IT management, product distribution, and global learning systems. In addition to his current role at the University of Michigan, Mr. Scott is a member of the IT Senior Management forum, a national organization dedicated exclusively to fostering upper-level executive talent among African
Paper ID #19864Utilizing a Student Led Program to Make Major Leaps in PersistenceLt. James Blake Gegenheimer, STEP James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. James is a Second Lieu- tenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Labora- tory. James is currently the Supplemental Instruction Coordinator at LSU for the College of Engineering. He also served as a Supplemental Instructor in Thermodynamics for over three years. He has worked to
architecture, he developed the first algorithm that allowed rendering arbitrary three-dimensional polygonal shapes for haptic interfaces (force-feedback human-computer interfaces). He holds 6 patents. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Measuring revealed student scheduling preferences using constrained discrete choice modelsAbstractFor constrained student resources with large student populations it is often necessary toimplement some form of reservation or scheduling system. Examples of scheduled-accessresources can include one-on-one tutoring, machine shops or labs, and computer-based testingfacilities. For planning and resource scheduling purposes it is important to be
independent andteam learning as they work through an engineering design plan to develop a competitive robot tofulfill an industrial need over a six-week timeframe. The program served approximately 25 teamswhich totaled to 500+ students representing public and private middle and high schools as wellas homeschools.community engagement To attract students to MS BEST, the Hub Director recruits at middle and high schoolsacross to the state of Mississippi. MS BEST is also advertised on the university’s engineeringoutreach website. In addition, middle and high school administrators and teachers from previousMS BEST events, as well as potentially new schools (teams) are emailed details about theprogram and its competition. Since MS BEST is a
post-survey. Among these participants (n=33), 76% are male and 24% are female. 38% ofthem are Asian, 21% White, 21% classified themselves as others, 7% with two or more races,7% prefer not to answer, and 3% as native Hawaiian or other pacific islanders. In terms ofparticipants’ current status, 62% are senior undergraduate students, 24% are graduate students,and 13% are students in other levels. According to the responses (n=33), 97% of the participantsown a smartphone or a tablet while all of those who currently didn’t responded that they plan toget one in the near future. To evaluate what is the main usage of their mobile devices, they wereasked how many times they use the mobile devices daily for entertainment, obtain information(e.g
available with her during the in-class problem session.The results from the F16 survey showed that the above problems were solved. The additionalcomplaints student had were: Having to take extra time to learn the concepts outside the classroom Information taken down after module is over. Waiting 40 minutes to get an answer on the discussion forum instead of having their questions answered right away in the classroom. More/better video resources required.The instructor plans on solving these problems as follows: Enforcing that since students are solving assigned problems in-class they are replacing that with studying the material outside the classroom time. Make sure to keep all the videos
ability to work with individuals from diverse backgrounds; and their understanding oftechnology applications relevant to their field of study. Motivated by these findings, the VIPcoordinators conducted a retrospective study of peer evaluations, applying social networkanalysis to quantify student interactions and identify patterns across the program. Resultsindicate that within the VIP Program, students interact more often with other majors and otherraces/ethnicities than their own major and race/ethnicity. Results support the findings of theprevious study, providing evidence of VIP experiences related to working in diverse groups andin multidisciplinary teams. This paper reports the results of this analysis and plans for
has been working as an undergraduate researcher at the EERC since 2014 and plans to pursue a Master of Engineering degree in Engineering Management at Cornell University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 No Excuses: Use of Simple Active Learning in Electrical and Computer EngineeringAbstractStudent-centered active learning, in which students are called upon to “do” something duringclass beyond listening and note taking, should be used to some degree in STEM courses. Activelearning has a significant positive impact on learning, understanding, and retention ofinformation. Fortunately, active learning can be incorporated into a course in many ways
process, Sect. 4 shows the operation of the module, and Sect.5 concludes the wholework and discusses the future plan.2. GBL Module Overview 2.1. Memory Game GBL Module The first VR GBL course module developed is a memory game with object matching for labsafety. The memory game is in a traditional game style, in which a player is required to revealhidden objects and remove them by matching. There are many memory games available onlinefor playing as well as the development for different purposes, such as provided by appypie.com[8], as shown in Fig. 1 (a). Fig. 1. An example of memory game available online. In lab safety training, students will be introduced to different items related to the safety, suchas fire
courses are customized for our school and institution and are not directly equivalent totypical Single Variable Calculus I or II or Multivariable Calculus courses.We also plan to introduce a Math Lab course to first-year students in their first semester. TheMath Lab will address the wide variability among our incoming students in their knowledge andskills in non-calculus areas. For example, topics like limits and determinants currently need tobe reviewed in multiple courses. The Math Lab course will cover these topics in a self-pacedenvironment. A module that includes a video lecture and practice worksheets will be offered foreach topic. Modules may be completed throughout the semester, and students will be providedwith several opportunities to
these 34 students rated the statement higher afterparticipating in the NM PREP program than they did before participating. Additionally, 69% ofthe students said they would continue to participate in STEM activities in the future, and 76%stated an interest in returning to another NM PREP program. Finally, 87% of the students wouldrecommend the program to a friend, which indicates an affinity for the program.Another goal of the NM PREP program is to enhance students’ awareness about engineeringcareer opportunities and possibilities. Once again, the program showed potential in this regard,with 74% of the students interested in pursuing a degree in STEM. In addition, 64% of thestudents planned to participate in STEM-based extra-curricular
nodes Set the amplitude and Figure 8. Schematic diagram of a Sallen-Key low-pass active filter circuit. frequency values of the function generator for circuit inputAn experiment that we plan to implement is to expand on the active filter experiment by addingseveral different op-amps, with a range of performance characteristics, to replace the single op-ampin this circuit. Students would then be able to measure and compare real-world performance trade-offs. Another experimental enhancement on our “to-do” list is to use a cross-point switch that allowsstudents to both change values and remotely rearrange components in order to find and repair circuitfaults introduced as part of the experiment.IVc. control softwareAs
interpersonal skill.6. Understand and describe the principles and processes that lead to effective teams. Evaluate and improve your effectiveness as a member of a team on assignments, activities, and/or a class project.7. Value diversity and the different perspectives, experience, skills that individuals bring to a team. Be able to effectively utilize those differences to enhance team performance.8. Develop skills needed to understand and establish a vision, establish goals, formulate a strategy and develop a plan consistent with a vision. Develop an ability to manage and prioritize your time effectively.9. Understand and be able to describe globalization including its historical context, driving forces and influences. Compare and
Engineers for Developing Countries (CEDC) is a student-driven service-orientedprogram whose mission is to provide sustainable, engineered solutions to communities in thedeveloping world. One of the most successful features of CEDC, from both undergraduateeducation and community development perspectives, is the structured and innovative internshipexperience. In addition to in-class student participation in design, planning, and projectimplementation, a few students are selected annually for an internship in the host communitywhere they have the opportunity to develop and enhance their leadership skills in an internationaland diverse setting. The internship program consists of Clemson University engineering studentsliving in rural Haiti for 6-12
approximately 60 Fall2015 students’ infographics and approximately 100 fall 2016 students’ infographics. Eachgroup’s infographics were collected (with students’ permission) and de-identified. For this pilot analysis, we planned to evaluate and analyze a portion of this total data set: 42student infographics, 21 each from the fall 2015 and fall 2016 semesters. Ultimately, our sampleconsisted of 20 from Fall 2015 and 21 from fall 2016.1 We collected this sample at random,choosing ~ three group assignments from each section of the course. Roughly seven of the 16sections from fall 2015 and 7 of the 12 sections from fall 2016 were represented in the sample.To facilitate a blind review, infographics were stripped of all information that would identifywhich
University. She worked in faculty development during her career with public schools, the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards, and in her current position. She is involved with the SPARCT Program as a member of the planning committee and she analyzes the qualitative data for program review and assessment purposes. Dr. Greene received her degrees from Kent State University and Florida Gulf Coast University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Development of a Training Workshop for Undergraduate Mentor TAs in an Introductory Engineering CourseAbstractOver the past three years, faculty at Florida Gulf Coast University have re-envisioned thefreshman-level